« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Daily Caller: was Yucca Mountain shutdown lawful?

The DC has the scoop*: Congress is now investigating whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) actually had the authority to unilaterally shut down the Yucca Mountain nuclear storage facility without Congressional authorization, given that Yucca Mountain was authorized under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.  Furthermore, there are now serious questions about whether the NRC’s leadership – and, by extension, the Obama administration – is ignoring the actual science of the situation in favor of petty and crasss partisan politics.

This is the key paragraph, I think: it describes the background to the sudden quashing in November 2010 of a safety report on the facility.

Dr. Janet Kotra, the deputy office director responsible for drafting the [Yucca Mountain] safety evaluation, known as the Safety Evaluation Report (SER), wrote in an internal memo that [NRC Chair {and Reid crony} Gregory] Jaczko unilaterally instructed his staff to “move to orderly closure of NRC’s Yucca Mountain program.” This is despite the fact the Nuclear Waste Policy Act remains in effect and the full commission has yet to rule on whether the Department of Energy can legally withdraw the license application.

Wwhat it’s showing here is that there is credible evidence that – pious rhetoric to the contrary – the decision to close down Yucca Mountain has nothing to do with whether it is actually dangerous to the environment.  There is a non-trivial percentage of the Democratic party’s base that hates and fears nuclear power; and Yucca Mountain is a bit of a boogieman to them.  Shutting it down would thus be an obvious partisan move by this administration.

Unfortunately for the White House, it apparently did not occur to Democrats that their faction would not be in control of C0ngress until the end of time; or that the legislative branch of the US government can get cranky when the executive decides that it can do anything that it likes…

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Including documents which they have not yet released.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • BA Cyclone

    ?The days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over. Our progress as a nation and our values as a nation are rooted in free and open inquiry. To undermine scientific integrity is to undermine our democracy.? – B. Obama, 4/27/09, 146th annual meeting of the National Academy of Sciences

  • acat

    They’ll use it to justify killing California’s agriculture, or ending offshore drilling in Texas, Louisiana, and now Alaska, or pushing bad car designs (Volt)…

    They’re not interested in science as a way to discover and verify truth, they’re only interested in science as a weapon they can use to get their way.

    Mew

  • greenboy

    The shutting down of Yucca Mountain has nothing to do with Democratic Party “hate” and “fear” of nuclear power, and everything to do with Nevada NIMBYs of all politcal stripes.

    Make no mistake, I hate and fear nuclear power. However, I’m not opposed to Yucca Mountain. Far better to stash the accumulated waste there than leave it in poorly secured storage pits scattered around the country.

    My preference, of course, would be to stash this world’s most nasty substance in Red States, of course, where presumably people “Love” and “Trust” nuclear power ;)

  • Adjoran

    Most of our online nuke plants are at or nearing capacity for onsite waste storage. This is the whole reason we spend years and millions involving the best scientists around the country to determine the safest long-term solution to waste disposal.

    While the public attitude on nuclear POWER has improved a great deal, the public still fears nuclear WASTE, and scare tactics on waste will eventually, if not overcome, force the industry to cease operations.

  • ajshea

    Jimmy Carter decided that breeder reactors were too dangerous to use, so we have to store all that waste that could be creating electricity instead of making Yucca Mountain “glow” (which it won’t).

    Here’s the crux of the matter that has been clouded by dishonest debate: high-level nuclear waste, the stuff that’s really dangerous, is still useful. The low- or lower-level waste that takes thousands to millions of years to decay is not dangerous.

    The more dangerous the radiation, the shorter the half-life; the longer the half-life, the less danger there is from the radiation. Bananas have a lot of radioactive potassium – more than the background level. A banana boat has more radiation than some of this “dangerous” nuclear “waste” they want to bury for millions of years.