« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama Judge Rules Companies Must Post NLRB’s Union Posters, Declines to Consider NLRB Appointments

On Friday, Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson approved the union-dominated National Labor Relations Board’s mandate on nearly all private-sector companies to post so-called “union rights posters.” Additionally, Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, declined to hear a challenge to Obama’s recent NLRB appointments.

In the union rights poster ruling, Berman Jackson ruled that the NLRB did not exceed its statutory authority to require private-sector employers that fall within the scope of the NLRB to post notices to employees advising them of their right to unionize. This means that most companies with two or more employees (outside of the airline or railroad industries) will be required to post the union rights posters (see PDF copy here) on April 30, 2012.

In a small bone threw to employers, Jackson did rule, according to the Hill, that the failure to post a notice would not be an automatic Unfair Labor Practice, as the NLRB originally proposed in its ruling:

She did rule, however, that the NLRB cannot “make a blanket advance determination that a failure to post [the notice] will always constitute an unfair labor practice,” though it can be considered in individual cases.

In a press release, the National Federation of Independent Business stated:

“We are pleased that the court has recognized that the Board far exceeded its statutory authority in attempting to take punitive enforcement measures against small-business owners who failed to comply with the poster rule,” said Karen Harned, executive director of NFIB’s Small Business Legal Center. “But in ruling that the NLRB does not possess the authority to enforce the poster rule as an unfair labor practice only, it is essentially handing the small-business community a quarter of a loaf. Among other things we are concerned that this decision will encourage frivolous lawsuits by unions against small-business owners who refuse to comply. We believe the court did not go far enough by failing to determine that the NLRB does not have rulemaking authority, in denying our First Amendment claim, and in denying our challenge to the alleged recess appointments. NFIB plans to appeal the decision in part.”

Separately, Berman Jackson refused to consider a challenge to the consitutionality of Barack Obama’s controversial appointments to the NLRB:

In a separate ruling, Berman Jackson declined to consider a challenge to President Barack Obama’s recess appointment of three labor board members in January. Business groups had argued the appointments were unconstitutional, saying the Senate was not technically in recess when Obama acted.

According to her bio, Barack Obama appointed Berman Jackson to the bench in March 2011.

__________________

“Socialism has no place in the hearts of those who would secure the fight for freedom and preserve democracy.” Samuel Gompers, American Federation of Labor, 1918

Cross-posted at LaborUnionReport.com

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com punditpawn

    So I have no ‘right’ to operate a non-union company?

    November is coming…

  • Locked and Loaded

    is this:
    Under the NLRA, it is illegal for your employer to: …

    • northeastred

      The NLRB and Judge Jackson (a woman!) are dead wrong on this. Locked and Loaded, we need more people like you standing up to the aggressive reach of government into workplace. I used to own a cleaning service in the 1990s and I suspected that some of my female employees were using bathroom stalls to steal cleaning supplies and hand them off to accomplices. Like you say, I will darn well film whatever I want to on my property. So I put in cameras above the woman’s stalls.

      After three months of examining the videos, I caught two women stealing floppy discs and staplers. Fired them on the spot. Next thing I know, they get lawyers and now I gotta write two big checks. This is what it’s coming to, folks. The government can now tell you what you can and can’t film on YOUR Business PROPERTY!

  • montani

    “Berman Jackson said the issue was not relevant in this case because the NLRB had already approved the new posters before Obama appointed the new members.”

    As much as I don’t the NLRB, that’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for “Berman Jackson declined to consider a challenge to President Barack Obama

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      It was more to make sure the small business community knows what the status was.

      Additionally, very few of the media sources mentioned the fact that the judge was an Obama appointee.

      One other thing: There are a lot of employers who are aghast at this requirement and, on principle, they are eight to be. However, from the practical side the posters will not spawn an increase in union organizing excepting in the rarest of cases. Most union campaigns begin from disgruntled employees. It wouldn’t matter if there are posters or not.

  • Tbone

    scumbag liberal judge. DUH.