None Dare Call it Hypocrisy: The Left’s Outrage Over Teaching Free-Enterprise in Universities


For the last few years, America has been slowly awakened to the level of Marxism taught in American classrooms. From the of taking public school students to Cuba and the NEA’s reccommendation of Saul Alinsky to the most recent revelation of the University of Missouri’s “Introduction to Labor Studies” taught by two Marxists who, in addition to allegedly giving a Communist organizer two hours of class time to recruit, also shared the finer points of industrial sabotage and cat electrocutions.

 

According to a student who was enrolled in the class, the professors politicized the classroom by bashing Scott Walker and Republicans, allegedly stating at one point:

“The Republican party has done a great job of reducing class to a bunch of tastes, and demonizing liberals because their taste is different from ‘rednecks.’”

Moreover, regarding the Communist organizer who was given two hours to recruit in class, the student noted:

Pecinovsky also described the dues requirements and initiation procedures of the Communist Party, and gave out his phone number several times, offering to stay as long as anyone wanted to talk to him about joining.

Prof. Ancel acknowledged that joining the Communist Party could cost students their future security clearances, make them less desirable to future employers, and potentially put them on federal watch lists. Still, she and Prof, Giljum invited this organization into class to recruit. Call me crazy, but I thought universities and professors were supposed to help students become more appealing to employers, not hook them up with questionable organizations that by their own admission could cost students their future livelihood.

Given the level of Marxism and outright socialism raging through America’s publicly-funded institutions, it is somewhat ironic (and not the least bit hypocritical) that the Left becomes hysterical when individuals who donate their private money to universities and have the audacity to place some conditions on their donations.

Last week, Bloomberg reported on former BB&T Corp. chairman John Allison’s giving of grants of up to $2 million to schools if they create a course on capitalism and make Atlas Shrugged required reading.

Allison’s crusade to counter what he considers the anti- capitalist orthodoxy at universities has produced results — and controversy. Some 60 schools, including at least four campuses of the University of North Carolina, began teaching Rand’s book after getting the foundation money. Faculty at several schools that have accepted Allison’s terms are protesting, saying donors shouldn’t have the power to set the curriculum to pursue their political agendas, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its June issue.

“We have sought out professors who wanted to teach these ideas,” says Allison, now a professor at Wake Forest University’s business school in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. “It’s really a battle of ideas. If the ideas that made America great aren’t heard, then their influence will be destroyed.”

In Florida, the Left’s favorite boogeymen du jour, the Koch Brothers, are taking heat for putting stipulations on the $1.5 million the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation is giving Florida State University for a new program promoting “political economy and free enterprise.” Not surprisingly, for its money, the foundation wants the ability to “screen and sign off on” new hires. Given the amount of Marxistsm in academia, it’s easy to see why a donor like Koch would want to ensure an instructor being hired to teach free enterprise isn’t one like those who teach the University of Missouri’s Introduction to Labor Studies. For all the angst the donors like Allison and Koch are causing the Left, even the New York Times notes the schools could refuse to accept the donations:

One could argue that such conditions compromise academic freedom, and allow the education of today’s impressionable youth to be dictated by the highest bidder. But colleges are not required to accept these gifts. If they found the conditions truly objectionable — or at least if their objections outweighed the additional good the money could do — they could always graciously decline the money.

Meanwhile, as the Left protests private money “compromising” academic freedom, taxpayer money (as well as private) still pours into colleges and universities to teach students about union activism and, to varying degrees, social justice (aka socialism). Here are just a few (with partial descriptions):

