Mitch Daniels Announces Intent to Sign H.B. 1210


Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels has announced his intent to sign Indiana’s H.B. 1210, a measure which would, among other things, prevent Title X Medicaid funds from being used facilities that provide abortions. When the bill becomes law, Indiana will become the third state to have such a provision, following Texas (which passed “Rider 8″ in 2003) and Missouri (which passed a nearly identical law in 1999).
Although the intent of the law is laudable, it would be inaccurate to say that the bills “defund Planned Parenthood,” as is commonly being reported in the media. As the Alliance Defense Fund has noted (pdf warning), the overall effect of the bill will essentially merely require some administrative paper shuffling on Planned Parenthood’s part. In fact, that is the central feature of the law that will likely save it from a challenge on Supremacy Clause grounds:

Because Rider 8′s language, like the language of H.B. 1210, could be read to permit family planning agencies to continue to receive funds by creating separate affiliates, in the court’s words by “dividing into ‘Family Planning’ entities and ‘Abortion Services’ entities, it did not run afoul of federal law. . . .
The Texas lawsuit was subsequently dismissed after Planned Parenthood unilaterally complied with the requirements of Rider 8 by incorporating six separate, independent affiliates for the provision of abortion services, transferring the abortion licenses to those facilities, and agreeing to maintain accounting, timekeeping, and boards of directors separate from the family planning services providers.

In other words, unlike Christie’s budgetary aggression in New Jersey, the Indiana law is unlikely to have the effect of actually resulting in the closing of any abortion clinics. However, it will accomplish two important objectives:

  • It will reduce the amount of tax dollars spent on abortion, which is important for conscience reasons alone.
  • It will probably reduce somewhat the number of abortions (probably by a relatively small number), as Indiana abortion clinics will now be forced to price all abortions at such a level that they are profitable without the aid of government largesse.

UPDATE: RedState has received the following statement from Michael J. Norton, Senior Defense Counsel from the Alliance Defense Fund:

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels should be commended for announcing his intention to sign into law the Schneider Amendment (H.B. 1210).  Tax dollars of the people of Indiana should not be funneled to abortionists, especially during tough economic times.  Indiana has worded a bill that allows them to be good stewards of the people’s money in this regard without fear of jeopardizing other funding that is clearly not at issue in this bill.  The Schneider Amendment states that no state agency may enter into a contract with or make a grant to “any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions are performed that involves the expenditure of state funds or federal funds administered by the state.”  If the bill becomes law, the State of Indiana would not be imposing conditions inconsistent with federal guidelines as some people allege, but instead would merely be applying its own congruent conditions for eligibility for qualified provider status under Medicaid.  Similar provisions have been upheld by courts.  The Schneider Amendment is good public policy to protect life as well as taxpayer resources.
Some have contended that this vote will provide a clear signal as to Daniels’ intentions with respect to a Presidential run. I am not as convinced that this is the case. Daniels has always been a reliable pro-lifer, and his vote here merely puts him in line with the overwhelming majority of Americans (including a substantial portion of Democrats) who oppose taxpayer funding of abortion. Furthermore, he has done no backpedaling (public or otherwise) from his stated position that he neither needs or wants the votes of voters who are primarily social conservatives. And he has still not taken any of the preliminary steps that would be expected for a candidate at this stage.
In the end, though, the politics of this decision should take a second seat to far more important goal of extricating the goverment from the business of providing abortions – and the passage of this bill accomplishes a small but symbolically meaningful step in that regard.



RSS feed

71 Comments Leave a comment

A question

Dan McLaughlin (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 6:54PM EDT (link)

Would PP Indiana have to operate from physically separate facilities, or can they still operate taxpayer-funded services out of their abortion clinics?

Also, if essentially the same thing was done previously in Texas, why is it being billed as a first-in-the-nation bill?

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

Because the media is incompetent

Leon H. Wolf (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:11PM EDT (link)

As to the first question, I really do not know. I think it just requires separate paperwork.

