« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Message for Meg Whitman: Go on Offense. Now.

The best way past a “scandal” for a Republican is through it. Take a day or two – no more, no less – to think it through, find a line of attack and go on offense. If George Allen had done that instead of trying to plead, ignore and then cower his way past the “macaca” incident, we’d not have the tragedy of both Senators from the Commonwealth of Virginia being Democrats.

On the latest so-called “scandal!” and “controversy” that has all the political talking heads in California running around screaming at the top of their lungs i.e. Meg Whitman’s illegal alien former housekeeper; if I were advising Whitman I’d tell her, apart from her offer to take a polygraph test, to call a Press Conference, and go on offense. I’d tell her to pound on the following points;

  1. The writing on the letter is not her husband’s. Period. He says he didn’t write it because he never saw the letter. If he had, and gone as far as to write instructions on it for Santilla, he would have discussed it with her.
  2. Obviously then, Whitman’s husband’s handwriting was forged. As a nine year employee, Santilla would certainly be familiar with it and may even have legitimate correspondence from Dr. Griffith Harsh (Meg Whitman’s husband) as a baseline for the forgery.
  3. The Whitman campaign demands the original copy of the letter for forensic dating to determine the time when the letter was actually printed and the time the supposed note by Whitman’s husband was written.
  4. Since neither Whitman nor her husband saw the letter, how did Santilla get a hold of a letter from the SSA to Meg Whitman and her family? This suggests a crime on the part of Santilla (intercepting mail) and Allred aiding and abetting after the fact.
  5. Gloria Allred has made a disgusting habit of popping up in the last weeks of a campaign to level false allegations against Republican candidates in a bid to torpedo their campaigns. She did this back in 2002 when she tried to derail Arnold’s election bid with false sexual harassment charges and she’s doing the exact same thing now. Why is she being granted any form of legitimacy knowing that this is what she does?
  6. To the Press; is she supposed to employ illegal aliens? Is that not illegal? What exactly is Allred and the press corps’ complaint? Are they really complaining that Whitman failed to do something that went against the law? Furthermore, an employee lied to her about her immigration status with false papers, obviously intercepted mail between her and the SSA – when she discovered it, she let the employee go; where’s the “scandal” here?

I repeat; for Republicans, the best way past a ginned up “scandal” or “controversy” is to plow straight through it – not trying to move on past it or hoping it goes away. Democrats can do that. Republicans can’t. Republicans have to up the ante and go on offense.

Force the partisan hacks calling themselves journalists and trying to make it a “scandal” defend why it is a “scandal.” Attack their decisions on the legitimacy of the issue. I guarantee that by the end of the week it’s on page B53 on its way to an ignoble death before it ends up torpedoing the Democrat’s chances.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • dontell
  • libertyatstake

    No more Queensbury Rules …. bare-knuckle all the way, baby. It’s all they got left, so I say give it right back.

    http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
    “Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive”

  • cactusjack

    on the ground. Issues or legality be damned. It has been their stock in trade for about 125 years, it is a matter of professional pride that Dems can take any close election and make it turn out “the way it should.” They still talk with great pride about 1960, which was so close who knows who really won when you factor in admittedly electioneered Cook County, IL and Duval County, TX. Midnight calls. Threats. The dead voting. So if we get there to say taking the House, don’t be surprised if it is through the court house and the judiciary because 2000 in Florida showed something the Dems never imagined: conservatives can hire lawyers too.

    • Kyle-MI

      They can’t win at cheating if it is not close.

      • cactusjack

        That election has all the hallmarks of a Dem street job. Drag it out, slow it down, hustle, hustle. Lawsuit, recount, lawsuit, recount, surprise! Coleman didn’t really win, turns out Franken did! Who knew!? The most recent example of which Florida was just a link in the chain.

        • eburke

          the largest vote total swing in the history of recounts in the United States (over a 1,000 votes) and the Liberal, activist MN Supreme Court rubber stamped it.

