« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ticking Time Bomb: Ongoing Labor Dispute Shows the Problem With Union Pensions

In Orange, CT, there have been two arrests over the last few weeks (the most recent on Saturday afternoon) in front of Dichello Distributors, where there is an ongoing labor battle between Teamsters, Local 443 and the company. The issue is over the company’s desire to exit the Teamsters’ grossly underfunded multi-employer pension plan, as well as asking union members to pay 10% of their medical premiums.

As the company advertises for replacement workers, Peter Deane, Vice President of Sales and General Manager of Dichello Distributors, stated in an interview:

The two major issues that the Teamsters refused to negotiate in any way, shape or form, were the pension and the health and welfare. They refused to have their members pay a portion of the healthcare which is fair in this day and age, and again, under-funded. But, and this is very important; Dichello needed to remain competitive in an industry dominated by non-union houses. That was the other goal we had to reach, and their pension is drastically under-funded. Our portion alone of the pension liability is $21 million. The pension, in their words is drastically under-funded, and is in critical condition, it’s unsustainable, and we’re just not willing to pay into a pension that very likely won’t be there for the men. Unfortunately, they seem to vehemently disagree with us on that point.

[snip]

Their pension fund, in their words is in critical condition. It’s less than 50% funded. It’s a multi-employer pension and it’s drastically under-funded. Dichello’s obligation into the pension has all been met. We’ve paid into that pension, exactly what we bargained for, for more than 30 years — for 35 years we’ve paid what we agreed to pay in, and at the end of the last contract we still have to pay $21 million because of the promises that the Teamsters made and the investments that they made. We cannot stay with their pension in all good faith.

As a unionized employer that, long ago, agreed to contribute money into a union multi-employer pension plan, Dichello Distributors is faced with what many similarly-situated employers are—paying money into a severely underfunded pension plan that, in turn, pools the money and distributes it to retirees (in many cases) of other companies.

The plan that Dichello Distributors pay into is the New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund, a union multi-employer plan that encompasses the members of 21 different Teamster locals throughout New England. While the pension plan has been underfunded for years, as of  2009, the plan was nearly $3 billion underfunded. As such, like many other union pension plans, it is listed in “critical” status. Even worse, it is projected to be in critical status for years to come.

Because of the gross underfunding of the Teamsters’ New England pension plan—caused, in part, by poorly-performing investments, as well as companies that have gone out of business no longer contributing to the fund—the cost of rehabilitating the fund must come from the remaining participating employers:

The Rehabilitation Plan contains two options which future contracts must conform to, both options apply to a Rehabilitation Period of ten years commencing October 1, 2011.  The Preferred Option requires employers to increase future contributions by 10% per annum for five years and by 8% per annum for the next five years.  Under the Preferred Option benefit accruals are unchanged.  The Default Option requires employers to increase future contributions by 12% per annum for five years and by 11% per annum for the next five years.  Under the Default Option benefit accruals are reduced by 60%.

In Dichello’s case, it appears that, if the company does not exit the plan now, its costs are going to skyrocket in October 2011 and for the foreseeable future. This is why some companies like Dichello Distributors choose to take the short-term pain of a labor dispute in order to preserve its longer-term viability.

Unfortunately, Dichello Distributors is not alone. Union multi-employer plans in the private-sector have been estimated to be as much as $165 billion underfunded (public-sector pension fund liabilities are much higher). In the private-sector, it is a time bomb that threatens to blow up a lot of companies’ financial well being. In the public-sector, the amount of underfunded plans are causing politicians (both Republican and Democrat alike) to take drastic measures to keep states and municipalities from going bankrupt. A few, like Central Falls, Rhode Island and Prichard, Alabama, already have.

Back in Orange, CT, as the members of Teamsters’ Local 443 picket Dichello Distributors, one can’t help but wonder if they truly understand the problem with their union pension.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Pic Credit.

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • powertothepeople

    years back when this same issue was raised by GM. It was in ’92 as that was the year of the great east coast ‘blizzard” that shut down so much from SC to MI. My buddy owned a company that did business with GM in Livonia MI and suffered greatly during the big strike. One of the issues back then was that GM could no longer afford the massive pension bill since so many had gone into retirement. They had asked the employees and the union to make more of a contribution to their own pension and benefits, and had asked the union to share more of the retired benefits. They were demanding this as a prerequisite to agreeing to the demands of the union. Neither side would budge and it ended up being one of the longest strikes in MI history. Many a company was damaged badly by the strike, many never recovering.

    Eventually, GM gave in. But if they knew 20 years ago that the whole thing was unsustainable, I can only imagine where it sits now.I can also only imagine what it is doing to much smaller companies and our governments.

    It is ridiculous how bad the union has been able to screw companies and the tax payers. And it is even more sad how unwilling the unions and the idiots who support it are willing to allow themselves to be bankrupted out of careers, yet they persist in their demands to keep all their “rights.” Oh well, maybe when millions of these idiots see their companies shut down, they are out of jobs, and their retirement benefits are lost and are not being paid, maybe some of the remaining union members will sit back, thinks for a sec, and realize they need to stop acting entitled or they will have nothing in the end.

    Maybe when they lose everything, they will take a trip to the famous golf course being played by the ones who have sucked not only them dry, but the country and the companies as well, and take a little justice.

    • powertothepeople
      • rickbull

        unions have made the transition from representing private industry folks to government employees: deeper pockets (taxpayers), and how often does a government go bankrupt and lay off all its employees?

        Union management is not interested in helping the company be competitive, and their only interest in keeping their members employed is because it keeps their management team flush with cash and benefits. They are no better, and often times worse than the “unfair management” of the employees they supposedly represent.

  • georgerob

    I had a small factory which Dallas invited to the city. We were moving anyhow so— We hired work release guys, we hired alternative something kids. It blew up almost the day Clinton was elected, first one then daily some gov clown showed up. We decided to move to Mexico, not money just to get away from Gov. The mayor said he’d help, even the fed work release guy helped—then the union came, this IS Texas so no big deal but they did damage daily. My factory is now in Mexico, the extra freight cost about the same as any labor saving—My partners say I am never allowed to come back!!!

  • renny

    no would is around to hire union members.

    The unions don’t care but the actualy workers should.

  • johnt

    The money will materialize from some place. Just like much of our current electorate, childrens’ minds & children’s wishes. Mommy and Daddy must provide, don’t bother me with thought.
    Everywhere a California, and now the nation, it took a while but now we’re here.

  • northernrockiesguy

    As long as a company can move to another state, it’s only a matter of time before the cost of moving will be less than the cost of staying and putting up with the union. The unions are slow poison,

  • donp

    For 18 years, I was represented by teamsters 445, newburgh, NY in the warehouse where I worked. When the management got frustrated enough trying to deal with the union, they moved out of state. Every year since then, I look at my pension status report with apprehension, knowing that while it is in way better shape than 443′s a lot of my coworkers were the about same age as me. I fear the real answer won’t come until 2020 or so when the biggest wave of retirements hits.

  • spaceman_spiff

    http://www.maricopagop.org/2011/04/17/uncivil-protest-at-tax-payer-rally-arizona-state-capitol/

  • popster

    The average union empolyee is robbed daily, all in the name of representation. Someone in one plant hiccups and the whole union walks out, nationwide. That’s reasonable.

  • hologram5

    Then, when they complain we the people just tell them, “NOT OUR PROBLEM, WE WARNED YOU”….

  • Pingback: URL