What options do these states have? Do they have any legal recourse at all?

As with the AZ immigration law, it seams that this Administration is more interested in prosecuting sovereign states than those actually breaking the law.

Like most of his tax evading cabinet members, Mrs. waters, Mr. Rangle,
voter intimidating black Panthers, voter fraud, a guy handing out liturature in front of an abortion clinc, (this did slip under the radar),
I coud go on and on and on and……

for backup only, the link to the guy handing out liturature.
http://www.lifenews.com/2010/12/23/state-5767/

For the Federal Govt., that is.

I think the way to defeat these people in D.C. is for States to continue, over and over, passing these constitutional amendments and laws, and force the DOJ to repeatedly file suits against the States.

Eventually, people will wake up and realize that it’s not the States that’s the problem…

invoke the 10th amendent of the USC. They further must stop wasting time with agency threatning to go to Federal. States have the authority to go directly to the US Supreme Court and eliminate the shopping around for a federal judge by aministrative government agencies, who have no authority over the sovereign Stayes.

Defund it and defang it. We’re watching and waiting.

Defund it and defang it. We’re watching and waiting.

Time for the states to think – Constitutional Convention.

Until a certain agency is defunded and the every single one of the people involved are removed from employment within the government, this will all continue, get worse and erupt into a crisis too good to waste — on purpose, generated by the administration for command and control.

The agency I’m talking about is The Office Of Information And Regulatory Affairs…… a.k.a. Cass Sunstein. The Czar of the Czars, reports to nobody other than the president and is accountable only to the furthest left of the far left.

for the States to take on the feds. Let the feds go to court. The secret ballot is one of the traditional liberties of this country and the NLRB’s motive is obvious.

for the States to take on the feds. Let the feds go to court. The secret ballot is one of the traditional liberties of this country and the NLRB’s motive is obvious.

…..prohibit the presentation of cards to an employer for his consideration, and does the language actually prohibit the employer from voluntarily recognizing a union after the presentation of the cards? If so, it sounds like a whole bunch of people didn’t dot their i’s and cross their t’s.

Georgia, for instance, is a right to work state.

Is what these four states did something that goes beyond what is already a part of Georgia’s constitution / law?

Georgia, for instance, is a right to work state.

Is what these four states did something that goes beyond what is already a part of Georgia’s constitution / law?

Seems that our bretheren from the other side of the aisle are hell bent at waiving the supremacy clause in our faces. Seems that they also are quick to jump on the union / globalization / internationalist bandwagon and give away our rights because they can pass laws and regulation.

Sooooo, if four states have already passed legislation which is theoretically struck down by the supremacy clause, then lets just use that against them….start a movement to ensure that the unions and big labor can’t unionize without a secret ballot. Call it something “catchy” so that those who are not as plugged in will actually just decide to vote for it. THEN MAKE IT AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION!!!!! Seriously….the supremacy clause can’t trump itself! At this point it is about the only silver bullet we still have!

Take away ALL funding from this bunch of clowns. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows them to require how balloting will be conducted in each state. In fact, if they cannot fund a legal challenge, maybe the unions will do it.

For the unions to fund it is good; it takes $ out of the OFO campaign.

AZ just won a Series of fights the Feds have been picking with them.
What makes the NLRB think they’ll do any better?

So the NLRB is attempting to preclude workers the right to a secret ballot in these states, or… what? Face fines? Imprisonment? Disappear one night never to be seen again?

And King of the UAW (catchy title) is threatening boycotts and demonstrations and various other civil unrest if southern auto-makers don’t kow-tow to the demands of the freedom-loving members of the Union of Socialis… er, American Auto Workers?

I suppose this was the same method by which people were “encouraged” to join the NAZI party.

(I suppose this is hate speech, but I’m already on the list anyway).

for his ‘healing’ in my beloved Arizona. Talk like Mr. Compassionate Non-partisan and then screw the state. Suing us for trying to protect ourselves and enforcing the immigration laws that the Feds WON’T isn’t enough. Perhaps this is payback for even electing Senator McCain. Who knows what’s in the bizarre mind of this POTUS,

and the Obama crowd.

Ruling by executive order, installing “czars” in place of cabinet members, the NLRB and the FCC and other agencies are just following the lead of El Presidente’s pattern of sidestepping congress when he can’t get his way.

The oversight committee will be busy if they are doing their job….

Regards

Just one more lawsuit to defend against. If Obama spent as much time learning how to be a rational president instead of playing golf and chaining business, he might have accomplished something useful. Instead he just issues executive orders, appoints his fellow Marxists to his labor relations board and putts some more.

Can we say good-bye to this pseudo-intellectual in 2012? Seriously.