« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Ex-SEIU Boss, Donor Dollars, No-Bid Contracts & Testing Anthrax Vaccines on Kids

According to the Los Angeles Times, with the exception of existing in locked freezers in Russia and U.S. labs, the smallpox virus was eradicated in 1978. Yet, in a no-bid contract, the Obama administration has given $443 million of American taxpayers’ money for a “experimental smallpox drug” to a bio-defense company, Siga, controlled by billionaire Democrat-donor Ron Perleman and whose board ex-SEIU boss Andy Stern sits on.

According to the Times:

When Siga complained that contracting specialists at the Department of Health and Human Services were resisting the company’s financial demands, senior officials replaced the government’s lead negotiator for the deal, interviews and documents show.

When Siga was in danger of losing its grip on the contract a year ago, the officials blocked other firms from competing.

Siga was awarded the final contract in May through a “sole-source” procurement in which it was the only company asked to submit a proposal. The contract calls for Siga to deliver 1.7 million doses of the drug for the nation’s biodefense stockpile. The price of approximately $255 per dose is well above what the government’s specialists had earlier said was reasonable, according to internal documents and interviews.

Siga’s questionable government deal may eventually mean $2.8 billion in revenues for the company—thought Siga’s profits would have to be split with its former partner in a failed merger, PharmAthene.

In September, after years of litigation following a failed merger, a Delaware court ruled that PharmAthene was entitled to 50% of Siga’s profits from its ST-246 smallpox vaccines.

While the Times notes that there is no credible evidence that the threat of a smallpox outbreak is imminent and that the U.S. already owns enough vaccine to treat the entire population, the Obama administration’s ties to Siga become even more questionable, considering the recent recommendation to start experimenting with an Anthrax vaccine on America’s children.

A key panel of government advisers Friday recommended that the federal government sponsor a controversial study to test the anthrax vaccine in children to see whether the inoculation would protect young Americans against a bioterrorist attack.

The National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB), which advises the federal government on issues related to bioterrorism, voted 12-1 to recommend that the Health and Human Services Department move forward with a study aimed at determining whether the vaccine is safe and effective in children and identifying the best dose. Patricia Quinlisk of the Iowa Department of Public Health, who chairs the panel, was the only dissenter.

[snip]

Nicole Lurie, the assistant HHS secretary for preparedness and response who requested the panel’s review, said officials would consider the panel’s recommendation, but she did not give a time-frame for a decision on whether to conduct the study. [Emphasis added.]

Interestingly the primary producer of the Anthrax vaccine is PharmAthene. While PharmAthene has reportedly spent millions lobbying in 2011, there is at least one call for PharmAthene and Siga to consider merging again.

While, according to USA Today, the Obama administration will not begin testing Anthrax vaccine on children for now while it resolves the ethical questions, it is noteworthy that the panel review for testing Anthrax vaccines on children was recommended by Dr. Nicole Lurie.

Lurie, an Obama appointee, is the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services.

According to the LA Times, Lurie has also been involved in the negotiations over Siga’s profit margin with the smallpox vaccine:

Negotiations over the price of the drug and Siga’s profit margin were contentious. In an internal memo in March, Dr. Richard J. Hatchett, chief medical officer for HHS‘ biodefense preparedness unit, said Siga’s projected profit at that point was 180%, which he called “outrageous.”

In an email earlier the same day, a department colleague told Hatchett that no government contracting officer “would sign a 3 digit profit percentage.”

In April, after Siga’s chief executive, Dr. Eric A. Rose, complained in writing about the department’s “approach to profit,” Lurie assured him that the “most senior procurement official” would be taking over the negotiations.

“I trust this will be satisfactory to you,” Lurie wrote Rose in a letter.

The Obama administration’s apparent willingness to award its cronies with no-bid contracts, as well as the seeming willingness to test questionable vaccines on children makes one wonder if this is what the President meant when he said he has the most open and ethical administration in history.

HT: Moe Lane.

________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Cross-posted on LaborUnionReport.com and BigGovernment.com

COMMENTS

  • persiflage

    Take a deep breath.
    This is just “the Chicago way”, don’t you see?
    That sounds so much better than “corrupt crony capitalism”, doesn’t it?

  • Ausonius

    :) :) :) :)

    I know! We all have our fantasies!

    We must push such information through the alternative media! And e-mail it to any “centrists” or “independents” of your acquanitance.

  • mystryda

    If children die during the testing, it’s really a bonus, since they’re just a punishment. Besides, testing on animals would annoy his base.

