« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Crickets Chirp as Obama’s NMB Nixes Flight Attendants’ Right to Strike*

With an Obama agency denying workers' "rights," where are all the union protesters?

Granted, it would probably be bad optics for union bosses to put a Hitler mustache on President Obama. However, the way they’ve been prattling on of late about so-called “rights,” you’d think union bosses would be filling up the buses and hightailing it to Washington to storm the offices of the National Mediation Board.

You see, while the right to collective bargaining in the government sector is dubious at best, in the private-sector the right to strike is supposed to be sacred…right? So, why aren’t the unions out protesting in front of the NMB over the agency’s decision to refuse to allow the flight attendants at American Airlines their right to strike?

The U.S. isn’t allowing flight attendants at financially strapped American Airlines to walk the picket lines any time soon, and that could change the tone of labor negotiations across the industry, some experts said Friday.

Wait. What? You mean it’s okay that workers’ rights are being denied because a company is financially strapped, but not when a state is financially strapped? Why the double standard?

The National Mediation Board, the U.S. agency that referees labor-management relations for airlines [and railroads], has ignored a request made a year ago by the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, asking the federal government to release it from negotiations for what’s called a 30-day cooling-off period, which then allows for a strike.

For almost three years, American Airlines flight attendants have been in talks with management, seeking improved wages and benefits as well as more job security. But management has refused to deal until the union allows it more scheduling flexibility for workers in order to increase productivity.

The NMB later said the carrier’s fragile finances and the weakened national economy would weigh heavily on its decision, according to the union.

The NMB said it would not comment on any ongoing labor negotiation.

“The political reality is, to a large extent, defined by the state of the economy,” said APFA President Laura Glading in a statement. “Consequently, it is clear to us that the White House will avoid any kind of disruption. And we cannot lose sight of the fact that the National Mediation Board answers to the White House.”

So, the NMB is actually considering the impact of its decision and denying workers their fundamental right to strike? On top of that, union bosses are quietly going along with it without comment or…protest? How interesting. How uniqueHow hypocritical.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

[*Note: The purpose of this post is not to encourage a strike at American Airlines. Rather, it is merely to point out the blatant hypocrisy of today's union bosses and their behavior over this past month.]

COMMENTS

  • jiminga

    NLRB menbers might remember Eastern Airlines strikers that killed the company. Just in Atlanta that put 70,000 people out of work, both direct employees and those supporting operations.

    Could this be an actual act of sanity from Obama’s team?

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      The National Mediation Board handles labor-related disputes involving airlines and railroads under the Railway Labor Act; where as the NLRB handles the rest of the private sector.

      As two out of the three NMB members in Washington are former union heads in the airline industry, they likely do remember Eastern.

    • Vegas_Rick

      as an act of sanity. Do we want Obama deciding which businesses can afford a strike and which cannot? Do we want him picking winners and losers in the business community? Oh…wait…he’s already been doing that.

      Never mind.

    • taxpayer1234

      sucked the private sector dry. They know they’ll lose membership once AA goes under, so they’re telling their members to shaddap. Plus, they’re very busy trying to protect their ultimate Cash Cow, government employers, from turning the unions out.

  • Locked and Loaded

    I think what we are seeing applied here by the union brains (?) is what is called the separation of the church of state.

    Seriously though, maybe even a union brain can see that the amount of money available for flying is limited. But it’s still impossible for that same grey matter to process the idea that the source of tax revenues is not.

  • dmacleo

    mechanics and stores clerks (all under TWA union) can’t “strike” either. and that is a good thing.
    was so glad when I moved out of a union job into non-union.

  • drfredc

    One must gather than some unions just aren’t Blue enough for the nation’s first Blue President..

  • f2000

    Obama’s got to get to a billion somehow.

  • gillis7

    unions should all be free to form and free to strike.

    just as free as the OWNER of the job is to FIRE the striking workers (one and all)

    and the first “scab” that walks by should be FREE to walk across the picket line (unmolested by any union thugs AND PROTECTED by the full force of the law from violence and intimidation) to negotiate any way he sees fit with the owner of the job to replace every one of the striking union members.

    it really is about LIBERTY

  • streetwise

    They are a vital part of infrastructure, and a strike at a mega-carrier can do a lot of economic damage in a weak economy.

    Add to this that the AA flight attendants are the HIGHEST paid in the industry, and that AA is losing money- well, even the Obama people can see the reality of this staring them in the face,