  • Cipriani College of Labor and Co-operative Studies
  • City College of San Francisco The City College Labor Studies program was created by the San Francisco labor movement in association with the college. Its aim is to prepare students for careers in the labor movement and in labor relations, and to educate workers about their rights.
  • Cornell University ILR School: ILR Extension Labor Programs are designed to deepen the knowledge and strengthen the skills of union leaders and activists, as well as unorganized workers interested in joining together for protection and benefits on the job. Partnering with unions and other worker-focused organizations, ILR Extension labor faculty conduct critical research, provide comprehensive education and training, and offer a variety of customized services focused on labor, employment and workplace issues.
  • CUNY Murphy Institute for Worker Education & Labor Studies Queens College (NY) Provides credit and non-credit courses to union members who receive tuition support from their unions. [Note: The unions probably would not want a proponent of capitalism teaching these courses, would they?]
  • DePaul Labor Education Program: The DePaul Labor Education Center offers a three-year certificate program in Labor Leadership that trains union members to become union leaders.
  • Florida International University Center for Labor Research and Studies: Houses projects such as the Immigration and Ethnicity Institute, the Human and Labor Rights Institute, Applied and Theoretical Research Projects, Florida Labor Archives, International Labor Program Union Leadership Academy Certificate Program, and Workplace Issues Certificate Program.
  • GA State University Labor Studies Program: Classes are usually sponsored by local unions, central bodies, union regional offices, or the Ga. State AFL-CIO.
  • Harvard Trade Union Program: The Labor and Worklife Program is a public policy and research center at Harvard Law School, which sponsors the Harvard Trade Union Program an annual, 6-week residential session for approximately 30 experienced union officials and senior staff focusing on strategic planning and leadership skills. Additionally, the program organizes conferences, symposiums, and shorter educational sessions on important issues facing the labor movement.
  • Indiana University Division of Labor Studies …Institute for the Study of Labor in Society that provides technical consulting in economic policy, labor resources, market research, public opinion and workplace education programs policy, etc.
  • Jefferson State Community College Center for Labor Education and Research CLEAR CLEAR designs and presents university level education programs for workers and their representatives.
  • Middle Tennessee State University The Tennessee Center for Labor-Management Relations (TNCLMR) is funded by the Department of Labor and Workforce Development and is associated with Middle Tennessee State University.
  • Pennsylvania Center for the Study of Labor Relations: Workshops currently being offered by the center include steward training, worker safety and health, and negotiations.
  • Rutgers Labor Education Program Labor studies and employment relations examines work, workers, the organizations employees create to defend their interests and non-work phenomena that affect and are affected by workers.
  • South Seattle Community College Labor Center: The Labor Center at South Seattle Community College is Washington State’s only statewide higher education outreach program providing direct educational and research services to labor unions. The Labor Center’s mission is to help union and community members develop the skills, confidence, and knowledge that will enable them to become more effective leaders, staff, and rank-and-file activists.
  • UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education Our curricula and leadership trainings serve to educate a diverse new generation of labor leaders.
  • UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education As part of the Institute of Industrial Relations (IIR), the UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education plays a unique role as a bridge between the university and the labor community in Southern California….Through its extensive connections with unions and workers, the Labor Center also provides labor with important and clearly defined access to UCLA’s resources and programs. An advisory committee comprised of about forty Southern California labor and community leaders (representing more than one million members in the public and private sectors) provides advice and support for the center
  • UMass Amherst Labor Center With course work in history, law, economics, research, organizing, and bargaining, we equip our graduates to work in the labor movement and associated social justice organizations.
  • UMass Boston Labor Resource Center The Center advocates for economic and social justice for working families as they seek to gain control over their futures at work, in their communities, and in the political arena. We lend our skills, expertise, and resources to workplace and community activists, assisting them in building a powerful, inclusive labor movement that can effectively advocate for all working people.
  • UMass Dartmouth Arnold M. Dubin Labor Education Center The Arnold M. Dubin Labor Education Center was established in 1975 to meet the educational needs of workers as members and leaders in the labor movement and as active and responsible citizens in the community. [Note: Mr. Dubin may have had some input as to how his money was used to promote the labor movement.]

Of course, there is also the aforementioned University of MO Kansas CIty Institute for Labor Studies:

The Institute for Labor Studies offers credit and non-credit courses on a wide range of labor issues including bargaining, grievance handling, internal organizing, the global economy, labor history. It offers custom training for unions and a Labor Studies Credit Certificate Program on the Interactive Video Network in cooperation with other Missouri labor education programs. It’s Labor in the Schools program has developed a 15-hour curriculum appropriate for high school 11th grade social studies classes and adaptable for apprenticeship and union education programs. ILS also sponsors and coordinates The Heartland Labor Forum, a one-hour weekly radio show on community radio in Kansas City. ILS does programming and tours on maquiladora issues in Mexico.

You probably noted in the program description, there is nothing about teaching the finer points of industrial sabotage, the electrocution of cats, and the recruitment of young Communists. Then again, since the program is at least partially funded with tax-payer money, they wouldn’t want to be that blatant.

While there are others of more or less Marxist leanings, the University of Wisconsin School for Workers (in Madison, Wisconsin) is noted as the “oldest University labor education program in North America.”

And, of course, let us not forget that unions donate money to colleges to influence academia, like Harvard’s Jerry Wurf Memorial Fund, which is paid for by AFSCME.

The Jerry Wurf Memorial Fund of the LWP was established in 1982 in memory of the late President of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Its income is used to initiate programs and activities that:

[R]eflect Jerry Wurf’s belief in the dignity of work, and his commitment to improving the quality of lives of working people, to free open thought and debate about public policy issues, to informed political action…and to reflect his interests in the quality of management in public service, especially as it assures the ability of workers to do their jobs with maximum effect and efficiency in environments sensitive to their needs [...]

Last, but not least, is the National Labor College/George Meany Center:

The National Labor College (NLC) is one of a kind, the only college in the United States with an exclusive mission to serve the educational needs of the labor movement. It is an activist institution made up of students, faculty and alumni who together form a learning community based on a common understanding of the world of work and the ecology of the labor movement. The College respects that its student body is made up of experienced, highly skilled working adults who have multiple commitments to family, job, union and community. In its academic programs, the NLC honors higher learning that takes place both inside and outside the collegiate community.

The National Labor College is partially funded by the AFL-CIO (paid for by member dues) and is affiliated with numerous (publicly-funded) universities. Though this is just a guess, the AFL-CIO would probably strenuously object to a free-market economist like Walter Williams being hired to teach at the National Labor College.

It’s unfortunate that businessmen are being chastised for donating money to colleges and having to stipulate that the money be used to promote free-markets. Then again, with so many schools openly embracing Marxist ideology, the hypocrisy of the Left-wing academia in this area is not one that is unexpected.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter



RSS feed

31 Comments Leave a comment

Sometimes, I really miss the USSR

gpclaw Saturday, May 14th at 10:06AM EDT (link)

I’m using hyperbole, but in many ways, the world seem much simpler during the Cold War era. I don’t recall all of this fascination with Marxist ideology. The Soviets served as a daily reminder of why collectivism is so evil, and that capitalism is the best path to liberty.

As far as the professors whining about strings being attached to private donations – if you don’t like the terms, don’t take the cash. Of course, they have zero issue with the conditions the feds place on government funding.

It was there during the cold war...

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 1:37PM EDT (link)

It was deliberately placed there seed by seed by communists over decades and this is just part of the fruit being born of that long term war view/effort of communism vs. everyone else for the last century including the part most of us think of as “the cold war”.

Razz Etc!
“Best Poker book written ever!!!” – Author’s unbiased opinion…

 

Not to worry China is waiting for

ihateliberals Monday, May 16th at 11:24AM EDT (link)

us to default on our loans or to move our manufacturing back to the USA. Talk about war.

 
 

You Forgot ISU

freemanja1991 (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 10:11AM EDT (link)

Iowa State, is getting the Harkin Institute. Proposed by his wife (no conflict of interest right?) Who was appointed to the board of regents. It is to Highlight his policy priorities. Because (supposedly) there are no places at the university highlighting these policies. I am, as a pissed student, considering seeing if I can sue to stop this (find a law it violates or if it violates the mission statement of ISU).

It would be different if it was done by someone other than his wife, posthumously, and was not teaching his bias, just giving the university his senate memorabilia.

Grassley is more deserving.

http://theiowarepublican.com/home/2011/04/26/senate-and-governor-urge-board-of-regents-to-hold-off-on-harkin-institute/

On Top of this how many legislatures do we control, let’s legislate this stuff out of existence.

 

Berkeley Center for Labor Research

Vannek Saturday, May 14th at 10:33AM EDT (link)

“UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education Our curricula and leadership trainings serve to educate a diverse new generation of labor leaders.”