  • johnt

    What started out as a reform movement is now a national Tammany Hall, and with a proped up idiot child as president. The One Undone.
    Of late it seems the LA Times hasn’t gotten the message, they’re supposed to be fixating on Herman Cain’s erotic urges or Perry’s gaffe, [ 57 states doesn't cut it as a gaffe.]
    180% profit margin? This will really have the Democrats answer to the Tea Party, the OWS vermin carriers, roaring. Sure.

  • renl57

    Part of being a strong leader is setting an example for the people to follow.

    Obama should start by testing the vaccine on his own daughters.

    And then the vaccines should be tested on the children of members of Congress (both parties).

    Let us see how that goes before deciding on the next step.

    • veritaseequitas

      Little Barry and Moochelle. They are the ones who always talk about having the best interests of the American people at heart – you know, their finances, what they eat, what they say, etc. Why not let them prove that they are sincere by being first up for testing.
      Little Barry and his odious administration are more and more out of control each and every day. It would not surprise me at all if they engineered a crisis that required Little Barry to declare a national emergency so he can stay in office for another term…or longer.

  • rickdeckard

    the bipartisan debt commission appears to be deadlocked, and it is unlikely the Thanksgiving deadline for an agreement to eliminate $1.5T in deficit spending over ten years, or approximately 3.5% of the budget, will be met.

    Go figure.

    $443M buys a lot of bullets. If I was in a buying mood that’s where I’d be spending.

  • florajo

    I think we should have an open bid so that China or India can win the bid and receive reference doses of the small pox virus. Maybe we should turn on our brains before we swing to the opposition on every single story. Yeahh, silly me.

    • Locked and Loaded

      Please do elaborate, and advise why you think it is either Siga or China/India.

  • florajo

    Government agencies must decide the bidding rules in advance. If you require unusual security restrictions, quality control levels, and particular geographic locations–as is obviously the case here–then you’re going to get deals that look and cost like this one. This is not the same as $80 staplers and $200 hammers. But that’s just my opinion.

  • renl57

    I remember that when in 2003 the Bush Administration raised the possibility of a smallpox attack, the liberals were incredulous, claiming that Bush was “appealing to fear”.

    Times change:

    “The Obama administration official who has overseen the buying of Siga’s drug says she is trying to strengthen the nation’s preparedness. Dr. Nicole Lurie, a presidential appointee who heads biodefense planning at Health and Human Services, cited a 2004 finding by the Bush administration that there was a ‘material threat’ smallpox could be used as a biological weapon.”

    http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-smallpox-20111112-m,0,6088814.story

    So now the Obama Administration is citing smallpox warnings by Bush???

  • readyfornov

    Another one of Obama’s buddies is involved with this company. SEIU’s Andy Stern. Obama is as corrupt as they come. Six degrees of Obama is corruption.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      nt.

  • sowa1

    What a hypocrite. He is so two faced. Says one thing and does another. Will veto anything the Super Committee does that keeps the American people from being hurt. Really. He already has killed hundreds of thousands of jobs, kept businesses from opening, Gives money etc. only to his supporters. Already has taken money from Medicare and the Military and wants more. Lies about Republicans not willing to do anything to help with jobs, when there are 15 job producing bills sitting in the Senate where Reid won’t even bring them up for a vote. Why you ask? Because they would pass and Obama would have to stop lying to us.

  • celador2

    Solyndra cronyism was due to WH concern for solar enegy, said Obama. What is WH and Obama excuse for a vaccine that is not needned, expensive, and that is untested due to danger?

  • byrrni

    Isn’t there another recent story of using client money inappropriately?
    What caring parent is going to volunteer their child for anthrax experimentation?
    It seems like there is a new story everyday that boggles the mind and makes one wonder where all the common sense went! There certainly isn’t any in Washington.
    Why is Congress allowing those currently occupying the White House to get away with actions that no other Administration would have even considered? They continually show their contempt for the American system of Government as recently demonstrated by refusing to honor a subpena issued for documents. The current resident may be sitting in the highest seat of power for this country but he is still supposed to be governed by the Constitution, THAT HE SWORE TO HONOR AND ABIDE BY, when he took office.
    How does he justify giving ANY money to a company for a drug to treat a disease that has been eliminated in this country? Is he planning to release the disease in another of his personal agendas?
    Please Congress, find a way to stop this madness! YOU are supposed to be in charge of the money, not the White House.