« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Democratic 2012 Massachusetts strategy: Kennedy.

Kennedy Kennedy Kennedy.  They’re trying to recruit Victoria Kennedy (Ted Kennedy’s widow) for the seat for 2012.  They actually tried to get her to run in 2010, but she refused – and she’s supposedly refusing now, but apparently the possible challengers to Scott Brown have already been collectively weighed by the state party, and found wanting. So there seems to be no better options for Massachusetts Democrats right now, which is as funny as it is unsurprising.

Now, the objective merits of a Victoria Kennedy candidacy can be argued – if you believe this Boston Globe puff piece, both she and her husband only used boats because walking on water takes too long to get anywhere – outside of the context of Massachusetts politics… in much the same way that a Jeb Bush 2012 Presidential candidacy can be objectively argued outside of the context of national politics.  Subjectively, however… this will hardly sound disinterested, but I can’t imagine that Massachusetts Democratic politicians are honestly enjoying the prospect of the ‘Kennedy seat’ surviving.  Scott Brown’s win earlier this year was the first time a Senate seat for MA changed hands in over a quarter of a century: does that state really lack for ambitious politicians who are tired of waiting for their chance*?

Moe Lane

*And if the state really does lack such politicians… well.  That is the fault of Senators Kennedy and Kerry, who both failed to do the first job of a competent public servant: ensuring that there’s somebody qualified to take his or her place.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • tngal

    Do they want her to challenge Brown orchannel her deceased husband? What part of “it isn’t Ted Kenedy’s seat” did they not get?

  • america1st

    the voters are showing signs of awakening from a half century of stupor to see how venal and destructive the tax & spend policies of the dimocraps have proven. After Scott thrashed coakley, the small fry don’t want to be ground up for chum and the party manipulators know the only arrow left in their quiver, no matter how worn it may be, is the “mystique” of the kennedy name. None of the CongressCritters wants to risk the plunge, deval patrick’s numbers are in the tank. The dark blue night is seeing a few ray’s of red sunshine on the horizon and the creatures of the night are slithering for cover before it grows stronger and burns them out.

  • RedBeard

    Dem operatives are furiously telling voters, “Pay no attention to those empty-suit Dems behind the curtain.” But as America1st said, the voters are paying attention, and Scott Brown is the telltale sign.

  • omegared5

    After all it is only proper that the lady fill her lordship’s seat. Oh wait, this is the US where titles of nobility are outlawed, and seats in the upper house of the national legislature aren’t hereditary. Yeah, I guess a politician willing to drive around the state in a truck and talk to the people he represents is kinda hard to defeat if he represents his constituents well.

  • swami7774

    She ought to keep doing the right thing and stay out of politics.

  • IJB

    …And get him to run against Brown as a D.

    But there’s nothing to suggest MA Dems are smart. Hopelessly corrupt? Yes. Smart? Heck no!

  • swami7774

    Especially since Cahill might get Cadillac Deval re-elected this year.
    But your overriding point is correct–they are not smart.

  • mbecker908

    She’s a two bit whore, I hope she runs and gets absolutely destroyed. Politically, professionally and personally.

  • maindependent

    The collective wisdom (?) or herd mentality of the Massachusetts electorate makes this a very interesting thread. Scott Browns election may have been a wake up call to the national democratic party, but as a citizen of the Commonwealth, I’m not sure voters here have answered the phone yet. Was Brown elected on his merits or as a rejection of Martha Coakley as an individual and not as a democrat. Only after the 2012 election is over will we really know.

  • bobojake
  • bobojake
  • msctex

    . . .are the first to throw themselves backwards 234 years to an aristocratic mindset?

  • jonreagan

    I don’t think it will fly for Vicky Kennedy in MA. Caroline Kennedy was basically incoherent as she toured the state of New York in 2009, trying to explain that, well, it would just be neat to be a United States Senator. This was after all of the elites like David Gergen explained to us poor schlubs on Main Street that the seat would be “hers for the asking” if she ran. Ask again.

    Fortunately, the days are over when the Kennedys can claim various public offices by some kind of royal entitlement, and I think that will apply even in Massachusetts. The one memorable line from Scott Brown’s victory was that the Senate seat there is the people’s seat, not the Kennedys’ seat. If they need to be told that again, well, have at it.

  • swami7774

    …I don’t think we win many converts by calling widows “two bit whore(s).”

  • clintonformccain

    Princess Caroline

  • popdaddy

    It appears all the Kennedy clan children are wraped up in drug related and other situations that prevent a run to maintain the “Kennedy seat”.

    The best the socalists can do is pimp one of the Kennedy wives.
    When does Mary Jo Kopecky get to rest?

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    If she were just a gold-digger or social climber, is there any chance she’d turn down a “shoo-in” Senate seat for herself? No.

    Yet she has. Repeatedly.

    We all know there’s no accounting for taste. Don’t forget, it is theoretically possible that she actually loved her husband, cared about him, misses him, and didn’t see him as just a path to wealth and power.

    Just because you vote Dem or marry one doesn’t necessarily mean you’re an inhuman monster. Being an elected Dem, that’s a different story – and the fact that she doesn’t want to be one speaks well of her.

  • normklevens

    Senator Brown has been almost a loyal democrat vote. Didn’t he vote for the latest stimulus and the so call Fin Reg bill ? Another raging Kennedy in the senate. She has not killed anyone so she is not eligible.

  • dambama

    Just sayin …

  • http://estquodest.com pauli67

    I really don’t think Ted Kennedy thought he would die. He had enough hubris to live 100 more years. This may have rubbed off on many around him, both political friends and enemies.