« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Teamsters’ Vegas Convention Calls for CEO Prosecutions & Union Pension Bailout

Despite the bribery scandalsthe dancers, and the jokes about the millions of their members’ dues that Teamster bosses spent in Las Vegas last week at the union’s 28th international convention, delegates did accomplish one thing of note: The delegates passed a resolution that, among other things, calls for a “financial rescue package for struggling union pensions” (also known as the $165 billion union pension bailout).

Following last year’s failure of Democrats (and a few Republicans, like new GOP-presidential hopeful Thad McCotter) to get taxpayers to shell out up to $165 billion to prop up union pension funds, unions have continued to bemoan the fact that they have been unable to dip their beaks into the public treasury as Wall St. fat cats did in 2008.

Meanwhile, as hundreds of union pension funds are listed in critical status, union bosses (including the Teamsters) continue to misleadingly blame the financial meltdown of 2008 for their ills. The fact of the matter is, many union pension funds were already underfunded before the economy tanked.

For example, the Teamsters notorious Central States Pension Fund (ironically, the same pension plan that helped build the Las Vegas strip) was estimated to be only half funded in 2007 when Teamsters president James P. Hoffa reportedly allowed UPS to withdraw from the fund in exchange for unionizing UPS Freight.

According to the New York Times in 2007:

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters announced last night that it had reached a tentative five-year contract with the United Parcel Service that calls for sweeping changes in the pension plan for many workers.

Under the accord, which covers 238,000 drivers and other workers, U.P.S. would be allowed to withdraw from the Central States pension plan, which was notorious for corruption in the 1960s and 1970s, but is now known for being underfunded.

[snip]

Unhappy with the high annual expenses of paying into the Central States plan, U.P.S. obtained the blessing of the union and the pension trustees to withdraw, but to do so it must first pay $6.1 billion to shore up the plan.

Actuaries estimate that the plan is underfunded by 49 percent, and with the $6.1 billion contribution, will remain 30 percent underfunded.

Again, UPS’ withdrawal from the Teamsters’ Central States Pension Fund was nearly a year before the market meltdown that occurred as a result of the housing bubble bursting.

By 2009, the numbers had worsened for the Central States Pension Fund. Rather than being 47% underfunded, it was 65% underfunded. While this was, in part, due to market meltdown, it was also due to the payment moratorium the Teamsters gave its largest freight employer YRCW.

YRCW, which is one of the last remaining LTL carriers that the Teamsters control, has been struggling to survive for several years—a dilemma further exacerbated by the recession. As a result, with roughly 25,000 (post-layoff) union jobs at stake, the Teamsters agreed to 15% wage cuts and a pension payment moratorium, further causing  a drain on the CSPF.

While the Teamsters did gain two seats on YRC’s board of directors in exchange for the union members’ concessions, the company is still not out of the woods as it a reported $68 million loss in the last quarter.

In the meantime, in Las Vegas last week, in addition to the Teamsters re-iterating their cry for a bailout, the union’s resolution also called for the “prosecution of the CEOs and other Wall Street players directly responsible for destroying the economy and the jobs, homes, and living standards of millions of Americans.”

Though the laudable (albeit unlikely) goal of prosecuting the “CEOs and other Wall Street players” has become standard fare among union bosses, here too, the Teamsters are missing the boat.

If they really want to prosecute those behind the bursting of the housing bubble, they need to look further South than just Wall Street. In fact, they need to look at their friends, the Democrats, in Washington.

But, of course, just like union bosses don’t want their members looking too deeply into their pension problems, they also don’t want Americans going after the real criminals who just happened to be union-bought politicians.

All in all, as the Teamsters bosses returned home from the town their pensions built, they’ll likely find that, behind all the glitz, gambling, and showgirls (not to mention The Joey Biden Show) their members’ money bought them, whatever happened in Vegas last week will probably stay in Vegas.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Cross-posted.