————
We can’t stop here. This is bat country.

 
 

I join Dan in my query...

aesthete (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:04PM EDT (link)

What differentiates this bill from Texas’?

I would add that your statement (“his stated position [is] that he neither needs or wants the votes of voters who are primarily social conservatives”) is a mischaracterization of the “truce” statements, though you’re right that he hasn’t backed off from those statements.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

Leon, your perception of my diary on Daniels

mbecker908 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:10PM EDT (link)

is wrong. Nowhere did I say or even indicate that signing this legislation would be a clear – or even hazy – indication that he is running for POTUS.

What I did say was that if he does not sign the legislation he’s dead meat in the primaries.

Change

Ahhh, fair enough.

Leon H. Wolf (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:13PM EDT (link)

Although, many people have in fact made that point.

I’m happy to update the post, if you want.

————
We can’t stop here. This is bat country.

No, this is fine.

mbecker908 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:33PM EDT (link)

And it wasn’t a big deal, just a minor correction.

Change

 
 
 

political move

student14 Friday, April 29th at 7:29PM EDT (link)

I am surprised he signed the bill, but I also very glad. Although, this was a political move because he’s most likely planning on running.

Hopefully there will be enough moderates running (Daniels, Romney, Trump, etc) to split the votes so that a true conservative (Palin, Cain) will end up winning the nomination.

"True conservative". Snort.

mbecker908 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:39PM EDT (link)

Sonny, Daniels is no moderate. He’s actually downsized government in Indiana and has neutered the public employee unions before it was fashionable.

Palin is all talk, there is nothing even remotely conservative about her governance – abbreviated as it was – in Alaska and Cain, while I like the guy has never run for office so you have no clue what he’d really do.

Trump isn’t a Republican, let alone a moderate and I’ll give you Romney. And Huckabee.

Frankly, if you’re looking for people who have conservative RECORDS as opposed to conservative press releases look at Daniels, Pawlenty and Christy. They all have warts, but they also have conservative records of governance.

And there is no such thing as a “true conservative”.

Change

Ummm, Becker? Didn't Cain run for Senate? [nt]

acat (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:51PM EDT (link)

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Ran and lost

aesthete (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 8:00PM EDT (link)

We have no indication of how he’d behave in a political office.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 

Palin/West 2012

student14 Friday, April 29th at 10:27PM EDT (link)

1. I am not a sonny. I am female.

2. “Daniels, Pawlenty and Christy.” Thank you, but no thanks. And I’ve read a couple of your comments before and you’ve bashed Palin in both. You can say it all day long, but she has a conservative record. I am not sure how you keep missing that and give pass for a bully like Christie.

Later Becker.

Ahhh yes.

mbecker908 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:13PM EDT (link)

The empty sound of ignorance.

Just pathetic.

Kid.

Change

Right back you, Becker

student14 Friday, April 29th at 11:38PM EDT (link)

I may just be a student, but you seem like a cynical old man. Don’t start assuming I am “ignorant” because you can’t seem to get past your sexism (or whatever you have towards Palin). Palin is a solid conservative. You don’t have to support her for the presidency, or for VP even, to know that. You’re seemingly blind by some type of hatred for her/misinformation that you have about her. And that’s fine; I dismiss you just the same.

Oh by the way, I have liberal friends who are not as cynical/dismissive as you are about Palin (of course they would never support her because they disagree with her politics).

Anyhow, I have finals to study for and I don’t want to wasting my time attempting to educate you.

Peace out…sir.