          It was disgusting to watch. And unfortunately Norm chose to fight by the Marquis of Queensbury rules instead of engaging in the street brawl which Ritchie and his ACORN cronies brought to the table. There wasn’t enuf Pepto Bismal manufactured that year to have dealt with all the irregularities that went down.

  • pamela1631

    Demand the original and see if prints/dna can be lifted.

    No Meg or Meg’s hubby prints…oh deary me Gloria
    You are so fastenered, it’s ridiculous.
    Forget the tattooed and blued.

    Disbarment anyone? Is it a sanctioning offense?

  • acat

    It’s possible, but rare, for an ambush of any kind to be carried out by a superior force… so, turn into the ambush and blow ‘em away.

    Martin hits all the right points, but I’ll add another one.

    Allred is touted as some champion of womens’ rights. Meg needs to crucify Gloria for attacking not one but two women, just for political points. It’s past time someone called Allred out for her despicable act.

    Mew

    • Doc Holliday

      near ambush, drive through the objective, you have no other choice.

      don’t agree on the superior force thing, an ambush is carried out where the force has the greatest advantage, no one wants to be caught in an ambush.

      But we can set our own ambush’es, and we need to take allred on, we need to leave a mark.

      • acat

        in this case, if this is all they’ve got – and Meg’s handlers ought to know everything about this case already – then it seems clear that it’s an attack by a smaller force.

        Scorched earth would be a good policy here – make sure Allred is not useful in the future.

        Mew

  • gwalt

    WTH?
    Let’s go after the media anchors. Embarrass them by questioning their reportinging, integrity, and liberalism. I pledge $100…..$200 to start a billboard campaign with media faces on them with some kind of caption underneath like ” Biased. Liberal. They want you un-informed.”

    Let’s put the media on defense. Let’s put their faces on ads — billboards– with “Biased. Liberal. They want you un-informed.”

    WTH?

    They come out every day. Every election cycle. Smearing us. Let’s put them on public display. They will implode.

    Erick; I sent you a mock-up Power Point for a billboard ad. For the fun of it— post and ask how many people would contribute to go on OFFENSE against the media which quite frankly have decided elections in 2006 and 2008!

    If we go on offense—-what are they going to do? Attack us?

    They’re going to anyway.

  • gwalt

    The iPad can eb touchy when posting.

  • uhangtight

    Exactly right.

    Besides, the writing is too legible to be a from a Dr.’s Hand..

    And, why would you have your Maid look into the SS#? You would have an assistant look into and follow up on the verification of the letter.

    Why would I hand this over to my maid to validate? I would ask them for the SS# again and then re-validate myself. This is not something you have a maid do, this is something you have an Assistant, Personal Assistant or Secretary do, not the maid. I assure you, I am not the corporate whiz that Meg is, but I know enough that I don’t have the ‘suspected individual’ check into the situation… I’m just sayin..

  • bobbymike

    politic force in the history of America. They are truly despicable.

    How many times do the Republicans have to be reminded that this is political war for the future of the country.

  • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

    …why gloria allred is a douche bag…

    • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

      We need to become like the Dems these days. Can Gloria Allred PROVE that she’s not a douche bag in a court of law?

  • E Pluribus Unum

    Spot on. Democrats are not courageous, they’re just mean and low-down.

    • proudgop

      The Dems have gone to smear mode on Whitman and its so funny SEIU had ad on this nanny issue not even 12 hours after it came to “light” with new ad.

      something smells

  • emaberk

    But its problematic that she didn’t report a known illegal the minute she found out. She’s gotten herself in a tough position.

    • Martin Knight
      • emaberk

        It’s not acceptable that she was aware of a known illegal who falsified federal documents and did not report her. Do you thing everyone should act that way? Just turn a blind eye because you feel bad for them?

        I have some advice, grow a pair and take a tough stance on illegals..

        • Jack_Savage

          We appreciate your advice. Of course, it is the high-pitched and irrelevant death cry of a cornered jackal just prior to being slaughtered by a pride of lions, but we appreciate it just the same.