Photo Credit.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    I for one would welcome the union thugs going after Wall St. After all, I enjoy an intra-party feud.

    I say this expecting most to know that in spite of what the Left would have the public believe, the fact is that much of the big money on Wall St. goes to the Democrat party and that most of the high rollers are in fact Democrats.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    I also have to admit to enjoying the slow decay of YRC. I used to work for FedEx at the Memphis HQ and can attest to how much unions were loathed by the company. At all levels we knew how destructive those parasites are. I now work for a major retailer in transportation. We hire almost exclusively on two factors, price and service. YRC is a loser in both. Non-union carriers do quite well with us-win, we get good prices and service, they get our business. Just the way capitalism is supposed to work.

  • gekster

    Well thats conservative right there, I tell ya.
    I don’t care what anybody says, that’s conservatism. ;)

  • izoneguy

    Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon

    http://www.amazon.com/Reckless-Endangerment-Outsized-Corruption-Armageddon/dp/0805091203

    Review of the book

    http://www.kansascity.com/2011/06/20/2963348/new-book-details-the-sleaze-that.html

    Both Democrats and Republicans backed government intrusion into the marketplace in pursuit of a social goal

    • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

      that every elected official in Washington needs to take a course in market economics. When the mortgage funding money was made easier to obtain, it did not make housing more affordable. Quite the opposite: it created a seller’s market where home prices went through the roof because they created more demand than there was supply, thus builders and sellers could demand a much higher price for their product: homes.

      And, since the banks and others were willing to lend more than 100% of the value of the product (they could actually make a profit on a foreclosure), when the bottom fell out of the market, buyers could walk away from their mortgage obligation because they had no “skin” in the game: the financing institution was left holding a property that was worth less than they had invested in it.

      Those who wish to prosecute the “banksters” need to consider that their elected representatives sold the hold-up weapon and drove the getaway car.

  • ohiohistorian

    Think the under-funding has anything to do with diverting funds to political campaigns? Need to have a law that forbids unions to use member funds for campaigning if they are underfunded in pensions. A 5-year prison term in maximum security for the entire elected leadership that violates this ought to be the punishment.

    I suspect no Republican has the stones to investigate or propose this.

    • powertothepeople

      that is all you want to give them? You must have a soft heart……….

      • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

        I, however, am like you: my compassion is wearing quite thin.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      union companies going out of business.

      The multi-employer system is a giant Ponzi scheme that reached has been slowly collapsing for well over 10 years–longer in some cases.

  • bobojake

    Nobody baled out all the pensioners that lost asll their money in Lehman Bros and the Stock Market. GM and Chrysler should of been in real bankruptcy not the foney trojan pony obamas’ bankruptcy .

  • republicanconscience

    PM: How many teamsters does it take to change a light bulb?

    Teamster: Three, you got a problem with that?

  • ag8tor

    Biden standing before the union goons promising the moon. Guess they don’t rate a visit from “O” since they are talking about funds drying up. Maybe they should investigate where the funds have actually gone. I bet the union bosses are living high while the rank and file is worried about thier pensions. If they would quit giving away the store to “O” for favorable status they could easily fund the plans. Wonder what they’ll do when they waste all these donations to “O” and have to work with a Republican president. The members should call them on this!

  • higgy68

    The under funded union pension funds can be attributed to several happenings. The union leadership has been very lavish in seeing to their own comforts and compensation. They tend to go first class in every respect. So, abuse of the membership dues for themselves is one reason. Heavy contributions to democrat campaigns is the other main waste or abuse of membership dues. Maryland public unions have very covertly solved their problem. They got the General Assembly to pass a law forcing non-union state government workers to pay dues. It seems all government workers will be forced to pay as much as $33.00 per month in dues just so the union leadership can enjoy their opulent life style.

  • megsmom

    This just proves that unions are spending the members dues on crooked Politians and are not using the dues to go for union pension plans. They are bankrupting themselves and their member