« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Move Over, Chris Christie: Wisconsin’s Walker Gives Public-Sector Unions Some Tough Love

He’s been in office for less than two months, but it’s become clear that newly-elected Governor Scott Walker plans on cleaning up Wisconsin’s fiscal house and public-sector unions are not too happy.

Wisconsin, according to the Sunshine Review

…[F]aces an estimated $58 million shortfall in its Medicaid budget, according to a new memo released this week by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. This comes after the state learned it would receive $194 in federal funds for Medicaid.[3] The state’s general fund is also expected to be $265 million short, reporting $71 million for the closing of the 2009-2010 financial year, instead of the expected $336 million.[11]

As opposed to massive layoffs that could have been on the table, Walker has introduced that will both save jobs and help get the state back on track.

In an e-mail to all Wisconsin state employees, Walker laid out his budgetary goals, as well as a zinger for the union bosses to howl over:

Collective Bargaining – Given the above changes, the bill also makes various changes to limit collective bargaining to the base pay rate. Total increases cannot exceed the Consumer Price Index (CPI) unless approved by a referendum. Contracts will be limited to one year and wages will be frozen until the new contract is settled. Collective bargaining units will have to take annual votes to maintain certification as a union. Employers will be prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units will not be required to pay dues. These changes take effect upon the expiration of existing contracts. Local police and fire employees and State Patrol Troopers and Inspectors are exempted from these changes.

Of course, unions are crying foul:

“Employees will not have justice. They will not have a say in the workplace. That’s anti-American,” Danny McGowan, business representative of Teamsters Local 662, said.

Local union leaders are up in arms over the proposal.

“It’s nothing more than an attack on labor,” McGowan said. “We can’t fix the states budget woes off the backs of public employees. It’s not fair, because it’s not their fault.”

Contrary to the Teamster’s claim, Walker’s plan does include the continuation of the grievance system:

Wisconsin’s Civil Service System –The Budget Repair Bill and my 2011-2013 Biennial Budget proposal will not include any provisions to alter or modify the main tenets of Wisconsin’s Civil Service System, one of the strongest in the nation. The grievance and dispute resolution systems currently in place, as well as all employee protections, will remain.

No word yet on when the unions are planning their childish marches, candlelight vigils, and attack ads, but they are sure to come.

In the meantime, it looks like Chris Christie’s got some new competition in the tough love department.

__________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.”  Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • acat

    Less of the “get-in-their-faces” thing that most midwesterners associate with NYC, for one thing…

    That said, Wisconsin has been heavily pro-union in their manufacturing sector for a very long time. This doesn’t seem to change that, police and fire are untouched, it looks like this is targetted straight at the union of government office drones… AFCSME IIRC.

    I don’t think Wisconsiners would take kindly to outsider agitation… home-grown agitation, sure, but .. there’s more of a “not from around here, are you?” attitude in the north woods.

    Mew

  • melbedewy

    Like PA, Michigan, Ohio, Iowa, Maine. This is why we elected you.
    Oh, and Boehner-NO more state bailouts.

    • Brian_Roastbeef

      And if Snyder has the guts accomplish something similar in big union Michigan, he’d be the king of them all.

      Good on Walker to get the job done.

  • carolina

    No change to pensions/benefits?

    OT – I think there could be an interesting ‘case study’ with the USPS. From what I have read, pensions are the only reason they are on the verge of default.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    LUR

    Can you clarify this statement “Collective bargaining units will have to take annual votes to maintain certification as a union. Employers will be prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units will not be required to pay dues.

    If they’re in the collective bargaining unit, the union, how will their dues be collected and how can they not be required to pay dues? Will it be up to the union to collect the dues itself?

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      It means that, as opposed to the employers taking dues out of paychecks the union will have to have employees send them in.

      Additionally, with annual elections, the unions will have to work through the year and prove their worth to avoid being decertified.

      This will be interesting to see if all of these provisions stay in the final version.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    …exemplified with this statement: “Employees will not have justice. They will not have a say in the workplace. That

    • zroxx

      It is the result of a warped sense of what “justice” is and a desire for someone else – the government – to take care of them. After years of the government interfering between employers and employees it’s now the assumption that this relationship can’t be worked out without intervening legislation. It is time to start repealing the layers off this onion.

      Let employers be free to hire and fire at will for whatever reason. Let employees be free to compete for employment wherever they want, associate freely, and leave at any time when they no longer want to abide by conditions set by the employer. That’s “liberty for all” and it doesn’t have to cost the taxpayer anything.

    • talgus

      support the products their members create (IE, buy advertisements)
      to grow their worth to the employers?
      And how did they ever get the employers to steal the money out of the members paychecks? (like the IRS does) Time to free market the union bosses. Make them prove their worth to the rank and file.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908
  • Deskpilot

    WI, as a financial entity, is no longer going to handle, in any way shape or form, any monies involved between their employees and the unions that represent them. (Less Fire/Police).
    That would men that no governent employee will be wasting tax-payer dollars processing deductions of unions dues, moving from a payroll account to a dues account and then from their making payments to unions.
    That means that every non exempted union member now has to include in their weekly budget, the ability to write a check for their union dues.
    Wait until they actually see the per pay period pain of that one.
    That’s why government deducts withholdings too. Imagine the greater outrage around the country , if after every paycheck was deposited, Americans had to write out the various checks for all of the withholdings (less the voluntary ones) of taxes. And you though 8/28 had a lot of people “protesting?”

    • nessa

      If people paid “real money” rather than automatic withholding the tax system would have been changed decades ago.

  • johnt

    including the federal government. But don’t expect decent news coverage on this, government is god to our media & cutting spending is a sin.
    I wonder if Walker gagged at the description of civil service workers as dedicated and hard working ?