« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

NLRB To Force Companies To Turn Over Employee Telephone Numbers & E-Mail Addresses To Unions?

Union-backed NLRB Chairman: "We keep our eye on the prize."

Undaunted by the constitutionally-questionable appointment of three members to Barack Obama’s National Labor Relations Board, union attorney and current NLRB chairman Mark Pearce declared in an Associated Press interview that he and his union comrades are continuing their assault on the 93% of private-sector employees who are union-free.

In fact, if Obama’s union appointees have their way, all employees who are targeted for unionization will have their employers forced to turn over their home telephone number and e-mail addresses to unions.

Ever since the 1960s, when unions have targeted companies for unionization through a NLRB-supervised election, employers have been required to turn over the list of employee names and their home addresses. The NLRB, in turn, promptly gives the list of employee names and home addresses to the involved union(s).

This list, called an Excelsior List, gives union organizers the ability to conduct intrusive home visits prior to the NLRB election. As is often said, just as when any other salesperson doing door-to-door sales knocks at the door, targeted employees can invite the union organizers into their homes, or they can sic the chihuahua on them.

The requirement to furnish the employees’ names and addresses list is mandatory. In fact, the refusal by an employer to furnish the list (or providing a list with too many errors) would typically result in the NLRB’s automatic overturning of an election if a union were to lose. Again, this requirement has been the standard since the 1960s.

Now, however, the union appointees within the Obama NLRB want to expand the current Excelsior List requirement from the mere furnishing of names and addresses to also include furnishing employees’ home telephone numbers and their e-mail addresses to enable unions to perpetually propagandize employees.

According to the AP report:

We keep our eye on the prize,” Pearce said in an interview with The Associated Press. “Our goal is to create a set of rules that eliminate a lot of waste of time, energy and money for the taxpayers.”

One change Pearce wants is to require businesses to hand over lists of employee phone numbers and emails to union leaders before an election.

He also wants the board to consider other rule changes it didn’t have time to approve before it was on the verge of losing a quorum last year. That includes the use of electronic filings and quicker timetables for certain procedures.

“My personal hope is that we take on all of these things and consider each one of these rules,” Pearce said. “We presume the constitutionality of the president’s appointments, and we go forward based on that understanding.”

With ambush elections looming on the horizon, as long as Obama’s NLRB continues its assault on union-free employers and their employees (and as long as Republicans remain unwilling to, or incapable of truly reining in the rogue NLRB), as opposed to creating jobs Barack Obama’s alleged goal of creating jobs will remain elusive. Still, the union bureaucrats within the federal apparatchik don’t seem to understand this simple fact.

_________________

“Socialism has no place in the hearts of those who would secure the fight for freedom and preserve democracy.” Samuel Gompers, American Federation of Labor, 1918

Cross-posted at LaborUnionReport.com

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • stumpy

    starting to remind me of the Gestapo.

  • tjpeco

    I’d really get a kick out of telling them to go f@%# off.

    • qualityguy

      but don’t be surprised when a brick comes hurling through your big plate glass window or your siding gets splattered with red paint. You have to remember that you are dealing with people here who are morally, emotionally and mentally bankrupt! Most don’t have the good sense that God gave to a dog! They are lemmings – drones doing the bidding of their corrupt leadership. Ain’t socialism grand?

      • Old_Crow
  • azrally

    How would making it easier for unions to harass employees “eliminate a lot of waste of time, energy and money for the taxpayers.

  • jiminga

    will surely cause a spike in off-shoring of even more jobs. But Obama’s minions don’t care. They have their eyes on the prize, and the prize is the destruction of the private sector economy.

  • duncer

    Remember the thugs that went to some bankers houses when they were not home and terrorized their families. They would do the same to workers that declined to sign on to card check. They were so called community organizations exercising free speech but you know this administration would not prosecute any more than they did the thugs with clubs at the polling places.

    • Raven

      More so because the long guns are at home. And they shoot better than I do.

      Ah, right. That’s why they don’t try those things in PA outside of Pittsburgh and Philly.

    • olsmithie

      I can only caution you that you may not have time to respond to an attack by the mobsters that call themselves a union. I recall a small child being killed in her bed by drive-by shooters sending a message to a holdout. One of our sites had to put steel panels up to stop the bullets that were fired at the plant by these “community organizers.” These people have no morals and will stoop to any low to collect their “protection money”, errr. I mean dues.

      Regards

      • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

        …the Phelps-Dodge strike in early 80s in Arizona with this…

        I recall a small child being killed in her bed by drive-by shooters sending a message to a holdout.

        Am I correct?

