« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Debra Burlingame Reacts to Obama

The American people are certainly resilient, but that doesn’t mean they want to be sitting ducks.

Debra Burlingame, spoke exclusively to RedState in reaction to President Obama’s comment that America could “absorb” another terrorist attack.  Ms. Burlingame is co-founder of 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America and the sister of hijacked American Airlines flight 77 pilot Charles Burlingame.

RedState asked Ms. Burlingame to respond to comments reported by celebrity Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward in his forthcoming book, “Obama’s Wars.”  On the possibility of another terrorist attack in the United States, the president said:

“I said very early on, as a Senator and continue to believe, as a presidential candidate and now as president, that we can absorb a terrorist attack. We will do everything we can to prevent it. but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever, that ever took place on our soil, we absorbed it, and we are stronger. This is a strong, powerful country that we live in, and our people are incredibly resilient.”

Ms. Burlingame said that the comments were inappropriate.

“The first thing I see are the three thousand families who probalby wouldn’t think we absorbed it that well. The first ones I think of are the four children on my brother’s plane. I think of the Falkenberg family, who lost four people: a husband, wife, and two children.  The three year old was so little, the family received no remains. Those are details that can be multiplied by the tens of thousands of people who were impacted by 9/11, probably hundreds of thousands if you include the rescue personnel.

Ms. Burlingame continued:

“[These comments come after] almost two years of President Obama ignoring the harsh realities of 9/11.  Think of Fort Hood…he stood there within days of that attack and called it unimaginable. Unimaginable. That’s what he said. I wonder if those families think we absorbed that attack very well?

Asked if the remarks fit a pattern of bloodless language from President Obama about the impact of the attacks that demonstrates a lack of understanding of what the victims’ families have gone through for the past nine years, Ms. Burlingame said the remarks spoke to a much greater danger.

“He has no idea of what families have gone through. I don’t know the context of the remarks.  9/11 is bigger than any one victim.  It’s bigger really than any one plane crash. It’s not for nothing that FBI Director Muller, Secretary Napolitano and CIA chief Panetta told us that we are in much greater danger of coordinated attack now than we were on Jan 20, 2009.  He doesn’t have a team in place that can stop one guy getting on the plane in the Netherlands with explosives in his underwear.

The American people are certainly resilient, but that doesn’t mean they want to be sitting ducks.

I wonder about an attack more catastrophic than 9/11. This is a president who refuses to give this war a name. Who refuses to acknowledge who the enemy is. He would rather launch predator strikes on people who can give us intelligence than have aggressive interrogations.

This is a President who thinks in political terms rather than in terms of leadership.  And I think it is ironic that this is the same president who said we must have a 15 story mosque at Ground Zero where he thinks we absorbed the attacks so well.

Lastly, Ms. Burlingame said that President Obama is not doing enough in the was on terror. Asked if she thought al-Qaeda terrorists would care about the context of the remarks, or read them as a dare, she remembered a famous declaration of a former president.

“President Bush was criticized for saying ‘Bring ‘em on!’ early in the war.  He was saying Amer people are tough. This was President Obama saying that we can sustain an attack and handle it really well.

The difference in those two comments is Bush was a president who was putting every tool he had in his arsenal into the fight against the enemy. This is a president who has said we have to Mirandize terrorists on the battlefield. This is a president who dismantled Guantanamo, who is not prosecuting  the 9/11 conspirators because of politics.

What is that saying to our enemy? It’s saying he is weak and not throwing everything he has into the fight and saying that those of us on the ground will be the ones to pick up the pieces.  I’d be more forgiving about this if I thought he was throwing everything he had at this enemy.  Obama says he doesn’t want a generational war. He’s going to get ten times a generational war if he continues with his timid policy of appeasement.  And the American people are just going to have to take their licks.”

COMMENTS

  • dianecee

    Ms. Burlingame should never have been game for obama’s plan of action to cut the 9/11 victims hearts and souls deeper. Why are Americans being subjected to the enemy this way? We are currently a country without a leader. I am sorry the tragic event we suffered, as a nation, is an ongoing nightmare. There is a way to solve it, though,,,,,all we have to do is go around the “gubmint”.

  • natlanthem

    Obama has a complete lack of empathy. He can see ideaology and he can see himself in the mirror. In any practical estimation, he is a sociopath, unable to understand or feel others pain, suffering, joy or anger. His reaction to the lady at the town hall the other day that was exhausted is a clear indication among thousands.

    Okay then, so what. Judge a man by his external behaviors, not his internal wiring. The problem here is, he is left to drift with what his intellect conceives without a real heart to know the balances. His damaged interior leads to poor choices on the exterior. He has NO idea the real agony caused by supporting the mosque. Not because he is a closet Islamist … that would take empathy and a belief outside yourself … but because he has lost that wiring along the way. Which is not unreasonable given his formative years. Read his poetry, it is obvious.

