« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Arianna Huffington’s Hilarious Hypocrisy: Union-Busting Like…a Capitalist Pig?!?

Will Arianna Huffington's Refusal to Collectively Bargain Draw Madison-Like Mobs?

We probably won’t hear AFL-CIO boss Richard Trumka comparing Arianna Huffington to Hitler; nor will we likely see Joey “BFD” Biden weigh in on the merits of collective bargaining in this case either. However, ever since Arianna Huffington suckered convinced AOL to give her gobs of money ($315 million), a cushy new job, and some prestige for her rags-to-riches rise to the top of the blogoshpere, she’s had a bit of a PR problem. You see, on top of getting her millions on the backs of the 900 AOL staffers losing their jobs, Huffington appears to be turning into one of those evil, greedy, capitalist pigs she so often hypocritically excoriates on her website.

Now, an affiliate of the “Marxist Maulers” (the red-shirted union otherwise known as CWA) is calling on all of HuffPo’s bloggers to honor an “e-strike” until HuffPo bloggers get paid their fair share.

Down with slave wages! [Oh! Wait...]  Since its inception, as do most community-oriented blogs, the liberal Huffington Post has relied on content from bloggers who, for the most part, report and opine for free, for passion, or publicity. However, since Huffington fell into some money (again), some of the unpaid talent at Visual Art Source took exception to providing their work for gratis and went on strike:

When we were invited to become a Huffington Post blogger last year I understood that the company paid nothing. We surveyed our writers’ reaction to assess their willingness to have their material reposted there for no additional pay. Visual Art Source, ArtScene and art ltd.(http://www.visualartsource.com) form an umbrella art publishing company that is actually quite large by the standards of our very specialized field. The tens of thousands of readers and online users that we boast, however, are miniscule compared to the 26 million visitors per month that the Huffington Post currently draws.

Yet we are now going on strike. For now, at least, no more content from us will appear on the Huffington Post.

And just like the corporate titans of the American Right, it would come as no surprise if Ms Huffington, whom I am certain has a good heart and only the best intentions, were to assume the obvious position: Who needs these people anyway?  They are not even employees.

Dahling, let them eat cake! Even as Huffington goes out speaking on “middle class” issues, her hypocrisy hasn’t taken long to evolve into union-busting nomenclature normally accused of 19th century “robber barrons”:

[Huffington] argued that blogging on the Huffington Post is equivalent to going on Rachel Maddow, Jon Stewart or the “Today” show to promote their ideas.

And, she said, there are plenty of people willing to take their place if they do.

The idea of going on strike when no one really notices,” Huffington said. “Go ahead, go on strike.” [Emphasis added.]

Enter the red shirts. Shortly after the VAS strike began, the Newspaper Guild, an affiliate of the Communications Workers of America, entered the fray. With its own business model and membership threatened by the amount of unpaid writers consuming the attention spans of the reading public, the TNG-CWA seemed only too happy to jump in.

At first, the TNG-CWA urged an e-campaign, asking people to fill in an electronic form asking Huffington to “help prevent independent journalists from having to settle for third-world wages.”

Then, on Wednesday, the TNG-CWA launched a full-fledged e-sympathy strike in support of VAS:

The Newspaper Guild is calling on unpaid writers of the Huffington Post to withhold their work in support of a strike launched by Visual Art Source in response to the company’s practice of using unpaid labor. In addition, we are asking that our members and all supporters of fair and equitable compensation for journalists join us in shining a light on the unprofessional and unethical practices of this company.

Just as we would ask writers to stand fast and not cross a physical picket line, we ask that they honor this electronic picket line. [Emphasis added.]

Solidarity? To Scab or Not to Scab?…That is the Question. As we know all-too-well, to the American Left, unions are the jack boots on the ground in American politics. Without the unions’ confiscated dues money, the Left has no future. The question for those unpaid progressive bloggers is: Will you honor the electronic picket line in solidarity at the request of the union and the strikers? Or, will your solidarity with unions be more talk than walk and your individual greed for seeing your words posted on line turn you into scabs? What’ll it be, progs?

So far, management at Huffington Post is betting on the latter, that bloggers will become scabs on HuffPo and, in fact, is throwing it back into the TNG-CWA and strikers’ faces (even boasting that replacement-writers will be filling the void):

Bottom line: nearly all of our bloggers are happy with the arrangement, and happy to access the platform and the huge audience it brings, without having to build, pay for, edit, moderate or maintain that platform. Indeed, we are inundated with requests from people who want to blog. The proof is in the pudding: people are looking to join the party, not go home early.

We continue to welcome new voices from people who have something to say.

So, for all you allegedly-principled prog bloggers out there who are still writing for HuffPo, how does it feel to be a scab? [See Jack London.]

