« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Mike McMahon (D, NY-13): my opponent takes JEWISH money!

Scared, Mikey?

[UPDATE] Via Hot Air: let the damage control begin!  McMahon shoots the messenger, and completely fails to explain why she delivered the message in the first place.  Remember, folks: fish rots from the head down.

Rep. McMahon is claiming that he wanted to make sure that people knew that the 200K that his opponent Mike Grimm raised last quarter – which is, by the way, quite good for a challenger – wasn’t locally raised.  Well, to start off with: there’s usually no particular stigma involved in getting money from out-of-district, although I suppose that NY-13 might be one of those districts where such things are important.  Secondly, and more importantly: you’d think that if McMahon wanted to prove that Grimm was getting mostly out-of-district money he’d pass out a list of Grimm’s out-of-district donors.  Not a list of Grimm’s Jewish donors.

You’d think.

The file, labeled “Grimm Jewish Money Q2,” for the second quarter fundraising period, shows a list of over 80 names, a half-dozen of which in fact do hail from Staten Island, and a handful of others that list Brooklyn as home.

“Where is Grimm’s money coming from,” said Jennifer Nelson, McMahon’s campaign spokeman. “There is a lot of Jewish money, a lot of money from people in Florida and Manhattan, retirees.”

Yes, Jennifer Nelson, thank you for making sure that we all know that the Jews are bankrolling one of your candidate’s Republican opponents.  I don’t know which would distress me more: that you felt the need to take a shower afterward, or that you didn’t.

As a point of comparison, the campaign also provided in-district and out-of-district fundraising totals from McMahon and Grimm’s G.O.P primary opponent, Michael Allegretti. However, they did not provide an out-of-district campaign filing from Grimm, but only a file of Jewish donors to him.

I suppose that we should be grateful that Rep. McMahon didn’t refer to it as ‘dirty Jew money.’

In public, that is.

Moe Lane

PS: McCain/Palin won NY-13, by the way: for that matter, both McCain and Palin have endorsed Grimm (McCain’s always up for supporting another war veteran and Palin has a soft spot for anti-establishment candidates).  McMahon’s a squatter who snuck in during the 2008 shellacking (and the retirement of Fossella); he’s been playing up his opposition to health care, but as you just saw… progressives will out.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • raydawggie

    Another Dem, facing political Siberia come January, lets slip exactly how he feels about ___.

    Going to be a fun month as more of these clowns lose it.

  • seandparnell

    I often say that “disclosure” of money in politics is more likely to simply inspire knee-jerk reactions and reveal prejudices than anything else.

    I’ll take this as a bit of evidence supporting my theory.

    Sean Parnell
    President
    Center for Competitive Politics
    http://www.campaignfreedom.org

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Could you be a little clearer?

  • renny

    Maybe, finally, some of the generally most educated, most highly represented in the professions of the Dem.-captive plantation populations has noticed this administration has been busy dissing the leadership of Israel, slobbering all over nations that want Israel’s annihilation (and some doubtless want ours), and is busy promoting and s*cking up to an illegal underclass that costs everyone tons of taxes, more costs in Medicaid and charity care, and contributes mightily to our failing education system, and this once bloc-voting group is selecting for freedom and liberty over party loyalty.

    Maybe this is change we can believe in.

  • http://www.redstate.com/etcartman Kenny Solomon

    Hey you Eeeeevil Jooooooooooos, we want each of you to donate $1,000, OK ?

    The response: $1,000 ? Why do you want $500 ? How come you’re asking for $250 ?

    ;)

    I wonder if the donation receipt is printed on a white sheet.

  • bk

    I couldn’t find it in the two that I read.

    This one is certainly a classic. His Finance Director compiles this info, and his Communication Director goes public with it. But we are horrible people for trying to link him or his campaign to it. Uh, okay.

  • bk
  • Coop

    … I think Mr. Grimm is right now probably receiving an extra shot of Jew and Gentile money.

  • proudgop

    I can tell you as someone who lives in city this is probably closest race to me that I can help out on.

    I am so baffled how all these Upper West Side and Upper East Jews can support Democrat party and yet they do

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Call Mel Gibson and Helen Thomas! Mobilize the brigades! Man the Barricades!

    Although I must confess, I, myself have also given in to stereotyping.

    When I needed a lawyer, I got a Jewish one!

    (well some things you just don’t leave to amateurs.)

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    If they haven’t woken up by now I am not sure anything will work.

    The left have not been friendly to Jewish People for about four decades now, especially if those Jews were also family oriented, or small businessmen, or traditional in anyway.

  • proudgop

    is that McMahon has support of Bloomberg who even hosted a fundraiser for him at Gracie Mansion. I am not sure you can get wealthier NYC Jew

  • cactusjack

    other 10 tribes and they’ve been missing out on all that other campaign contribution money they could have asked for.

  • conservativeinabluestate

    I wonder if Geoge Soros counts as Jewish Money. McMahon is a total disgrace and a giant a-hole.

    Allegretti no conservative and is a bitter clown. He must be defeated.Mike Grimm is the Conservative choice. Allegretti’s losers smeared Palin after her endorsement of Palin. Shame on Allegretti.

  • seandparnell

    Disclosure of contributions made directly to candidates has some marginal value as an anti-corruption measure.

    But for the most part, it simply allows people to divert attention to irrelevancies based on whatever knee-jerk reactions can be inspired by tying the candidate with “big oil” or “big labor” or “trial lawyers” or whatever other “special interest” happens to be the most convenient bogeyman.

    And, of course, as this case indicates, “the Jews” are considered by some to be a bogeyman. Pathetic.

    Sean Parnell
    President
    Center for Competitive Politics
    http://www.campaignfreedom.org

  • seandparnell

    Probably should mention that my irritation with the whole “disclosure” thing is heightened these days by the Orwellian-named DISCLOSE Act, which among many other things touts the idea that we need “to know where the money is coming from” in order to consider political ads.

    Because without knowing the names of the people/businesses giving to Planned Parenthood, the Chamber of Commerce, National Right to Life, the Sierra Club, American Association for Justice (formerly the Trial Lawyers Association), and countless other organizations, we’d have no way of knowing their perspective and interests…

    I wrote this up today, in fact: http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog/detail/no-shadow-groups-out-there-un-disclosed-donors-or-not

    Sean Parnell
    President
    Center for Competitive Politics
    http://www.campaignfreedom.org