    A sociopath is dangerous. Add the stress of the presidency, a feeling of abandonment (Rahm, Michelle, etc), possible substance abuses and population that is rapidly beginning to hate the man, even among his own party, and you have a cannon that is swinging in the wind and waves. With no anchor, he can easily step into behaviors truly barbaric for an American President.

    Always remember, the President is also the ultimate head Postman, and all that implies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_postal

    • bodenet

      This is all very true. You have an excellent understanding of the man’s emotional state and that IS important.

      However, we need to focus more on the functional apparatus his administration has put in place to “transform” America into a European Socialist state and a bankrupt, dysfunctional government.

      We need to VOTE OUT EVERY SUPPORTER of Obama and the policies he has put in place for the economy, the courts, international diplomacy, the military and defense and commerce and banking regulation.

      Vote out your local politicians that supported Obama as well!

  • oklahomajon

    He should said any time they attack us we will track them down and send to He__

    • thomas

      Yes, send them to He-__. But be more specific, he should have said:

      “It’s now the policy of this nation to regard any mass-destruction attack by radical Islam — wether nuclear, chemical, biological or otherwise — against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack on the United States, requiring a full, conflict-ending retaliatory response upon the the terrorists and the nations supporting terrorism, including a response against cities constituting the historic and religious centers of the terrorists.” [meaning Mecca and/or Medina]

      Adapted from Kennedy’s televised speech during the Cuban missle crisis.

      Of course there’s no chance Comrade Obama would adopt such a policy — no, we’ll just get more stupid comments telling the terrorists: “Keep trying, we can absorb another one, it makes us stronger!”

  • thomas

    So, we can ?absorb? another 3,000 dead? Another 3,000 anguished horrified families, with their guts torn away. Really. Another 3,000 dead will make us ?stronger??! Comrade Obama is an idiot and a wimp ? a weak, shameful, spineless wimp. No courage. No honor. No sense of justice. No will to fight.

    Good going independents and Democrats. How?s hope, change, cowardice and endless high-unemployment working out for you?

    • taxpayer1234

      Stalin told his proletariat that the more people made cannon fodder, the stronger the Soviet nation would become, yada yada. The Islamics extol homicide bombings as the ultimate career goal for any young Muslim.

      Obama is both a communist and a Muslim sympathizer (or Muslim, who knows for sure). Does he want America, and Americans, to live?

      • bodenet

        Obama is an atavism, His Marxist economics and social ideas are as appropriate as a blacksmith on Broadway in NYC. He is locked in to the idea of social control as the ultimate objective of government. His views were prophetically described by George Orwell.

    • davesinsanantonio

      Wimp-in-Chief.

    • bus2dc

      What do we expect from a man who can only talk through a teleprompter? Maybe there’s even a power-pack in the back with an on-off switch. The man is manufactured, without a genuine emotion or opinion. 100 different advisors plan his every reaction and response. The problem (among a million others) is that his weak and indecisive language make him not only look like a fool but is played in the mid-East – giving countless signals to the terrorist groups. Perhaps it is intentional. All we know is that we DON’T KNOW him. And what we aso know is that every word from his mouth, every move he’s made, all signal no allegiance to our OWN country. We have a fake president, and God only knows who made him and is actually pushing the buttons.

      • bodenet

        We cannot expect any of the ideas that allowed him to become president. We cannot expect anything that sustains the principles of Constitutional America that made this country the hope of millions of people from every nation. What we can expect is unemployment, black markets, more drug activity, higher crime rates and less security from dangers within and without and a collapsing infrastructure. This Obama Administration is the dream model for organized crime.

  • bobmontgomery

    “We can absorb a terrorist attack.” “I looked like a special Olympian out there.” “The Cambridge Police acted stupidly.” “Quit listening to Rush Limbaugh.” “Get out of the way and don’t do too much talkin’”. “…a Navy Corpseman.”
    G.W. Bush was not conservative enough for many of our tastes. but he had more grace, civility, honor, certainly an equal if not superior formal and informal education, and, yes, gravitas, than Al Gore, John Kerry and Barack Obama combined. Did we mention decency and common sense? No Pulitzer, no Oscar, no Nobel. Just the everlasting gratitude of the American people for keeping Maureen Dowd’s psychiatrist in walking around money.

  • Adjoran

    That isn’t exactly what he said, either. And if we try to spin this fragment too fast, it could bite us in hind parts.

    The full quote is:

    ” During my Oval Office inteview with the President, Obama volunteers some extended thoughts about terrorism.

