« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

UPDATE: #OccupyWallSt: Just A Saturday Stroll Through The Park…

A motley, Marxist mob issues call to tear down 'the Machine,' seize workplaces & schools.

It was supposed to be this:

On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months.

Instead, as they say about the best laid plans, it was something entirely different. It was, frankly, a stroll through a parkZuccotti Park, in lower Manhattan, to be exact.

A Non-Union Non-Event

Over the summer, on the heels of Arab Spring, an anti-capitalist group called adbusters established a campaign to occupy Wall Street, beginning on September 17th. Whether coincidental or not, September 17th also happened to be Constitution Day. While there had been some unfounded unfounded speculation a few weeks ago that the SEIU’s Stephen Lerner and ACORN founder Wade Rathke were behind the OccupyWallSt movement, there were never any signs that the Marxist-Anarchist protesters had any formal union backing—nor has there been anything posted on union websites about the occupation of Wall St.

On Sunday morning, the protestors did, however, call for “revolution

We want freedom for all, without regards for identity, because we are all people, and because no other reason should be needed. However, this freedom has been largely taken from the people, and slowly made to trickle down, whenever we get angry.

UPDATE: Their list of “demands” are at the bottom, but includes (among others), this gem:

We call for workers to not only strike, but seize their workplaces collectively, and to organize them democratically. We call for students and teachers to act together, to teach democracy, not merely the teachers to the students, but the students to the teachers. To seize the classrooms and free minds together.

Dude. Comrade.

“The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry…”

What started out as a beautiful, sunny Saturday in New York turned cloudy by mid-afternoon and, while the weather was still mild by 3:15, it became clear by a quick ride through the streets surrounding Wall Street that, despite a warm up event back in August, protesters would not be fulfilling their goal of occupation this weekend.

The NYPD had a sea of blue uniformed officers, as well as police in plain clothes swarming the financial district. Empty police vans, cops with bunbles of zip ties (to be used as handcuffs) on their belts. Streets were closed off with both barricades and a literal solid wall of NYPD officers were blocking the entrances to Wall Street. There would be no occupation.

In fact, were it not for the help from one of New York’s finest giving direction to the new site of #OccupyWallSt, one might have never found the thousand (plus or minus) people occupying Zuccotti Park.

As the New York Times noted:

As it turned out, the demonstrators found much of their target off limits on Saturday as the city shut down sections of Wall Street near the New York Stock Exchange and Federal Hall well before their arrival.

Despite the fact that nowhere near the 20,000 that event organizers had hoped for shown up and there were nearly as many tourists gawking as there were protesters, the menagerie of protesters who congregated in Zuccotti Park did seemed somewhat upbeat, more like those attendees at a Grateful Dead concert. People seeing old friends hugged, shook hands, as though it had been ages since they’d seen each other at a previous protest or General Assembly.

Seeing that the non-event was more akin to a concert in the park (sans music, for the most part), it was decided that a stroll was in order. What follows are some pictures and descriptions of The Day Wall Street Was Not Occupied (otherwise known as a stroll through the park).

Meeting the Fawkers & Collaborators

Entering the park off of  Thames Street, the first thing that was noticed the number of Guy Fawkes masks mingling in the crowd. A couple were wearing black pants and white shirts with black ties that has become synonymous with anonymous—the collection of computer hackers that have broken into the computer systems of some well known entities.  Several Guys were scattered and milling about, talking in small clusters and having their pictures taken, presumably by the press (or their adoring fans).

One of the Guys who happened to pass by and, upon request, posed for a picture as he held his handbills.

The biggest (only?) consistent theme that the protesters have is the Destruction of Capitalism. However, with the exception of a few, protesters were cagily lacking int answers to the question of what they want to replace capitalism with.

After milling about for a while and stopping now and then to listen to a variety of “ideas” that were being suggested (not with a firm answer, mind you, just suggested) about how to run the world—workers owning the means of production was one that was overheard—these two “collaborators” were kind enough to pose to have their picture taken and, in conversation, were rather enlightening about their mindset.

After posing for the above picture, the figure on the right asked, “what do you think about all of this?”

“All of what?”

“The protest,” he responded.

“What are you protesting?”

“Capitalism,” he said.

“We don’t have capitalism…”

Interrupting, he said, “No you’re right. It’s facism. Corporatism. We’re controlled by corporations and their killing everyone.”

He talked about ocean pollution and how ‘we’ needed to tear down the machine.

“So what are you going to replace it with?”

