« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

BREAKING: White House Pressured OMB to Approve Solyndra Loan Before Due Diligence Complete

Things are going from bad to worse for the White House on the Solyndra collapse. It is embarrassing enough for the President that his highly touted “green jobs” stimulus success story folded like a cheap suit leaving 1100 people out of jobs and leaving the tax payers with a bill upwards of half a billion dollars. Now, the Washington Post is reporting that political officials in the White House pressured the OMB to approve the massive federal loan to Solyndra before the OMB’s due diligence was complete:

The August 2009 e-mails, released exclusively to The Washington Post, show White House officials repeatedly asking OMB reviewers when they would be able to decide on the federal loan and noting a looming press event at which they planned to announce the deal. In response, OMB officials expressed concern that they were being rushed to approve the company’s project without adequate time to assess the risk to taxpayers, according to information provided by Republican congressionalinvestigators.

Solyndra collapsed two weeks ago, leaving taxpayers liable for the $535 million loan.

One e-mail from an OMB official referred to “the time pressure we are under to sign-off on Solyndra.” Another complained, “There isn’t time to negotiate.”

“We have ended up with a situation of having to do rushed approvals on a couple of occasions (and we are worried about Solyndra at the end of the week),” one official wrote. That Aug. 31, 2009, message, written by a senior OMB staffer and sent to Terrell P. McSweeny, Biden’s domestic policy adviser, concluded, “We would prefer to have sufficient time to do our due diligence reviews.”

** SNIP **

The e-mail exchanges could intensify questions about whether the administration was playing favorites and made costly errors while choosing the first recipient of a loan guarantee under its stimulus program. Solyndra’s biggest investors were funds operated on behalf of the family foundation of Tulsa billionaire and Obama fundraiser George Kaiser. Although he has been a frequent White House visitor, Kaiser has said he did not use political influence to win approval of the loan.

The more evidence that comes out about the Solyndra debacle, the more the focus shifts from the foolishness of dumping taxpayer money after pipe dreams to open corruption creating a half a billion dollar slush fund for one of the President’s political friends. It is reprehensible that when the United States is facing a financial crisis caused in large part by irresponsible lending practices, the White House is engaging in even worse loan chicanery with the taxpayers’ money.

 

COMMENTS

  • msctex

    Tomorrow, it will be racism.

    • APA Guy

      Bush…that “green jobs” stimumus crusader…EASY target indeed.

      These people are beyond incompetent…oh how I wish the election was this year. Obama wouldn’t get 40% of the vote. As it is, he’s likely in for 45-46% max…and that’s before this scandal hits the airwaves for a few months and beyond.

      • APA Guy

        nt

        • lastgopinillinois

          During the hearing it was revealed that plans for a loan to Solyndra were in place during the Bush administration and they were flatly REJECTED due to skepticism with the companies cash flow problems.
          Cant blame it on Bush!

          • cwfoster

            They already started trying! LMAO! But seriously is it just me, or is it the epitome of irony that this is blowing up as big and as fast as it is, and another scandal, that potentially would involve the White House being an accessory before the fact in the murders of a Border Patrol officer and a DEA agent, is still languishing in relative obscurity! I suppose a half billion dollars is worth much more than the lives of two men who worked for the government. That’s SAD!

    • lucitee

      A situation where OTHER approvals “had to be rushed” without due diligence! WHICH ONES were they? WHO rushed them and WHO benefitted from the “RUSH JOB”? Did the “Companies, entities, groups or persons ALSO included getting “stimulus money”?
      Investigate EVERY recipient of the “STIMULUS FUNDS”! Investigate FULLY and see how many Companies from the EAST benefitted! And I am NOT talking OUR East Coast!

      • ora09

        Looks as if the OMB is trying to salvage their reputation. But apparently they have been prsessured more than once by this Obama team.

  • johnt

    Thet’ve done a great job on the Gunwalker thing, the major policy failures, their basic training with the Rev Wright/Racist church, the poor souls are really getting hit hard, there’s only so much dirt to hide.

    • edintexas

      In fact they’ve had decades and decades of cover-up through omission. I’m sure it goes back further, but we can certainly prove that all the “major” media of the day knew of Roosevelt’s incapacity, and never a mention made it to the papers, radio reports or the various newsreels.

  • whiskeyjim

    Isn’t Bush to blame for the rush to approve Solyndra somehow?

    I think it is. Just wait for it.

    • rogershru2

      http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/solyndra-blame-bush-obama-officials/story?id=14513389

      “After spending months touting the Obama administration’s decision to loan $535 million to the California solar energy upstart Solyndra, top officials took a new tack Wednesday while testifying before Congress about the company’s abrupt shut-down and bankruptcy: the loan, they said, was actually the Bush administration’s idea. The Energy Department’s top lending officer told Congress that the Solyndra loan application was not only filed during President Bush’s term, but it surged towards completion before Obama took office in January 2009.

      “By the time the Obama administration took office in late January 2009, the loan programs’ staff had already established a goal of, and timeline for, issuing the company a conditional loan guarantee commitment in March 2009,” said Jonathan Silver, who heads the Energy loan program.

