Unions and Democrats are scared. They should be.
Very soon, Democrats and their union bosses’ worst fears may soon be realized and, if they cannot continue their slight of hand, it may threaten their very existence. While it is true that Democrats and their union bosses are facing possibly debilitating losses on November 2nd, they are hiding the really bad news from voters until after November 2nd.
Do you remember that promise we heard back in 2008 about transparency? Democrats and, in particular, then-candidate Barack Obama stated emphatically that “transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency.” What a joke that was. Well, it’s time to shed some light on the house of cards that is about to come crashing down on Democrats’ and union bosses’ heads.
“This is Armageddon.”
In June, a conversation took place in a hotel restaurant in Washington. As a latecomer to the conversation, it was easy to pick up that the topic that was the $165 billion union pension bailout bill introduced by Sen. Bob Casey [D-PA] in March.
Upon introductions, one of the individuals stated, “this is Armageddon.”
When asked for clarification, the person explained about the accounting rules developed to shore up underfunded union pensions and the dates when those union companies affected would have to assume their liabilities had the DC crowd (in particular, the Democrats and the unions) in a panic.
Yesterday, the Washington Examiner’s Mark Hemingway gave a good breakdown of how bad it could get for Democrats and their union bosses:
On Nov. 1, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ceases to take public comment on a new rule requiring that companies more accurately report liabilities they have from participation in multiemployer pension plans. Unless FASB is persuaded otherwise, the rule takes effect Dec. 15.
There are some 1,500 multiemployer pension plans in the United States, which are unique to unions. In these plans, multiple companies pay into the pension plan, but each company assumes the total liability.
Under “last man standing” accounting rules, if five companies are in a plan and four go bankrupt, the fifth company is responsible for meeting the pension obligations for the employees of the other four companies.
What this means is that companies with union labor often have pension liabilities that are several multiples higher than the pension expenditures they report — the Kroger grocery store chain shocked analysts last year when it disclosed its multiemployer pension liabilities more than doubled in a year to $1.2 billion.
[snip]
FASB’s new rule could effectively wipe out the paper worth of many companies, especially in the trucking and construction industries. Once banks and creditors are aware of these staggering pension liabilities, it will make it nearly impossible for union businesses to get loans, credit lines or bonding.
The effects of having to meet reality will almost certainly cause a significant drop in stock prices for those companies affected and, as a result, may cause a large ripple effect throughout the rest of the economy. In those cases where the liabilities exceed the value of the unionized companies, it is entirely possible many of those companies will go out of business, laying off tens of thousands of employees, and further causing a drop in economic activity.
Some companies risk having their ratings downgraded, especially if weaker companies become bankrupt and leave the pension plans.
One example of a company that would likely go out of business is YRC trucking, which employs approximately 35,000 Teamsters. While the freight currently carried by YRC would likely be picked up by other carriers (many of which are non-union), the loss of members (and their dues) would be devastating for the Teamsters and the Democrats.
Right now, before November 2nd, Democrats don’t want voters to know that their union benefactors may further cause the economy to fall further or more companies to close and jobs to be lost. As a result, Democrats are not talking about it on the campaign trail. Instead they’re hoping they can work out a scheme during a lame duck session, sticking taxpayers with another $165 billion union bailout.
Without the bailout though, as we noted in July, unions and Democrats face a bleak future:
On the other hand, even though Democrats know that another union bailout will likely make them even bigger pariahs with the American people, the very survival of their party rests on their ability on passing this poisonous piece of legislation. If they fail, the ramifications for the Democrats are disastrous.
As opposed to taking more from taxpayers and adding more to the debt or creating another Ponzi scheme, the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s F. Vincent Vernuccio offers some alternatives to the union pension bailout:
The entire multiemployer model needs to be rethought. The funding and disclosure standards of the PPA and FASB are a good start but more needs to be done. Unions who use their pensions for recruitment should be required to tell prospective union members if the retirement packages they are touting are in critical or endangered status. Any mention of government insurance should be accompanied by the caveat that multi-employer plans are only insured by up to $12,870.