I work at UC Berkeley. About two years ago, a piece of misdirected mail was delivered to me. It was a donation check from the SEIU to the Berkeley Center for Labor Research. I mentioned this fact at the UC Berkeley blogsite, and of course a rep from the Center insisted that they do “non-partisan labor research.” Yeah, right.

 

they would have loved to have someone like me in that classroom

kyle8 (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 10:35AM EDT (link)

HHMMM Let’s see, Communism is directly responsibe for the death of about 60 million people, and so entirely bankrupt that Russia and China have both abandoned it entirely. Yeah, that sounds like something I want to be involved with!

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

kyle8, capitalism went from being "the ultimate evil"

lineholder (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 1:14PM EDT (link)

to being a necessary evil. Interesting how the need for economic survival can change perspective.

Off topic from this diary and no threadjack intended, but I was reading an article yesterday evening that stated that China will soon be entering that territory of rapidly declining population totals. China’s one-child reproductive policies have been in place for 35 years now. Life expectancy increased from 46 years of age to almost 70. So China will soon be looking at an aging society of citizens in their golden years. (This is in a primarily mfg, export-dependent society)

The nation now has a disproportionate number of males to females (120 to 100) which could be problematic in restoring the 2.1 reproduction rate necessary to sustain population from generation to generation. (Infanticide of female babies is still high, it’s a societal “thing” among the Chinese to have male babies).

The gov’t has lightened up on these regulations in specific areas, but the general populace has now become acclimated to a totally different lifestyle and some members of the population are choosing to go childless.

Unintended consequences of socialism??

quite right

kyle8 (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 5:59PM EDT (link)

China will be facing absolute demographic decline very soon.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

Not to mention all those "broken branches"...

acat (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 6:17PM EDT (link)

will generate societal pressure toward adventurism….A foreign war bride is better than no bride at all.

Biology is destiny, in some ways.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 

The Free Market is not a Republican Idea It is a Liberal Idea

mrpresident (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 10:37AM EDT (link)

The Free market ideology is a neoliberal idea, it is killing us and if you support it you are no different than Obama….

The goal of neoliberal economic globalization is the removal of all barriers to commerce, and the privatization of all available resources and services. In this scenario, public life will be at the mercy of market forces, as the extracted profits benefit the few, writes Rajesh Makwana.

The thrust of international policy behind the phenomenon of economic globalization is neoliberal in nature. Being hugely profitable to corporations and the wealthy elite, neoliberal polices are propagated through the IMF, World Bank and WTO. Neoliberalism favours the free-market as the most efficient method of global resource allocation. Consequently it favours large-scale, corporate commerce and the privatization of resources. http://www.stwr.org/globalization/neoliberalism-and-economic-globalization.html

“I don’t care who writes a nation’s laws, or crafts its advanced treatises, if I can write its economics textbooks.” So said one of the greatest textbook writers of them all, Paul Samuelson.

But even Samuelson didn’t live forever—he died in 2009 aged 94—and now others decide what the rising generation is reading. It is a fair bet that, on one of the most critical issues of modern economic policy, his successors’ books would not meet with the master’s approval. That issue is trade.

Although Samuelson spent most of his life promoting unqualified free trade, he came close in his declining years to admitting he was wrong. In a paper in 2004, he suggested that there might be some circumstances in which a nation did not benefit from free trade. His analysis was carefully hedged; but, given his unique status not only as a textbook writer but as the first American economist to win a Nobel Prize, the effect on the faithful was as if the pope had conceded there might not be a God after all.

Many of America’s thinking classes are no longer willing to drink the Kool-Aid. As the most recent presidential administrations have staggered from one economic debacle to another, economists have found themselves pilloried not only for failing to offer timely warnings of the dangers ahead but, in far too many cases, for the erstwhile rapture with which they endorsed the policies that resulted in the Wall Street train wreck. The result, as the Washington-

James Fallows pointed out that there is increasing doubt these days about almost every aspect of established economic wisdom. Fallows, an author on East Asian trade who learned his economics as a Rhodes scholar at Oxford, adds: “I don’t think that anything as coherent as a new view, or systematic critique, has emerged. It’s more an inchoate sense that the established ‘laws’ and principles are increasingly mismatched to the observed realities.”

