« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Scott Brown’s Common Sense: A Tax Receipt

Good ideas sometimes take a while to ripen in Washington, D.C. such as Andrew Langer’s 2008 idea to send taxpayers a receipt of what their dollars bought:

“We believe that the government ought to provide a receipt to each taxpayer in October of every year — a note of thanks detailing the total amount in federal income taxes paid by the filer for the prior calendar year,” Langer said. “If Americans are to really exercise their oversight roles, then the federal government has its own obligation to ensure that the populace knows exactly what they are paying. And saying thank you is, frankly, just good manners.”

He said the measure is an alternative to moving tax-filing day to October to coincide more closely with elections — an idea that has been popular on the right for some time.

As for the idea gaining any traction in Congress, Langer said his organization is going to start pushing members on the matter.

Now, Scott Brown (R-MA aka the former Kennedy seat) and co-sponsor Bill Nelson (D-FL) propose a bill called the Taxpayer Receipt Act of 2011, to do exactly this. The Tax Receipt Bill will take Obama’s attempt at transparency one step further: It will give taxpayers concrete evidence of how their money is spent.

Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh have joked for years about having Tax Day be Election Day. Well, at least with a receipt, the Taxpayers can see what they’re spending money on. My guess, with each American owing $45,000 to the Federal government, they’d be keenly interested in knowing how well the government stewards their money.

This bill could be transformational. Imagine receiving an accounting of what each citizen owes–the interest on the national debt, costs for Medicaid, Medicare, national defense, education, foreign aid, etc.

Most people do not pay anywhere near the amount each individual owes, too. Not only would big taxpayers be outraged (they already are outraged), people who pay less in taxes but receive huge benefits would also see how their personal path, affects the goverments’ path, and that it’s unsustainable.

With the country being in such a precarious financial place, it’s difficult for people to understand what the debt means to each individual. How does one compute 14 trillion dollars? How does one carve out his own his own part and responsibility?

The Tax Payer Receipt Act will do just that–kinda like the calorie charts the government loves imposing on food companies. It’s about time a corpulent America learn how overweight they are and how many calories the government is eating turns to fat.

Scott Brown’s legislation is a common sense solution to the getting the Federal Government back in shape.

Sign a petition to encourage Congress to act on this bill at TheTaxReceipt.com

COMMENTS

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    I am not sure the results are going to be what you think they will. Look at the sample on the website: #1 is social security, for which most people are probably going to have no problem with as a “retirement” plan, but #2 is defense and my guess is people will scream from the heavens to cut this first. Do not forget that Americans tend not to like to do math and so I doubt they are going to take the time to add up categories on the receipt, but will instead look at it line by line.

    Also, do we really need yet another thing printed on paper and mailed at our expense.

  • Aaron Gardner

    My first thought was that the compiling and printing of these reports for all tax payers, in various languages as not to offend any naturalized citizens who may not read English or have limited skills in ESL, would just become another waste of tax payers dollars.

    • http://silveradvisor.blogspot.com GordonTaylor

      N/T

    • acat

      that magically started appearing while Al “lockbox” Gore was veep?

      The ones that purport to show what I’ll receive when I retire, that are deliberately similar to what I get from my 401k account?

      Yeah. That’d be just more government waste.

      Mew

  • edintexas

    While Brown and Nelson are not far Left, neither is Conservative. A similar type of bill was introduced in the House last year by Jim McDermott, who is pretty far Left.

    I also agree that this would largely be a waste of money. Far better to move April 15th to the first Monday in November. No continuing cost associated with the date move and even more effective in reminding those who actually pay taxes (as opposed to those who owe no taxes, or even receive a “refund” of the taxes they didn’t pay).

  • chieftain

    and include the interest paid and the new borrowings made.
    To make the calculation simple and lower the cost of doing this, the amounts reported should be on an equal per capita basis. This will show countless people how little they pay compared to their “equal” share of the budget.
    Don’t require them to be sent on a date specific, but rather within a range of dates e.g. from September 15th to October 31.

  • usadying

    The tax receipt would become politicized based on whomever has the power at the time.

  • dmacleo

    the 17K IRS employees hired for administering the health care abortion.

    or…more accurately..a giant waste of money disguised as eyewash.

  • BA Cyclone

    If Bill Nelson supports it, my auto-position starts out being against it.

  • leftylurker

    Maybe we can get social security reform, medicare reform. and defense policy reform out of it, because that’s the vast majority of the budget there.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    Post the entire US budget on line down to the paperclip so we can see exactly where our money is going. If we can see each expenditure we could recommend cuts. After we’ve calmed down from our outrage.

  • dsmurf

    from Social security, Medicare, now Obamacare?
    Or what about GSEs? like Fannie and Freddie? Man this idea makes my head hurt.