No worker should be forced into a critical status pension fund. They did not make the promises to current employees and retirees and should not be forced to pay into a broken system.
Union members should be allowed the same mobility and retirement control as the other three quarters of workers receiving pension benefits in America. Defined contribution (DC) plans should be encouraged for new workers. Older members should be given the option to opt-out of failing pension plans and convert the money they receive into a DC plan.
If all contributing employers or a majority of beneficiaries agree, a multi-employer plan should be terminated if the ratio of employees to retirees reaches 1 to 1 – in 2007 before UPS withdrew; the Teamsters Central States Plan covered 451,000 workers with only 155,000 currently employed. A system where one worker is supporting three retirees is doomed to failure. Instead of having decades of future liabilities, employers should be given an option of a onetime buyout of failing union pensions.
America is careening toward bankruptcy. While blame can initially be laid at the feet of both parties, over the last 20 months, Democrats’ meddling in the private-sector, out-of-control spending, and sheer ineptitude in recognizing the job-killing policies they promote have pushed the nation closer to the precipice.
Now, with two weeks before November 2nd, Democrats are hiding the fact that financial Armageddon may be right around the corner. If Americans are the ‘shareholders’ and politicians are the executives in charge, the lack of disclosure on the part of Democrats would be criminal.
__________________
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Jeff Emanuel
Senate Seats Sworn In Before January
reaganauh2o Tuesday, October 19th at 2:26PM EDT (link)are extremely critical to block the lame duck agenda.
Indeed,
remnant60 (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:02PM EDT (link)and I doubt there will be time for the new seats to be ‘tainted’ by the old war-horses (elites) as long as we keep the fire to the newbie’s feet.
And we will have to keep the fire on their feet!
There’s something about that swamp that sweeps around the Potomac…
That's why it's critical to put Kirk in Obama's old seat
sarg01 Wednesday, October 20th at 6:56PM EDT (link)Yeah, he’s pretty marginal as a Republican, pretty much the worst Senate guy we’re running nationwide … but his opponent is well versed in Illinois thugocracy on top of being extremely liberal and guaranteed to vote for anything a union wants.
I’m not sure if Raese’s election seats immediately or not. It is also a special election, but I think the WV law is different on the matter from the IL and DE law.
Impeach , prosecute and imprison
cobra Tuesday, October 19th at 2:46PM EDT (link)This is the only way to save our country.
No more footsie playing with these commie goons.
DOJ
robmull Wednesday, October 20th at 6:31AM EDT (link)Impeach, prosecute and imprison would certainly be a good way to save our country. The big problem with that is, now, it would be like getting criminals to prosecute themselves for each others crimes, in front of [or next to] an old friend, [and also] criminal judge. And I understand that George Soros is sinking a few million dollar$ into hundreds new uber-liberal “journalists,” to poke more “jabs” at those who are trying to end the madness, and more million$ into making sure the election “polls” are “fixed,” much the same way. The “swamp” is getting bigger and deeper, and it’s time for “We The People” to pull the drain plug; Nov. 2, 2010; and again in 2012; and again in 2014, etc.
Pension Plans
mousestalker (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 2:51PM EDT (link)Have been the time bomb ticking under a lot of the status quo. Several states have seen theirs get questioned. I’m not shocked that union sponsored plans are likely to be under the gun soon.
The Feds want to share your 401K with Unions
utahmom Wednesday, October 20th at 11:07AM EDT (link)The Dems plan on capturing Private Pension Plans claiming they offer more security while the scheme is to more “fairly” redistribute taxpayer funded pension funds to help cover Union Pension Plans. The way they will attempt to capture these Private Pensions according to a Human Events article, titled “New Lame Duck Threat to Bailout Union Pensions”, is by attaching a bill to the Bush Tax Cuts extension during the lame duck session. Source: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=39336
So, if this happens - you think the next Republican President
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 2:59PM EDT (link)Will be blaming Obama on and on and on??????