          Mom’s calling. Hide the Tokemaster and hit the hay, fair’s in town and they will need you at the gate bright and early tomorrow.

          • emaberk

            Whitman found out in 2009 and fired her but she should have reported her too but didn’t. Thats a problem for someone wanting to be Governor of a state with a massive illegal problem. Do you think she should have reported her?

          • Jack_Savage

            And I am confident that your current position is standing with your head inserted up your anus.

            I am going to email Moe now. He yells at me for playing with fools.

          • emaberk

            But its a question that Whitman should answer for.

            Its simple either you believe there is a need for the arrest, detention, and deportation of illegal immigrants like Nicki Diaz or you don’t. Illegal immigration is a Federal crime and must be enforced.

          • Doc Holliday
    • JadedByPolitics

      says more about the type of person she is. This woman worked around her and her family for 9 years and while it probably hurt her to fire her, in her kind heart she could NOT turn her into the police. I would but Whitman is a kinder, gentler person them me!

      BTW AILPAC came off of my email list today. I supported them in the past but to call for Whitman to be arrested is EXTREME!

      • acat

        Meg didn’t bother turning in her housekeeper not out of kindness, but because she knew Cali doesn’t enforce immigration laws anyway.

        Mew

      • emaberk

        the U.S. illegally, a Federal crime. Falsified Federal documents/identification, another Federal crime and lied to Whitman’s family for the past 9 years. But in Whitman’s best judgment she decided not to report any of this to the proper authorities.

        Thats a problem. Maybe not a huge problem for some people but to those of us who want serious immigration policies it doesn’t look good.

        Maybe Whitman will learn a valuable lesson from this. If she had done the right thing and reported Nicki perhaps she would have been arrested and deported by now (I know wishful thinking) and Whitman wouldn’t be in this mess.

    • The_Gadfly

      It is therefore the height of hubris to assume it to be true when coming from a known Marxists thug.

      1. I rather strongly suspect that if you fire someone because SSN sends you a letter saying their numbers don’t match up, you will quickly find yourself being sued by the fired employee for improper dismissal. They may even file as a hate crime because it was racially motivated.

      2. The proper procedure upon receipt of such a letter is to talk to the employee and ask if it is a mistake. If the employee says it is a mistake, you ask them to correct it. Depending on where you are you might even be required to render assistance in trying to correct the mistake.

      3. Why is the government not more actively enforcing the law? Given items 1 and 2 above, it is fair to say that the government encourages citizens to break the law until such time as it is convenient to shake them down for money or torpedo a political campaign. Malice or accident?

    • kenchely

      Her not reporting the maid is consistent with her story that she liked her and wouldn’t want to hurt her–also consistent with her having paid her $23 per hour. Instead, she just let her go.

      It would be interesting to know whether the maid received money either from Gloria Allred or the SEIU to make the accusation. I wonder whether the crying was because of the trauma of her firing or because of a guilty conscience that she was turning on someone who had treated her well for years–who had made her the best-paid illegal in California.

      • acat

        http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/02/whitman-looks-to-regain-momentum-in-second-debate/

        It’s like her campaign staff read Martin’s post or something.

        Mew

  • smitch61

    She better do it quickly because Jerry Brown in office makes me sick to my stomach to think about.

  • cactusjack
  • lbjgal

    Good luck at getting the California GOP establishment as well as the Megan Whitman campaign to listen to you. If the California GOP investigated their perceptive conservative candidates the party would have the candidate- October surprise would be a thing of the past in California.