  • The_Gadfly

    to read a 15,000 page document, and that’s assuming you can figure out a way to stick it in their mailbox or that we can afford to print a copy for every American. If it is only a 4 page summary, it will just be more Leviathan propaganda mailed at taxpayer expense to taxpayers. Well, actually a lot of non-taxpayers since we are awfully close to the ‘most Americans don’t pay income taxes’ tipping point.

    While I appreciate the sentiment, the idea is a non-starter for me. Moving either election day or tax day so that they both fall within a week of each other is a much better idea.

  • taylerdog23

    Excellent post, Melissa.

    I suspect that the hemming and hawing on this proposal will come from both the right and the left because both sides will not want to see the expenses associated with their “sacred cows” laid out so plainly.

    Seriously, this can easily be a short table that lays out where tax dollars go by broad categories–

    Social Security
    Medicare & Medicaid
    Defense
    Interest on Nat’l Debt
    Discretionary
    Other Mandatory

    Have links to each category explaining what they are, and it’s done.

    What are people scared of? The fact that showing that all of the discretionary spending combined we (rightfully so) complain about equals only approx. 19% of the Federal budget? Sorry, but if we’re serious about getting the debt under control, everything has to be on the table, including the much loved SS, Medicare & Medicaid and Defense spending. Laying the facts out like this will hopefully move people to start accepting that fact. Constantly whining about unreasonable line-item expenditures or earmarks does not get us where we need to be.

    Kudos, Sen. Brown

    • The_Gadfly

      Technically it all is online — in the Federal Register. But that hasn’t really helped sort it out so far.

      I understand the intent. But the devil is in the details. And the details of a multi-trillion dollar budget are impossible for human minds to truly comprehend. There’s simply not enough time. Which is why we need to shrink the size of government. I mean, what I find to be the most sickening part of the current debate about cutting $61.5 billion from the budget, is that given the size of the budget, that’s less than a rounding error.

      • taylerdog23

        And yes, I know it’s in Fed Reg @ gpoaccess.gov, but I’m probably not the only one that finds the info nearly incomprehensible.

        I guess I just wonder how we reasonably and rationally can wade through a trillion dollar budget and deal with all those detail devils. Daunting…

  • mkozikowski

    I think you would get more bang for your buck if you made “Withholding” illegal.
    How about this idea? Have every taxpayer just submit an income return each quarter, like a business does?
    This way, each taxpayer will see the true cost of taxes.

    If you were to ask any given taxpayer about their taxes, they would respond that their taxes are the small number they pay in April. They totally don’t count the withholding tens of thousands over the year.

    So, Tax receipt good.
    Withholding Illegal, much, much better

    • The_Gadfly

      First, that keeps it in most people’s minds. Second, I think we’d be throwing a whole lot of people in jail if it was paid quarterly because they’d spend it before it was due. And yes, I would go to the trouble of requiring it to be check or money order and pay government worker to receive, record, and deposit them all. Simply letting your employer do it like they do with your 401(k) or health insurance puts it just as out of mind for most people.

  • fuzislippers

    This receipt thing is absolutely absurd in every conceivable way. I mean, really, the feds themselves creating these “receipts” for the money that they themselves are wasting? Um, sure, that makes massive sense. Spend billions setting that up because there may be one or two morons who actually believe whatever the feds dream up to “account” for tax revenue. Yep, and the next time I want someone to guard my business, I’ll hire a thief to take inventory and then send me updates on said inventory. Fox, hen house, massive waste of massive amounts of money (our government literally can’t set up a website for under a million bucks or buy a toilet for less than $500).

    Besides, we have umpteen government “watchdog” orgs who do almost exactly this, including the new “tax calculators” that are all over the internet that tell you what percentage of your taxes go to what (and that, too, is obviously faulty, since we don’t even have a freaking federal budget and haven’t had one since BO took office!). If you’re worried people can’t access this information, just remember that the people who don’t know about these tools/resources are probably not paying income taxes, anyway. But they’d get a paper receipt generated by a brand-new bureaucracy and mailed at taxpayer expense, don’t want to leave anyone out, right?

    Post the information online (even though it’s already there), on an existing site (type in your ss and get the information or something–and how many people would actually do that?), and let that be that. Save some trees, save billions, and save the smoke and mirrors. What an enormous waste of money (to be line-itemed on our receipts? yeah, sure it will).

  • Praying

    Skip the gimmicks and get down to serious business – like a 15% across the board cut. These nickle and dime solutions are just making our legislators look stupid and petty. I mean, more than usual.

    • The_Gadfly

      That would work out to $383 billion for FY2011, which is more than 6 times what the Senate rejected yesterday.