"He spoke, but said nothing"

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:14AM EDT (link)

Here’s the problem with your posts: they’re chock-full of what you’re “feeling” and assuming about other people, not facts or anything close to a logical train of thought. I counted no less than three non-sequiturs in your first two sentences alone, and that’s not counting the fact that this entire thread has been a tiresome exercise in sussing facts out of you instead of touchy-feely garbage. I think I speak for the site when I say that I don’t give a frak about the feelings and opinions of college students as they pertain to politics. I *do* care about facts and logical arguments, and anyone who brings them will have my respect. Those people, college student or no, will also be given much more of a fair hearing when they choose to indulge in the occasional post about their feelings and intuition. You’re not at that level, not even close. ‘Becker is.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

Level?

student14 Saturday, April 30th at 1:09AM EDT (link)

I know what level I am at thank you.

He called me ignorant, I responded.

I deal plenty with logic, facts and reason. Sorry you can’t see that.

PS, I’d like to take the time to thank you and Becker’s generation for getting us into the mess we’re in now. My generation’s future sure looks bright.

You are either ignorant or foolish

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:25AM EDT (link)

If you don’t have the knowledge to respond to posts in a coherent fashion without using non-sequitur, you’re ignorant and too arrogant to admit it.

If you do have the knowledge but refuse to use it, instead opting to use ill-defined terms and categories (“true conservative”), unfounded assertions based on these ill-defined terms (“Sarah Palin and Herman Cain are true conservatives”, to paraphrase), and then getting offended when you get called on it, you’re foolish.

In either case, you can remedy it by posting logical arguments and backing them up with facts.

I’m not in ‘becker’s generation. It says a lot about you that you deal in group identity and ascribe blame based on that, rather than dealing with individuals and their arguments.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

Ageist. nt

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:31AM EDT (link)

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 

Ever more evidence of the worth of higher education.

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 2:18AM EDT (link)

Looks like a big zero to me.

You’re embarrassing yourself, not that you’d notice of course. And as far as mentioning that you’re ignorant, I was too kind. Ignorance can be easily fixed by the desire to learn and the willingness to work. Your problem can’t be fixed.

You don’t know how to do basic research.

You don’t know the difference between facts, assumptions and feelings. Hint, they’re not the same and need to be identified when used.

You can’t assemble a cogent argument, neither logic nor reasoning are your friends.

You can’t write.

Change

Oh, the irony!

student14 Saturday, April 30th at 2:55AM EDT (link)

Seems like I struck a cord with you men and I see that the name calling continues. Way to go guys.

But really, that’s all you fellas have? “foolish,” “ignorant” “incoherent” “can’t write,” etc.

Classy dudes. And care to back up any of your “arguments” or any of your claims?

Honestly, some sleep may help.

Franz Rule

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 3:07AM EDT (link)

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

So that's a no?

student14 Saturday, April 30th at 3:23AM EDT (link)

Thank you for confirming that you can’t back up your arguments, claims or the name calling.

Took you long enough.

Good night fellas. Try not to get too bent out of shape the next time someone else disagrees with you :)

Oh, and FYI, I am a she; not a “he.” Just so that you’re getting something right.

Oh, you're a "she"! That changes everything!

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 3:41AM EDT (link)

Oh wait…

It doesn’t.

At least it explains why you think you’re winning this argument :P (Kidding, ladies of RS.)

Back to Franz Rule…

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 
 
 
 
 

I made no assumptions.

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:28AM EDT (link)

Your pathetic little offerings speak quite clearly for themselves.

I’m not cynical or dismissive. I doubt you even understand the meaning of those words given what I’ve written about her. I have no intention of rehashing all of that because it would be pearls before swine, but I respect Palin’s abilities to do what she does well and as it happens one of those things doesn’t happen to be executive level work and I’ve detailed my issues with her “experience” several times.

Oh, and as far as “educating” somebody, you should google “Instapundit, education bubble”. You’re the poster child. And, dearie, if I need to be educated I’ll go to someone with real experience in the real world. And it won’t be you.

