« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

One preloaded racism explanation, coming right up!

Via the Daily Caller we get to see the latest use of mass therapy to treat the crippling scourge of liberal  lack of self esteem.  Using your money.

If you think $50,000 doesn’t buy what it used to, think again. For that rough sum, a professor at UCLA has agreed to draw up a report that proves opponents of the Democrats’ health-care bill aren’t motivated by a sense of fiscal responsibility or a general distrust of back-room deals, but by race.

The kicker? Taxpayers are funding the study.

According to the study’s abstract, provided by the National Science Foundation, a government agency under the control of the executive branch: “This research project attempts to provide further evidence for this Obama-induced racialization by pinpointing the extent that health-care opinions are influenced by racial attitudes and determining Obama’s causal role in racializing public opinion about a policy that has no manifest racial content.”

The guy’s name is David Sears, and he actually scored 52K for this – which is kind of impressive; usually people pay for psychological help.  At first I was going to be upset about this, but then I realized: if the government’s just going to be giving away money for damfool notions like this anyway, you might as well take advantage of it.  That’s why I’m going to request $250K to test the thesis that UCLA psychology professors who routinely assign racism as a motive for their political opponents got that way because they weren’t hugged enough as children, and never really knew their fathers.  I need the extra money because I plan to do a control using psychology professors at the University of Hawaii, so obviously there’s going to have to be a travel budget there.

Also: UCLA psychology professors who routinely assign racism as a motive for their political opponents got that way because they weren’t hugged enough as children, and never really knew their fathers.  Hey, it’s not like Dr. Sears also didn’t draw his graph, then plot his data points…

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • charpaddy

    we all know that the ONLY reason any sane person would object to the deathcare bill is because they are RACISTS!

    So, why fund the study at all? Oh, let me guess: So that the libs can use the study to….TA DA…once again smear the tea partiers. So, what else in new?

    We must all speak and think in lockstep. 2 minute hate coming soon.

  • Tbone

    not dead bodies caused by the Death Panels.

  • http://www.southernsara.com southernsara

    So, instead of pursuing and actually scientific study, wherein the outcome is dependent on the evidence, this person has already decided the outcome and will make sure the evidence supports it. That’s some integrity for you right there. Right.

  • ralatredstate

    it appears to be consistent with the abstract that the study could show that public opinion on healthcare has been “racialized” by Obama because, while the opinions of whites have not changed, support for socialized medicine has gone from 70% to 99% among blacks as a result of Obama.

    The Obama effect should be far more pronounced for other policies not especially popular among blacks, such as (I’m guessing) radical environmentalism, but strongly favored by O.

    [Thanks to all RedStaters for a great site]

  • reggie1

    Even small sums like $52,000 can have unintended consequences when it’s the government spending it. In this case, it is that the “professor” actually does provide an example of why Obamacare is hated. And it’s not racism.

    It’s because Obamacare is every bit “outcome-based” as this hack’s research paper.

    Obamacare isn’t based on evidence of what works or not in delivering health care, controlling costs, and improving quality. It is all about getting coverage to some interest groups while making non-interest groups pay for it. Dam# the quality. Dam# the cost.

    Professor Psycho’s research isn’t tasked with finding out why there’s resistance. It doesn’t have an objective- it has a method. The method is to justify the pre-determined narrative that demonizes Obamacare’s opponents.

  • taxpayer1234
  • taxpayer1234

    you will never, ever see it included in the findings.

  • Carol Tarasewicz

    I have read lots of congressional bill last summer, I did not read final bill that was passed. I am hoping Jim DeMint can start repeal. I heard that Muslims do not have to buy insurance or be fined because they consider that gambling. A friend emailed that to me.

    Isn’t any health insurance a gamble unless you have problems? I think it is. I am not sure if it’s true about Muslims but I expect it is. They are protecting a religion, what about Christians? Yes, everyone can make fun of us, we don’t kill people over jokes.

  • finaljeopardy

    That’s like the principal giving your lunch money to the bully who’s gonna beat you up if you don’t do his homework.