You really just can’t make this stuff up!

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • averagevoterdotcom

    A typical Liberal – what’s yours is mine; what’s mine is mine.

    • etlib

      Also typical:

      Liberals project their own faults onto others. They accuse conservatives of being money-grubbung an dselfish because they are exactly that and think everyone is.

      Since they are unable to control their own base instincts they think everyone else is also unable to do so and therefore the government is required to rein in everybody.

  • johnt

    On Huffington’s response you have to love the “most of our bloggers are happy”, line, Sure, and dem black sharecroppers singing in de hot sun are happy too, as well those coal miners in unsafe mines in the 30′s, and of course underpaid, unorganized factory workers, and can we ignore the migrant farm workers? Pass the barf bag.
    Pardon but, a variation on “you can’t make this stuff up”, you cannot, could not, dream up, much less make up, liberalism.
    This is another pinprick in the minds of demented LittleLefties. A few will get it, a portion of that few will add it to the growing list of leftist absurdities, of intellectual, moral,political grotesqueries, of corruption and hypocrisy unknown outside the perimeter of Madhouses,
    Some just may have the capacity to learn.
    Except of course the media.

  • horizon3

    The Lefties are doing what they always do, kill the host that feeds them.
    Arianna has ALWAYS been a capitalist, and always will be one. She goes with the wind, the progs have had the wind at their backs since Obama gained office, and now that even the most rabid of them can see the writing on the wall that he’s a one term wonder, that the majority of America has been awakened by his idiocy and profligate spending, that their day in sun is over.
    That said; they aren’t going to go out without a fight, and they will get violent, so gird your loins the battle is just getting heated up.

  • bk

    Seems like they’re two peas in a pod to me.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport
      • ohiohistorian

        There’s even a worse image for you.

        • rickbull

          before someone has to go to the ER with projectile nausea.

    • williamjameson

      They could name them Moonbat and Sicko.

  • ss396

    Yeah, go ahead and impede the lefty message. Make it hard for people to hear that voice. Silence those Progressives. Shut it up entirely. That’s a really smart move by the unions. I love it.

    And….Ms. Huffington is correct: most people won’t notice.

    The progressive message has run its course; it is losing ground. It is starting to lose financing, which is going to be a fun free-fall to watch. Their strikes and demonstrations were supposed to enhance the solidarity with the citizenry in a glorious fight against “the Man”, but they only exposed the thuggery of its practitioners and put it on public display.

    It took 70 years for Marxism-Leninism to die; Progressive politics is on life support with the plug about to be pulled. Can it be that we are truly witnessing the first death-rattles of that mad god Socialism itself?

    • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

      It’s inherent to human nature – the desire to make other people provide for you. Statism, whether manifested as socialism, communism, progressivism, fascism, or something else, will always be with us. Don’t make the mistake of thinking victory is nigh; a conclusive, comprehensive victory will never come while humans are in charge.

      Besides, wasn’t it just a couple of years back that the Ds were predicting the end of the Republican party and death of conservatism? How’d that work out?

      • ss396

        And you are correct about not getting too hopeful. Yes, there will always be an urge among a certain class, a self-appointed elite, who will be clueless enough to think that they know better than anyone else what needs to be done, and where our interests lie.

        But what I am seeing are the stirrings of a broader rejection of that concept, and the demise of its appeal. Not this year; not next year; not the next election, not even the next Administration. I’m thinking decades, not years; but I am also thinking decades, not centuries.

        Certainly there will be obstructions and confusions and setbacks along the path to the death of socialism, but if the central momentum can be kept, the contradictions within a socialist framework will become more and more apparent and less and less tolerable. I did use the word ‘if’ a couple of times there, but I see no reason to let my pervasive discouragement degenerate into a disgusted acquiescence.

        This is a battle that can be won. I give it even odds that the battle might be won before I die. Perhaps it won’t be, but I am optimistic enough to believe that I, for one, can give my children a better world than I had.

        • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

          This is a battle that can be won. I agree. We can definitely improve the country for our children.
          The war, however, will always be with us. Our vigilance must be eternal.

  • johnt

    He is the fellow who can spend millions on politics, unlike the Koch brothers who represent evil and corruption when they spend. Big spending is bad, sometime.
    I remember her when she was, or acted like, a conservative, a Normal Person. She turned on a dime, or was it a million? I doubt she is leaving the comfort of Soros the Nazi’s wallet, prostitutes don’t do that. So A H with George’s help will most likely befoul another media outlet.
    Wonder if she will ever sell out again?

    • rickbull

      She sold out the Conservatives when she divorced Michael Huffington and became a liberal;
      She sold out the Serbians by opposing NATO’s intervention to prevent genocide in Eastern Europe;
      She sold out her “volunteer” (read unpaid) journalists when she cashed out with AOL.