WHAT ARE THOSE REALITIES?

The following are 28 statistics about the gutting of the U.S. economy that will blow your mind….

#1 According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. trade deficit for the month of March was $48.2 billion. That was up from $45.4 billion in February.

#2 The United States has had a negative trade balance every single yearsince 1976.

#3 Between December 2000 and December 2010, the U.S. ran a total trade deficit of 6.1 trillion dollars.

#4 The U.S. trade deficit with China in March was $18.1 billion. This is money that is not going to support U.S. businesses and U.S. workers. If that money was actually going to our businesses and to our workers it would increase tax revenues.

#5 Since China entered the WTO in 2001, the U.S. trade deficit with China has grown by an average of 18% per year.

#6 During 2010, we spent $365 billion on goods and services from China while they only spent $92 billion on goods and services from us.

#7 Since 2005, Americans have gobbled up Chinese products and services totaling $1.1 trillion, but the Chinese have only spent $272 billion on American goods and services.

#8 The U.S. trade deficit with China in 2010 was 27 times larger than it was back in 1990.

#9 According to a recent report from the Economic Policy Institute, between 2001 and 2008 the United States lost 2.4 million jobs due to the growing trade deficit with China. Every single state in America experienced a net job loss due to our trade deficit with China during that time period.

#10 The United States has lost an average of 50,000 manufacturing jobs per month since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.

#11 The United States has lost a staggering 32 percent of its manufacturing jobs since the year 2000.

#12 Between December 2000 and December 2010, 38 percent of the manufacturing jobs in Ohio were lost, 42 percent of the manufacturing jobs in North Carolina were lost and 48 percent of the manufacturing jobs in Michigan were lost.

#13 Back in 1970, 25 percent of all jobs in the United States were manufacturing jobs. Today, only 9 percent of the jobs in the United States are manufacturing jobs.

#14 China produced 19.8 percent of all the goods consumed in the world last year. The United States only produced 19.4 percent.

#15 According to the IMF, China is going to have the largest economy in the world by 2016.

#16 Nobel economist Robert W. Fogel of the University of Chicago is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three times larger than the U.S. economy by the year 2040 if current trends continue.

#17 Back in 1998, the United States had 25 percent of the world’s high tech export market and China had just 10 percent. Ten years later, the United States had less than 15 percent and China’s share had soared to 20 percent.

#18 Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry was actually lower in 2010 than it was in 1975.

#19 In 2002, the United States had a trade deficit in “advanced technology products” of $16 billion with the rest of the world. In 2010, that number skyrocketed to $82 billion.

#20 Last year, China produced 11 times as much steel as the United States did.

#21 Do you remember when the United States was the dominant manufacturer of automobiles and trucks on the globe? Well, in 2010 the U.S. ran a trade deficit in automobiles, trucks and parts of $110 billion.

#22 In 2010, South Korea exported 12 times as many automobiles, trucks and parts to us as we exported to them.

#23 According to one recent study, China could become the global leader in patent filings by next year.

#24 China is now the number one supplier of components that are critical to the operation of U.S. defense systems.

#25 In 2010, the number one U.S. export to China was “scrap and trash”.

#26 Thanks to our exploding trade deficit with China, the Chinese have accumulated nearly 3 trillion dollars in foreign currency reserves. That is the largest stockpile of foreign currency reserves on the entire globe.

#27 The amount of the trade deficit that can be attributed to foreign oil is at the highest level that we have seen since 2008.

#28 It is being projected that for the first time ever, the OPEC nations are going to bring in over a trillion dollars from exporting oil this year. Their biggest customer is the United States………

you are an economic illiterate and you will get nowhere on a site like this spreading that socialist BS

kyle8 (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 10:52AM EDT (link)

point one: The so called trade deficit is meaningless. When people enter into voluntary exchanges then they are better off than they were before, Otherwise they would spend their money elsewhere

point two: If china is becoming the leader in world economics then that is a good, and natural thing. It is because the largest nation in the world finally embraced economic freedom. It means that they become not only a major exporter, but as wealth increases they also become a major market for the rest of the world.