Those who had once simpered: “I don’t want to destroy the rich, I only want to seize a little of their surplus to help the poor, just a little, they’ll never miss it!” – then, later, had snapped: “The tycoons can stand being squeezed; they’ve amassed enough to last them for three generations” – then, later, had yelled: “Why should the people suffer while businessmen have reserves to last a year?” – now were screaming: “Why should we starve while some people have reserves to last a week?” – Atlas Shrugged
Rashid Khalidi
robmull Wednesday, October 20th at 6:58AM EDT (link)Mr. Obama’s close relationships with the likes of Rev. Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Bill Ayers and Rashid Khalidi, all firm and active anti-Semites, may give a clue to why Iran is rapidly getting the “bomb,” and Israel is being cut-short of nearly everything they want to do. Bill Ayers is now a co-founder with his wife, Burnadine Dohrn, [Weather Underground] and are very busy little beavers [Free Gaza] trying to penetrate Israel’s blockade of weapons bound for Palestine, Hamas and Hezbollah. I suppose that Rashid is still a Hamas spokesperson, Rev. Wright and Louis are still preaching hate about Jews, and “The Audacity of Hope,” is not just the name of one of Mr. Obama’s books, but the name of “Bill’s” new vessel that is making another attempt to invade and vaporize Israel. Hummmmm.
All this is true, but
edintexas Wednesday, October 20th at 9:58AM EDT (link)It is still not germane and a thread-jack.
This is no joke. It IS Armageddon.
johnconradarens (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 3:02PM EDT (link)These dinosaur defined benefit plans started going under water about 20 years ago. I had no idea the labyrinth of agreements propping them up was as byzantine as it is. This is the American version of the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand that exposed the underlying secret security agreements that entwined Europe (and the world), and which brought about World War One.
All ASSETS of all UNIONS should be seized immediately and wait the outcome of the jury.NT
bobojake (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 3:13PM EDT (link)let it be done!!
promise Tuesday, October 19th at 10:00PM EDT (link)AMEN! I volunteer for jury duty!
That's not the way to deal with it
sarg01 Wednesday, October 20th at 7:02PM EDT (link)Getting all big government is rarely the solution. It usually feels nice to take action against wrongdoers, but any power used by the good guys can be later co-opted by the bad guys using the first example as precedent.
And there’s no need anyhow. The union members will deal with the union leaders far more effectively if it gets out that they were defrauded out of the pensions.
Nine House Republicans must also be committing
kestrel (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 3:38PM EDT (link)would-be “criminal” lack of disclosure. The House bill that is the equivalent of Senator Casey’s pension bailout bill has more than 50 co-sponsors, including these nine Republicans:
Virginia Brown-Waite [R-FL5]
Jo Ann Emerson [R-MO8]
Steven LaTourette [R-OH14]
John Linder [R-GA7]
Thaddeus McCotter [R-MI11]
Tim Murphy [R-PA18]
Peter Roskam [R-IL6]
Aaron Schock [R-IL18]
Patrick Tiberi [R-OH12]
Mike Pence was a co-sponsor at one point, but officially withdrew his sponsorship. I suggest that Michigan’s otherwise conservative Rep. Thaddeus McCotter do the same.
What is the bill number of the House equivalent?
GKC Tuesday, October 19th at 8:08PM EDT (link)My scumbag Congressman (Charlie Wilson OH-6) is a perrenial Pelosi lapdog and is rumored to be showing up at a nearby debate on Thursday. That would be very out of character for him as he usually doesn’t deign to interact with actual constituents (unless they are coming as supplicants for casework crumbs). His single town hall during the August recess was announced to the public about 17 hours before it actually took place at a public library in a tiny village in the hills far from most of the population of the sprawling District. Anyway, I’m making time to show up at the debate just in case and would very much like to look up in advance whether he is a cosponsor.
The House bill is H.R.3936
pilgrim (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 8:53PM EDT (link)Charlie Wilson is a co-sponsor of this bill.
