« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Machinists’ Catch 22: Boeing Employee Files NLRB Charge Against Union

Since President Obama’s NLRB announced its prosecution of the Boeing Company some weeks ago for its opening a second 787 assembly line in South Carolina, the media and politicians have had much to say about the NLRB’s attack on business, Right to Work States, as well as the obvious overreach of a union-backed labor board attempting to make business decisions.

However, less well publicized is the simple story of how the employees in South Carolina were once unionized by the very union the NLRB is going to bat for—the Machinists’ union. That is they were until they kicked the union out of Charleston.

In fact, in all likelihood, were it not for the fact that the employees in South Carolina chose to exercise their legal rights to decertify the union, the Machinists (as their legal bargaining representative) would not have pursued charges against Boeing—charges that, if the union and NLRB are successful, will most likely destroy the South Carolina jobs.

If the union would have filed the same charges against Boeing while the employees were members of the union, the union’s actions the South Carolina employees could have filed charges against the union for a failure to represent them.

However, since the employees had decertified the union, the union’s charges against Boeing (as well as the NLRB’s complaint and remedy to take the work from South Carolina) appear to be nothing more than retaliation against the Charleston employees for exercising their right to become union free. [This was noted here last week.]

Furthermore, since the union is allegedly still pursuing the [re]unionization of the Charleston employees with a promise that, if they unionize, the union would bring job security to the Charleston employees (inferring that the union would make the case against Boeing would go away if Charleston employees were unionized), this would indicate the union is holding employees’ jobs hostage. If true, this could also be considered unlawful coercion on the part of the union.

Reaching a similar conclusion, last Wednesday, attorneys for the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed an Unfair Labor Practice charge with the NLRB on behalf of a Charleston employee at Boeing.

Yesterday (6/15/2011) National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation attorneys filed Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) charges against the Machinist union (IAM) for their client Dennis Murray, who previously led a successful effort to decertify the Machinist union at Boeing’s Charleston facility.

Murray claims that the union’s current charges against Boeing and the resulting Obama appointee National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Lafe Solomon’s complaint against Boeing that would eliminate over 1,000 existing jobs in South Carolina are the result of retaliation against him and the workers of South Carolina by the IAM for previously voting out the union.

A copy of the full charge is here.

Now, it will be incumbent on the NLRB to investigate the charge and, if the charge is found to have merit, then the entire argument the NLRB is prosecuting Boeing over is built on an illegal motive by the union—retaliation against the Charleston employees for choosing to become union free.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Cross-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • edintexas

    Call me a cynic, but the probability of this NLRB finding the charge “…to have merit,” , absent heavy Congressional pressure, is about Slim to None and Slim just left town. I could be wrong, and hogs could fly.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    It’s blatantly obvious that what the unions are doing is illegal and an unfair labor practice. Suing them for it is absolutely right if not obliged.

    There’s not the slightest chance of winning the suit. But that is NOT the point. The point is to illustrate in front of all America that the left considers the law meaningless – that it’s all about their own power and greed, nothing more, nothing less.

    When Scott Walker did that in Wisconsin, and was willing to stand up to the thugs – ordinary Americans were revolted at what the unions did, Walker won, and the unions lost bigtime. That’s what has to happen here. These workers will lose in court time after time after time – but if they keep trying, the more they lose, the more angry and appalled middle America will get.

    Until, just maybe, the fury at union depravity will allow us finally to remove their unearned privileges and monopoly phony “rights.”

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    ;)

  • izoneguy

    Once he is gone the Congress needs to block any replacement.
    And don’t allow Obama anymore recess appointments.

    • Adjoran

      is for the Senate to stay in session. That’s not going to happen. The long-standing tradition is that the same person may not be recess-appointed to the same position more than once, but there is no “controlling legal authority” on it.

      Better to defund the NLRB altogether. It was necessary half a century ago, but not today.

      • izoneguy

        Senators Urge House To Block Recess Appointments

        http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110526-713080.html

  • izoneguy

    Read the comments as well – quite a hoot!!!

    Boeing’s Threat to American Enterprise

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304186404576388062830875084.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion#articleTabs%3Darticle

  • averagevoterdotcom

    who feels like I have fallen down a socialist rabbitt hole every time I see a story on this boeing thing??