Point 3: When one group of people gain wealth due to commerce, it does not meant that another group of people have lost wealth. It is not a zero sum game. When people are free of undue government coercion they become efficient, and that efficiency helps to create wealth.

point 4; I find it amusing that so many people are apoplectic about the rise of free trade around the globe, and the rise of China. But we have more wealth as individuals, and a higher living standard than in the so called boom years of the 1950′s and 60′s. In fact, except for the recession, which won’t last forever, we are better off by every measurable than ever before.

point 5: Globalism and free markets have been responsible for raising the standard of living of literally BILLIONS of people from abject poverty to a middle class status in just the last thirty years. This lessens the pressures of war, revolution, and every other bad thing.

point 7: you are a gullible nincompoop, I suggest you read some economics books, Here are two: Basic Economics, and Advanced Economics, by Thomas Sowell.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

You tell him, Kyle

GregInFla (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 3:14PM EDT (link)

I’d add Sowell’s Applied Economics as the first reader for this student, and maybe Free To Choose for his dessert. For the record, I stopped after maybe his fifth point. Millions of the Chinese and Indian people are out of poverty due to capitalism. Same in nearly every part of the world. Socialism never made anyone but the govt leaders better off. The so-called “poor” here in USA would not be considered poor anywhere else.


– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.

 
 

ATTN mrpresident

Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 11:04AM EDT (link)

We don’t want our comments section fouled with your cut and paste nonsense.

Do it again and I’ll deactivate your account.

Got it? That’s a yes or no question, by the way.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Like!

freemanja1991 (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 11:51AM EDT (link)

Bless you!

 
 
 

Ronald Reagan, Lincoln, Teddy, Hamilton were all Protectionists but evidently today they would be called socialists

mrpresident (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 11:13AM EDT (link)

Well I guess facts are not something you are familiar with, it is you who are naive. Free Trade is not Republican…Unless of course you call Lincoln a socialist too and agree with FDR….

**Northern Progressives sought free trade to undermine the power base of Republicans** –

Woodrow Wilson would admit as much in a speech to Congress. A brief resurgence by Republicans in the 1920s was disastrous for them. Woodrow Wilson’s ideological understudy, Franklin Roosevelt, would essentially blame the Great Depression upon the protectionist policies exemplified by the previous Republican President, Herbert Hoover……….

So if a “socialist” Democrat like FDR supported free trade and was against protectionism to undermine the Republicans why is it that Republicans so staunchly support it today? Look at CATO, Heritage et al…

In pro-Lincoln newspapers, the phrase “free trade” was invoked as the equivalent of industrial suicide. HELLLOOOO!

In the Confederate Constitution is a clause that has no parallel in the U.S. Constitution. It affirms strong support for free trade and opposition to protectionism: “but no bounties shall be granted from the Treasury; nor shall any duties or taxes on importation from foreign nations be laid to promote or foster any branch of industry.”……….

READ THIS FROM THE CATO INSTITUTE AND THEN YOU WILL CALL REAGAN A SOCIALIST TOO.

May 30, 1988
The Reagan Record On Trade:
Rhetoric Vs. Reality THE CATO INSTITUTE

The Reagan administration has failed to promote free trade. Ronald Reagan by his actions has become the most protectionist president since Herbert Hoover, the heavyweight champion of protectionists.

THE ENTIRE ARTICLE IS HERE http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa107.html

I’m no socialist, I’m a Republican in the truest since. You are a neoliberal pla

then how did cato miss this.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 11:30AM EDT (link)

http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Ronald_Reagan_Free_Trade.htm

excerpt:
“Reagan himself was a dreamer, capable of imagining a world without trade barriers. In announcing his presidential candidacy in Nov. 1979, he had proposed a “North American accord” in which commerce & people would move freely across the borders of Canada & Mexico”.

It seems cato has a sective reading problem.

Do a search on; “ronald reagan free trade”
Give it a try, it’s not that hard.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

The Cato article was written 5 months before

gpclaw Saturday, May 14th at 5:26PM EDT (link)

Reagan signed the Canada-US Free Trade act, in October on 1988. The process had stalled, and this was Cato’s attempt to light a fire under the administration.