He seemed puzzled.

Clarifying: “What is the alternative?”

“Well,” he said, “there’s a lot of different things.”

“Like what?”

“Well, there’s ‘collaboratism,’” he stated.

Beginning to chuckle: “What the h**l is that?”

“It’s where society gets broken into smaller groups and decisions are made unanimously.”

[Trying not to laugh in his baklava-covered face.]

“Dude, that’ll never work. No two people are going to agree on everything—let alone society making unanimous decisions.”

“Well, there are other systems,” he said.

“Okay. Good luck.” Moving on, laughing.

A while later, as the Democratic Socialists of America led a march of about 25 people around the park chanting “The workers, united, will never be defeated [sic*],”, the Collaborator, Baklava Boy, was spotted again, this time carrying his backpack and without his mask .

* Another indication unions weren’t involved in #occupywallst is the DSA’s misuse of  defeated instead of divided.

While the crowd has (since they were still congregating late into the night) a singular goal of ending capitalism, it was still an amalgamation of anarchists and an assorted variety of Marxists—from the Workers World Party to the Democratic Socialists of America.

When asked if the protesters were trying to bring Wisconsin to New York, one NYPD officer stated, “No. The Wisconsin people were okay. These people are like the fringe that no one wants.”

At some point during the day, the NYPD apparently let protesters march around the Bull but, according to the NY Times, when 15 people sat briefly on the sidewalk, they quickly got up after being threatened with arrest.

Surprisingly, even though they share a mutual hatred for the Federal Reserve, some of the protesters even think Ron Paul is crazy

Some Final Thoughts.

It appeared that many of the protesters were professional protesters (if there is such a thing)—that, for them, raging against The Machine is a full-time gig. While many of them seem to be in their early 20s, it appeared that they had the angry rhetoric down pat. Evil Capitalism. Evil Corporations. End them both and the world would be a happy place.

Ironically, the protesters set up a live stream video so people could watch the event, but only after watching those nasty advertisements from those evil corporations.

It was clear that the occupation of Wall Street was not going to happen during this protest. However, as protesters were overheard on several occasions in the park, this is the beginning. Never mind the fact that anarchism and socialism have both been around for well over a hundred years, due to their youth, the ideologies are probably new to a lot of these protesters.

And, they will be back. Only next time, it may not be just a stroll in the park.

________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Cross-posted on LaborUnionReport.com and BigGovernment.com

COMMENTS

  • Michael M. Keohane

    Who else would be smart enough to attempt to close down Wall Street on a Saturday? Yes, they are young and secure in their belief that their ideas are new and important. Socialists under thirty -OK. Socialists over thirty – brain dead.

    • msctex

      30 is too generous, if that is the right term for allowed stupidity. Once free of the indoctrination of our higher education process, Reality should quickly dispel the cloud.

      That is, for anyone whose intellect has anything to offer society.

  • NeoKong

    Where do they come up with this garbage….?

    We need to retake the freedom that has been stolen from the people, altogether.

    1. If you agree that freedom is the right to communicate, to live, to be, to go, to love, to do what you will without the impositions of others, then you might be one of us.

    I guess that means they don’t like it when they have to mow the lawn like they said they would for the last two weeks.

    2. If you agree that a person is entitled to the sweat of their brows, that being talented at management should not entitle others to act like overseers and overlords, that all workers should have the right to engage in decisions, democratically, then you might be one of us.

    Sounds like someone working at the candle shop doesn’t like being told to sweep the men’s room.

    We call for workers to not only strike, but seize their workplaces collectively, and to organize them democratically. We call for students and teachers to act together, to teach democracy, not merely the teachers to the students, but the students to the teachers. To seize the classrooms and free minds together.

    Yeah right….why should the guy who actually owns the business get to say how it is run…?
    Doesn’t he know he is supposed to share the profits equally with the janitor and the stock boy?

    We call for the seizure and use of abandoned buildings, of abandoned land, of every property seized and abandoned by speculators, for the people, for every group that will organize them.

    There is your typical leftie commie loser.
    They cannot figure out why smoking dope in their parent’s basement while they play on their X-Box has not made them rich yet.
    They want to own property but just can’t figure out how to pay for it.
    They would prefer to seize it like it was the Cheetos in their mother’s kitchen.
    They are broke and unemployed. Many are probably leeching off of someone else but yet they want to run everything when it looks quite apparent that half of them cannot even run the washing machine.
    They all want a piece of the pie without working for it.