      Republicans pushed back hard against this version of events, unearthing internal Energy Department emails that indicate the panel evaluating the loans had made the unanimous decision to shelve Solyndra’s application two weeks before Obama took office.”

      • ora09

        Congress has being investigating Solyndra for a few months now. The FBI raid puts much of the Company’s records under their jurisdiction. Could they now be denied to Congress?

  • smagar

    Ya know, that forces the WaPo to cover the story.

    If the WaPo editors sat on the evidence, they must have known that the House GOP would not only give the evidence to another news organization—they’d let slip that the WaPo buried the story. Not good for the WaPo.

    Well played, House GOP.

    • Christian

      For real stories they will prominently cover pretty much everything.

  • YnotNOW

    If Solyndra had any reasonable expectation of profitability, they would have been able to attract private capital. Which means that loans, subsidy, preferrential treatment, or whatever you want to call it, will ALWAYS be a waste of taxpayer money.

    So the political crony favoritism and lack of review is just more of the same.

    We need to end all corporate subsidy – starting with phase out of ethanol. Wind and solar not far behind. Then farm subsidy, etc. That is the only conservative, free-market way.

    • Christian

      No matter who does it, it should really be called “crony socialism.” Ditto for nuclear and oil and gas. Given our circumstances they should all pay their own way.

      No more subsidies, cash or otherwise.

    • lastgopinillinois

      months ago. This was during the investigation the democrats started (under their claims that oil companies were price-gouging, while earning large profits).
      As I recall, the hearing (where all the major oil co. CEO;s were present) was aired on C-Span. At least two of the CEO’s who were asked by congressional democrats if they could live without the subsidy, agreed that they could if tax rates were lower.
      There has been a lot more talk about lowering the corporate rates and dropping subsidy’s since then, and most recently by the super-committee.
      So far, I havent heard anybody accrediting Paul Ryans “path-to-prosperity” proposal, nor any mention of his subsequent video on tax reform.

  • YnotNOW

    If Solyndra had any reasonable expectation of profitability, they would have been able to attract private capital. Which means that loans, subsidy, preferrential treatment, or whatever you want to call it, will ALWAYS be a waste of taxpayer money.

    So the political crony favoritism and lack of review is just more of the same.

    We need to end all corporate subsidy – starting with phase out of ethanol. Wind and solar not far behind. Then farm subsidy, etc. That is the only conservative, free-market way.

    • easyb

      And I’m in the solar industry. Believe it or not, there’s a lot of conservatives in the industry, making a buck off of government stupidity.

      Having said that, the tax credit and various local subsidies do keep prices artificially high, as do all subsidies, by nature.

      For example, I recently quoted a solar project in Modesto Irrigation District. With 30% tax credit, depreciation, and the MID performance based initiative, over 10 years the company would have gotten all of their initial investment back, plus another $70k or so. Who’s to say the quoting solar companies wouldn’t pad their price by $70k, figuring that the company would be happy with a net zero investment? The answer is, they would, and they do.

      Get rid of the incentives, and the manufacturers & installers will drive cost down due to the competition of natural market forces. Or, the industry will dry up just like the thermal solar industry did in the early 80′s.

      Until then, thank you all for your donation of the tax credit to my customer’s solar projects! :)

      I will now duck from the tomatoes hurled my way…

      • YnotNOW

        because us subsidizing your industry makes us all poorer.

        But I agree that it is not ideologically inconsistent to oppose subsidy on principle, but to accept them if they are available. After all, if they have already taken my tax money, and other people are getting a share, why shouldn’t I get some also, while still adhering to the position that such giveaways are bad policy. See for example the Koch Industries which have taken so much heat for their accepting the same “favors” that all their competitors take, while supporting conservative politicians and positions that say the government should get out of this business entirely.

        And I do hope that, when government finally (please!) comes to it’s senses and stops subsidizing inefficiency, that your industry can realize those market efficiencies and make product at market-clearing prices. Because that is what make the entire country richer!

  • izoneguy

    That is what it was pure & simple.
    The scammers “give” Obama $500,000 – Obama pushes the $500,000,000
    loan their way – they “produce” a product for two years – all the while, the scammers are spending money on themselves and then protecting those assets.
    They even do a cover loan to look legit. Want to bet that that money is from the $500,000,000??? Creative accounting – I wonder if these guys ran a Hollywood studio???

    At this point – it would have been better to give $250,000,000 to Steven Spielberg and $250,000,000 to James Cameron and let them make some blockbuster films – at least the taxpayer might have received a return on it’s “investment”!

  • DerKrieger

    String ‘em up!

  • ombd

    Another day, another disclosure. There’s a good reason why the White House is running scared on this. Several good reasons, come to think of it … http://www.ombudizen.com/2011/09/11/solargate/

  • snowshooze

    Was the ln underwritten? Did somebody back this?
    or was this an unsecured loan?
    535 million seems like a lot to get rid of Obama..

    • snowshooze

      That is my understanding…… Taxpayer-backed.
      So I believe at this point… we do in fact sit down to eat 535 million dollars…

      • YnotNOW

        Though we may get back 5-cents on the dollar, as the company is liquidated, and therefore only borrow from the Chinese $508 Million.