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/10/01/governments-bad-investments
Charlie Wilson is a co-sponsor.
kestrel (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 10:11PM EDT (link)Here’s the link:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3936
here are sponsors & cosponsors of House & Senate bills
pilgrim (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 10:44PM EDT (link)H.R.3936 : Preserve Benefits and Jobs Act
Sponsor: Rep Pomeroy, Earl [ND]
Rep Altmire, Jason [PA-4]
Rep Bean, Melissa L. [IL-8]
Rep Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [GA-2]
Rep Boswell, Leonard L. [IA-3]
Rep Braley, Bruce L. [IA-1]
Rep Carnahan, Russ [MO-3]
Rep Carney, Christopher P. [PA-10]
Rep Chandler, Ben [KY-6]
Rep Dahlkemper, Kathleen A. [PA-3]
Rep Davis, Lincoln [TN-4]
Rep Donnelly, Joe [IN-2]
Rep Driehaus, Steve [OH-1]
Rep Foster, Bill [IL-14]
Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]
Rep Giffords, Gabrielle [AZ-8]
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. [NY-22]
Rep Kagen, Steve [WI-8]
Rep Kilroy, Mary Jo [OH-15]
Rep Kind, Ron [WI-3]
Rep Kirkpatrick, Ann [AZ-1]
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10]
Rep Larsen, Rick [WA-2]
Rep Loebsack, David [IA-2]
Rep Marshall, Jim [GA-8]
Rep McMahon, Michael E. [NY-13]
Rep Mitchell, Harry E. [AZ-5]
Rep Skelton, Ike [MO-4]
Rep Space, Zachary T. [OH-18]
Rep Sutton, Betty [OH-13]
Rep Wilson, Charles A. [OH-6]
Rep Yarmuth, John A. [KY-3]
S.3157: Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act
Sponsor: Sen Casey, Robert P., Jr. [PA]
Sen Brown, Sherrod [OH]
Sen Burris, Roland [IL]
Sen Durbin, Richard [IL]
Sen Franken, Al [MN]
Sen Stabenow, Debbie [MI]
The Republican answer to this...
MacAoidh (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 3:48PM EDT (link)…needs to be to offer a tax-free rollout of 70 cents on the dollar for every dime individuals have in an underfunded pension fund. The offer should apply on an general basis regardless of age or seniority.You want out, you get out, at 70 cents tax free. Period.
Who could oppose it? What’s their argument? “You’ll destroy the pension fund.” And? If it’s unsustainable, so be it. Time to break it up. And if the union was raiding that fund to make donations to politicians, do they really expect public sympathy and money?
Check out MacAoidh’s commentary on Louisiana and national politics at TheHayride.com
MacAoidh- Who should be making this offer
Scope (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:08PM EDT (link)and who should be paying for it? The taxpayers? I’m not a union member, and, I have no union pension coming to me ever, from anyone. I’m not willing to pay for someone else’s ponzi scheme gone bad. Heck, I don’t expect to ever receive SS or Medicare, even though I’ve paid into it for more than 40 years.
I expect to see the riots in Greece and France to be hitting our shores sometime next year. If the Republicans continue to bail them out, they will be out of their new found power as of election day 2012.
I agree, and everyone of these Democrats should
knitwit (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 8:34PM EDT (link)be kicking in every penny they received from Unions back into the kitty themselves to cover the losses! What an ad this would make for anyone running against a Democrat, from Sharron Angle on down to the tiniest seat in the most remote district. Where are the non-candidate groups when you need one? This should be a national ad blitz.
“I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country”–Nathan Hale
Compromise: The art of giving to your enemy that which he is not powerful enough to take.
Obamacrat Class system Exposed
drfredc Tuesday, October 19th at 4:32PM EDT (link)The Dem’s union problems will go nuclear as soon as some of the GOP elected start to clarify the tri-class system the Obamacrats have been attempting to create –
The Priviledged (the unions, pols, greens, attorneys whose existance is politically constructed to be outside market forces),
The Peasants (private sector workers),
The Collectors (who run around and collect money from the Peasants and pass it on to the Privileged to outside of market forces).