    • macwell

      It’s almost like looking through a time portal, these people look like the same people who I was with in Haight Ashbury in 66-68. Hey I was 20, knew it all, and thought old people were just stupid. Seeing that little head pop out for the first time. totally dependent on you for his/her very life. It’s quite humbling. I grew up right then and there. I understood that I’d would have to provide for that little…person. I must say that at the time it was fun, and looking back, I learned a lot from the experiences there.
      I think this stuff is overblown, we have more important things to debate, like how to take back the republic.
      How to oust these entrenched parasites from our Congress?
      I believe that if we the people could just put an end to the corruption in government, we would have enough money to pay for everything we want.
      I’d be willing to bet that one out of EVERY two dollars goes to some form of corruption.
      We the people NEED to send a clear message next election day. We must rid ourselves of these who think they’re entitled to live like princes. We MUST demand the end of the lobby. If one want to address government, of course you may, but pay for it yourself.
      It isn’t government’s role to wipe our butts, or choose our toothpaste, or decide which brand of cheeseburger I may eat, or if I want to smoke, or not. If government did it’s job, not only would it solve the big problem of Illegals, but it would also reduce the deficit.
      We the people need REAL leaders, people like Sarah Palin, and Marco Rubio, and a few others who will assess our situation fairly and tell us what we must do to fix it. This isn’t 1967 and I’m not 20 any more, I can make my own decisions, you, (the government that is supposed to help it’s people), are always standing in the way. Take your money and retire now, trust me, it’ll be easier for you. Next year, 2012, we the people will take our government back!

    • GregInFla

      Thanks, Neokong, for expressing my opinions of these fools so well.

  • seattlebruce

    That’s just a great quote. :)

  • wembeley

    I am laughing so hard at this!

    “A job is a right”
    Really?!?! Are you kidding me?!?! I could be mistaken but I think of it more as a privilege.

    I’m really picking my brain here to find a time in US’s history when it was socialism and/or communism, not capitalism that made America the great nation that it is and has been for so many years.

    • ihateliberals

      about the current debt and sagging economy. If the Capitlistic methods were unleahed things would change in a hurry. Look what happened when Reagan squashed the socialistic policies of Jimmy Carter. Within two yers we were out of double digit inflation. Capitalism works with the proper business environment. My question would be “Why would a capitalist wnt to keep the population poor?” By doing that he would be cutting off his supply of money. His supply of demand for his products would dwindle to nothing. A socialist on the other hand would not care about tht. They would just care that everyone regardless of input would be equal. What happens is tht everyone is equally poor. Every country tht has ever tried the Marxist approach to society has failed. This is the definition of insanity. “Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different results. Inder capitalism doing the same thing over and over produces the same results. It’s called prosperity. it never fails.

      • GregInFla

        use a spellchecker…I’ve got one arm in a sling but still proof my comments.

  • Locked and Loaded

    Occupy Wall Street is leaderless resistance movement with people of many colors, genders and political persuasions.

    We call for the unemployed to volunteer, to learn, to teach, to use what skills they have to support themselves as part of the revolting people as a community.

    ——————————————-

    Yes, they’re revolting, and they’re not just male and female either; they’re … something else.

    Somebody probably wrote out their complete thesis in one sitting. How many joints it took is anybody’s guess.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    which would not exist were it not for all those evil corporations that have built it and provide each of us with the ability to have said service piped into our homes and businesses.

    Sounds a bit like the government that uses guns to enforce its rules against the private ownership of — wait for it — guns!

  • MikeG (Icythus)

    Great report, LUR! Hugely entertaining.

    I did have one question: you identified one protester as “Baklava Boy” and described his “baklava-covered face”. Now, from the picture, this individual appeared to be wearing the traditional piece of anarchist headgear known as a “balaclava”, and not the delicious Turkish pastry that is “baklava”, which is more often seen being consumed with hearty relish than worn to revolutionary protests (though I could understand how the enthusiastic gourmand might wind up with a face covered on baklava). Was this young man also in possession of fluffy, honey-soaked confections, or was this a bit of subtle mockery on your part by deliberately conflating the two items? ;-)

    Needless to say, I was a tad bit confused!

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      :)

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      those things are so sticky, I can just see a stupid protestor in my mind with sticky honey and flaky crust smeared all over his head.

