« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Union Coalition Scores Victory on Sick Days, But At What Cost?

Milwaukee, meet Detroit. Last Thursday, a Wisconsin Court of Appeals lifted an injunction on a 2008 voter-approved measure requiring businesses to provide employees with up to nine sick days per calendar year. It may now head to the Wisconsin’s Supreme Court. If the Court’s decision is not overturned, businesses with 10 or more employees will be required provide nearly two weeks of paid sick time to their employees.

The measure, pushed by 9to5, as well as a “multi-state consortium” of unions and other left-wing activist groups, was passed in 2008, but had been held up under an injunction due challenges in the way that the ballot was worded, as well as the argument that the measure “pre-empted by state and federal laws, impaired existing contracts and exercised police powers invalidly.”

According to BusinessWeek:

The 3-0 ruling overturned a lower court’s decision that said the ballot question didn’t contain enough information about the ordinance. The appeals court decided that the question did indeed comply with necessary requirements and did not violate state statutes or other prohibitions.

The law allows Milwaukee workers at private companies to accrue one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked. Employees could take up to nine days of sick leave each calendar year. Businesses with nine or fewer employees could cap the maximum paid sick leave at five days per year.

A press release from “familyvalues@work” (the consortium), claims that momentum is building nationwide for paid sick days.

A historic decision by the Wisconsin State Court of Appeals yesterday to uphold a Milwaukee city law that provides paid sick days to workers is building momentum nationwide for growing campaigns in cities and states to pass paid sick days laws that benefit working families, public health and the economy.

In Philadelphia, a paid sick days bill was passed out of a City Council committee a few weeks ago, and iConnecticut, the state legislature is moving forward on a bill with bipartisan support. Paid sick days legislation in New York City has 35 City Council sponsors, legislation is about to be introduced in Seattle, and more than a dozen states have coalitions advocating actively for paid sick days and paid family leave policies.  Milwaukee, San Francisco and Washington, DC have passed paid sick days laws.

“The economy is changing, the workforce is changing and workers need policies like paid sick days to stay in their jobs and care for their families,” said Ellen Bravo, Executive Director of Family Values @ Work, a national consortium of state organizations advocating for paid sick days, paid family leave and other family friendly workplace policies. “At a time when corporations are seeing record profits, no worker in America should have to choose between taking care of a sick child or loved one and losing a job or a paycheck.”

Hey, Joe, remember that vacation time you had? For businesses of 10 or more employees, especially small businesses, the sudden increase of providing nearly two more weeks of paid time off to employees will come at a cost. While some companies may be able to increase their prices, other may not. As a result, those companies may be forced to choose between lowering the amount of vacation time provided to employees or, if possible, moving out or Milwaukee altogether. If they do, who could blame them?

According to union attorney Barbara Zack Quindel, based on San Francisco’s experience in passing a similar measure, there’s nothing to be concerned about.

“San Francisco’s situation shows there aren’t detrimental effects to this,” 9to5 lead lawyer Barbara Zack Quindel said. “People in Milwaukee knew what they were doing when they passed this.”

Did they? We’ll soon see. If nothing else, when more industry leaves Milwaukee, there’ll always be jobs to be had plowing the streets and working the food courts at Summerfest.

Photo Credit: Voces de la Frontera

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • smitch61

    My daughter received her ‘letter’ from the union yesterday (teachers) calling for a state wide strike in lieu of the governors budget. Governor Snyder’s budget has not yet been approved. The letter is requesting a meeting on Tuesday in which they will vote for the discussion of a state wide strike. …. could get ugly. My daughter will be voting no, but she said the ‘scuttlebutt’ is in support of it.

    • http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu Rhymes With Right

      Just say no to striking — even if the rest of her colleagues do walk off the job, I’d like to encourage her to stand on principle. That is what this teacher would do if there were ever such an attempt down here.

  • http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu Rhymes With Right

    Looking for a business-friendly climate and a growing workforce? Come to Texas!

    • GregInFla
  • stormbringer

    If this was voter approved, then why all the angst. The people of Milwaukee are obviously willing to shoot themselves in the foot.
    Businesses that are not willing to absorb the cost can move to Florida. The business climate is great, and improving under Gov. Scott.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      You seem to be calling for capitulation to the left.

      • stormbringer

        The left will have to sleep in the bed they made.

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          The voters approved Obama. Should we cave to everything he asks?

          • congressworksforus

            But those not “of the left” can move too.

            It is, after all, what the Founders intended.

            I don’t like this any more than the next guy, but the way to win this war is to quit playing their game. If Milwaukee wants to pass a stupid law, go for it; those that oppose it should just move the hell away.

            And if businesses refuse to relocate, you know who is controlling those businesses, and it’s time to find another job.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            The proposal is capitulation and retreat.

          • skorrent1

            The proposal is for the Right not to use the Courts to overturn a legal expression of popular will! Think Prop 8 in California.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      …in 2008, there was a lot of hope and change in the air and, clearly, people voted that way.

      • carolina

        if they voted on this today. If not……. then they will get what they deserve = fewer jobs in Milwaukee.
        I also imagine that employers will look at using more contract workers and more part time employees.

      • carolina

        if they voted on this today. If not……. then they will get what they deserve = fewer jobs in Milwaukee.
        I also imagine that employers will look at using more contract workers and more part time employees.

  • drfredc

    What’s to stop workerbees from just voting to get paid whatever they want, work, sick or not?

    Paid sick leave laws seem like a “just compensation” rights violation of the employer’s property rights. The employer has property that is to be taken without “just compensation” by force of law?

    Please excuse my common sense logic on this stuff… Don’t worry, it doesn’t seem to be contagious…

  • Adjoran

    It’s a cost, without doubt.

    The thinking probably is that many of the businesses who will be affected, like fast food restaurants and discount chain stores, can’t just leave because the location is part of their business – there are already McDonald’s and Wal-Marts in the suburbs, and in Texas.

    So the cost will come out of the employees in the form of lower wages (or deferred wage increases) or loss of other benefits, or passed on to consumers in higher prices.

  • snowshooze

    I am fortunante to not be in that area.
    The last time I moved my shop, it took nearly two months to get back to full operations. I had to wire in and plumb equipment and lighting, set machines, hire heavy equipment… it was a very difficult and expensive process. I had to do it to gain more floor space, but I was stuck in the old shop for a good deal of time due to the level of hardship I knew I would have to face.
    It only cost around five thousand out of pocket, but additionally, income was interrupted fora good period, and my entire year of hard work became pretty much a wash..
    I will avoid another move as long as possible. To think I can just pull stakes and move with the political winds is nuts. And to think the big companies have it any easier is just as nuts.
    Were I exposed to this situation, I would have to first look at those incurred fully burdened costs of the employees, and start my trimming there. The problem is, there isn’t much to work with now.
    In order to keep competent, skilled workers, I need to make sure they get enough compensation to stick with me, pay their bills and not have to seek additional employment to supplement their wages or they will do so on their own.
    Further…imagine trying to sell your home in the current climate. Great.
    I have to fight. I cannot afford to run, and I have no inclination to do so. I have worked very hard for the things I have, and am not about to accept the government mandating further the burdens I am required to bear in order to make a living.
    This is no fight to run from unless you plan to spend the rest of your life and all your money moving.
    I do not have that luxury.