  • RealQuiet

    One of the most appalling, egregious selfish acts I have ever seen. Allred simply used this person to satisfy her unquenchable thirst to be on the tube, in the media, and will pay her by having her at minimum, jailed for years at the worst.

    http://www.marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364

    • RealQuiet

      n/t

  • dio55

    California is going down the tube and with a republican house there will be no bailout. I really do not want a Republican there for the liberal media to place all the blame on . California and New york must dessolve into a liberal cesspool with obama in the white house and dem governors in both states so no one else to blame but democrats. who knows they may be red states in a decade

    • chabsentia

      Californaai is going down the tubes with or without a Federal bailout unless the taxpayers bail them out yearly. California has not had a Budget for over ninety days. The Largest Union will not make such small concessions such as paying into their bloated pensions. Fifty percent of the Revenue of California goes to support the Public Sector. The Democrat voters in California outnumber Republican voters two to one and the peopel keep electing Democrats. The Democrats are beholden to the Unions who take fifty percrnt of the Revenue of California. Where do you see a majority Republican Legislature?Wont happen.The Unions wont give because they expcect a bailout from their Congress and their man in the White House.

  • proudmarinemom

    is not very likely to support Santilla, the housekeeper.

    This lady was employed at a good wage for nine years and now has betrayed her employer in the most vicious and vengeful way. Imagine the effect this will have on other potential employers of foreign-born workers?

    I would certainly think twice before hiring a foreign-born landscaper, nanny, housekeeper, or handyman now that I’ve seen what can happen if they decide to betray me.

    Not very good PR for the immigrant community, is it, Ms. Santilla?

    • lineholder

      There will be plenty of people who have been willing to hire immigrants in good faith or out of an act of generosity who will become a lot more cautious because of this incident.

      Which reminds me…I wonder if the immigrants working on the landscaping crew that is hired by our homeowner’s association are legal or illegal immigrants? I guess I’ll have to call tomorrow and find out.

    • KC

      Meg could even use this in a political ad, — this is an insidious aspect of the porous boarder. No one in their right mind should ever hire a ?potential undocumented worker? when they will be faced with social and political ruin for doing so. And this brings up the issue of Racial Profiling that is so politically incorrect. Here Meg is trying to do the right thing, and be kind, and at the same time deal with a lying cheating identity thief.

      This letter from social security implies that you could be in legal trouble yourself if you use this letter against an employee. Unfortunately, the only thing Meg could have done is instruct her tax professional to investigate this with the social security administration and find out who they believe is the true owner of the SSN. After she learned that her employee?s SSN belonged to her employee?s sister she could go to the federal authorities because forgery of a SSN is a criminal offense. Meg was actually being rather generous in simply letting her go. Now of course it is Allred who has exposed her to the world (ref: Mark Levin).

    • Martin Knight
      • JSobieski

        imprudent.

        While the underlying logic may make sense to someone who is already on Team Whitman, I can’t imagine that those invested in Team Brown are going to go through the hoops as hoped.

        The we-are-entitled community is not going to all of sudden discover supply side economics and think that what is bad for their employers is bad for them.

        If that was true, they would already be Republicans.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • MF

      We have a gardener who is of Mexican descent. When we first hired him over ten years ago, he was legall;y here in the US, but not a US citizen. He also was working toward gaining his US citizenship, which he obtained about five years ago. We were so proud of him! He is most definitely an American as much as you or I, and I would testify as a character witness if the need ever were to arise.

  • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

    “We never got that letter,” which became “We may have got that lettter.” “I’d take a lie detector test,” which became “If Allred and Brown did, too.”

    Definitely go back on offense. She has the money.

    If she has an Achilles’ heel, it’s that she was never credible to the anti-illegal immigrant crowd from the outset.

    • Doc Holliday

      Repubs and conservatives have a history of getting bogged down in scandals and then even eating their own. The left will play this game as long as it works, they can always find a lawyer to tell a turncoat they will be rich. Meg does not need to fight this, she needs to make one statement then move on, move to the attack.

      Nothing was discovered about Whitman’s character, anyone who thinks differently basically wants the left to rule this country. They will come up with more and more BS prior to Nov. 2, they expect us to fold because we usually turn on each other. The holier than thou types are the first to turn.

