« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

‘I will not be shaking his hand tonight…’

That will probably be the most quoted line from the Rand Paul / Jack Conway debate last night, and for good reason: it represents a rather drastic line in the sand drawn against the scurrilous and vituperative wave of attacks made by progressive Democrats desperate to keep their tottering Congressional majorities. The video:

What Dr. Paul is referring to is this exceptionally offensive and cynical attempt by the Conway campaign to provoke religious bigotry in Kentucky voters. As Ed Morrissey noted at the link, one of the things that made said ad so… pettily nasty… was that Conway not only attacked Paul’s personal religious beliefs; he went after Paul’s opposition to funding faith-based initiatives. Given the way that progressives in the last decade had gone after such things hammer and tongs themselves – at least, when there was a Republican in office – I think that we can safely assume then that their opposition was a flat-out lie.

This is going to backlash against the Conway campaign. To begin with, it showed a certain contempt for Kentucky voters generally that suggests to me that the idea came from outside the state: surely Kentucky Democrats themselves know their constituents better than that. Second, an ad that allows your opponent to say something like “I will not be associated with someone who attacks my religionlegitimately is more or less the definition of a bad ad. Third – and I don’t know how important it is, but it may be – doing this ad allowed Paul (practically forced him, in fact) to bring up something that normally doesn’t get mentioned about him: he’s a Presbyterian. Which is to say, a perfectly normal mainline Protestant sect that has female deacons (his wife is one). Which is also to say, something that is light years away from the progressive, probably out-of-state smear job that was tossed at the man and his family.

Put another way: I applaud Dr. Paul’s refusal to shake the hand of Jack Conway. Because I think that by now we all know where Jack Conway’s hands have been.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: Dr. Rand Paul for Senate.

PPS: If you don’t believe me about how bad this was for Conway, maybe you’ll believe Senator Claire McCaskill (D, MO). The fact that she felt the need to temper her party’s talking points on the GOP at all

COMMENTS

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    A handshake is a gesture of respect. It provides a legitimacy to another person. If someone acts in poor taste, they are not worthy of the handshake.

  • qixlqatl

    by shaking hands with slime.

  • smitch61

    How was the debate overall?

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    The attitude of “my respected colleague” and wanting to get along to go along by Rinos is what the dems have used to sink the country into the current mess over the last century.

  • d_lamar

    The whole idea of shaking hands, or walking across the aisle to reach a compromise, disgusts me.

    We need to realize that these people desire to destroy the United States as it was founded. They are our enemies, not our friends. Their desire is to destroy our way of life, and its time that conservatives treated our enemies for what they are.

  • 2koolkirk

    of filthy and personally insulting tactics. Oh, and followed by a sincere recap of your principles.

    Rand Paul is pretty special in my book.

  • Darin_H

    Good for you to be so restrained! Not only wouldn’t I shake hands with that scumbag, Conway, I’d probably give him a right cross to his nose (hey, what can I say, I’m a sinner. Saved, but a sinner nonetheless).

  • aesthete

    No one who jumps to chain his fellow Americans to another’s wishes, as Conway has done (and continues to do) throughout his career, is deserving of a gentleman’s handshake.

  • constitutionalconservative

    These disgusting attacks have gone on long enough, totally aided and abetted by the MSM. It has been bad in a lot of races (Christine O’Donnell’s leaps to mind), but there are few places where it has been worse than Kentucky, where the media has engaged in a feeding frenzy about anything Rand Paul might have said or done in the past 30 years while giving his plastic and unprincipled opponent a totally blank check.

    Rand Paul had tolerated this too long by pretending that the Dems would play by the rules. I’m glad that he finally chose to hit back and stop pretending that he was running against someone who had any sense of decency and honor.

  • The_Rebel

    yet in Colorado’s 7th district, Perlmutter refused to shake hands with Ryan Frazier. Instead, he swatted Frazier’s hand during an exchange over health care, apologizing immediately:

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • minister_of_war

    … well since Mike Huckabee tried this kind of garbage against Mitt Romney during the 2008 Presidential Primaries. Both are disgusting displays & neither man seems to be ashamed of his actions. Go Rand Paul!

    This kind of garbage will backfire big time.

    And Moe-

    You said that: “This is going to backlash against the Conway campaign.”

    I think that this whole situation is so disgusting & frustrating that I think that you meant “backfire” not “backlash” too.

    But one thing for sure is that it could cause a very strong backlash against Conway’s tactics. Nobody likes seeing another man’s faith questioned.

  • zornorph

    I would have just shaken his hand and not looked at him while doing it or something. This didn’t go over well when Clayton Williams refused to shake Anne Richard’s hand in the 1990 TX-Gov race.