        • olsmithie

          so it may have been. Don’t recall all th details.

          Regards

          • rightkindofred

            …that it makes me want to throw up.
            BUT, in my area (Ohio), Republicans depend upon getting about half of the union vote to get elected. A lot of union members are with us on cultural/social issues, and will vote Republican as long as they think they’re going to get a fair shake on economic issues. That’s a formula that’s been producing Republican victories ever since we won with “The Silent Majority” in ’68. My takeaway is that we should position ourselves as being opposed to Union excesses and abuses, not to labor per se.

          • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

            Here’s the story:

            Tot, 3, is shot; strike blamed: http://goo.gl/0ZwZw

  • dfaith

    I get why people don’t like the idea of unions knowing where they live or having their contact info, but there is a larger practical problem here that has to be solved somehow.

    In order for people to exercise their statutory right to decide whether or not to organize, workers have to engage in an election, which requires a campaign. To have a true campaign where workers get to hear both sides’ arguments, both sides have to be given access to the workers.

    Companies aren’t forced to allow unions on their property (and rightfully so), so how would people opposed to the Excelsior list propose providing for a fair campaign where both sides get to be heard?

    • geah

      we are talking union are we not? the paint thing was happening back in the 70s against self employed house painters for pete sake, like they were a threat to big business, IT is called we be the boss, you be the wee little man and pay us boss type people most of your little money… crude yes, true yes.

    • scmom

      The union may not be able to be on the property, but they can leave their pamphlets and information around for everyone to have and read. Those employees who are supporting the union will, make no mistake, be sure to contact everyone and make sure that the Union’s side of the story has been made available.

    • olsmithie

      Thus they have access to each employee even if they didn’t have addresses. The home addresses are needed for the muscle to go threaten holdouts at their home with their children present..

      Regards

      • olsmithie

        in most cases I can look up your street address in milliseconds.

        Regards

        • veritaseequitas

          a telephone number.

          • funwithknives

            but Legally directing these companies, to hand out cell phone numbers{by the way, NEVER in reverse look-up} or E/M addresses is directing same, under force of law, to violate it’s employee’s Right- To-Privacy. Examine any Standard Employment Privacy Statement/Mutual Agreement.
            {Can anyone here spell “Lawsuit of Massive Proportions”??}
            Just How would NLRB Force an employer to hand out this info? At the point of a gun? Court Injunction? Aggrieved parties could get their own Stay and A W A A Y, W E G O !!!!
            { BTW, I recently used reverse look-up to find businesses advertising for help. Many times no results were seen unless you wanted to “Pay The Freight” they charged, per-inquiry.I got No Luck At All, probably 25% of the time . It’s not infallable}

            Has it finally come to this? Truly, I DO FEAR My Government…

  • DVPTEXFLA

    It looks like Obama and his minions are writing another chapter in their favorite book…How to Send Jobs Offshore for Dummies… some of the first chapters included these favorites… Raising taxes as high as possible… New Regulations Create New Jobs….Obamacare Really Does Save Money (Wink ,Wink) and everyone’s favorite…Of Course the Cost of Energy Will Go Sky High, and now How Unions Saved the Businesses…Including chapters from the Steel Industry, the rubber industry….the makers of your I-Phone….

  • veritaseequitas

    privacy laws. In my employment we are trained continuously on the protection of employee’s PII (personally identifiable information). Why is it the unions are above the laws that everyone else is supposed to follow? Next thing you know, they are going to want employee’s banking info, medical info, etc.
    With the plethora of employment law we have in this country, the usefulness and relevancy of the unions has become moot. They really need to be disembowled.

  • Juggernaut

    at union members homes as well as threatnening phone calls. With such people there is no telling how low they will go. Will forward this via twitter and email. Makes me think of Brownshirts.

    • funwithknives

      illustrated a shooting at a non-union electrical contractor’s house in Monroe, Michigan. Hacked on his truck awhile, as well. Virtually no media reports locally even though I personally notified each and every outlet’s HotLine E/Mail account. {on Windows form#2011,with clickable links as part of my submissions}
      Media Bias? What Media Bias? {Ohhh…, That’s Riiight, they are all IN A UNION!!}

  • Juggernaut

    at union members homes as well as threatnening phone calls. With such people there is no telling how low they will go. Will forward this via twitter and email. Makes me think of Brownshirts.

    • avagreen

      …….martial law waiting in the wing.

    • Common_Cents

      community organizing at its finest.

  • Pingback: Resource

  • Pingback: 30 Reasons Not to Vote Obama or The Democrat/Communist Party « tommaerling