  • reaganbuckley

    We have privatized profits and socialized risks.
    They very wealthy banks receive bailout handouts from the taxpayers.
    The very poor and very rich get the handouts with the rest paying for it.
    The people protesting are wannabe socialists compared to the large banks!
    Socialism has come to American with the wealthiest getting the biggest handouts – TALF, TARP, Solyndra etc…

    • gekster

      you’re just ticked off because you ain’t rich.
      Typical marxist.
      Call others what you yourself are.

      • reaganbuckley

        I live a very comfortable lifestyle without government handouts, thank you very much. I can’t eat two steaks, so I don’t need much more than I already have. However, I resent my taxpayer money being given to people who make foolish business decisions and then expect the government to save them. My Christian values I can accept some of my money going to poor people, even though I don’t get to choose how it’s spent. What I can not accept is politically connected people getting bailed out of their poor decisions.

        Please explain to me how that is Marxist? I find it curious that people who advocate for cuts to the poor are not bothered by the handouts given to the very rich. BTW name calling is a technique of the liberal. I would appreciate if you refrain from using those Alinsky/Ayers tactics.

        • edintexas

          Campaign against Crony Capitalism, or Corporate Welfare if you prefer. Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of throwing tax money at corporations which are engaged in whatever the particular politician favors. Whether it is “Green Jobs” or the Export-Import Bank loans to Boeing, government has no business being involved in funding business (outside of purchases for the government itself, e.g. military equipment). “Green Jobs” is throwing money down the proverbial rat hole. If the product is commercially viable, funding can be obtained from private sources. Government should not be involved in trying to consult the “crystal ball”, or whatever method, to pick winners and losers in commercial activity. And Boeing would be able to obtain loans to advance their overseas sales, it just might eat into their profits if they had to pay higher interest on the loan. And that is not an approval for failing to go after industrial concerns in other countries which are subsidized by their governments into an unfair advantage. I’m not keen on international boards, etc. but unfair competition is one area where there actually is a role for such.

    • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

      Ask the folks at Lehman Brothers how their taxpayer handout went.

      Oh!!!! Wait, you can’t, because Lehman was allowed to fail, and their former employees are all with someone else now (or unemployed).

      • reaganbuckley

        They regret they didn’t bail out more undeserved people.
        Let people risk their own capital instead of ensuring they get a free pass if they lose it. If they know they will get a free pass then they will invest foolishly.

        • izoneguy

          You GO TO JAIL

          • edintexas

            How About eliminated taxpayer funded loans to business entirely? It is one thing to prop up Chrysler when Chrysler owned the only tank manufacturing facility (which Chrysler promptly sold off after being propped up based on that selling point), quite another to pick companies for taxpayer subsidy.

          • izoneguy

            Clearly it is not working.
            The govt. fails at almost everything.
            They need to get back to basics.
            Defend the country.
            Leave the rest to the American people.
            I know it will be hard for the nanny staters to let go.
            We need to give them a really hard shove.

      • reaganbuckley

        It’s picking favorites and spreading the wealth by government intervention.

        • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

          who would disagree with your assessment. They all hate Bush for the crony capitalism of the TARP, and accuse 0bama of being a Republican in his practice of same cronyism. They all think that The One should have nationalized the banks (and AIG) and the auto companies rather than bailing them out.

        • http://nerds4cain.com Brookhaven

          Yea, I know use of the term causes some people to immediatly tune you out, but what we’re seeing as crony capitalisim as practiced by the Obama administration is classic fascist economics.

          (1) The company (for the most part) stays in private hands, and profits flow to the company’s owners, not the government.

          (2) The company is required to acheive government goals (produce green energy jobs like Solyndra; rush a hybrid to market and prop up union workers like GM).

          (3) The government assumes some (or all) of the company’s financial risk. Losses are absorbed or softened by the government, but should any profits occur they would go to the owners of the company.

          This is perfectly displayed in the Solyndra affair. A private company; it works to achieve government goals; profits go to the company owners; losses are absorbed by the government. Classic fascist economics–classic.

          This system eventually crashed and burned when Mussolini tried it, and Obama’s efforts will eventually crash and burn. Top down economic control never works.

          Worse than communism (imho), because it has the veneer of capitalism, and when it eventually fails the left ends up blaming capitalism, despite the fact that the failure we’re seeing is a failure of fascist economics, not capitalism.

      • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

        Of *course* he was going to let Lehman fail.

        … and then TARP to save the rest, like Goldman Sachs.

        Sorry, but some cynicism *is* in order when it comes to these things.

        They bailed out fannie and freddie, they bailed out AIG, they TARPed everyone …

        but they let Lehman twist in the wind, causing chaos.