Change

 

Ah

redtillimdead (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:07AM EDT (link)

Palin supporters (Don’t take this negatively. I respect and admire her, just don’t think she’d be a great President or candidate for President) claiming sexism is about as common as liberals claiming racism now. Never thought I’d see the right resort to this, but sadly, its becoming more and more common.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

What else could it be?

student14 Saturday, April 30th at 1:34AM EDT (link)

–Trump comes on with an “in your face” accusatory attitude with practically no proof about the birth certificate and he’s hailed as the new wonder boy and is now a serious presidential contender. Have these people even looked at his political executive record? or lack thereof? He’s leading in major polls. Why?

—Christie? great governor for a blue state. Whatever. He’s taken on teacher’s union like a champ. Sure, he actually has to. His state is in a very big hole. His support for gun control, amnesty, the ground zero mosque and a shady appointment of an Islamist to the supreme court are all pushed aside Why? because he talks tough in front of the camera? Walker has done more in his couple of months in office than Christie has done in his time serving. And before you call me “naive,” I know they’re in two very different states but I have yet to hear of the outstanding things coming out NJ, When Palin was governor, she took on corruption, unions and oil companies (who, in my opinion, make teacher’s unions look pretty wimpy). She served with nearly 90% approval ratings and significantly reduced spending in her state. I didn’t hear anything about her until she was tapped by McCain. There is an obvious double standard and you’re going to equate that the “race card.” Suit yourself.

—Newt has 50 ex. wives, has quit his job and has collaborated with Pelosi in the past but he’s still being respected in Republican circles and is considered as a serious Republican presidential nominee. I haven’t head the term “quitter” applied to him even once. We should all know why Palin resigned, she explained it thousands of time. It was completely legitimate. I am glad she did. Who else would have worked as hard to uncover Obama’s radical agenda? or worked as tirelessly to endorse conservatives in the GOP candidates in primaries and general elections? or been a mega force behind the conservative movement?

Which GOP boy can you think of that has done what she has in the past two years? yet all the establishment and snobby conservative pundits do is hit her over the head every chance they get.

Hence why I will never register to the Republican party. Actually both parties are dirt. In fact, I will gladly vote for a conservative democrat (none at this time) than a McCain/Brown type Republican in a nanosecond.

Jane, you ignorant slut

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:56AM EDT (link)

Do you see anyone defending Newt or Trump here? Do you see ‘becker defending either of them? Because if you do, you might want to see either an eye doctor or a psychologist.

Regardless, your inability to think up a reason besides sexism for someone reaching a different conclusion than you is a failure of your imagination or mental prowess, not proof for sexism. Support for Trump, for example, can easily be ascribed to general stupidity or ignorance — both of which you should be intimately familiar with.

It’s also nice to see you confirm your ignorance by assigning equal status to both parties. As a person who is disgusted by the current iteration of the Republican party, I can nonetheless tell the difference between it and the Dems while recognizing their commonalities. That’s what being an adult is all about — it’s about making rational statements based on processed information, rather than making sweeping generalities that sound good in your head about disparate people and things.

Do you feel patronized? Good — when you don’t want to be patronized in the future, post rationally, logically, and critically. Posting a dollop of emotion might work for your poli-sci professor, but it isn’t going to pass muster here. Good luck on your finals — may they go better for you than this exercise in petulance did for the rest of us.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

Time for Franz...

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 2:12AM EDT (link)

Oh and “what else could it be”? Well you educated fool, it could be that she does not have the skills to be an executive, she can’t work with legislatures even when they are overwhelmingly Republican, she has no history of being able to prioritize and so far in her home state where she could have avoided 100% of the liability of the ethics charges that were the cause of her resignation with one phone call, her popularity with those who know her best is in the low twenties. Gee I guess all those people who live in the frozen reaches are sexist pigs too huh?

Go back to your silly books, you’re seriously overmatched.

Change

Safe to say you're not informed about Palin!

student14 Saturday, April 30th at 3:01AM EDT (link)

Also, grad school books aren’t silly. They’re expensive, very informative and important.

You should try reading some. Kind of need to.

Heh. nt

mbecker908 (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 3:10AM EDT (link)
 
 
 
 

becker is a cynical old man?

