« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Dems Dodge Questions On Discriminatory Union PLAs For DNC Convention

In February, when North Carolina was awarded the Democratic National Convention over forced-union states, we alerted you to the devil in the details of the DNC having its convention in a predominantly union-free state. At issue is something traditionally known as Project Labor Agreements that give work to unionized employers and, as well,  discriminate against union-free workers. Now, that devil appears to be rearing its ugly head and Democrat mayor Anthony Foxx, who is running from Republican challenger Scott Stone, appears unwilling to give Charlotte residents a straight answer on how much work will go to unionized workers.

Since North Carolina is a Right-to-Work state (which means workers are not required to join or pay unions), unions have not plagued the state like those in the North (see Ohio, for reference). However, it also means that there may not be enough qualified union members in the state to cover the DNC work which, with Charlotte’s mayoral election up for grabs on November 8th, is raising all kinds of questions—including whether or not DNC convention planners plan on bringing union workers in from out of state.

Here is the source of the controversy:

The host committee must also establish a labor agreement within the next two months and organizers to hire union labor for tasks related to providing, services goods and materials.

And from the  Master Agreement [in PDF]:

17.1.   Use of union labor. To the extent permitted by law, to the extent, if any,such labor is available in the region, and except as otherwise expressly agreed by the DNCC, all services, goods, equipment, supplies and materials to be provided or procured by the Host Committee hereunder shall be performed or supplied by firms covered by current union collective bargaining agreements with the unions which have jurisdiction for the work or services to be performed.

17.2.   Labor agreement.  The Host Committee agrees that it will, within sixty (60) days of the date of this Agreement, conclude and execute with unions of potential jurisdiction in the Charlotte metropolitan area, an agreement obligating the Host Committee to utilize firms employing or contracting with members of those unions to the maximum extent feasible and obligating the unions to refrain from supporting,  participating in or sanctioning any strike, sympathy strike, walkout, work stoppage or other labor action that would interfere with or delay work necessary to put on the Convention, or engage in handbilling or picketing (including, but not limited to, informational picketing) at the Convention Facilities.

As was noted back in February, “what the contract does not address specifically—which leaves the door wide open—is this: If there are not enough unionized companies (with enough union laborers) to fulfill the work, can the unions send in union members from other states and take the work? Short answer: It certainly appears that way.”

On Tuesday, Democrat convention CEO Steve Kerrrigan awarded $7 million worth of convention work to three firms (tow of which are based outside of North Carolina), and evaded the union-only question.

Convention CEO Steve Kerrigan said the contracts also would “maximize union labor.” But he declined to say to what extent union workers are expected to participate.

Scott Stone, the Republican candidate for Mayor of Charlotte has even called on the DNC Host Committee to release the PLAs that vendors are forced to sign.

“The contracts have been awarded and the DNC and Mayor Foxx cannot continue to put off these important questions about the extent to which organized labor will be used for the convention,” said Stone. “We understand that the DNC is going to use union labor and we think it only fair that they be transparent about how much union labor they will use.”

This issue may be causing some heartburn at the top of the DNC. If the DNC and Charlotte’s Democrat mayor can dodge answering the questions of whether unions will take Charlotte work, or whether Charlotte workers will be required to join unions in order to do the convention work  until after the mayor’s race is settled on November 8th, they can avoid a potentially very damaging embarrassment.

On the other hand, if they answer the question and, in fact, Charlotte’s workers are pushed aside or forced to join a union under the PLA, and it costs Anthony Foxx his job, the DNC would have an awkward time hosting a convention in a city where the Republican mayor has vowed to put Charlotte residents first.

Perhaps Charlotte residents are beginning to learn: If you do a deal with the devil, you’re bound to get burned.

Related:

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

COMMENTS

  • Adjoran

    when the Convention was first landed, given the howling the unions did over NC being right-to-work. You and I know the DNC made concessions which will at least demand every bit of work or service the Convention and its venue requires be performed by union workers, whether local or out of state.

    The only question is “Can they be forced to admit it before the mayoral election?”

  • The_Gadfly

    meaning the Dems are planning to bus in outside union forces. They could also have chosen Charlotte to save money because the venue wouldn’t HAVE to enter PLAs. The wording in the contract is very slippery. I think that would actually be worse for Dems nationally, but it isn’t like The Big 0 has thrown lots of other people/groups under the bus when it suites his purposes.

    I am leaning 80-20 to your interpretation because the mayor doesn’t benefit from the alternate explanation and he’s keeping his mouth shut.

  • celador2

    If Democrats can use a double standard they will. From crony capitalism and bailouts, handouts to convention contracts the DNC does not favor universal application of the law. Universal application is a foundation of a republic. LOL

  • tommyzax

    This is very old news. But good to see it’s getting some national play, if only as a way to muddy the Democrats.

    Look, they’re gonna win this one like they do every one. When it comes to fair play, conservatives are the master, but somehow… SOMEHOW… Democrats/liberals (even commies!) come out smelling like roses. You see that ad from Foxx? If this emanated from the Democrats – dynamite! But because it’s come from a Republican – backfire. Always does. Why? Because we’re using THEIR tactics. And that means… ta daaaa… we end up looking like hypocrites and – oh yeah – will shortly be called one in the press.

    But beyond that, the issue is incorrect. It’s not that the Dems are hypocrites that will win any more voters or sympathy. Why? Because it’s a known fact that they are!

    The KEY to winning this argument is to show what will happen if we follow their plan. War-game it. And then? And then? People understand consequences… and, unfortunately, fear.

  • lightfootletters

    “Project Labor Agreements that give work to unionized employers and, as well, discriminate against union-free workers.” If it wasn’t such a serious issue and it is, it would be laughable that some of us keep calling Democrats and over-oppressive unions liberals. When, in reality, the Public Employee Democrat Party Complex is the most un-liberal group of people in the United States besides the Military Political Complex of Islam.
    Lightfoot Letters

    • edintexas

      “When, in reality, the Public Employee Democrat Party Complex is the most un-liberal group of people in the United States besides the Military Political Complex of Islam.”

      Perfect!

  • smagar

    Baseline assumption: The Charlotte media eventually wants to work in a major media market, plus they went to J school. Hence, presume they are liberal.

    The DNC makes some face-saving compromise, and agrees to let some percentage of the convention support work go to local workers. The size of that percentage will correlate directly to the DNC’s hopes for winning NC’s electoral votes in 2012.

    However, be sure that, behind the scenes, as much of that work as possible will go to union suppliers, at union prices.

    The Charlotte MSM could put a stop to this, if they were to promise NOW that, come 2012, their camera crews will be all over the convention site. And, any out-of-state license plates or New Yawk/Bahstan accents amongst the convention workers would be on the local news that night.

    But, if (as I suspect), Charlotte’s MSM is mostly interested in auditioning for jobs with the DC/NYC-centered MSM, expect instead an intensive, seemingly-coordinated local media blitz on the homeless, or rocks on farms with ancient racist slogans on them, while all sorts of work goes on unnoticed at the Charlotte convention center….

    • SoFiMil

      For the Kos Kids lurking here, this is not snark.

  • smagar

    North Carolinians like to describe their state as “a vale of humility in between two mountains of conceit.”

    I’ve updated that saying: “A vale of liberalism in between two mountains of conservatism.”