  • minister_of_war

    -nt-

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth
  • minister_of_war

    What exactly is happening there? I would like to know.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

    Two RS posts from June 2010

    http://www.redstate.com/snarkandboobs/2010/06/04/die-in-a-fire-you-vicious-racist-scumbag/

    http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/06/16/the-christianity-scam/

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    we shouldn’t shake his hand? Stupid police making Gates house safe etc…

  • minister_of_war

    That whole situation was also utterly disgusting.

    The point of Christianity is that it is not a religious belief that a person is born into.

    We can teach our children Christian values, but they are not automatically “Christian” due to their upbringing either.

    Being a Christian means that a person at some point recognizes that Jesus was the Son of God, is Devine & agrees to follow Him as an expression of this belief.

    None of us are qualified in deciding who is a “true believer” in Christ because only God would know such things.

  • zornorph

    He felt that she had been ‘lying about him’ but he was rude in refusing to shake her hand and some felt that it cost him the election. I remember hearing a GOP pundit say that you should ‘Treat a lady like a lady.” I also know that GHWB called up Williams and cussed the living sh*t out of him for losing the race because he couldn’t stand Anne Richards after what she said about him at the Dem convention in 1988.
    Williams ‘Relax and enjoy it/rape joke’ didn’t help endear him to women, either, but the handshaking thing sort of drove the image home. I don’t think the Paul thing is near as bad, but I would have just given a curt handshake and let it go.

  • minister_of_war

    My point being that someone attacking Rand Paul’s Christian faith might be an exception to the rule of handshaking. If you attacked my Christian faith, I’d probably be less likely to want to shake your hand – no matter what protocol says.

    You make another good point too as to why the 2 situations might not be good comparisons.

    “I remember hearing a GOP pundit say that you should ?Treat a lady like a lady.?

    Well, I don’t know how Rand Paul would treat Jack Conway like a lady or if that’s the correct thing to do in this situation, but it might make it different because Conway isn’t a lady. If I remember correctly, the words that Rand Paul used when Conway was avoiding talking about the issues & instead continued to defend his attack on Paul’s Christianity were: “Man up Jack”.

  • joayn

    and that’s why I could never run for office.

  • michiganwolverine

    You have already posted this twice. And you know it is not related.

    So I will post my reply twice:

    Huckabee’s NYT situation reminded me of McChrystal’s Rolling Stone situation.

    When you are spending a few days talking with a reporter, sometimes an interview becomes just a conversation. Then all of a sudden it is written up in a magazine story as a hit on the person being interviewed. Huckabee asked an innocent question of a reporter while they were talking and it ended up as front page news claiming Huckabee was attacking Romney.

    Huckabee apologized for the incident right away, but Romney supporters are still fanning the flames.

    Huckabee apologizes to Romney at Des Moines University, Iowa
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzzWFbHfbg4

    Why don’t you watch the video, as it is a sincere apology.

  • cactusjack

    the unwarranted religious innuendo attacks. Make no mistake, recognize this for what it is – this is an old tool out of the Carville arsenal, used to defeat conservatives in the South, and Hillary (when she thought she would be the nominee) was getting ready to use it like a battleaxe against Romney (when her team thought he would be the Republican nominee) in 2008. Yes someone’s religion is part of their character and in some sincere way there ought to be a way to evaluate it, but when I think of the likes of Obama, Carville and Hillary going after *anyone* on our side with this – well, then we ‘ve gotten to a point where honest practicing of a religion has become an impediment to Conservatives running for office, and they are at the mercy of people, to some of whom the whole religion thing is a big joke to be exploited.

  • Doc Holliday

    I would rather have Dennis Miller than either of those two. Of the two, I would opt for Romney.

  • cactusjack

    situation – they offered the left hand, keeping the drawn sword handle firmly in the right. Then it is up to the vermin whether he insults himself by shaking hands, or dishonors himself by not shaking hands.

  • cactusjack

    trips & activities to the border is what killed his(Claytie’s) campaign. It really offended a lot of conservative women let alone Anne’s blue hair motorcycle brigade.

  • qixlqatl
  • fastrock

    First heard Rand speak at a Sept 09 Louisville Tea Party. Not the most polished, but everything from the heart. MSM would love to take down Rand, but the leg tingler C Matthews hammered Conway for his campaign ad.

  • minister_of_war

    Huckabee made a halfhearted apology about only one tiny aspect of his attack on Romney’s Christian faith. Huckabee’s attacks were often subversive, but his pointless ad calling himself the “CHRISTIAN LEADER” was definitely part of his strategy. And I think that it’s totally relevant to the current argument – as were the attacks on Nikki Haley’s Christian faith in her Primary. It is never appropriate to question the Christian faith of one’s opponent.

  • Pingback: No Articles Found | Rate Insurance Quotes