« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Is Sir Donald out as Medicare czar?

Not exactly: the Politico reports that, in wake of forty-two Senators sending a letter indicating that Sir Donald Berwick is simply unacceptable for the job of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) head*, Senate Democrats have made an answer to that by… giving up trying to get Berwick nominated. There’ll be no fight, no confirmation hearing, no standing on what the Democrats consider ‘principle.’ They’ll just let him keep going until later in 2011. I’m not fully checked out on the minutiae of recess appointments, but presumably the President can make another recess appointment for Berwick during the next time that the Senate is in recess for long enough.

But that’s not really the point; the point is that it’s clear that one thing is true in the 112th Congress that was also true in the 111th. To wit: Democrats won’t fight. Oh, sure, when they have the votes they’re the toughest guys in the room, and will be happy to walk all over you: witness that ludicrous strutting over passage of Obamacare back in 2009. But the second that they don’t have a sure thing, Democratic politicians cave (see the defeat of the Obama tax hikes during the lame duck session). They cave – or, as we’re seeing in the states, Democratic politicians run away. Because Democratic politicians are cowards, from top to bottom. And here’s the fun part: we know it. Which is why those forty-two Senators sent the letter. Which is why Senate Democrats caved on the cuts in the current CR. Which is why they’ll break later on the budget. They just don’t know how to be brave and fight for their beliefs**.

Poor things.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*We Republicans can get so unreasonable about people too vigorously praising elderly-killing British-style national healthcare rationing systems – particularly when they’re especially enamored of the wealth-redistributive aspects of health care systems like Obamacare. Call it a quirk.

**The usual reminder: if you don’t like the way that Republican legislators are acting then turn off your computer, go outside, and do something more practical to do to change the situation than complaining on the Internet (trust me, there are a lot of things more practical to do to change the situation than complaining on the Internet). Also, if you keep scowling all the time then your face will freeze like that, and then where will you be?

COMMENTS

  • luvnthebigsites

    Democrats: The party of cowards.

    (It has a ring to it).

  • IJB

    If you could, George Bush would have just kept doing that with several of his people (e.g. John Bolton).

    So I’m pretty sure the law does not allow that.

    OTOH, I’m not even sure if Dems are *following* the law anymore, as Recess Appointments used to not be able to last past the end of a Congressional Term, but all of a sudden a bunch of Obama’s have lasted past the 111th Congress.

    Maybe the “rules” just apply to Republicans, but never apply to Democrats, I don’t know…

  • hoosierteacher

    …but I think that you are right, given this article from the Weekly Standard. I don’t think Obama gets a shot at a second recess appointment.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/democrats-abandon-donald-berwicks-nomination-top-medicare-and-medicaid-post_552998.html

  • http://www.absolutelynobama.com absolutelynobama

    Calling them “Progressiveviks” because the Dims are the modern inheritors to the Bolsheviks.

    Other fun things to call the Democrat party:

    Socialists

    National Socialists

    Grave Diggers of the American Dream.

  • earlgrey

    nt.

  • thurman

    That is correct, he is allowed to serve until the end of 2011 and can’t be reappointed without Senate confirmation

    Remember also there are two factors here on the Dems’ side:

    1. They were fairly angry themselves when Obama recess appointed him. The Dems hadn’t even started the committee process vetting him, so it was a bit of a slap in the face to Senate Dems. So they’re not going to stick their necks out for Obama on this one

    2. This is also more a sign of their overall lack of any resolve at all on Obamacare specifically– they know this is political kryptonite and have no interest themselves to reopen this can of worms. They know a Berwick confirmation debate would be poisonous for them, they’re actually happy to avoid the issue

    I wouldn’t read as much into the Dems’ cowardice on this one, I think this is mostly just more evidence of how toxic Obamacare still is, plus a war of egos between Senate Dems and the WH

  • thurman

    That is correct, he is allowed to serve until the end of 2011 and can’t be reappointed without Senate confirmation

    Remember also there are two factors here on the Dems’ side:

    1. They were fairly angry themselves when Obama recess appointed him. The Dems hadn’t even started the committee process vetting him, so it was a bit of a slap in the face to Senate Dems. So they’re not going to stick their necks out for Obama on this one

    2. This is also more a sign of their overall lack of any resolve at all on Obamacare specifically– they know this is political kryptonite and have no interest themselves to reopen this can of worms. They know a Berwick confirmation debate would be poisonous for them, they’re actually happy to avoid the issue

    I wouldn’t read as much into the Dems’ cowardice on this one, I think this is mostly just more evidence of how toxic Obamacare still is, plus a war of egos between Senate Dems and the WH

  • earlgrey
  • earlgrey
  • biglarryk56

    therefore, why the hell is Berwick still in office? He shouLd have left office last December at the end of the 111th! But, remember, this is Obama, who ignores the Constitution when it doesn’t suit him.

  • biglarryk56

    if Obama recess-appoints him again, once again trampling over the Constitution as he sees fit. The Anointed One is a dictator who rules by decree, not the rule of law.

  • biglarryk56

    berwick’s recess appointment should have ended at the end of the 111th Congress last December!

  • biglarryk56

    Here are the examples:

    (1) A federal judge in Louisiana ruled that the moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico was unconstitutional…Obama, through his lackey Ken Salazar, ignored it.

    (2) Federal Judge Vinson ruled Obamacare unconstitutional in its entireity, and that the states do not have to implement the mandtes in a null and void law. But Obama goes ahead with it anyway without asking for a stay of the ruling….it’s a “so we lost, we’re going ahead no matter what” moment.

    (3) And now, all of Obama’s recess appointments made during recesses of the 111th Congress that should have been ended and vacated last December are STILL THERE! WHY??????

    Conclusion: for making himself out to be a smart constitutional scholar, the Anointed One gets the stupid award of the decade.

  • Mike Ferguson
  • Adjoran

    Cowardice is bad enough, but the damage in each individual instance is limited, and the motivation is generally just to save one’s own skin.

    The actions of the Democrats are subversive of our institutions, and their intent is precisely the subversion.

    Cowards have their own shame, but it’s a far cry from trying to undermine the Republic’s rule of law. The comparison with Democrats gives cowards a bad name!

  • america1st

    At the root, they tend to be hypocrites as well. I find their self-chosen label of “Democrat” especially so – the fleebaggers & their ilk are consciously subverting the democratic process. Unwilling to face the consequences of their insane financial policies, they scurry under rocks.

    Cowardice, yes, but so many other scurrilous characteristics as well; it is no wonder so many of them are so hostile to the foundations of our society.

  • http://www.liberallyconservative.com donbistroff

    All politics is local, at least as the collective bargaining reform for public employees unfolds.

    Three Republicans in Wisconsin may fold their tents and vote against Gov. Walker’s proposed legislation.

    The Ohio Senate barely scraped together enough votes to have their Senate pass Gov. Kasich’s reform package winning by 1-vote.

    These “cowards” are more worried about their public sector jobs, fearing they may have to find a real one if not reelected.

    And then we have the RINO brigade, specifically from New England but from other locales – Arizona and South Caroline come to mind – depending on which way the political winds are blowing.

  • libertasinfinitio

    …we’ll still have another anti-capitalist ObamaCare proponent served up to oppress We The People!

    Time to roll back the Red’s on all fronts!

    Resist Socialism!