Once the agreement was signed, Cato has portrayed Reagan as a strong defender of free trade.

Then the poster should have used the updated article.

gekster (Diary) Sunday, May 15th at 1:40PM EDT (link)

And not try to misslead.

(sorry for the late reply)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

Nail on head

gpclaw Sunday, May 15th at 2:51PM EDT (link)

Oh, he’s definitely trying to mislead. He’s attempting to use the words of ‘credible” conservatives, to pursue a liberal agenda. He stated in an earlier posting that he voted for Obama, and has never voted Republican.

The big mistake he made, and made by many on the left, is assuming that Libertarians and Conservatives are one in the same. Cato is a Libertarian think tank, not Conservative. Sure, their are many areas where the two ideologies share common ground, but to use the words of a Libertarian think tank, as a “smoking gun” against the ideas of Conservatism, is flawed.

 
 
 
 

Yes, well, they also believed that slavery was something we just had to live with.

kyle8 (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 11:43AM EDT (link)

Fortunately we have learned a lot and progressed in two hundred years. Trade restrictions are merely the arbitrary use by producers (ie. the rich) of government power to keep themselves free from competition, and drive up the price for the consumers (us).

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

The Fiasco of Free Trade is all Richard Nixon's fault..Well him and a liberal economist named Milton Friedman

mrpresident (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 12:50PM EDT (link)

In 1973 President Richard Nixon cut U.S. tariffs to all time lows, which moved the United States further in the free market direction, and away from its American School economic system.

The term “American System,” was coined by Clay to distinguish it, as a school of thought, from the competing theory of economics at the time, the “British System” represented by Adam Smith in his work Wealth of Nations.
It represented the legacy of Alexander Hamilton, who in his Report on Manufactures, argued that the U.S. could not become fully independent until it was self-sufficient in all necessary economic products.

The American School included three cardinal policy points:
Support industry: The advocacy of protectionism, and opposition to free trade – particularly for the protection of “infant industries” and those facing import competition from abroad.

The Republicans have had the equivalent of the Invasion of the Body Snatchers since Nixon and the invaders are neoliberals.

Republicans like me who have not been snatched are now the enemy of “republicanism” and called socialists.

Read this it describes our current economic philosophy and yes it is liberal…………

Are you a Neoliberal?

Neoliberalism is one of the names that is used to describe a certain economic ideology. It can also be called corporate capitalism, corporate globalization, globalization, and even suicide economics. This ideology is what actually dominates the politics of the global economy. This is a brief explaination of how neoliberalism was created, how it came to dominate the economic world, how neoliberalism affects the communities of the world, what “foundations” sustain this monster, and finally, other forms of structuring economies.

The History of Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism has not always existed. Actually, it is quite a young system of thought – it became the dominant economic ideology only within the last twenty-five or thirty years. The previous system, which dated from approximately the end of the 1930s until the late 1970s, was formed in large part by the ideas of the English economist, John Maynard Keynes, and by his influence which is known as “Keynesianism.” Without rejecting capitalism, Keynes decided that the State should take an active role in managing the economy of its country. In Keynesianism, the State imposes rules and supervises the market to direct the economy towards priorities it previously determined. The State was never intended to supplant the market, but rather to regulate it. For example, the State could require that a part of the profits of foreign investors must be re-invested within the country; or it could impose tariffs on foreign products to protect national industries; or the State could invest in its national markets to promote public objectives. In conclusion: in Keynesianism, the market was subordinate to the power of the State.

But while Keynesianism dominated the global economy, another very influential economist, Milton Friedman, proposed an economic model based on principles that are practically contrary to those of Keynes – a model that forms the base of what is now known as neoliberalism.

Friedman proposed that the State should almost never intervene in the national economy – which is to say that the control of the economy would be in the hands of private capital and not in the hands of the State. It criticized national governments for its enormous and inefficient bureaucracies that impeded the optimal functioning of the market. As advisor to US Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, Milton Friedman came to have a decisive influence over the structuring of the global economy. The latter, accompanied by his counterpart, Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, began to put Friedman’s economic theories into practice. With the objective of permitting corporations and investors to maximize their profits by operating freely in any part of the world, these two leaders promoted the policies of free trade, deregulation, privatization of public enterprises, lower inflation, the unrestricted movement of capital, and balanced budgets (by spending what is collected in taxes)……

Ronald Reagan said, “What is a conservative after all but one who conserves, one who is committed to protecting and holding close the things by which we live.