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 2:24AM EDT (link)

yeah and the Doc likes Marty Robbins and Robert Duvall. I would be cynical too if you were the example of our youth. BTW, you won’t be educating mbeck anytime soon.

btw, your generation better buck up, don’t be free loaders like the baby boomers who sucked from the teet of their parent’s hard work. Quit asking for things and make things.

sorry beck, I am not saying you are old, but he had you on cynical…me too lol.

Molon Labe!

 
 
 

Christie may be many things

PowerToThePeople (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:48PM EDT (link)

and I do not like many of his social stances, but he is far from being a bully. He is a republican dead in the middle of liberal town, he was stuck with massive union costs, inherited a massive deficit, and had to play tough ball to get things done.

Quite frankly, without getting into your assertion that Palin governed as a conservative, Christie has actually governed during his tenure which is much more than we can say for Palin. Christie faced and is facing a much more dire financial situation than Palin did, his state has always been ran by libs and unions, his deficit that he got stuck with made anything Alaska may have been facing pale in comparison, and he is hated by the opposition as much if not more than Palin ever was during her tenure, and he has not cut and run yet and I do not expect him to do so either.

Palin, oh boy, but will leave that one alone. But West needs to actually serve his constituents for more than a few months proving his rhetoric matches his deeds prior to anyone considering him ready to run this country. And as VP, he is only a breath away from being president should something happen to Palin or she quits again. His service record is admirable, but that does not mean in any way he is ready to be president. And his recent outspoken support for the idiot Trump should make any conservative pause for a sec when cheering for a West ticket.

Ok.

student14 Saturday, April 30th at 1:39AM EDT (link)

I disagree. But what do I know, I am “ignorant” and don’t know enough about the “real world.” Or so they think.

 
 
 

kind of like Rudy

Doc Holliday (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 10:39PM EDT (link)

he talked like a pro choicer but helped babies lives. Some guys talk a great pro life game, but haven’t saved anyone but their 0% NARAL rating.

btw, I agree about Palin, she is pro America, but has tinges of big gov populism.

Molon Labe!

 
 
 

So now everyone who was dead set on opposing him if he didn't sign this bill...

Diogenes314 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:54PM EDT (link)

…will oppose him anyway.

Just like every libertarian will oppose him now.

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 7:57PM EDT (link)

Generalities are fun.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Heh. (n/t)

Finrod (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 9:21PM EDT (link)

.

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

 

fun and wrong

Doc Holliday (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 10:43PM EDT (link)

you act like you want piss people off and chase them away from your club. You, Leon, and Neil have *&^% ons for libertarian conservatives and in a bad way. I say get over it, our side is winning.

I would say most libertarian-conservatives and many Libertarians are pro-life. Of course you know that, you just love pissing people off. The funny thing about some social/morality cons here, they are kind of angry jerks. Where is the peace to all men? Where is the do unto others?. It seems to the me that some of the most “socially” conservative people here are pretty anti-social.

Molon Labe!

Funny that you go after me with this rather than the libertarian who said the same thing. Telling. nt

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:05PM EDT (link)

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


fair enough Aaron

Doc Holliday (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:14PM EDT (link)

I think we should all stop fighting. I am positive I agree with socons here 90 percent of the time, I know it to be true. We all make the mistake of exaggerating differences to no good end.

We need to stand together. I am NOT a Libertarian, I am a conservative and have always been a conservative. When we all start picking nits and splitting up into subgroups, only then do I trot out the “libertarian-conservative”.

I said my piece, with no snark or shots, that is where I stand. We better come together and bring friends.

Molon Labe!

 

it was a long time coming

Doc Holliday (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:18PM EDT (link)

Aaron, and you were not even the main target. I am tired of libertarian-conservatives being treated like crap around here, like some want us to leave the site. The guy that calls us libertines really yanks my chain. But like I said, I am a conservative and I want ALL of us together, it is our only chance of taking the left down.

