« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Unwittingly, Obama’s NLRB Moves To Put Final Nail In Private-Sector Unions’ Coffin

Or, simply: Why pay for the cow when you can get the milk for free?

For all of the pro-union leanings of President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board appointees, the NLRB is, unwittingly, about to do something that those of us in the preventive labor relations field have been doing for years: Educate employees that they don’t need to pay dues to a union in order to exercise their rights.

In 1935, Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act.  The cornerstone of the law, which applies to most private-sector workplaces with two or more employees, is what is known as employees’ Section Seven Rights.

Section Seven is as follows [emphasis added]:

Sec. 7. [§ 157.] Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all such activities except to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment as authorized in section 8(a)(3) [section 158(a)(3) of this title].

What many employees (and employers) don’t realize is that employees without a union have the exact same rights as they do with a union and, often times, even more. As a result, every year, thousands of employees get duped into unionization and paying union dues when, if they knew their already-existing rights, they might never entertain the thought.

Employees without a union have the right, when there are two or more, to complain to their employer, to negotiate agreements, to work in concert for the betterment of their workplace on issues of pay, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment…Again, all without a union.

Now, Barack Obama’s NLRB is going to advertise this for America’s union-free workplace.

According to a piece in the Wall Street Journal, the NLRB’s Chairman, former union attorney Mark Pearce is pushing to advertise the rights of employees to work without unions:

“I want workers to know that if they have grievances they have a right under certain circumstances to voice them,” Mr. Pearce said.

In the next two weeks, the NLRB is set to roll out a Web page explaining “concerted activity” and highlighting cases involving unlawful punishment for it. It also plans pamphlets in English and Spanish that will be distributed through worker-advocacy groups and sister federal agencies, such as the Labor Department. NLRB officials will address the issue in speeches and appearances on radio and television.

[snip]

The NLRB’s Mr. Pearce said the information campaign isn’t related to declining union membership. “This is a message that the NLRB has been trying to get out for years. What’s new is that, for a variety of reasons, people are more open to hearing it than ever before,” he said. A similar agency effort in 2006 didn’t take hold as intended.

While some employers will bemoan this move by the NLRB and others who, based on a lack of knowledge of the NLRA, unintentionally run afoul of  the law, those that are more sophisticated will see the advantages of being able to explain to employees how preferable (and cost effective) it is to work directly (individually, or as a group) with their employer, without employees having to pay hundreds of dollars per year to an organization whose agenda (and politics) may be harmful to employees, their jobs and their company.

As importantly, for those currently-unionized workers, once they realize that they can exercise the same rights that they currently have with the union without paying a union, there will likely be more unionized workers looking for a way to decertify their union. [Information on how to decertify unions can be found here.]

As the old saying goes: Why pay for the cow when you can get the milk for free?

While some will disagree with the NLRB’s effort to educate employees about their ability to exercise their rights without a union, most should see the union-free advantages to the NLRB’s move.

In fact, Republicans may also realize the benefits of the NLRB’s move as more and more employees realize they don’t need to pay unions, which will result in less money going to union-bought Democrats.

For once, whether they realize it or not, the union appointees within the Obama NLRB aren’t appearing to be the sock puppets for union bosses.

__________________

“Socialism has no place in the hearts of those who would secure the fight for freedom and preserve democracy.” Samuel Gompers, American Federation of Labor, 1918

COMMENTS

  • synergist777

    Union leaders, of course, want to get re-elected. So, even though the unions representing workers for big businesses work hard to get workers from medium or smaller businesses to join up, the union rules are often set up to favor the big businesses, which, after all, hire far more union members, and make the medium to smaller business far less competitive. The result is that the myth (supported, in part, by law) that industry unions have a legal monopoly on worker organization actually works against the interests of workers for any but the largest companies. And corporate management is not allowed to encourage, in any way, their workers to form their own union rather than join the big one.

  • RSSS

    Do you consider this surprising news or have you seen a trend that would have led to this development?

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      But not necessarily the NLRB’s reinforcement of the fact that Section Seven applies to non-union workers as well.

      Back in the Clinton administration, the Clinton NLRB conferred “Weingarten Rights” (normally reserved to unionized workplaces) to union-free workers. Though it was later overturned with the Bush NLRB, it had little impact while it was in effect.

      As stated above, though, the advertising is new.

  • rightsideray

    is more of a trend hence the end runs by current regime to prop up union bosses. After the ’97 Teamsters strike many drivers dropped out when they found what the company offered but was never presented to rank & file. Younger workers aren’t locked into the idea that they benefit from unions who don’t heed the worker’s best interests ahead of the bosses’

  • Juggernaut

    people that they have the same rights union or not and that they can exercise those rights for “free” through the courts or gov interaction and in many cases it won’t cost a dime. Free sells liberals like nothing else, all it takes is the right approach. We’ll never break them from all unions but the gov unions must go at the state and federal level because they create one of the big obstacles to deficit cutting and entitlement reform.

  • johnt

    and fairness. Are we sure he is a Democrat?