        Lehman was the one company they should have saved. Not for Lehmans sake, but for the systematic risks it would have stopped…. we could have saved a LOT of economic pain if that was done, and we wouldnt have needed TARP at the scale that was done, let alone Obamanomics!

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      It was your Democrat party buddies who bailed out all the big financial corps, not once, but twice, and the auto bailouts as well. Don’t forget that.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        about you because I have seen you several times go after conservatives, the republican party, or right wing positions. before.

        • gekster

          ..

  • macwell

    CAN WE JUST DESTROY IT FOR G_D’S SAKE?

  • dajeeps

    That is a priceless photo of hypocrisy, the guy with the mask holding a sign saying something about the heroic join them. I guess that works if one is Spiderman, but it likely doesn’t garner much in the way of public support if one has to go make a decisive political statement wearing a mask. What a bunch of sissies.

  • johnt

    How crude.

  • macbookben

    ..are there for two reasons: to score weed and meet loose chicks.

    • Michael M. Keohane

      “The Strawberry Statement.”

      • macbookben

        …read the synopsis. Maybe I’ll check YouTube. Anyway, sounds groooooovy.

    • jarrod21

      The chicks. Not the weed.

  • Return to Revolution

    have been around for >100 yrs in their current (modern) incarnation. Even more profound however, is that the actual concepts and philosophy behind socialism (collectivism) have been employed essentially for all of civilization with very few exceptions. Meanwhile, our current system of capitalism (at least as its laid out in the Constitution), is really the only system of governance in existence that is comparatively new (300+ yrs in the making vs 5000 yrs…). While concepts of liberty and collectivism have been discussed in philosophy, we are the first society to put in practice freedom that is explicitly protected by its charter (i.e., not a democracy).

    These young protestors are apparently incapable of grasping that every form of society they favor, whether it be socialism, communism, facism, even anarchy (which ultimately becomes gang rule and thus indistiginguishable from the rest) are all variations on a theme. Only capitalism is fundamentally different.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      pile of garbage as their Leninist ancestors.

      You’re right The same battle has been raging for more than 100 years.

      The only difference is they actually put one of their own in the White House and they’re calling out to hasten the transition.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      It has to do with the fact that there are a certain percentage of misfits and ner’do wells in every society. They don’t fit in and never will, so they are filled with hate for the society that rejects them.

      Gloaming on to some idiot philosophy like socialism just give them an excuse and lets them pretend that they know something the other folk don’t know. They are the smart ones, they know the truth.

      It is just a convenient excuse for small minded misfits to exercise their hate and fell superior to others.

      And it was ALWAYS that. At one time it was very dangerous because a lot of otherwise normal people were fooled into believing in socialism. No one with a real brain can buy into it now.

  • politicalqrm

    the other night. They had a person yelling out something and the crowd would repeat it. This went on and on. One person would finish and another would start up with some other drivel.

    The list of “demands” mirrors the Soviet Stalin era language. It’s nothing new. The same crap just gets passed down the generations…

    And, yes, there are professional paid protestors. It’s a bunch of people who hate everything, have no life path and are just angry. This is what occurs especially during the political conventions. They have people for each protest, they are told what they are protesting and what to say and where to report.

    And these people say those of us who believe in America are just blindly following..They’re pathetic.

  • byrrni

    This was an attempt by Unions/Worker’s Party engine to deflect the anger and attention from the outrageous behavior of the current administration in Washington to another target in support of their benefactor. It was orchestrated and the American People are not as stupid as they thought.
    It made me proud that this whole plan fizzled. It shows that, in spite of the problems facing us, the American People are not as easily lead into anarchy as those in Europe and the Middle East.

  • atillathehun

    The Marxist of the 60′s have morphed into a more user friendly mode. They have learned that Americans generally will not condone or tolerate violence in the name of political movements. The Marxist who want to overthrowy western capitalism are now bring briefcases to the White/Red House. Andy Stern and his thug buddy Trumka have an open door to the OBama Marxist in Chief. Eventually they always reveal their violent roots as in Wisconsin.

  • pennycrosson

    when confronting a protester, compliment them on some article of clothing or their backpack or something, then ask who gave it to them.. When they respond that it wasn’t a gift, ask if they stole it. When they deny that, then ask where they bought it. After that, it’s pretty easy to point out that they are willing participants in the capitalist system, the very system that provided them with their clothes, backpacks and supplies to create their stupid signs. Maybe that’ll make one of them stop and think. Maybe. But I doubt it.

  • Pingback: My Homepage