Molon Labe!

Unfortunately Doc, you don't get to be sole representation of the libertarians here.

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:51PM EDT (link)

I will take your comment as what it was, blowing off steam. That said, you have to realize that some who run under the banner of libertarianism, or in some cases classical liberalism, are full of bull excrement.

Take Diogenes as an example, I could google and find a multitude of instances where he stated that he supported the state approach to limiting abortion. Yet, he was absent from the debate over the last week and only now shows up to kick SoCons in the proverbial nuts about supporting Daniels in a non delcared 2012 Presidential Race. It is simply antagonistic and trollish behavior.

He is the libertine who brings dishonor on your group.

Also take Finrod, who attempted to turn a thread about abortion into a debate about the War on Drugs. Are we to indulge this sort of stupidity?

Is it really our lot, that we are to remain silent in the face of such distractions and blatant attempts to blame SoCons even when are engaging at the State level?

You must admit, some of the libertarians have earned their fair share of derision.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


I will have to check up on some things before I comment on them Aaron

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:02AM EDT (link)

You are right, I don’t speak for anyone but myself. I certainly don’t speak for Diogenes nor to I go on record for him (mafia joke). I have never had an issue with Finrod, he seems a good guy, but I would need to read the context of this particular claim to comment on it.

I do admit that libertarians go off half cocked sometimes, looking for a fight. I am sure I have done this myself at times, but there was never personal animosity. Sometimes people just want to spar over little things. I don’t claim one side is alone in this, but its not like there are libertarian mods here, and that is fine, we chose to come here.

I know I will try to see our similarities more and overlook the little key words that send to set us to fighting. Like I said before, I really think our similarities are vast and our differences small. It is just that people seem to magnify differences, sometimes just to fill the space :)

I don’t want this place to become a love fest, a good argument can be fun, but both sides are wrong when they make the other feel unwanted. And both sides are wrong when we make the other into something he is not. I think respect is the key, and I will try to walk the talk.

Molon Labe!

Respect is dependent upon reciprocity.

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:14AM EDT (link)

Those who understand that they are guests in this house understand that.

Have a good weekend Doc.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


well said Aaron

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:19AM EDT (link)

you have a good weekend to sir :)

Molon Labe!

 
 
 

[deleted] you, Aaron.

Finrod (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 3:36PM EDT (link)

I bring up the War on Drugs as an example because it’s the perfect example of an issue that makes SoCons look like colossal flaming hypocrites. It’s a prime example of 1) a completely ineffective government program that keeps getting more and more funding from both parties because they want to look good by kicking a convenient boogeyman (drugs are bad, m’kay), 2) being the source of the most widespread intrusion into the personal space of Americans in the form of no-knock raids in the country’s history, 3) a blatant violation of the Constitution (10th Amendment, enumerated powers of Congress) which makes every Republican who supports it look like a bloody idiot because it negates everything else we say about how the Left ignores and twists the Constitution for their own whims, because here’s an issue where we’re doing THE EXACT SAME THING.

Also, I posted one (1) comment that brought up the War on Drugs yesterday. I didn’t feed the threadjack that followed, you posted more than I did in that. Physician, heal thyself.

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

Spoken like a true libertarian, but certainly not by a conservative

Bill S (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 4:05PM EDT (link)

Conservatives LIKE the war on drugs.
Conservatives don’t believe it’s an intrusion.
Conservatives don’t believe it’s a violation of the Constitution.

LIbertarians think like you. (Surprise, surprise).

Such is the nature of the philosophical chasm between the two.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Explain this one:

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 4:59PM EDT (link)

“Conservatives don’t believe it’s a violation of the Constitution.”

Because if “conservatives” believe this one, they’re either liars, damned liars, or lawyers.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

The philisophical chasm revealed.

Diogenes314 (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 5:50PM EDT (link)

Libertarians believe in limited government based on Constitutional principles.
“Conservatives’ believe in limited government-except when it comes to the things they like. And screw the Constitution.