      My bet is that she’s probably selling somebody else out right this very moment.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        nt

  • powertothepeople

    surround yourself with snakes, want to be like those snakes, are “friends” with snakes, one should not be surprised when you get bit by said snakes.

    I hope she is smarter than she looks and knew her day was coming when the very ones she exalted, called righteous, said were the future of this country, and defended when they were indefensible, would turn on here with greenbacks in their eyes.

  • Tbone

    I would feel cheated when no check arrived. That is why I am still a happy guy.

    • Aaron Gardner
  • johnt

    they are held in by their leaders. They’re probably not even laughed at anymore Sell them out, dump them, herd them into Health Horror, what’s the difference? They will do what they’re told.

    • davesinsanantonio

      they are littlelibs. They all think they are part of the “in” group. Tee Hee!

  • Locked and Loaded

    but I think this statement -

    And just like the corporate titans of the American Right, it would come as no surprise if Ms Huffington, whom I am certain has a good heart and only the best intentions, were to assume the obvious position: Who needs these people anyway? They are not even employees.

    - very much illustrates the dissonance (sorry, can’t call it cognitive) clouding their pointy little heads.

    These people simply cannot stand on principle.

  • izoneguy

    I am sure the AOL lawyer’s are in full swing to reverse their deal.
    They thought the slave factory would continue and I am sure Huffington assured them it would be no problem.

    • http://www.twitter.com/AWG9_yoyo yoyo

      on [My___ ].

      …Wait, what do you mean no one uses MySpace any longer? Oh, crap….

  • merryj1

    …perhaps for the first time in her life, A. Huffington is not completely wrong (being self-absorbed and tight-fisted are not great virtues, but did she ever SAY she was a ‘nice guy’)?

    There was a disclosure in the e-mail “brief” of this article that is apparently not included in the above entry – that Red State set aside 10% of a money deal to distribute among Red State contributors. Kudos to Eric and Red State for that – it was the right thing to do. But it was voluntary, NOT obligatory.

    What the Huff-Po former blog-contributors are demanding is akin to, for example, writers of “letters to the editor” published in the Chicago Tribune or Sun-Times demanding payment for those items after the respective newspapers were sold. There was never a stated nor implied cash benefit for their contributions, regardless of how much the publications’ principals might rake in at some future point in time.

    The Huff-Po bloggers knew when they submitted their copy that their “pay” was limited to a byline and ego-strokes, no cash. Presumably, they intended to use the subsequent (electronic) clips to pad their resumes and enhance their portfolios.

    Nothing has really changed, except that portfolios filled with Huffington Post ‘credits’ might have been rendered all but worthless by all of the publicity about their whining and complaints, and highlighting their belated rush to unionize. Heh.

  • ericthered

    So, Ari the Greek has induced the proles to work for free. Isn’t that the whole point of the Capitalists who demand Socialism for everyone but themselves?

  • http://www.twitter.com/AWG9_yoyo yoyo

    Then lets see how long the strike holds.

    Something simple like – “Go ‘Fair Tax’!” or “Erick Erickson is my HERO!” or “Nuclear Power is the Way to Go!”

    No more than 30 seconds, I bet.

    ‘:o)~

  • http://www.liberallyconservative.com Liberally Conservative

    I always wondered how Huffington made it to the top, found herself in a wide swath of “elitist” circles and on the cocktail circuit.

    I’ve heard this women speak and forget the thick accent, she comes off like a buffoon, has little substance and in some photo’s looks as though she could stop that runaway train in “Unstoppable” by simply looking at it.

    It’s seems she’s like that person rising not from the ashes but from the manure pile only to come out smelling like a rose.

    Hypocrites like Huffington never preach what they practice and greed is tattooed on their posterior while they go around promoting exactly the prescription they would never take themselves.

  • williamjameson

    ROFL!!! That was as funny as Alvin Green only people actually listened to her. HuffBlo received 2% of the Gallop poll votes, just 2% to Alvins 28% voter turnout. And it must kill her to know Sarah Palin won her race and has polled far higher.

    Start your own blog or apply for a job, that’s how you get paid. HuffBlo bloggerds got exposure so if they want something more then that’s too bad, they agreed to work for free. I do love the irony of the Wealth Redistributionist attitude working against all of them including Arianna, though she made millions it could backfire and she loses control and possibly cost her a fortune in lawsuits even though they don’t have a case. Let them sue and create commerce for lawyers, ROFL!!!

    Nice graphic too!!

    http://articles.cnn.com/2003-09-30/politics/calif.recall_1_arianna-huffington-gubernatorial-replacement-race-presidential-election?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS