« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Sic Transit Gloria Green Jobs.

So

  • Thanks to the Democrats, we spent 800 billion on a stimulus package that didn’t work.
  • Thanks to the Democrats, we allocated 92 billion of that money (meant to be spent on, well, things that would stimulate the economy) on renewable energy policies.
  • Thanks to the Democrats, we’ve managed to spend only about 20 billion of that money in a year and a half (remember; this was supposed to be emergency spending).
  • Thanks to the Democrats, our best-case scenario (via those mad optimists in the White House) is that the money spent netted us 191K jobs, or $105K a job.  The Department of Energy estimates 82K jobs, or $244K/job.
  • And, thanks ever so much to the Democrats, “as much as 80 percent of some green programs, including $2.3 billion of manufacturing tax credits, went to foreign firms that employed workers primarily in countries including China, South Korea and Spain, rather than in the United States.”

You know, it used to be that you could count on the Democratic party to be provincial and short-sighted obstructionists when it came to putting the brakes on international trade, sure – but at least they used to know how to be competent provincial and short-sighted obstructionists.  This is embarrassing.

If you’re wondering what happened, the problem is that ‘green’ technologies are notoriously more expensive than ‘non-green’ ones.  That’s because ‘more expensive’ and ‘less efficient’ are more or less synonymous in this context: if the ‘green’ solution already is a clearly superior option, generally we would have already started using it.  You would think that this elementary observation is, well, elementary: but apparently it comes as a continual unwelcome surprise to environmental activists and the legislatures that deign to listen to them, as anyone familiar with phosphates and dishwashers could tell you.  In other words, it’s expensive to ‘go green’ – so if you want to keep competitive, you need to find a place to reduce costs elsewhere.  And that’s where the rest of the planet’s ability to make some things more cheaply than we can comes into play.

You should not be surprised by this.  Contemptuous of the Democratic party’s inability to function, govern, and/or set a coherent set of policies – but not surprised.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://www.2010blog.net jsanzone

    Small footprint, big output. Where are they on relicensing/licensing nuclear plants, again?

  • hungarianfalcon

    We switched back to the “good stuff” after getting tired of the spots, uncleaned dishes, etc. We are also more energy efficient because we have to use a lot less aggressive wash cycle for better performance.

    HF

  • throwback59

    than Marxists are incompetent Marxists.

  • IJB

    By definition, *all* Marxists are incompetent.

    If they were competent, they wouldn’t be Marxists.

  • throwback59
  • http://JamesonLewis3rd.com JamesonLewis3rd

    “Green Jobs” is a euphemism for “Goose that Lays the Golden Eggs.”

  • neomom

    Some licenses are in the approval process. Funding for Yucca Mountain is in process of being cut off. They have approved loan guarantees for 1 site, but demand is down due to the recession so the utilities are in no hurry to spend a few billion on a new plant.

    They should have given actual stimulus money to the utilities. THAT would have had a multiplier effect far greater than more paper pushers in the government or filling a few potholes.

  • Return to Revolution

    Even nuclear fusion, if developed, would be opposed even though there would be little or no waste. The equipment itself would be hazardous and the threat of accidents, however remote, would be too much for the environazis.

    Plus, such a scheme might allow capitalism to function which is even worse – and an even more fundamental reason to oppose.

  • neomom

    We sometimes forget that we are now being ruled by a bunch of late 60′s hippie radicals. Nuclear is eeeeeeevvvviiillllll….. They really believe “The China Syndrome”is factual. Hell I had one liberal lawyer ask me how much radiation was emitted into the atmosphere when nuclear fuel was burned. (face palm)

    However, there are reactor designs out there that could recycle the spent fuel and have much less waste material that would be toxic for far less time. Right here in the US of A, a little group of folks in North Carolina are trying to convince the Feds that its a good thing. Imagine that, American ingenuity.

    Nah – that will never do.

  • http://herbal-nutrition.net/Billga Bill

    Have we figured that out yet?

  • Adjoran

    none have necessarily been analyzed to be sure they are even “green” in the sense many jobs so labeled actually use more energy and create more waste and pollution than the positions they supposedly replace. But in the Wonderland of DC, just calling a job “green” seems to be enough to satisfy nearly everyone.

    This doesn’t even address Moe’s point about the full economic cost of those jobs, and that’s a critical one if you really care about the environment. Why? Because taking care of the environment is directly related to per capita output. The wealthier countries do more to improve their environment, less wealthy countries do less, the poorest countries do nothing and often actively make things worse. It isn’t some “green” initiative or policy which will save the planet, it is maximizing economic growth – which not coincidentally is also related to fighting poverty and improving health care.

    Capitalism – is there nothing it can’t do for humanity and the world? And yet the Left despises it so much . . . why Obama despises it might be best summarized by Dinesh D’Souza in Forbes: http://tinyurl.com/389ay2d The argument for Obama’s philosophy being from a Kenyan anti-colonial perspective is the most logical explanation of Obama’s world view I’ve seen yet.

  • SoulEspresso

    Q: What is a Marxist?
    A: Someone who reads the writings of Karl Marx.
    Q: Then what is a capitalist?
    A: Someone who understands the writings of Karl Marx.

  • davesinsanantonio

    they would lie about it, just as they did with the so called man-made global warming.

  • davesinsanantonio
  • neomom

    That Forbes article was quite the thinker…

    Something else to think about the “green” industry. Many of the technologies currently in favor are heavy in “rare earth” elements. Most of which have the market monopoly owned by China and are decidedly not green in retrieving them. Not to mention are not nearly as plentiful as fossil fuels.

  • tex41lb

    Beneath any class of incompetents lie the teacher of the incompetent.

  • morninginamerica

    We are being taken by the old shell game. While we watch what they want us to, the truth lies elsewhere. Under the guise of saving the planet for the gullible, the hard Left has transferred hundreds of billions of dollars to its friends and found full-time employment for thousands. All that with someone else’s money and freedom — quite an achievement!