And before I get a hundred replies, no, I don’t think you speak for Conservatives.

 
 
 
 
 
 

and another thing!

Doc Holliday (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 11:06PM EDT (link)

I will put my voting record up against ANYONE on this site!

ahh, that felt good, I am not centered, and relaxed.

Molon Labe!

 
 

Die-hard Libertarian neighbor behind Daniels.

grandma Saturday, April 30th at 12:33AM EDT (link)

Today my neighbor worked at convincing me that Daniels is better than my opinion of Daniels. So maybe this is a good sign.

This granny fought PP for 30+ years, and I feel the PP bill is too little, too late.

 
 

He passed one test

Dan McLaughlin (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 8:21PM EDT (link)

There will be others. Some people will remain closed to Daniels, others will remain open to him. But he avoided adding too many more people to the first group.

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

 

Dead wrong

paint_it_red (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 8:40PM EDT (link)

I count myself among those who would have been dead set on opposing him, or any candidate, who vetoes a bill defunding PP, or otherwise takes a position more conducive to public funding of abortion. It almost sounds like you were rooting for him to take a liberal position here. What Daniels did goes a long way toward mending fences over the “truce” comment. There will certainly be other issues and challenges ahead, but this was a big test, and he passed with flying colors. I’m proud to have voted for him.

“It is not good to cultivate a respect so much for the law as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right.” Henry David Thoreau

“The means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.” Martin Luther King Jr.

“If you want peace, work for Justice.” Pope John Paul II

Good for you.

Diogenes314 (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:59AM EDT (link)

I was actually referring to those who said if he allowed it to become law without his signature he would be dead to them-most of who previously said he was dead to him already. We’ll see how many become Daniels fans or even neutral on the guy.

But if this makes you look at him twice, good for you.

BTW, I favored the bill (or would have if I was an Indianian). Since you asked.

 
 
 

I guess he figured his "Truce" was off

scarlos (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 9:11PM EDT (link)

Once the Indiana Fleebaggers left the state. Good for him.

Socialism is Oligarchy in disguise

 

no brainer

davenj1 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 9:17PM EDT (link)

This action was a no brainer for me. Daniels has a fairly reliable pro-life record. Also regarding those thinking it was necessary to mend fences with SoCons, get over the “truce” comment. I occasionally read liberal or Democratic sites and they exhibit some worry about Daniels. They usually resort to criticisms of his height. However, mbecker908 is right that SoCons could derail a candidacy especially in early primaries which is why I don’t believe any group should hijack a party and no candidate should pander. Daniels is still my man…

 

Mitch Daniels will be the GOP nominee for POTUS

RealQuiet (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 9:45PM EDT (link)

Book it. Good friend Haley Barbour dropping out and likely to fundraise big time for him. Daniels already has a monster fundraising network anyway. My preferred POTUS candidate Paul Ryan has vocally talked about and supported him. Daniels is no moderate, sorry. He’s a pro-life, fiscal conservative though a quiet one. Has plenty of experience as being governor of Indiana in arguably the most pivotal region that will determine who will be POTUS after 2012.

You can read the tea leaves easy on this one. All the GOP heavy hitters are lining up behind Daniels. Add on conservative young gun Marco Rubio of Florida as his running mate to appeal to conservatives and the Hispanic vote and POTUS nominee in waiting if Daniels serves 2 terms.

Good article how things are shaping up.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/04/29/the_campaign_waiting_for_mitch_daniels_109700.html

Nothing's certain at this point

aesthete (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 10:00PM EDT (link)

The GOP field is as fractured as I’ve ever seen it, and new political developments seem to be fast and furious lately. I hope Daniels is given a fair shake, and plenty of folks seem to be lining up behind him, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves here.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

yeah, I don't think any of them have earned a dang thing yet

Doc Holliday (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 10:28PM EDT (link)

I am not going to bash them much longer, I am a team player and I know the mettle of our enemy. I lament the best men did not step forward, but I know all are better than Obama.

