« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Unions Panic as Reality Sets In: Obama’s EPA Will Kill ‘Tens of Thousands’ of Jobs

Union bosses dumped hundreds of millions of dollars of their members’ dues into getting Barack Obama elected. They chastised the racists in their ranks, downplayed his socialist rhetoric, and they thought he would be their union savior. Worse, union bosses put both their members’ money and their livelihoods in his hands. Apparently, union bosses could have their cake and eat it too (or so they thought).

In their rush to promote those so-called “green jobs” union bosses convinced themselves (and their members) that there would be no displacement, no job losses, no casualties or no pain in Obama’s plan of hope and change. They were wrong.

This would be the “hope” and “change” part of moving the American economy to a “green economy“:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed the first-ever national standards for mercury, arsenic and other emissions from power plants. The new power plant mercury and air toxics standards would require many power plants to install emissions control technologies to cut mercury, arsenic, chromium, nickel and acid gases emissions.

The updated standards will attempt to provide a level playing field for power plants across the country. The proposed rule provides up to four years for facilities to meet the standards and, once fully implemented, will prevent 91 percent of mercury in coal from being released into the air. EPA expects the new rule will support 31,000 short-term construction jobs and 9,000 long-term utility jobs.

This would be reality smacking the union bosses at the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers squarely in the face

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) said it believes a three-year timeframe for reducing emissions of carbon, mercury and other pollutants through the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standard is not realistic. The union is backing a bill calling for Congress to delay new rules on emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Union official said they have met with the EPA to discuss concerns and recognize the agency has limited discretion and flexibility in addressing compliance timelines because it is bound by federal court mandates.

The union said 50,000 jobs are at stake if power plants cannot get an extra five or six years to either clean up or shut down their oldest coal-fired power plants. Under the Clean Air Act, plants get three years with a possible one-year extension after that to install emissions control equipment.

And this would be reality hitting the United Mine Workers’ President Cecil Roberts in the face as well…

The Clean Air Act’s deadline for meeting the new regulations is just 36 months after the rules are finalized in November. EPA can grant a one-year extension on a case-by-case basis. While some generating units will be retrofitted with additional pollution controls to meet the standards, hundreds of smaller and older units will simply be closed.

Tens of thousands of jobs will be lost in the utility, coal and transportation sectors. Hundreds of communities will suffer as their tax bases shrink with the closure of nearby utility plants. Industrial states that were hit hard by the recession and still suffering from high unemployment will take another, needless hit.

To make matters worse, the new source limits EPA is proposing are so stringent that no new state-of-the-art power plant equipped with highly efficient scrubbers and other pollution controls could meet each of the multiple standards. Some of the new source standards are below the detection limits of current monitoring and testing equipment.

Unfortunately, union bosses either ignored Barack Obama (or were just plain ignorant) when he warned America of his plans back in 2008:

It didn’t take a rocket scientist to know that Obama’s plans would cost jobs—many of those jobs occupied by union members. Beyond the hype of ‘hope’ and ‘change,’ it’s become all too clear that union bosses sold their members a bill of goods.

It’s a good thing union bosses don’t build rockets.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • http://slcliberty.blogivists.com randy streu

    a voice, crying in the wilderness. Or, you know, AN ENTIRE POLITICAL PARTY.

    The chickens… are comin’ home… to roost.

    • paramedichess

      It’s almost as if elections have consequences. Who knew?

  • renny

    From the housing debacle (on-going and and terrible drag on the entire economy) to higher gasoline and fuel prices (just wait until another bad winter and home heating expenses) to the permatorium on oil drilling in the US (everywhere, not just the Gulf Coast) to the EPA rampages through all industry to the orig. 2008 stock market crash that lost 50% of equity and murdered many middle class investors’ life’s savings, all have meant nothing to the boy king.

    Now, he flits around in Air Force One at $185,000 a mile telling us to buy high-price smaller electic cars, not filling up any gas tank of his own, and looking down his nose at anyone who protests taxes or his policies.

    The best thing about o’s trashing Israel is that MAYBE the Jewish vote, an important intellectual influence on many campuses and in the arts, might decide it doesn’t like having Israel thrown under the bus with o’s other discards and will not work, support, or vote for the fraud in chief.

  • radicalrighty

    You reap what you sow . . .

  • Right Reason

    . . .that the union bosses’ primary concern was for their workers. Dangerous assumption, that.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      that the NLRB existed to help control the workers, that cat should have jumped right out of the bag.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      think union bosses have their members as their primary concern.

      There’s a difference.

  • jaykali

    We know it won’t happen. What happened to ‘equal protection under the law?’ It’s been changed to ‘preferred protection if you have friends in washington’. So if there’s a cadillac tax on insurance plans, no worries – are you in a union? We’ll just carve out an exception! Need to disclose donations? Oh wait we’ll carve out exceptions if you’re a union.

    • http://slcliberty.blogivists.com randy streu

      What’re the Union bosses gonna do, after all? Vote Republican?

  • http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/ Jason Gillman

    Frankly the membership must be putting a little worry in the empty space between the ears of union leadership. Normally they wouldn’t worry too much about this stuff.

    In Michigan and elsewhere, manufacturing relies on cheap and energy. In Michigan, we are ramping up a major Right-To-Work effort that will be helped by a growth in distrust of union leadership knowing what is best, or recognizing danger signs to their membership.

    As someone else alluded, they could have seen this coming.

    • Next93

      This idea that an “addiction to cheap energy”is unique to Americans is idiotic. The entire industrial revolution (and the resulting, unprecedented leap in the human standard of living) is based is based on the use of”cheap energy”.

      To live in a world where wind, sun, and muscle are the only forms of energy available, we’ll have to return to a pre-industrial existance.

  • freshhorsesnow

    and the American people might actually benefit from it.

    When the membership gets some clarity on the situation, they might be inclined to support candidates that have sound domestic policies which create and protect jobs in the USA. Not align themselves with one political party or another.

    If the American people stood together and demanded from ALL elected officials accountability; along with consequences, we could turn this ship around.

    “American people over American politics.”