      • edwlstr

        media whore but do it publicly. And if you can tie the aging space cadet to her then you can watch both of them go down in flames. I wouldn’t know Whitman from Adam’s tomcat but I have seen more than enough of both Brown and Allred. Only wine improves with age, it seems……

  • Doc Holliday

    his own party, the so called conservatives ran for the hills. It was not Allen that failed, it was those that ran scared, the fair weather friends.

    • Martin Knight

      Conservatives didn’t abandon him. They turned out and voted for him. What really lost him the election, first, was the WaPo and every other Virginia newspaper headlining “macaca” for a straight six weeks. The Washington Post published over a 100 stories on it in 60 days!

      The second thing that lost him the election was his decision, after his campaign flailing impotently for weeks, to act the “elegant statesman” and try to be “above the fray” as his reputation was being shredded to bits – instead of grabbing the bull by the horns and going on offense. I remember – I even wrote up a speech for Allen to settle the issue once and for all.

      • acat

        Had Allen followed your advice and attacked into the fray – which would have required his campaign to recognize the threat and pick *one* strategy to counter it – he would have done fine.

        As evidence, I submit Palin. She’s got flaws, but her response to the media, after she was out from under McLames’ handlers, she did a decent job on counter-attacking.

        Mew

      • Doc Holliday

        they are part of the Demonrat Machine. The Alred accusations have been proven false, and the accusations are not really accusations anyway.

        But where I think we both agree is that the MSM will push this story as long as it hurts Whitman, They have no interest in the truth.

        I may look at this differently from you Martin, but I DO want to go on the attack. I just think things like lie detectors are reactive, not pro active. And even if Meg does it, the left will blame the questions etc, it will never end. I say trash alred, trash the left and move on. The MSM will not let up, they are trying to distract Whitman, and they have.

        • Martin Knight

          Since she can’t walk it back – I just incorporated it into my post.

          Otherwise, I thought it was ridiculous.

  • Doc Holliday

    take a polygraph? talk about handwriting? NO, she should ignore it and talk about smaller government. If she followed your plan she might exonerate herself by Nov 2, but she will not win any election.

    • Martin Knight

      Did it work for George W. Bush and his administration when they decided to ignore “BushLied”? Did it work for George Allen and his campaign with the WaPo and every other VA newspaper plastering the macaca story all over the headlines for six weeks?

      No.

      It doesn’t work. They were Republicans.

      Democrats can ignore such “scandals” and it would blow over because their fellow liberals in the Press would let it slide. Republicans don’t have that luxury.

      Whitman can expect this story to remain in the news – with the fired maid crying on cue on California TV screens – for the next few weeks up until it has morphed into her employing child labor.

      My plan is simple; have one single solid story (see above; mail intercepted, note forged) – not this panicked headless chicken scramble – call a Press Conference and blow up the massive holes in Santillan and Allred’s story and their credibility – anybody who has heard Allred dissemble on Hewitt and Levin’s shows can see that this was quite simply a partisan hack attack on behalf of Jerry Brown.

      By the way, Whitman offered to take the polygraph already before I wrote this post – if I were advising her, that would certainly not have happened.

      My way means you kill the story once and for all in one day especially if Whitman prefaces it all with a recounting of the serious problems facing California and declares that this Press Conference is her campaign’s last word on this irrelevant topic.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        The right way to handle this is attack, attack, attack. Call them a pack of liars and question their motives.

        This is one reason that conservatives have always been at a disadvantage against left wingers, Because they know how to fight dirty, and sometimes we try to be “above it all”

        Like you said, THAT DON’T WORK !

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

    …or does anyone there read RedState?

    Otherwise this is all echo chamber reverberations.

    Mind you, I agree with the diarist and the general tenor of the comments – I just hate to see a lot of energy dissipated. It’s Meg’sr campaign that needs to take a different tack.

    The task is to get the word out to Meg.

    • Martin Knight
  • tlhanger

    But she must of been winning for the Democrats to pull this crap.

    I heard she was offering to take a lie dector test and felt this wasn’t needed, but who knows with CA voters. I just hope she continues to push her message till voting day and doesn’t get to tangled in these phoney charges.

