« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

AT&T to Buy T-Mobile, Union Targets $15 Million/yr in Dues Through Card Check

Sunday’s breaking business story is the announcement that unionized AT&T will be buying union-free T-Mobile for $39 billion. With 42,000 mostly union-free employees, German-owned T-Mobile has long been a target of the red-shirted Communications Workers of America. Now, as the mostly unionized AT&T Mobility has agreed to allow the CWA to unionize its employees without secret-ballot elections (via neutrality and card-check), the red-shirted union bosses are seeing the green that will likely come from T-Mobile’s employees.

With 42,000 unionizable T-Mobile employees and the potential of raking in 1.3 percent of their paychecks—an estimated $15 million in union dues each year—top union boss Larry Cohen wasted no time on Sunday declaring the union’s interest in unionizing the T-Mobile employees:

CWA and ver.di, the largest union in Germany, have partnered to support T-Mobile workers in the U.S., and the global union movement has been a strong supporter of this effort. CWA and ver.di formed a joint union – TU – that represents T-Mobile workers on both sides of the Atlantic.  Hundreds of TU members in the U.S. will welcome this news since of all the possible partners, AT&T will mean better employment security and a management record of full neutrality toward union membership and a bargaining voice. For T-Mobile USA workers who want a voice in their workplace, this acquisition can provide a fresh start with T-Mobile management. Some 42,000 ATT mobility employees are union represented.*

Over the years that the CWA has targeted T-Mobile employees, most have been resistant to the CWA’s pressure tactics. Now, however, with AT&T Mobility likely to turn the employees (and their paychecks) over to the CWA, if CWA’s tactics are rebuffed, the union can always use surrogates to threaten them with the full support of the union-controlled NLRB.

* Footnote: The vast majority of employees of AT&T Mobility’s main rival, Verizon Wireless, are not unionized.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • thurman

    as soon as my contract is up

    I had no idea AT&T was unionized like this.

    Thank you, as always, for posting things absolutely no one else seems to be covering

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      CWA and IBEW are in Verizon, too.

      Which is why they’re trying to push Obama on so-called Universal Access: to get that money funneled to unions.

      • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport
        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          But Verizon Communications owns 55%, and Vodafone (unionized or not per-country) owns the rest.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            Who is the target of any union-based boycott?

  • donnybrooke

    Switched from T-Mobile to Verizon, that is. T-Mobile had terrible service (in this area at least). Couldn’t happen to a nicer company (not that I care about unions gaining more members, but I think AT&T will probably gut the company anyway).

  • Mike

    …AT&T is doing this because they are unequipped (from a hardware standpoint) to compete with Verizon in the 4G arena. T-Mobile, on the other hand, has the biggest 4G network out there.

    That has nothing to do with unions, just a gee-whiz tidbit I thought the nerds like me might enjoy :D

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      AT&T and T-Mobile actually use the same technologies, GSM and HSPA+, the latter not being a “true” 4G tech.

      Outside of marketroid babble, that term is typically reserved for the blazing fast WiMax (available now from Sprint/Clearwire) and LTE (available now from Verizon) technologies.

      Which is why it never made a lot of sense when the Sprint/T-Mobile rumors went around: Sprint and T-Mobile are using completely different stuff, while AT&T and T-Mobile are using the same stuff on different frequencies.

      I get the impression AT&T has decided to cede the 4G field for now. I don’t know why. Maybe because of Net Neutrality regulatory risks on people who build infrastructure. Maybe because they want Verizon to work out the LTE kinks first before they roll out. Maybe just because they want to keep doing their backhaul upgrades first. Maybe a combination of the three.

  • bobojake
    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Wireless market is heavily competitive.

      Besides, the problem with anti-trust is that we can change companies we buy from, but DOJ is the *real* monopoly.

      • bobojake
        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          The ones who run the DOJ Antitrust division?

  • congressworksforus

    While T-Mobile got hammered for its slow 3G roll-out, it was because they were already looking past 3G and wanted to ensure that anything they DID roll out was easily replaced at a fraction of the cost.

    Incidentally, under the actual definition of 4G, while the T-Mobile network is the fastest, it is still far from true 4G. None of these companies have, or are even remotely close to, what 4G actually is. A case of the industry redefining something for its own benefit. Who’da thunk it.

  • Thomas_Alan

    I just won a dispute with T-Mobile breaking their contract and fled to AT&T.

  • spiritofreagan

    Guys this isn’t about Technology or who has the better network this is about Unions taking over every aspect of our lives. This is entirely about money for the unions. No one will gain by this merger. we all will lose alittle more freedom in the process. The Progressive Liberals are slowly chipping away at our free society. SEIU, CWA, AFL/CIO it doesn’t matter who they re it matters as to what they are. The Progressives failed in every attempt to control society through wars and governments so they are attacking from the most vulnerable people of all. The workers. If they can control the workers they control the world. They can take over governments from within instead of the old method of voting and freedom to choose. If we don’t stop the Unions now in this country there will ot be a later.

  • jimbo999

    I worked for a company, NCR Corp, that was swallowed up by AT&T in 1992. They treated us like dirt for about 7 years. They dumped their failing computer division on us to “fix”. It was a disaster, which almost killed NCR. In the end they cut us loose and we were able to bring the company back enough to be profitable again. I worked side by side with a “real” AT&T worker and as things go, we compared salary and benefits. He had 20 years with the company and I had 30 years with NCR. We did equal jobs. He made 30% more pay, paid nothing on his health care, and he was retiring that year with 20 years of service at the age of 48, with a pension higher than I now make after retiring (forced) with 39 years at age 60. The only difference between us was that he was in the union. AT&T was so happy, delighted, ecstatic to have a non-union division to kick around that it was like a shark feeding frenzy. They gave us the junk and they kept the profitable parts for themselves. They kept offering

  • finnmccuill

    If I could sign a couple of pieces of paper and immediately be the recipient of 15 million or so dollars a year without any effort, screw everybody! Where do I sign? ?

    Question: When CROTUS runs off to hide in the desert to play golf with Qaddafi, does he take along a gang of his “new Black Panthers” to open doors, and make mean faces at people? Wonder how many of my tax dollars are being funnelled into their pockets? Surely, I must be mistaken? ? ?