This stuff isn’t rocket science, but it does require leadership to clarify this situation and then to keep banging that drum, then bang it some more. The only saving grace here for the Obamacrats is the GOP Senate RINO LOSERship is totally inept in being able to articulate and follow thru on a clear message on anything conservative. While the GOP may end up controlling the Senate, the LOSERship is likely to persist in their losership roles, even though there may be a significant influx of new conservative legislators.
Always, Fred C
If it goes boom - they'll just blame capitalism -
tjpeco Tuesday, October 19th at 4:59PM EDT (link)– and the media will let them get away with it.
This isn't something I can laugh at...
Justin Spagnolo (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 4:59PM EDT (link)I would like to think this is “chickens coming home to roost”… its not… because desperate people will do anything to bring home security and peace of mind, but lack wisdom by allowing desperation govern their actions or choices.
The lame duck session will most likely under the “too big to fail” language will get legislation to pass that will further entrench the Treasury with nationalized debt sale that made taxpayers the guarantors of debt that will never be paid back but will expand the balance sheet at a time that it needs to be contracting. I fear the ripple this may have in the current currency war.
“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. “ -James Madison
This is probably why Soros is already wheezing about
davesinsanantonio (Diary) Wednesday, October 20th at 5:43AM EDT (link)the weakness of the dollar. When this becomes widely known, the dollar will nosedive and Soros will make more billions, but the average person will be bankrupt and out of a job. We had all better start storing food and convincing others to do so. This ain’t gonna be pretty!
No wonder Richard Trunka seems more hysterical
johnt Tuesday, October 19th at 5:03PM EDT (link)which is saying something.
Really, I can’t handle all the good[ ?] news that’s coming in faster & faster.
If the republicans pick up even one seat it will be all their fault. We are running out of bailouts, though the promise of more power to The O and his gangsters, and more pain to millions of Normal People is irresistible.
“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville
Look at what is going on in France over pensions.
NeoKong (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:04PM EDT (link)Sacre bleu
That is merely because Sarkozy wants to reform pensions.
Can you imagine what would happen if those people were in danger of losing their pensions….?
How long before that happens in California ?
They have $500 billion in unfunded liabilities for state workers.
Where are they going to get the money ?
Follow me on Twitter.
Not from me....
qixlqatl (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:49PM EDT (link)I’m broke.
“Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind.”
George Gordon Noel Byron
This is to be expected
kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:57PM EDT (link)When you indulge children and then take away the indulgence, what do they do? They pitch a fit. That is what is happening, the silly French are pitching a childish fit.
Now it remains to be seen if Sarkozy will remain a good parent and be strong and resist. If he does it will all blow over when they realize they cannot get their way.
But if he caves in, then there is nothing but hell on earth for the future of France, they will go broke and all the kings horses and all the kings men will not be able to put them back together again.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Labor
uhangtight (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:15PM EDT (link)As always you have done an awesome job. Now, folks let’s start asking those politicians running for office what they propose to do about this? Let’s start with the Dems. Also, anyone represented by the Repubs mentioned in the comments above start calling and asking them what they are thinking?
Thanks! People should start asking Dems...
LaborUnionReport (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 8:23PM EDT (link)what their intentions are (and make sure it’s on video).
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine December 23, 1776
In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.-Ayn Rand
LaborUnionReport.com
The Most Comprehensive Source for
News & Views on Today’s Labor Unions.
Follow @laborunionrpt
Thank you for this excellent piece
alaskaescapeartist (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 5:22PM EDT (link)I think we could be in for a very bumpy ride.
This issue is sensitive to the Anchorage paper
fbks (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 10:01PM EDT (link)I researched the issues around S 3157 and posted related comments on the Anchorage Daily News and have been blocked. Must have been a raw nerve.
Could it Be...
edintexas Wednesday, October 20th at 10:06AM EDT (link)That they are counting on the Murk to break the filibuster?
Trucking and Construction?
GKC Tuesday, October 19th at 10:46PM EDT (link)Hmmm. Could this be the underlying reason why Obama started calling for another massive stimulus to be devoted exclusively to “infrastructure”? It seemed odd since, at the very same time, he was telling us that the first stimulus was so successful that it ended the recession (apparently by sheer force of its transcendant awesomeness) in June 2009 just threee and a half months after it was signed and before hardly any of the money had been spent. But I have to admit, “Son of Stimulus” does sound a lot easier to sell than “stealing your savings to pay off my union supporters.”
