« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Is Illinois Turning Purple? The Democrats are Sure Trying

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran a story yesterday which asked the provocative question, “Is Illinois Turning Purple?”  The article noted the following:

• Obama’s job-approval rating in Illinois, according to a Chicago Tribune poll taken earlier this month, hovers just over the halfway mark, at 51 percent — still well above some of the numbers he’s seeing nationally, but more than 10 points down from the support he enjoyed here two years ago.

• The race for Obama’s open U.S. Senate seat has been neck-and-neck for months, with the Republican, U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk, edging in polls over Democratic state treasurer and Obama protégé Alexi Giannoulias.

• Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, a fixture in and around progressive Illinois politics since the 1970s, is badly trailing his conservative GOP challenger, state Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, despite the fact that Brady won his party’s crowded February primary with just one-fifth of Republican votes. The latest Rasmussen Reports poll has Brady up 50 percent to 37 percent.

• The Democrats’ commanding majority in the congressional delegation might, according to the latest polls, be whittled down to just one seat in November, with Democrats all but assured of losing ground in the Legislature as well.

Although this evidence is compelling, it is certainly too soon to go so far as to say that the state is “turning purple.” After all, many states this year (such as Wisconsin) are polling far more red than usual due to the national mood, which is tilting heavily Republican. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion to draw is that the potential boatracing facing the Democrats in Illinois is a one-time aberration. Heck, at this point, the Democrats haven’t even lost anything in Illinois yet.

You know what might change that? A constant stream of stories reminding everyone in the State, in horribly graphic ways, that everyone in the State Democrat hierarchy is crooked and quite possibly associated with the mob and/or hookers. Like, say, this one (content warning) detailing how Jesse Jackson attempted to buy Barack Obama’s Senate seat from Rod Blagojevich with $6 million dollars and the services of an attractive blonde who may or may not be a hooker. I mean, you get the feeling that people who live in Illinois are by this point sort of jaded about political corruption but stories like this one have a way of sticking in people’s minds for a couple months, especially when they are on the way to the voting booth.

Now, you might think that this sort of tarring-by-association isn’t fair to poor Alexi Giannoulias, apparently had nothing to do with the entire sordid affair surrounding Barack Obama’s Senate seat. Fair enough. a pretty simple way for Mr. Giannoulias to get around this problem is to stop ducking the press on the campaign trail so they can cover his campaign independent of the whole mess. Of course, the end result of that strategy would be having to answer questions about Giannoulias’s own ties to the mob, so maybe he’s made a calculated risk that being unfairly associated with bribery and hookers is a better strategy in the long run.

And folks, when Democrats are making these sorts of strategic calculations, the suggestion that a state like Illinois is turning purple doesn’t seem so ludicrous after all.

COMMENTS

  • http://wadingacross.wordpress.com logus

    Especially since the Post Dispatch is such a liberal rag.

    What irony if the election of one of their own was the snowflake that starts the avalanche of Democrat losses in Illinois.

  • dontell

    I live down state and no one is happy with the dems that I can find…

    • jb13

      The Democrats power base lies in northeastern Illinois, where, as I’m sure you know, most of the state’s people live. And here in this section of the state, I know a great number of people who may not like what the Dems are doing, but are too braindead to ever consider voting for a Republican. They whine and moan like everyone else about the state’s corruption, but refuse to actually throw out the corrupt actors who have ruined their state.

      That is why I caution all of my out-of-state friends residing in sane, rational areas of the country: Do not be surprised if Giannoulias wins. This is a very winnable race. But do not underestimate the hold that the Dems have here. I know some on Redsttate believe that Kirk’s failings are the reasons the race is close. Actually, it’s the opposite: It’s only because Alexi G. is such a flawed candidate running in a GOP wave year that Kirk isn’t behind by double digits.

      Will the GOP make inroads this year? Undoubtedly. Will it be enough to turn Illinois purple? That may all depend on how well the GOP governs over the next 2-4 years.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        He was doing much better before the story broke.

      • http://www.downstateiladvocate.com anacreon

        with the vote today with the Republicans against repealing DADT and the Dream Act. Had Kirk broken ranks, he would have lost a shaky, but growing downstate support handing Giannoulias the Senate seat. I’m on the ground in downstate Illinois and hear much grumbling about Kirk, but a grudging commitment to voting for him. Had Kirk taken another hit on a social issue, he would have lost the support that he (and others) have tried to build.

        You do have a point about Illinois and the Senate though. Illinois has really always been a purple state. We seem to have a tendency to elect Democrats to the Senate, and Republicans to the Governor’s mansion. Sure, there are times where one party holds the Governor and Senate seat(s), but for the most part, it has been a split making is sort of purpleish. It’s kind of a media creation that Illinois is a “blue” state when it may have always been a purple state. I remember my Illinois History class and my professor stating that “as DC goes, so does Illinois”. For the most part, his thesis rings true.

    • indyjohn

      that happens to be unwillingly and unhappily dominated by the Peoples’ Democratic Republic of Chicago. The urban elites and their ignorant minions, who have been uneducated by the worst school system in the country, use their superior numbers to rule the rest of the state for their own corrupt benefit.

      As an Indiana resident, I would love to see a new state created out of Indiana and Illinois. We will donate the northwestern corner of our state, including South Bend and Elkhart. Illinois would be split (roughly) along the line of I-80. The one new state of Illiana would be solidly red and happy. The other new state of Daley would be a miserable, blue cesspool. I can dream, can’t I?

  • RedBeard

    Having been raised there, I am fully aware of two things.

    First, few cities in the world can match Chicago for arts, culture, sports, architecture, the waterfront, miusic and food.

    And secondly, an honest Chicago politician is as rare as a Cubs World Series trophy.

    • acat

      That is, in Chicago, a businessman can know, months or even years in advance, just how much boodle* he’s going to have to give, which insurance agency he’s going to have to use, etc. etc. And, because it’s predictable, it can be worked with.

      Illinois isn’t so much turning purple as pruning back the overgrowth of blue that’s been getting too greedy.

      Mew

      * yes, that’s the actual word for it

  • redneck_hippie

    nice review of the Dem/Rep battles:

    http://www.opinionduel.com/battle10/247334/illinois-m-roundup-mytheos-holt