    ?I said very early on, as a Senator and continue to believe, as a presidential candidate and now as president, that we can absorb a terrorist attack. We will do everything we can to prevent it. But even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever, that ever took place on our soil, we absorbed it, and we are stronger. This is a strong, powerful country that we live in, and our people are incredibly resilient.?

    Then he addressed his big concern. ?A potential game changer would be a nuclear weapon in the hands of terrorists, blowing up a major American city. Or a weapon of mass destruction in a major American city. And so when I go down on the list of things I have to worry about all the time, that is at the top, because that?s one area where you can?t afford any mistakes. And so right away, coming in, we said, how are we going to start ramping up and putting that at the center of a lot of our national security discussion? Making sure that that occurrence, even if remote, never happens.?

    When taken in context, it’s obvious he isn’t complacent about it, he’s saying the real danger is WMDs, and that’s what we have to concentrate on those because there is no way to anticipate everything.

    • seattle_ite

      I don’t care if it’s small attacks, or huge. We may be resilient, but this guy will get millions killed with his appeasing garbage.

      If we don’t even try to stop the “minor” attacks, the enemy will keep trying for the big one. Or, am I the only one who gets that?

    • Mark Impomeni

      Those that want to do us harm will read this as a dare, pure and simple. That’s why the remarks were incredibly stupid and dangerous, whatever the context. George W. Bush would have known better.

    • davesinsanantonio

      is “one area where you can’t afford any mistakes”, why is he allowing the most terror sponsoring country to continue on the path to having a nuclear weapons capability??? He is all talk and no follow through. He hugs terrorists and bows to their sponsors. I believe he would welcome another terrorist attack on America, because “a crisis is a terrible thing to waste”. Every attack on this country gives him another opportunity to increase government power, and that is his real goal. He may hope such an attack is not against Chicago or Washington for his own safety, but I bet he would easily give up Denver or Dallas, or some other city in “fly-over country”.
      We have two choices, we can believe his words or we can watch his actions. “By their fruits ye shall know them”! Obama’s real problem now is that all Americans are beginning to know him, and he can’t fool us anymore.

      • bus2dc

        It was predicted right from the start, and rightly so, that Obama would go soft on Iran and hard on Israel. That is exactly what he has done, step-by-step, carefully manipulating his wording and messages to engender hostility toward Israel (much like he did with AZ, btw) and stalling nonsense-talk of “diplomacy” and “sanctions” on Iran. His real goals have NOTHING to do with the safety and security of America. He has compromised us already in thousands of big and small ways. You don’t have to BE the bogeyman, it’s more than sufficient if you simply leave the door open tp intentionally LET HIM IN.

    • realskinny

      “A nuclear weapon in the hands of terrorists.” The Muslim gangsters running Iran ARE terrorists. What plans has he for handling this? The only thing he has ramped up is appeasement. Books will be written about what a miserable pathetic excuse for a human being this POS is. Come to think of it, they already have been.

    • edintexas

      “And so right away, coming in, we said, how are we going to start ramping up and putting that at the center of a lot of our national security discussion?”

      The obvious implication of that statement is the Bush 43 Administration never gave a thought to the possibility. In fact not just the obvious implication, but in the English language the only interpretation. Do you really believe the import of that statement?

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    …that one death is a tragedy, and 3000 is a statistic.

    • mriggio

      ‘one death is a tragedy, one million deaths is a statistic’.

      #$$&# typos…..Cheers!

      • mriggio

        and Stalin was wrong, too–

        a million deaths=untold millions of tragedies.

  • bushhog

    is the most concise and accurate description of our president’s approach to the world that I have seen. Should be a good phrase to hang on him in ’12, if not in the upcoming elections.

  • mkozikowski

    Does not believe in the word ‘WIN’.
    It hurts too many feelings.

    So, if you don’t believe in ‘Win’, and you don’t believe that there should be a stronger or weaker, or a richer or poorer, then, by definition, you must believe in “absorbing the blow’.

    That is what he believes. That is how he has acted. That is what we have.

    The United States went from ‘Top Dog’ to ‘World Class Wimp’ in less than two years. All it took was a leader who doesn’t believe in ‘Win’.

    We got him. And Here We Are.

    • davesinsanantonio

      “I would be a poor commander-in-chief. But, he makes a pretty “wimp-in-chief”.

  • dwscho

    more concerned about our country being tolerant of Islam than focused on protecting America from a repeat attack or, from the intolerant actions of those trying to build a mosque near ground zero. What a shameful excuse for a President let alone a supposed American.

  • mickeydpekinil

    I thought I was somewhat in the know, but was surprised to read that some folks did not get exact identification and remains for a formal funeral after 9/11.