The only thing that is "Shovel Ready"
izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 11:07PM EDT (link)is the Democratic Party – R.I.P.
Those who had once simpered: “I don’t want to destroy the rich, I only want to seize a little of their surplus to help the poor, just a little, they’ll never miss it!” – then, later, had snapped: “The tycoons can stand being squeezed; they’ve amassed enough to last them for three generations” – then, later, had yelled: “Why should the people suffer while businessmen have reserves to last a year?” – now were screaming: “Why should we starve while some people have reserves to last a week?” – Atlas Shrugged
Shovel Ready Jobs
kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, October 19th at 11:10PM EDT (link)Well the Unions always have a mysterious package to bury. Usually wrapped in a carpet.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Dems Tightening
annas Wednesday, October 20th at 4:14AM EDT (link)the race? FOX, Rasmussen, Real Clear Politics all show the Dems pulling ahead or catching up in races across the country. Will SOMEONE tell me what is happening? Things have never been scarier in this country, the Dems are clearly culpable, and yet things are looking UP for them?
Hey Dems...
jerseydevil Wednesday, October 20th at 5:26AM EDT (link)Are your gettin’ it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI6Ms0b4q-4
Chris
“The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either – but right through the human heart.”
Alexandr Solzhenitzyn
I'm Getting Ready to Crack Open and Ice-Cold Brew...
reaganiterepublicanresistance Wednesday, October 20th at 7:10AM EDT (link)and engage in an evening of some SERIOUS, Grade-A Shadenfruede LOL
The Reaganite Republican
Pension Plans- Government/Schools American Dream
bordway01 Wednesday, October 20th at 10:51AM EDT (link)The rules for Government accounting is different from the regulation of GAAP accounting and if the truth be known, these pension plans are considerable debts/liability to our States, Cities and communities and are in serious trouble. To the majority of people it is unknown what the debt for these pensions actually are as it isn’t clearly reported in the financials It is one of those dirty little secrets that no one wants to discuss in hopes that it just goes away.
It isn’t just a “Democratic/Union” problem. It is a can of worms that no one has wanted to deal with. It is an American Dream of Dreams about to crash.
You could fix the actuarial imbalance in most of these funds very quickly
ashland_avenue (Diary) Wednesday, October 20th at 12:03PM EDT (link)You just wouldnt necessarily like the cost.
Probably you’re thinking I am referrening to assumption by the federal government of the liabilities.
I am not.
It is as simple as this: A $100 billion plan, with interest rates at 2.5% (which is where the 10-yr is now trading) will generate $2.5 million annually to service its actuarial needs.
If no one is entering the plan, a certain amount of the corpus can be withdrawn each year to cover the cash needs of paying retirees.
However, most state plans have assumed plan returns upwards of 6% and several assume 8%.
This is one of the toxic effects of keeping rates low. It empoverishes savers. What middle class person who saved oh-so-carefully for retirement can live comfortably on 2.5% interest, or even worse on the rates being paid on short term deposits?
The lower assumed interest rates, the higher the actuarial needs of a union pension plan, or a retiree investment portfolio.
A piece on Bloomberg today refers to the phenomenon:
==================================================
One of those subsidies is the $350 billion that savers forgo each year because the Fed keeps interest rates near zero, according to Petzel’s calculations. While banks can borrow at close to zero from the Fed, they lend to consumers and corporations at almost 5 percent, or to the Treasury at 2.5 percent, and they get to keep the difference.
“The huge wealth transfer from fixed-income pensioners to the banks has helped the banks repay TARP,” Petzel said.
The link is here http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-20/bailout-of-wall-street-returns-8-2-profit-to-taxpayers-beating-treasuries.html
==========================================
In sum, by exploding the Fed’s balance sheet, by keeping long and short term rates low, we are actively impoverishing union pension funds and other saver/investors.
