« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Will Michael Steele not seek re-election?

There is a good deal of evidence suggesting it – Michael Steele is not canvassing for support, has no team in place to help him get re-elected RNC chair, and will have a conference call on Monday that many think will have his announcement that he won’t seek re-election – but at best it’s a suggestion, not a fact.  Given the fiscal difficulties that the RNC is facing right now, it might be prudent for Steele to step aside and let somebody else take the reins.  We’re going to need a strong focus on the twin categories of raising money and putting boots on the ground; so distractions at this point are not particularly welcome.  And it would almost certainly be best if we had a clean break between the RNC of the past and the one of the future.

You may notice that the above paragraph is, if not conciliatory, at least not particularly inflammatory towards Michael Steele.  That is because my primary goal is to get Steele to resign with a minimum of fuss and bother.  I have no desire to lecture people – “Hah!” said he, cynically – but if your primary goal is instead to, say, get even… then perhaps you should keep quiet on this topic until you’ve mastered your passions, instead of the other way around.  Yes, I know: horribly unfair, but that’s the universe for you.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • JadedByPolitics

    That ego of his was his undoing. Those comments of racism within the Republican Party was out of bounds and his spending on FRIENDS was pretty darn close to illegal as far as I am concerned. Michael Steele shows why I am JadedByPolitics because I supported him wholeheartedly two years ago and once again I was WRONG!

  • harlan

    Gee. Surely you don’t think that their base is punishing them for acting like spineless liberal democrats and elitist belt-way pols.

  • bk

    will he at least have time to sign a bunch of consulting contracts to lock in future RNC dough to some more buddies?

    The Times and others must have their headlines ready to go:
    “Racist Teabaggers Lynch Black RNC Chairman Despite Election Success”

  • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim
  • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH
  • powertothepeople

    and while we could have had worse and in the last few months he did improve, we could also do a lot better. This is the job I would like to see Palin in. She is hands down the best in the party right now at raising funds and pushing candidates past the finish line at least in primaries. With a little refinement and her dropping the whole Mama Grizzlie thing, she could prove to be the best head of the RNC in the last 20 years.

  • jomo2009

    it will be the best thing he could possibly do for the party. The accusations of racism were bad enough, but the sweetheart contracts for friends and their relatives, the neglect of a serious GOTV effort in the mid-terms and the unforgiveable bungling of the main task any party chairman has, the raising of sufficient funds with which to fight elections, were the last straw. I have no rancor in my heart for Michael Steele. I wish him well in whatever endeavor he chooses to pursue. But it’s time for him to go.

  • grant9992

    agree with you completely from what I have read she the Tea Party tried to push her as their candidate as the RNC which I would have loved because she is great at that! It even says here she rejected quickly http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46073.html which may mean a run at the whitehouse for her in 2012 indefinately. Which I think is dumb on her part because I believe she would be perfect at the RNC role its a shame really..

  • RZ

    never contribute one cent to the RNC ever again. No matter who’s chairman. Sure, most of the money goes to candidates; who aren’t even conservative. But i’m not paying for the crap they spend the money on, i.e hotels & travel.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    get even.

  • http://www.andrewcray.wordpress.com andrewcray

    I hate to be saying this, but Michael Steele should go. As symbolic as his election to be RNC chair was, he has often given liberals fire power against the Republican Party. Despite the allegations of illegal spending and so forth, he has done a poor job of leading the party–and that alone should be his sole cause for not running for re-election.

  • Stan

    That sums it up for me as well.

  • msctex

    . . .the fact that she drives the opposition into a frothing incoherence.

    And I’m only exaggerating a little bit.

  • beefeater

    I think the democrat party has shown us what happens when you put an in over his head, above his pay grade, empty suit ,token in a position of authority.

  • ss396

    I don’t like laundering my tax money through a bunch of DC central planning bureaucrats, and don’t much care to do so for voluntary political contributions, either. Money is power, and our main advocacy is that centralized power is something to be very, very cautious about. Not to eschew it totally, but I prefer to keep that beast starved.

  • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Socrates

    I suspect no one will read this. Maybe I’ll expand it into a post of its own.

    The faulty strategy that relies on a last-minute ground game has got to go. The party needs to recommit to having a fully functional ground game for the primaries.

    And our advertising should start now, educating voters on the evils of voting ourselves money from the public trough.

    The trouble is, a lot of us appear not to believe there are any such evils.

  • cwilson

    According to Gateway Pundit, “Breaking: Michael Steele To Run For 2nd Term As RNC Chairman ?Update: Steele Releases Statement ? Plays Race Card”

    You stay classy, Michael.