After this election, Obama will not just be a socialist, marxist, black liberation theory practitioner, with a chip on his shoulder, he will be pissed off as well, whether he wins or loses. Our job is to make him lose for our own sake.

Molon Labe!

 

I saw this same thing happen with GWB in 2000

RealQuiet (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 12:34AM EDT (link)

Line all the ducks in a row. Maybe I’m wrong, but you can’t help but observe the pattern :)

Oh, they might try

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:31AM EDT (link)

but it reminds me of nothing so much as the scheming of Turkish eunuchs at the bathhouse at the turn of the century. Republican insiders don’t realize that the inmates have in a very real sense taken over at least parts of the asylum. I would like to think that Daniels is a great candidate for the Tea Party, but he might not be — you never know. At any rate, I think that the “what” is more important than the “who” in many cases, and is what we should be concentrating on.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 
 

Daniels/Ryan!!

redtillimdead (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:12AM EDT (link)

I see it happening. They both like each other very much and are very likeminded. Ryan is behind Daniels. Bush is behind Daniels. Walker, Christie, and Kasich are all probably behind Daniels.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

I like Ryan...

aesthete (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 1:34AM EDT (link)

right where he’s at. Ryan is too much of a talent to be wasted as the chairwarmer-in-chief. IMO, if it’s a Guv we would be better served to either nominate an outsider like Cain or a foreign policy guy.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

Ryan

redtillimdead (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 3:34AM EDT (link)

I think its almost a necessity to have him on the ticket in 2012. The Dems are going to try to hurt us with his plan. No one else can explain it like he can and make people like it the way he can. Daniels may be able to, but I doubt any of the other candidates could.

Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.

 
 

Either Ryan or Rubio for VP would be fine

RealQuiet (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 9:51AM EDT (link)

They both have their advantages. The thing that is so attractive on a Daniels/Ryan ticket is it is a pure Midwest ticket with both being from very pivotal states. Obama’s only chance at winning would be holding WI, MI, and PA. There are some who think IN and OH will be competitive. They won’t be if Daniels is the nominee and with Ryan very well thought of in Wisconsin, Obama will have a very daunting task ahead. Michigan and Pennsylvania appear to be very well in play as well. I think Michigan is more likely to fall red than Pennsylvania. That state has been trending red for years due to Granholm economic misery.

 
 
 

Good for Gov. Daniels. (nt)

runner12 (Diary) Friday, April 29th at 10:58PM EDT (link)

Daniels/Palin

Spartan4Life (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 7:44AM EDT (link)

This is my dream ticket. I like Daniels for his quiet confidence and I like Palin for her ability to sock it to the liberals with a smile.

It would be a good move for Palin. She can earn her credibility stripe while working to help implement Daniel’s vision. The seat would be warmed up for her if she wanted it in 2020.

 

This is bad news. I like having others "force their will

johnt Saturday, April 30th at 10:21AM EDT (link)

on me”, peacefully of course. I spent eight frustrating years listening to the wails of the disenchanted over Bush forcing his will on us, but nothing ever happened. To make it worse, the bastard cut our taxes, which is forcing freedom on us. Here we had a situation where we would be coerced to pay for death, which is coercion with muscle, & Daniels ups and does this. What’s the world coming to?

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

sounds like you need a craigslist ad -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 10:36AM EDT (link)

Molon Labe!

"Wanted: Sarcasm tag" ... [nt]

acat (Diary) Saturday, April 30th at 10:52AM EDT (link)

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Someone needs a tag for this?

johnt Sunday, May 1st at 10:02AM EDT (link)

n/t

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

When in doubt, /sarc it out.

acat (Diary) Sunday, May 1st at 10:14AM EDT (link)

On rare occasions, Red State does get visitors from the Far Left who really do think this way …

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator