« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The PEOPLE’S BUDGET!

…yeah, you know what’s in it already, don’t you? That “People’s” bit is what we call a tell: a promise of big, honking wholesale confiscation of Other People’s (Not Really The Real People) Money.  And lo! – this is precisely what the Congressional Progressive Caucus wants to do:

  • Increase payroll taxes. Both sides.
  • Reintroduce the tax hikes on small businesses that were threatened last year.
  • Impose new tax hikes on highest bracket, reaching 47%.
  • New taxes on foreign earnings.
  • “Crisis responsibility fee.” Which sounds better than “Soak stockholders of banks for accepting TARP money tax.”
  • “Financial speculation tax.” Which sounds better than “the twenty-first century equivalent of the Stamp Act:” it’s a tax on electronic stock transactions.
  • $1,450,000,000,000 in new spending.
  • Public option.
  • Cuts to military.

…well, OK, the Democrats are threatening to do that last one today with the shutdown; but the rest is only not appalling because it’s probably unlikely that the Democratic party is generally going to even acknowledge that this plan exists.  They should, though, given that it’s the only darn plan that they apparently even have. If you are a Republican, this lack of an alternative probably amuses you; if you are a Democrat, this really should appall you.

Reactions? Philip Klein (who got leaked the plan) thinks that if the Democrats don’t embrace this plan (or any plan), then that itself is telling.  Megan McArdle is politely appalled, and makes the obvious statement that no entitlement reform = tax hikes on the middle class.  Q&O aptly sums up these people with one word: “Fools.”  Me?  I question the timing.  This is a heck of a point in history to come out and say “Hey!  Let’s take money away from the troops!”

Then again: progressives.  “Can’t live with them, pass the beer nuts.”

Moe Lane (crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • rabidf16

    One thing I will never forget in my early Air Force days is SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) training. Part of it was a couple nights in a mock prisoner of war camp. Some of the time you were locked in solitary confinement in a 2′ by 2′ room. There were only two things in that little room with you, a one legged stool and a coffee can to relieve yourself in. The prison guards (pretending to be Russians/Communists), called it……
    The People’s Can

  • roppongibob

    High frequency trading distorts markets. A .05 cent tax on these trades is a good thing. It would level the playing field for the small investor.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    were so much more altruistic with bid-ask spreads and commissions when they had it all to themselves.

    http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2345

    Gus Sauter, chief investment officer of the Vanguard Group mutual fund company, says he doesn’t think so, noting that the stock market has had middle men for hundreds of years. To assure liquidity — the constant availability of shares, buyers and sellers — these “market makers” complete sales by buying and selling in their own accounts if they cannot immediately match buyers and sellers. Market makers earn a profit on the difference between the bid prices buyers are willing to pay for a stock and the askprices sellers are willing to accept. High-frequency traders have moved this process into the 21st century, Sauter says, arguing that profits they earn are “likely less than was taken out of the system” previously by traditional market makers. “If they were doing what they do without computers, we would call them market makers,” he says.

    Now are the computer algorithms more likely to become highly correlated and cause the “Flash Crash” of early 2010. Sure.

    But this small buy-and-hold investor didn’t even notice.