  • mirac777

    Whitman could and should go on the offensive. This “scandal” is a good opportunity that shouldnt go to waste.( sound familar?)

    I would creat a simple ad that would point out that if the Dems and the State of Calif. enforced the laws and deported illegals then this may never have happened. Calif, and its sanctuary cities are breaking Fed law, period.

    Calif is about 20 billion in the RED. It is time to work on fixing that little problem, no? Illegals and Jerry’s Unions are the main reasons they are that far in debt and busineses are running out of California by the hundreds!

    • MF

      for two reasons: First, she’s in favor of amnesty in some form or another. Second, and more importantly, she and her team believe that anything that takes a hard line on immigration will immediately kill off any Hispanic vote.

      The really ridiculous thing is that most of the Hispanics who are here legally (either US citizens, whether native or naturalized) and many of the legals are IN FAVOR of enforcement and against amnesties. But because the media talking heads continue to paint a different picture, they never hear that. Let’s face it, the only Hispanics that are against enforcement are either illegals (who shouldn’t have a vote, but frequently do anyway due to voter registration fraud), liberals or just plain straight ticket Dems.

  • proudmarinemom

    in order to be found evidence in favor of Ms. Whitman’s defense.

    Her husband may well have written the words, “Nicky, Please check on this” on that Post-it note, but it could have been attached to anything — dry cleaning, a cable TV bill, a written phone message — anything. All Santilla had to do was save the note and attach it to the SS letter.

    This woman appears to have been planning this attack for some time. She is a lousy actress, too. The crocodile tears wouldn’t fool a 6-year-old kid.

  • proudmarinemom

    Incidentally, I heard Gloria Allred say that the term “illegal alien” is offensive because of it evokes images of Martians.

    Both of my children received “Green” Cards when they departed South America with us to travel to the U.S. for final adoption. Many people are unaware that the Green Card is not green and is not offically called a green card.

    The offical name: “Resident Alien Identification Card”

    My son loved to refer to his baby sister as “our Little Alien” and nobody thought that was remotely offensive.

    • MF

      You make a good point, PMM. And we have far too many instances of where someone takes offense where none is intended. Just like the ridiculous laws concerning hate crimes – what should matter is intent of the speaker, not how the listener received it. It’s not my fault that someone else has a stick up his or her posterior, if I said something that had no ill intent to it but happened to be something that someone else didn’t like.

  • SeriousLaff

    Make this an example of how rediculous current immigration laws are. Identity theft is a serious crime that should be taken seriously. Anyone using a phony license or social security number should be imprisoned and then deported.As it is now, no match letters are useless and employers can be sued for asking about immigration status after immigration documents are presented. Whitman should use this as an opportunity to demand both State and Federal immigration laws make sense and be inforced.

  • stevopevo

    Sure you have to defend yourself but, then go on the offensive. I’m not sure that is the right path. A simple correction of their misconception or interpretation. Then ignore them. The Liberal media doesn’t care what your reply is or anything else that you say. They are not listening. Everything out of the mouths of Liberals from 1999 until yesterday is “I hate Bush” Bush was the idiot that tricked everyone with almost no exception into agreeing to go to war in Iraq. that is impossible for an idiot to do. Tricking the entire Senate,House, UN, all the heads of state world wide? That is either not true, or Bush is a Genius. The liberal media needs to be ignored, disregarded, Discarded, laughed at, scorned, but not read. The liberal press doesn’t rise to the notion of Journalism. It is just activism. Biased, disingenuous (a word I had never heard of until the Clinton Presidency) tricksters, hucksters, spin masters,but not truthful, unbiased, reporters. When you respond to their tripe you keep the ball in their court. Ignore them. It is already happening. More and more people are looking for their news in other places. But I know many people who buy the NYT because they always have. It has a reputation for honest that it doesn’t deserve. Even if you read it for the fashion section or the real estate listings you are funding the liberal press. You are funding the people who attack conservatives because conservatives don’t agree with their philosophy. That is not Journalism. That is propaganda.