To conserve is to protect and Reagan was a protectionist therefore a “conserve” ative. Like me, not a socialist.

G'bye

Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 12:58PM EDT (link)

You were warned

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 

Where did you learn economics, a Naomi Wolf polemic?

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 1:40PM EDT (link)

Nixon was pretty much as far from a neoliberal (or any other kind of liberal) as you could find. Reagan was more of a monetarist, and Thatcher was, from what I could tell, an Austrian. Thatcher’s policies worked tremendously well for a UK weighted down by debt, government and unions; Reagan unfortunately was tied down by the Dem Congress most of his time in office, but those changes that he did make were very positive (as was his support of Paul Volcker in the Fed).

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 
 

Drive by, ahistorical talking points.

Loren Heal (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 12:53PM EDT (link)

Your comment follows a particular form of ad hominem attack most favored by the left.

1. Find a conservative hero or icon.
2. Find, distort, and misuse a quote or action from that icon.
3. Apply that in some way to all conservatives or Republicans.

Note that I am not saying you are anything but what you say you are, although claiming to be a Republican is another common tactic of the left.

What I am saying is that times change and conditions change. If you’re holding us to the actions of Lincoln in war time, or even more his allied newspapers, then I would say you should be put in jail for opposing our point of view, as his opponents were. See how silly that is?

Cato, for instance, is a fine organization, but sometimes in their writings one can find basic gaps in logic and historical awareness. I would not be surprised if they note that Reagan signed a treaty, and therefore give him credit and blame for everything in it, good and bad, and for the effects of that treaty after his departure from office. Also, though he may have favored the treaty, that doesn’t mean that he wasn’t working with the Senate he had, which was one controlled by Democrats.


Join the Concord Project, and follow @lheal, if you dare.

 
 

Amazing! Thinking of all that money and effort

lineholder (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 12:54PM EDT (link)

invested by the left into promotion of socialistic principles via education…how many people could be free of poverty in our own country had they focused on other things instead?

How many people in the world could be free of poverty?

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 1:41PM EDT (link)

If some many people weren’t power mongering socialist/communist/marxist/islamist/nearly_anything_else-ist/ism win at all costs SOBs with no care for the rights of others?

Razz Etc!
“Best Poker book written ever!!!” – Author’s unbiased opinion…

correction

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 1:41PM EDT (link)

“so many” not “some many”… pimf.

Razz Etc!
“Best Poker book written ever!!!” – Author’s unbiased opinion…

 
 
 

I went to post the videos of the professors teaching sabotage

johnnyd (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 3:07PM EDT (link)

and they all have been scrubbed from Youtube. They have also scrubbed Richard Trumkas speech at the European Democratic Socialists convention.

They are actively removing any evidence against the cause of marxist/communism.

It is getting scary the amount of money and effort they are putting into taking over the media, ALL media types.

Here is the video Johnnyd

PowerToThePeople (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 3:13PM EDT (link)

Thank you very much /nt

johnnyd (Diary) Saturday, May 14th at 4:14PM EDT (link)
 
 
 

This article emphasizes the need for parents to stay in

ihateliberals Monday, May 16th at 11:31AM EDT (link)

charge of their childs education from K-1 through College. If we conservative parents rely on the school system to teach the right things then we are remiss in our responsibilities of parenting. My youngest of 5 children is now 24 and she is a conservative free enterprise type person. throughout all of my children’s schooling I had to counter much of what they were being taught in History, Social Studies and a slew of other things. I am very thankful that my children are now all conservatives. One of my children was a diehard liberal and then something happened. He came to me one day and said “Dad, now I understand”. The life changing event was he got married and had a child. Now he has to work very hard to keep roof and food for his family. he detest people that won’t work and expect the government to give to them. he knows now tht it is his money.