« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Le Affaire Sestak: It’s the he-campaigned-on-it, stupid.

(H/T: Hot Air Headlines) I refuse to believe that Eric Alterman is dumb enough to not know the answer to the questions:

Why in the world did he go blabbing about it? What did he possibly think he had to gain?

…if only because his essay* rather conspicuously danced around even trying to work out a rationale – which is odd, because said rationale is really fairly simple.  In reverse order: what Joe Sestak thought that he had to gain was the Democratic nomination for Pennsylvania Senate.  He was the underdog against the establishment candidate (and turncoat) Arlen Specter: the White House was on the other side; and Sestak was using an anti-establishment gambit.  So he became the Guy Who Wouldn’t Be Bought.

As to why Sestak’s still blabbing about it: well, now that he’s won the nomination – and, incidentally, been bought – I’m  sure he doesn’t want to be.   But there’s the pesky problem that he did use this incident to campaign – something that few (if any) of the supposed counter-examples offered by Establishment Democratic flunkies did themselves – and it does happen to be illegal, and the official explanation  is fairly slapdash, and gets more so with every new iteration.  And as the above links show, this was as much an issue to the GOP back in February (when Specter was still the favorite) as it is in May, and will be in June, July, August, September, October, and the first few days of November…

…after which, it will of course become merely a footnote to Pat Toomey’s election.

Moe Lane

*Executive summary: Joe Sestak is a Bad Man for bringing up something that is no big deal and everybody does, even if it is technically illegal and stuff, and the White House is simultaneously not at fault, perfect, and messing things up.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • bk

    1) Sestak floated this to “prove” his “outsider” credentials.
    2) His criticism of Specter was that he voted as a moderate, not a liberal.

    So when you put it all together, Sestak is saying “Elect me the outsider, so I can put it to those in power who tried to bribe me … by voting with them 100% of the time.” Huh?

  • WarEagle01

    out of that idiotic Plame business, in which no crime was even committed, how could they not expect the GOP to run with thing? It’s hilarious that lefties like Alterman, Jeffrey Toobin, and the always-wrong Larry Sabato are pretending to be in high dudgeon about the GOP pushing Sleazestakgate, when they would have killed to have this kind of real scandal during the Bush years.

  • Tbone

    pick me up a double latte?”

    Just who is the Coffee Boy now, Bill?

  • partyof1
  • jsmiddleton4

    The good news in all this is Sestak’s campaign. If not for the on going campaign this whole matter would go away. It would quietly be shoved under the carpet by the main stream media and Obama’s operatives. Would be shoved under there regardless of Issa or anyone’s questions.

    Sestak’s campaign is what is keeping the issue alive and therefore going to need to be addressed.

    Gotta love it.

    The person Obama tried to buy off, tried to defeat, one of his own, is indirectly going to be the source of all the questions still being asked and needing to be answered.

    God is good!

  • nepanyrush

    The campaign ads were of Specter as voting with Bush and being a Republican all his life. They showed Bush praising Specter, with Santorum alongside, and they showed Specter and Palin together. The ads showed how often Specter voted with the Republicans.

    I did not see ads here in PA painting Specter as too moderate, just too Republican.

  • izoneguy

    such as Corzine, Deeds & Coakley – he may start campaigning for Toomey.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    to keep his yapper shut about what really happened.

    Lemme get this straight…Obama brought in former President Bill Clinton to offer Sestak the equivalent of a couple of free passes to the Smithsonian to drop out of the race?

    Sestak displayed the typical conniving Democratic’s inability to think beyond the current speech/interview.

    Churchill: “Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?” Socialite: “My goodness, Mr. Churchill… Well, I suppose… we would have to discuss terms, of course… ”
    Churchill: “Would you sleep with me for five pounds?”
    Socialite: “Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!” Churchill: “Madam, we’ve already established that. Now we are haggling about the price.”

    Sestak’s quintessential example of Churchill’s quote, albeit in reverse order

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Would prisoner B.Clinton, assisting/committing the felony for the O and the O both get Secret Service protection if they are cellmates someday? Would Rahm be in the cellblock? Oh the drama…

    Probably not, since that would be cost effective and all…

    R.I.C.O. not just for gangsters of the past but also for felons of the present…

    Clinton getting involved reminds of a Jeff Foxworthy line that went something like “If he’s your best friend you’re not calling him to get you out of jail-he should be right there with you…”

  • bk

    Voting moderate / voting Republican – Sestak promises 100% pure partisan liberal votes. Specter waffled back and forth, and the same Dems who criticized Republicans for not having a “big tent” don’t want Specter or even people like Lieberman. You’re 100% with them or they don’t want you.

  • bk

    It’s just a COINCIDENCE that Obama met Clinton and the WH talked with the Sestak family the day before they all came out with brand new and (of course) identical stories about what happened.

  • littlehouse18

    might be that once he refused their ‘nice’ offer for him to get out, he felt the need to protect himself by getting a story out there before Axelrod’s machine savaged him as Plan B.

    Alas, I fear the best we can hope for from this is a Toomey victory, and removing Rahmbo. Not so bad, but we wasted the impeachment tool on Clinton.

  • Adjoran

    “I refuse to believe that Eric Alterman is dumb enough …”

    Well, believe it! So many on the right believe that just because any sentient being should be able to understand something, that this means his counterparts on the Left understand it. They do not.

    In order to keep their world view, leftists have to brainwash themselves completely. Any little ray of truth might collapse the entire edifice, so they block it out.

    Think about it: nearly all the policy prescriptions favored by the Left have been repeatedly put into practice and failed utterly each time, yet they keep coming back with . . . the same things.

    That’s not a sign of rational thought. And when you begin by assuming leftists think rationally, you are bound to end up frustrated and bewildered.

  • redneck_hippie
  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    The only way there’ll ever be another impeachment, is if the party the President isn’t in holds 2/3 majorities of both House and Senate. Don’t see that happening anytime soon.

    If Obama personally murdered someone on national TV, would there be even one single Democrat vote for impeachment? No.