« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ohio’s John Kasich Signs Law Limiting Government Union Power

The Fat Lady Sang Her Heart Out Last Night and It Sounded Sweet.

On Thursday, union bosses found themselves beating to the sound of a different drummer as Ohio’s taxpayers won a reprieve from the same old union song and dance as Governor John Kasich signed SB5 into law. As many have stated on numerous occasions, government unions have spent many years perfecting a system of backing political candidates who get elected with union money and resources, then once in office reward those very unions at the expense of the taxpayers. Well, in Ohio, government unions gaming the system just got severely limited.

While both laws [Wisconsin's and Ohio's] severely limit public employees’ ability to bargain collectively — they both prohibit any bargaining over health coverage and pensions — the Ohio law largely eliminates bargaining for the police and firefighters. Wisconsin’s law leaves those two groups’ bargaining rights untouched. Ohio’s law also gives city councils and school boards a free hand to unilaterally impose their side’s final contract offer when management and union fail to reach a settlement.

[snip]

State Senator Shannon Jones, a Republican and chief sponsor of the Ohio law, said curbing collective bargaining made sense when so many states, cities, counties and school districts faced daunting budget deficits. She said the law would help public employers hold down compensation costs, especially soaring health and pension costs, as a way to minimize any layoffs and reductions in public services, whether police patrols or garbage collections.

“The economy has changed fundamentally,” Ms. Jones said. “Not only families and business have to change to adapt to tougher economic circumstances, but governments have to adapt, too.”

As Huffington Post noted, Democrats offered nothing more than protests all the way up to the time the law was signed.

Democrats opposed the measure but offered no amendments to it. Instead, they delivered boxes containing more than 65,000 opponent signatures to the House labor committee’s chairman.

Unions, on the other hand, have vowed to fight the new law by gathering enough signatures to put it on the November ballot. That is, if they can gather 230,000 valid signatures within 90 days.

Until then, enjoy the music, taxpayers. You deserve a break.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

Photo Attribution: Alaskan Dude

COMMENTS

  • radicalrighty

    (now) Governor Kasich aspired to run the country.

  • http://www.planettron.com nickderinger

    The Left has no self-control. They are a Juggernaut with a one track mind. They rush ahead at full speed even when they see that the bridge is out because they have the audacity to believe that the bridge will magically repair itself just as they reach it.

    In the words of a famous engineer who dorve his train off the broken bridge and into the canyon: “Oh poooh!!!”

  • cbman

    What will happen private sector and public sector wages if
    unions are busted?

    What will happen to the businesses they support?

    • edintexas

      I will violate my own rule and respond to an apparent troll. The (IIRC) 94% of US workers who are not unionized will continue without noticing anything but a somewhat lesser increase in their tax bills. And businesses will continue to stay in business as long as they are well run, just as they do in Right to Work states.

    • conserv3

      “what will happen to businesses when public sector unions are ‘busted’?”

      oh geez, do you really need an answer? Who pays the public sector? I’m sure businesses will do just fine when taxpayers have more of their hard earned money to spend. Of all the dumb questions…

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      effectively busted themselves several decades ago, ummm, nothing.

      With respect to businesses, if they are currently unionized they’ll continue to lose market share. See the auto industry. If they aren’t, ummmm, nothing. Unless they happen to be somewhere where states and local governments decide to outsource, in which they’ll do just fine and so will local taxpayers.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      The same thing that will happen to them if we didn’t bust the unions. They will decline in real terms as long as The Fed keeps interest rates near zero.

      The businesses they support will be much better off. They will no longer be vampired off of to support their risible benefit packages.

  • hunter10

    What is so difficult to understand here? No one is interferring with private sector unions.

  • Ausonius

    There are 360,000 government workers in Ohio.

    To force a statewide referendum, a petition to place this issue on the ballot needs under a quarter million names.

    See: http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2011/04/01/kasich-signs-sb5-but-fight-isnt-over.html?sid=101

    An excerpt, and note the Obamaism in the second sentence!

    “When Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s pen touched paper on Senate Bill 5 last night, nary a protester was found outside the Statehouse.

    But make no mistake, the fight over collective-bargaining rights for public employees will continue.

    Kasich, a Republican, put his signature on GOP-produced legislation that removes health care and benefits from collective bargaining, makes it illegal to strike and replaces automatic pay increases with a merit-based pay system for the state’s 360,000 public workers.

    Even before Kasich signed the bill, labor groups and their Democratic allies had begun to organize the drive to collect at least 231,149 signatures of registered voters to place a referendum to repeal the bill on the Nov. 8 statewide ballot. “

  • renny

    Slightly off topic, but in the last election, OH supposedly registered 700,000 new voters and even the McCain compaign took notice and sued the OH (Soros) sec. of state to vet the registrees. She said there were too many to investigate, altho’ 200,000 might be fraudulent, but it was better that 200,000 vote illegally than to deny one legal vote.
    The US Sup. Ct. agreed.
    litte o won OH by 200,000 votes (and yet only a total of 5000 more actually than the total vote in 2004).
    WoW, I used to think 3 was a magic number, but now 200,000 is.
    Do we think OH will have any trouble getting 250,000 signatures?
    And also, send money to WI to block Rep. recalls and electing a troll lib to their Sup. Ct.
    The tea parties have a link for donations: “Tea Party Express”
    Addendum–I often wonder what happened to the other 500,000 new voters in OH, since they evidently didn’t vote and dropped off the radar. Has anyone had a UFO sighting there lately? Maybe they were abducted.

  • renny

    I will try typing it out:

  • renny

    I give up.

  • taylerdog23

    This is going to get interesting…Walker and the WI GOP were cowards in not exempting Police and Firefighters unions. They knew they could pay a political price and they backed down. Kudos to the OH GOP and Gov. Kasich for standing up to all public unions.

    This is where the rubber is going to meet the road in terms of public support for these measures. It’s easy to vilify teacher’s unions (and I love doing it), but I wonder how this is going to play out.

    Police and firefighters have bravely bucked their union leadership for years back thankfully voted to the right.

    My opinion is that it’s worth the political price to possibly alienate police and firefighters from the GOP because the pain should be shared by all public unions.

    • taylerdog23