« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Help Defeat International Regulatory Schemes for the Internet

From the diaries…

Today the House Subcommittee on Communications and Technology is examining a dangerous international attempt to regulate and tax the Internet.

Several hostile countries are pursuing the expansion of a 1988 International Telecommunication Regulation (ITR) Treaty under the auspices of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), an agency within the United Nations. Their preferred venue for this back-door power play is the December 2012 World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) in Dubai.

This morning’s hearing will be watched with great interest around the world as everyone looks to see what the United States says about surrendering exclusive inter-governmental policy controls over things like network governance, technical standards, domain names, content controls, access taxes, cybersecurity and more.

Make no mistake about it: our national sovereignty is at risk. If the expansion of a global legal regime for communication technologies gains traction, the effects to the global economy as well as our individual liberties will be severe.

FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell has said that several foreign dignitaries personally spoke to him about creating a new Internet user fee to subsidize an international universal service fund at the expense of traditional end users. Countries like Iran and China support an Internet Iron Curtain that would censor political dissidents and deny anonymous activity online through mandatory registrations of IP addresses. Russia’s Vladimir Putin has even openly stated his intention to seek, “international control over the Internet using the monitoring and supervisory capabilities of the [ITU].”

Thankfully, there’s bipartisan agreement in Congress that we shouldn’t give new authorities to the ITU. We’re rallying behind the decentralized, multi-stakeholder models that have enhanced flexibility and innovation in the past. Even the Obama Administration should be commended for its efforts to help thwart this attempt. However, it’s also frustrating to think about how this Administration undermined our nation’s credibility in this developing fight against international regulations when it superimposed regulations over management of Internet networks in the United States.

Because America leads the world by example it’s no surprise that some might seek to imitate our domestic rules and regulations on a global scale. Despite our own failures to reign-in the regulatory Leviathan at the FCC, we now need a serious game plan that deals with those who would put international politics ahead of an open and prosperous Internet. We may have our differences on domestic telecommunications policy, but having those policies decided at the international level would be the worst thing for the Internet.

Today’s open and free Internet is an empowering force for good in our world. That’s why we need your voice – tell your Member of Congress and this Administration to beat back any ploy to internationalize control over the Internet. When you do it also ask them to hold our domestic telecommunications regulators at the FCC more accountable, too.

COMMENTS

  • Pingback: Resource

  • http://contributor.yahoo.com/user/960306/gregory_schmidt.html theillinoisguy

    Everything they touch seems to try to reduce our sovereignty in one way or another. Enough with this Marxist crap – stop trying to bring us down to everyone else’s level, try to help them get to ours. I know it’s harder to build than destroy, but deal with it.

  • Dave_A

    Founded back in the days of the telegraph, their purpose is to ensure that phone & other communication systems interoperate world-wide…

    Examples include defining 2G/3G/4G for cell phones, VOIP codecs, the fax protocol, and so on…

    IEEE, of course, is responsible for standardizing the Ethernet protocol and it’s sub-families (such as wifi)…

    There is a valid point to having these sorts of organizations, as it keeps communications tech from being different in each country you go to… Usually it’s not done by law, but by setting a standard that manufacturers will follow in order to maintain interoperability…

  • bob570

    I think it’s time to send the UN Packing. Their constant attempts to bring their third world dictatorial rule to our shores is getting annoying. We should suggest they move their headquarters to say, Syria, or Iran, or North Korea, where they would feel more at home.

  • brojohn2

    as long as the standards don’t give dictators and war lords control over every aspect of the internet. The idea that anyone can squelch free speech when they don’t like it, gee sounds like “progressives” I will send my congressman a note today to tell him how I feel about this idea of “control” of the internet.

  • edintexas

    BUT – it now is part of the UN. So in the context of today – the ITU is the UN,

  • wumingren

    In the event that hostile entities take over the Internet, is there any reason we shouldn’t abandon it and start up a new one? Instead of http://www we use something else.

  • UpLateAgain

    Control will no doubt be insidious and peace-meal, so that people tolerate it bit by bit (no pun intended). If ever there was a ‘camel’s nose under the tent’ situation, this is it.