  • The_Gadfly

    Meg should go on the counter offensive and sue the Marxist thug for slander under cover of legal action.

    I know what you are thinking, the courts have already agreed that any argument in a political fight is fair game. It’s time to call the underlying theory of this argument what it is: License not liberty and one that is corrosive detrimental to the well being of a republic based on ordered liberty. It is precisely the ability of one group of thugs to slander ANYONE who runs for office that keeps honest citizens from running while thieves like Blago and Rangel run with relative impunity. As a largely a-political business leader Meg Whitman is perfectly situated to make these arguments. And making those arguments in public is the sort of thing to which Joe Sixpack will respond.

    Also, some independent group should take whatever action is necessary to bring the issue of whether Allred has met the necessary ethical standards to retain her license to practice law. Same with anyone else associated with this incident. Moreover I believe that although lawyer-client privilege ordinarily protects the discussion of legal matters, once the lawyer becomes aware of specific illegal behavior on the part of their client, that privilege no longer applies and they are required to report that behavior. If not, Meg can raise that as another issue that will have Joe Sixpack more apoplectic than the hiring of an illegal alien.

    This isn’t sniper fire time. This is called in air strike followed by Howitzers pounding, and then cleaned up with guns and flamethrowers blazing time.

  • kenchely

    There are four ways Gloria Allred could have the document she is waving in front of us.

    1. She could have had it stolen from the Whitman house, which would involve two felonies–burglary and larceny.

    2. She could have gotten a contact working in the Social Security office to run a copy of the letter, a breach of confidentiality and a federal offense.

    3. Someone in the Social Security office might have come forward with a copy on his own, and she might simply have taken it and used it, which would be receiving stolen property and aiding and abetting the breach of confidentiality.

    4. She could have forged, or had forged for her, the document, a felony.

    No matter which way she got it, she is party to a crime. The matter should be referred to the local prosecutor’s office and the California bar, and Meg Whitman would be a proper person to make the complaint. Gloria Allred’s sleaze has gone on long enough, and this is the time to shut it down.

  • searic

    If conservatives continue to attempt to knuckle under and appease the press (assuming they have sense to ignore their lefties opponents), they will lose, lose, lose!
    If Gingritch had gone on the offense as Speaker rather than turning tail and grovelling, he might still be Speaker. Instead Newt was nuetered. Conservative generally but conservative Repulicans in particular need to show some GUTS!

  • searic

    If conservatives continue to attempt to knuckle under and appease the press (assuming they have sense to ignore their lefties opponents), they will lose, lose, lose!
    If Gingritch had gone on the offense as Speaker rather than turning tail and grovelling, he might still be Speaker. Instead Newt was nuetered. Conservative generally but conservative Repulicans in particular need to show some GUTS!

  • securitymom

    Greta Van Susteren demolished Gloria Allred tonight. The takedown was precise. I knew Greta was a good lawyer but seeing her in action tonight was amazing. Someone posted it on youtube already. It is about 9 min long but well worth the viewing.

  • proudmarinemom

    is one of the most ethical jurists in this country. She has dedicated her life to the cause of justice. I first met her in 1982 when I was a paralegal and had the privilege of seeing her argue some tough cases. She is unfailingly fair-minded and can excoriate the opposition with her systematic dismantling of false testimony.

    Gloria Allred is an opportunistic bottom-feeder who cares nothing for justice.

    This “case” against Meg Whitman should have every American who cares about justice standing up and demanding the disbarment of Ms. Allred and the deportation of her lying, back-stabbing, ungrateful, anti-American client.

    This scandal could change the course of history for this nation. This injustice must be put down.

  • Tbone

    and her hairdresser a bad reputation.

    • acat

      * yeah, I know it’s not that high a percentage, but .. there’s a lot of camera-hogging grandstanders with law degrees….

      Mew

      • Scope

        n/t

  • Pingback: YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE THIS !

  • Pingback: kizi