The cost of repairing that damage may ultimately prove far more than the bailout of a few multiemployer pension plans.
Shouldn't Conservative Candidates be Exposing
danielbdp (Diary) Wednesday, October 20th at 1:28PM EDT (link)this continued Fraud and Abuse of Taxpayers and Savers alike?
If Democrats want to keep this quiet till after the elections, shouldn’t our Conservative candidates be exposing both games (the critical underfunding of multi-employer pension plans and the general screwing of the dollar’s value by keeping interest rates artificially low and issuing mountains of new debt per microsecond)?
Just saying…will get the blame for anything going wrong after Nov 2nd anyway…might as well open the wound and begin surgery right away…
Democrats do not want rule of law or transparency
southernpatriots (Diary) Wednesday, October 20th at 1:30PM EDT (link)An ex-governor of Georgia wanting us to forget his horrible tenure as governor, now wants the accused not to be properly represented by counsel. Over the past years law enforcement in bigger cities around America where professional sports teams are located have to investigate accusations against the players almost on a weekly basis. It often goes this way. Young white women go to bars and clubs hoping to hook up with a famous and rich professional basketball, baseball or football player. They flirt with the pro player (who oftentimes is African American) and go with the athlete back to his hotel room or home. The young women spends the night with the athlete and then tells a close friend and within a day or two the close friend tells someone else and either the young woman’s family finds out or she is afraid they will. She is very concerned that her family will not be sympathetic to her (and that they may harbor some prejudice?) so she cooks up the story that she was raped by the athlete. The Democrat former Gov. wants to deny the athlete or defedant to have his attorney question the accuser or depose her. Is this equal justice for all? So the athlete is treated “guilty before proven innocent.:” This scenario happens often in large cities across the U.S., including Atlanta, Georgia. Congratulations ex-governor, we hope you stay an ex.
Life expectancy has increased more than planned retirement
luciandorus Wednesday, October 20th at 11:23PM EDT (link)“When the United States finally passed a social security law in 1935 …, the average life expectancy in America was only 61.7 years. Of course, people who did reach 65 had a considerable number of years to live and to enjoy SOCIAL SECURITY benefits …” (Quote from http://www.medrounds.org/encyclopedia-of-aging/2006/01/retirement-age-history-of.html)
From the “Life Expectancy by Age, 1850–2004″ chart data (at http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html) it can be calculated that the average number of years lived over the age of 65 has increased from about 13 to 18 between 1939-41 and 2004. If this process continues, soon there will be more money going out than coming in the pension funds! Or, benefits are going to be continuously reduced to allow for the increase in the number of recipients!
Stop empowering the equivalency game
Plumb_Bob (Diary) Thursday, October 21st at 12:03PM EDT (link)The author wrote:
No, it cannot be laid at the feet of both parties.
America is going bankrupt explicitly and specifically because it is attempting to finance the irrational, Utopian dreams of morally and intellectually deficient social progressives.
Secondary blame may be assigned to the Congresspeople, federal and state executives, and judges who have supported this irresponsible dream along the way. Some percentage considerably smaller than 50% of these have been Republicans. A percentage considerably greater than 50% have been Democrats, so if one is assigning blame solely based on who voted which way, the blame lays largely on the Democratic majority, and secondarily on those Republicans who were stupid, greedy, or cowardly enough to cooperate with them.
But the real blame rests on the progressive social engineers who envisioned and then executed the policy to attempt to achieve the Utopian dream, that dream of heaven envisioned by lazy, arrogant, morally illiterate fools, to which the wise properly assign the name “Hell.”
It’s not a bipartisan destruction. It’s a partisan one with some bipartisan cooperation.
—-
We will not have a righteous government again until we become a righteous nation again.
(A collection of my political essays from 2008-2010 can be found at www.plumbbobblog.com. All visitors welcome.)
When unions control too much the production
luciandorus Tuesday, October 26th at 2:13AM EDT (link)A major role in the collapse of USSR was the fact that its unions controlled fully its economy’s production. Even if the situations are not entirely comparable, have the US unions learned anything from that event?