        Did that make you feel any better? :)

  • TopGun

    The Arnold released all of those prisoners to save the state some expense, and here they could’ve used prison labor, had a profitable business, kept the prisoners off the street, and the taxpayers from getting robbed…again.

  • popster

    to posting a bond? Do you suppose they couldn’t find a backer?

  • 4dees

    Corruption reigns inside the Beltway, but the Obama White House / administration is probably the most corrupt presidency we’ve ever had, and the sad thin, is they flaunt it in our faces. It’s all about Chicago thug politics, and while it may serve Chicagoans well, it doesn’t serve the rest of this country well at all. Obama is an abject failure, and he’s attempting to make the U.S. an abject failure in turn. If he weren’t such a narcissist, he should resign so that this country can obout the business of healing the economy and America.

  • renl57

    The basic problem is that Obama and his fellow lefties believe strongly that the U.S. must move to a green economy. All the usual reasons: Fight global warming, fight pollution from coal, etc. But they couldn’t sell that to the voters, especially in tough economic times.

    So they invented this fantasy of “millions of green jobs” to try to sell “green” as a jobs program. Hence they’ve been rushing to disburse loan guarantees and other largesse to “green” companies and “green” industries. They want “green,” while in their public statements they keep talking about “jobs.”

    But to date, having disbursed roughly $20 billion in loan guarantees, some 3,500 jobs have been created–a far cry from “millions”.

    Alan Blinder, a liberal economist, admitted: “There are good reasons to create green jobs, but they have more to do with green than with jobs.”

    http://tinyurl.com/3cvhpel

    “Green” is not a jobs program. Either in China or the U.S. It’s a “green” program. And you support it only if you support the goals of “green”.

  • wbedding

    with the Solyndra debacle, why is everyone surprised? Freddie and Fannie have been the Democrat’s ultimate boondoggle for DECADES! the Housing and Development Act of 1974, the Fair Housing Act of 1968…all of these have been designed to prop up the Democratic Party’s interests. Pushing loans onto people who cannot afford them has led us to this current economic catastrophe. As the housing bubble burst, so did the economy. We survived the Tech bubble because it was not as deeply woven into the fabric of our economy as housing is. When will people wake up and see that these programs are running us into the ground as a nation? Fair comment that people need to be protected from dubious scams. HOWEVER, this government is complicit in the mortgage crisis we face right now. Blaming it on “Arab Springs” and “earthquakes” is a childish attempt to deflect blame and responsibility. Republicans have screamed for years about this to no avail. The committee comments and video testimony are there on C-SPAN’s archives. Now, Mr. B. Hussein Obama has taken the term “stimulus” to include political pay-offs. Until we return this government to what it was intended to do – basically keep us safe from foreign security threats – we will continue down this path of destruction. Sorry for the long rant.

  • carolynr

    Fellow Republicans/Indies/Patriotic Dems….this is probably an impeachable offense. Do you really want to have our Republican candidate run AGAINST SOMEONE OTHER THAN OBAMA. LET HIM HANG HIMSELF.

  • travis690

    I am totally in favor of capital formation, but I would like to suggest that the Treasury should not be involved in this type of financing. If there was an actual market benefit to this technology, then Solyndra would not have gone bankrupt. But they should be getting capital from their investors. And as any good capitalist will tell you, any investment in unproven technology may not result in success; it’s a part of the system.

    But there is no part of this program for the enablement of private investors (not the same as capitalists) to use their connections to enable affiliates to borrow money with a Treasury guarantee. And if Mr. Kaiser was a real capitalist, he would be willing to find other private investors to put up more money to allow the company to continue (or come up with it himself), rather than holding a gun to the taxpayers to force an investment into something that may not have a market.

  • http://www.ajharaldson.com lakeworthcane

    The lefties aren?t stupid. This is just how they get their money. When they pushed this loan through, they knew the company would fold and the scadal would come to light. But they didn?t care. They controlled the executive?-including the Department of Justice?-and the Congress. So, they simply pushed the loan through, grabbed as much of the money as possible, and made ready with their standard silly and laughable excuses.

    Going out a little bit farther on this limb, I?d say that they didn?t foresee 1) conservatives taking the House in 2010 and, 2) the left so quickly losing its stranglehold on the information flow (the media). So now they might be kind of (how you say?) ?royally screwed.?

    Obama has a history of making money this way. Back in the 1990s he teamed up with Bill Ayers (because Ayers was good at this sort of thing) to obtain $100 million in taxpayer money for an educational project. Ayers started the project; Obama was named among its directors. The project never amounted to much (education in the Chicago area didn?t noticeably improve), but Obama got the money he needed to build what would later become his political machine: the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (A.C.O.R.N.).

    Anyway . . . the Obama machine just might completely destroy American leftism, or at least force it to openly operate as what it is: largely a criminal organization.

  • Pingback: 100+ Disgusting Revelations from Barack Hussein Obama « Off-Grid Blogger

  • Pingback: Georgia Crouser