« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Sore Union Losers at Delta Air Lines

At 0 for 8, With Tens of Millions in Dues at Stake, Unions Cry Foul Over Election Losses

There’s big money at stake for unions at Delta Air Lines, Inc—over $22 million in annual union dues. As the only (primarily) union-free major airline (Delta’s pilots are unionized), unions have long targeted the Atlanta-based carrier.  However, now, with the National Mediation Board members being controlled by unions*, as well as Delta’s recent merger with unionized Northwest Airlines, the unions have declared it open hunting season on Delta. So far, however, the unions have lost eight out of the eight elections they’ve called for—and now are going to rely on the union-controlled NMB to overturn the results so they can hold rerun elections.

Delta Air Lines Inc. TechOps Stores workers on Monday became the eighth worker group at the airline to reject union overtures.

The nearly 700 workers, which handle the airline’s parts, rejected representation by the International Association of Machinists (IAM). There were 607 votes cast — 439 “no” votes, only 166 votes for IAM and two write-in votes, Delta (NYSE: DAL) reported. There were 673 eligible voters.

“This is the eighth work group in which representation was resolved since Delta’s merger, resulting in no union for the more than 41,000 employees in these groups,” said Mike Campbell, executive vice president of HR and Labor Relations, in a statement. “We urge the IAM and AFA to respect our people’s choice and the will of the majority. Delta people have patiently waited two years to have their pay, benefits, work rules, and seniority aligned. It’s time to move forward.”

Unfortunately for the Delta workers who voted not to become unionized, the unions don’t appear to be respecting the will of the majority.

With two out of the three members of the National Mediation Board being former union officials (*see below), union bosses are banking on being able to overturn the election results and get new elections ordered.

The International Association of Machinists (IAM) has already charged that Delta interfered with the TechOps Stores elections last week, and is also “investigating” an election involving 13,000 Delta Fleet Service workers, the large majority of whom also rejected the IAM two weeks ago.

In addition, after 53% of Delta’s flight attendants voted against representation by the Association of Flight Attendants (or AFA-CWA)—for the third time in less than ten years—the AFA-CWA has also filed charges with the NMB with the expectation that their union friends at the agency will give them a new election.

What is also at stake is the freedom to choose whether or not to pay union dues—especially for those Delta employees who live in Right to Work states. Under the Railway Labor Act, there are no “right to work” provisions in the airline industry. This means that if the unions succeed at unionizing Delta, all 41,000 workers could be required to pay union dues, or be fired from their jobs. At $45 per month, the unions stand to rake in $1,845,000 each and every month (not to mention initiation fees for new hires), or more than $22 million each year.

Moreoever, once they become unionized, unlike the National Labor Relations Act, there are no provisions in the Railway Labor Act to decertify unions—so the unions’ ability to keep Delta’s employees as cash cows will likely be permanent.

Unless and until Delta workers resoundingly reject the union attacks, they’d better get used to the idea of these born sore losers continuing to target them.


* The National Mediation Board (which governs labor relations in the airline and railroad industries) is an independent agency comprised of three members. Two of these members are former union officials:Linda Puchala is the former president of the Association of Flight Attendants, as well as a former staff director for AFSCME.  Harry Hoglander is a former Executive Vice President of the Air Line Pilots Association.

In May, the union-controlled NMB changed the 75-year old practice on how airline and railroad elections are conducted, making it easier to unionize workers in those industries.

__________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.”  Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

For more news & views on today’s unions, go to LaborUnionReport.com

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • powertothepeople

    and one more time you have brought needed info to our eyes.

    Keep ‘em coming!

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      :)

  • GregInFla

    via the Congress? Also, who pays for the elections? Does it cost Delta to have them, or do unions put up the entire cost? I say, one election to unionize every ten years unless you get petitions signed by 40+ percent of the workers. These unions cannot accept the fact that they are rejected, and sounds just like the administration on Nov 3rd: it must be marketing or messaging if people do not think we are great!

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      Right-to-Work laws were created exclusively for workers who fall under the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Act, due to the 1947 “Taft-Hartley” Amendments to the NLRA. The Railway Labor Act, which applies to airlines and railroads is completely different.

      Congress probably could amend the RLA, but it is pretty low on the priority list I would think.

      Also, in answer to your second question, under the RLA, a union has to get signatures of 35% of a possible “craft and class” before it can hold an election (as compared to 30% under the NLRA). However, as the unions are alleging misconduct in order to have the NMB toss out the results of these elections, the unions would not need to get new signatures.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      However, presuming one or both sides “campaign” they would be doing so with their own resources…in the case of a union, union dues from other members cover those costs.

      [This was actually in reference to your second question, as opposed to what was answered above.]

  • GregInFla

    When flying American last week, I noted that all the flight attendants had pro-union slogans on their badge lanyards. For some reason, given the response when asked about them, I did not think they were very positive/gung-ho about the union.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      According to this article, there’s a 50/50 chance of them striking (providied Obama allows them to, which is his prerogative under the RLA)…

      http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/11/analyst-higgins-aa-fas-wrong-l.html

      • GregInFla

        They looked to be well-cared-for and worked under good conditions on the planes. Given good and safe working conditions, what else could striking do for them, besides have them lose their jobs? There are plenty of furloughed flight attendants out there who’d love to have a job again.

        I applaud Delta’s workers’ resistance to unions. I suggest anyone flying Delta to tell them so and support their decision.

  • romeg

    for government mandated special allowances for unions to be abolished. Along with that, the Federal Government needs to decertify all federal government employee unions and for governments at every level to abolish, once and for all, labor stoppages by unions and unionized employees.

    There are plenty of laws to protect employees against maltreatment by employers without the special grants of protection at taxpayer expense and at the cost of higher unemployment that unions depend upon in order to stay in business.

    Free markets for everyone; employer and employee alike.

  • NeoKong

    I love that guy.

    Billy Jack: I’m gonna take this right foot, and I’m gonna whop you on that side of your face…
    [points to Posner's right cheek]
    Billy Jack: …and you wanna know something? There’s not a damn thing you’re gonna be able to do about it.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      That there is what we’re gonna do to unions.

      And there’s not a damn thing they’re gonna be able to do about it.

  • banzaibob

    Have not respecting the will of the people so why start now.

  • pamela1631

    Pardon my french, but these union yoyos remind me of that really creepy guy that would not take no for answer about going out on a date. You know the type the men in the family would have to have a rather serious conversation with about the creepy guy’s lack of
    hygiene and listening skills. Talk about stalker mentality.

    Any way to have the union goons declared stalkers for not getting the point of “We reject you and all you stand for in life”?

  • http://www.defeatobama.com DefeatObama.com

    This sort of behavior needs to be pointed out to more individuals.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    I mean, I obviously don’t love what the unions and the Obamanistas are doing.

    But I love the bright lights being shown on it. You do a super job.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      ;)

  • silentcalrox

    want to destroy an airline, or any other company, unionize them. Unions are passe, and they’re poison!

  • Mike Ferguson

    (nt)

  • Michael Dugas

    They’ve become political action committees more than labor relation organizations. They also seem to have no problem going against their members if it will benefit their own pockets. I mean who the heck does the UAW actually represent anymore? How can they be major shareholders in GM AND represent the workers? That’s the walking talking definition of a conflict of interest. If the GM workers have a gripe that’s going to cost GM, thus the UAW, money who’s side will they be on? I doubt it will be the workers.
    Unions these days are just liberal PACs to fund Union controlled candidates who will continue to vote to use tax dollars to line their own pockets.

    • davesinsanantonio

      outlaw unions, claiming that since they represent the workers unions are unnecessary. Of course, outlawing something that is unnecessary is different from outlawing something that is actually harmful. Once these clowns get power, they stop representing people without power and only care about keeping and increasing their power.

      Unions are no different. Of course, the fact that the UAW is now the MAN, the owner if the company, and therefore cannot truly represent the interests of the workers is completely lost on the union leadership, and apparently, on many of its members also. It is like the old robber barons telling their workers that paying them starvation wages and refusing to implement safety procedures or install safety equipment was in their best interests. The unions will soon be telling their members that cutting their benefits, and eventually not keeping their wages up when inflation hits, is in their best interests. How many times have unions screwed over the union’s employees? And the members think these people can actually have their best interests at heart??? No wonder union membership is falling.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Trying the same thing over and over hoping for different results?

    But then again maybe the labor board will just declare them unionized and save the airlines the hassle of holding all those annoying rejection elections…

    Ooooh… rejection elections… hmmm…

  • liandro

    I don’t comment much, but I wanted to swing by and say how much I’ve appreciated your posts. As others have mentioned, it spells out not only some things going on that we might otherwise miss, but also why it is important. Thank you!

    • GregInFla

      To LUR, your work is appreciated!

  • Pingback: click here