« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Union Bosses Applaud Obama’s Unconstitutional Appointments to Union-Controlled NLRB

On Wednesday afternoon, the current President of the United States did what may be described as an unconstitutional end run around the United States Senate by “recess appointing” three nominees to the National Labor Relations Board (as well as to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) even though the Senate is not in recess.

Notwithstanding the CFPB appointment, Obama’s seating of the three NLRB appointees—two of whom are  ardently pro-union and demonstrate Obama’s ongoing willingness to continue his union-backed carpet-bombing campaign on millions of job creators—drew immediate fire U.S. House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN), who stated:

“President Obama’s stunning move to install not one but three new members to the National Labor Relations Board without a hearing or a vote in the United States Senate is an unprecedented abuse of power and an affront to the will of the American people.

“For months, workers and employers have expressed outrage over the board’s job-destroying actions, and in response, the House of Representatives took definitive action to rein in the NLRB’s activist agenda through two pieces of bipartisan legislation. Now, the president has taken matters into his own hands, unilaterally selecting new board members without allowing the Senate or the public any opportunity to consider their qualifications for this important position.

“Make no mistake – each and every decision issued by this board will be tainted by the president’s actions. I will continue to pursue aggressive oversight of the NLRB and take any action necessary to protect the rights of workers and employers.”

Obama’s appointments to the NLRB comes a less than three weeks following his nomination of International Union of Operating Engineers General Counsel Richard Griffin and former attorney to Ted Kennedy, Sharon Block, to fill vacancies at the Board.

Union bosses, however, are positively gleeful with Obama’s move.

The SEIU issued a press release Wednesday afternoon stating:

President Obama Stands With Working Families

Today President Obama appointed three new members to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and in doing so took a strong stand for workers around the country.

The appointments bypasses the predictable Republican filibusters or other obstructionist measures they would employ. There is no doubt that if given the shot, the GOP would have done away with the Board entirely, probably the very worst thing working families need right now.

[Apparently, to the SEIU, America's job creators do not work, nor do they have families.]

Noting the presumption of obstructionism, rather than fact, Moe Lane points out:

They have not been in point of fact filibustered; the question hasn’t even arisen yet, given that it’s been all of nineteen days since the names were submitted and a huge chunk of that time was the Christmas/New Year’s break.

Teamsters’ boss Jimmy Hoffa (the younger) issued a press release as well, which stated:

Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa today applauded President Obama for using his constitutional authority to appoint well-qualified people to government posts that are key to protecting working people from union-busting corporations and financial predators.

Not to be left out in heaping praise on the appointments, United Steel Workers president, Leo Gerard stated:

“Republicans left the President with no choice but to recess appoint these four people, three to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and one to direct the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,” said USW International President Leo W. Gerard. “President Obama showed today that he will use every means at his disposal to circumvent Republican opposition to safeguarding workers and consumers.”

Apparently, “every means at his disposal” includes stepping all over the separation of powers as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

If, in fact, Barack Obama was attempting to restore some semblance of credibility to the union-controlled NLRB, this move only makes matters worse, as the attacks on America’s job creators will continue.

For more reactions to Obama’s NLRB appointments, go here.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Follow @laborunionrpt

Cross-posted on LaborUnionReport.com

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    The guy wants to be a dictator.

    • z06gal

      and the Republican “leadership” is not going to do one thing about it either. Boehner whines about the “unconstitutional power grab” but that will be it. Obama knows that the Pubs are spineless and will not try to stop anything he wants to do. It is sickening

  • Tbone

    This has gone to far.

  • Michael Dugas

    And Democrat Senators better stand up also against this tyranny or will they finally put the final nail in the coffin of their belief in a Representative Democracy. After all it’s Reid who has been keeping the Senate going in these pro forma sessions. Democrats used this same procedure to prevent Bush from doing recess appointments. I can’t see the Dems wanting this precedent to stand and risk it being used against them during a republican administration.

  • westcoastpatriette

    will be dictating this year as he has already said he will not wait any longer for cooperation from Congress but will begin to move on his own to get things done. He is desperate and getting reckless practically daring Congress to do something about it. And if they don’t start aggressive action to stop him, he will only get bolder.

    Congress must intervene to stop this madman.

    • DerKrieger

      …at Federalism?

      • westcoastpatriette

        It’s stuff like this and the limpwristed response from Congress that makes imperative the need for States to fight back — but due to the many reasons you and I have discussed before, people rarely understand the latent power residing in their state governments if only they would grow a pair, too.

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    ;)

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      “Now lets see if Republican Senators finally show some fight about something.”

  • annas

    Does no one do something? Everyone says the things he continues to do are unconstitutional and yet NO ONE files charges or even takes him to task over it. Everyone is afraid of him or afraid to be termed a racist. The man is becoming a dictator and we simply sit by and decry the situation!

    • docaja

      If these actions truly amounted to an overthrow of the Republic some number of our Republican representatives and senators,even Democrats, would initiate action. I don’t believe this type of rhetoric improves our ability to influene outcomes

  • freemanja1991

    Sue get the Courts to Remove these appointees for improperly being sat. Void all rules passed? Like how AZ’s supreme court put Mathas back on the redistricting commission.

  • raginpatriot

    Many call Hussein Obama a socialist, but it he’s displaying more characteristics of fascism (though both are related subsets of collectivism). Before long they’ll be handing out “black shirts” at “Organizing for America” and ACORN offices across the land.

  • Ausonius

    The Republicans have rolled over every time and handed him wins on debt ceilings and other things.

    Why should he be afraid of losing a nomination fight? The traditions of the Senate?

    Why would he care? He is a RADICAL: by definition he will not care about keeping traditions and will go out of his way to break them.

    Weakness attracts dominance. When the bully knows he can kick sand in your face, he will.

  • izoneguy

    OK, so I was helping my son with 7th grade history homework….

    It was describe – Monarchy, Theocratic, Totalitarian & Democracy

    OK, –

    Monarchy – he picked Great Britian
    Theocratic – he picked the Vatican
    Totalitarian – he picked Nazi Germany and when he was reading
    the definition –

    Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a political system where the state recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible.[1] Totalitarian regimes stay in political power through an all-encompassing propaganda disseminated through the state-controlled mass media, a single party that is often marked by personality cultism, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of speech, mass surveillance, and widespread use of terror.

    He read that and said “Hmmmm, that sure sounds like Obama”
    WOW – I said – Son, you should tell the teacher that!!!
    Waiting for a call from the history teacher…..

    • gekster

      uncorupted from being a grownup, can usually see more clearly.
      I see you are raising him well.
      Now that call from that teacher……