« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Good News / Bad News for Debbie Wasserman Schultz!

Excuse me: the UNION-BUSTING Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

By: Moe Lane (Diary)  |  May 26th, 2011 at 07:12 PM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

The bad news: she didn’t realize that she was calling members of her own party ‘anti-woman’ before she started screaming to The Weekly Standard‘s John McCormack about how people who voted to defund Planned Parenthood are anti-woman!

TWS: But there were eleven [correction: ten] Democrats who voted against funding for Planned Parenthood, so are those eleven Democrats anti-woman?

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: No, they’re not, because if you, when I declare someone, when I make a broad statement like that, I look at the balance of somebody’s–where their priorities are, the balance of their record. And so one individual isolated vote here and there does not make you anti-woman.

TWS: So what are the broader votes that make those Democrats who voted on those same issues–on Planned Parenthood on H.R. 3–what makes them not anti-woman?

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: I don’t think there are any Democrats.

TWS: Eleven.

Note that Debbie Wasserman Schultz happens to be the Deputy Minority Whip; I was unaware that the position was a sinecure.  Or that it causes traumatic memory loss among those who have been burdened by the job.  Or that the Democrats simply pick lying suckweasels for the position… actually, no: I was already aware of that one.

Anyway, the good news: at least Wasserman Schultz’s bright enough* not to try to answer John McCormack by either trying to have him arrested, or by shoving him to the ground.  That never ends well.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Barely.  Seriously, Debbie?  If you’re going to fulminate about Republican Presidential candidates driving foreign cars, don’t own a Nissan, OK?  Particularly since the only places where they’re made in the USA are in right-to-work states.  Guess union solidarity only goes so far, huh?

Tags: , , , , , , ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • powertothepeople

    although it would be more correct as this:

    Anti those women, pro children.

    But do love how witches like her feel the only true women are the ones who believe the same evil crap she believes. And only if they are republican.

  • powertothepeople

    although it would be more correct as this:

    Anti those women, pro children.

    But do love how witches like her feel the only true women are the ones who believe the same evil crap she believes. And only if they are republican.

  • http://jakespeaks.wordpress.com/ Jake W

    Needs to be taken out if at all possible (and with the right nominee, it should be).

    ‘Nuff said.

  • blooch

    Ever since Obama went from 57 states to “67 borders she’s been a bit distracted…really worried about Republican Jews and the things they might say and do regarding Democratic candidates they perceive as anti-Israel.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dnc-tries-use-netanyahu-pressure-republicans_571453.html

    This distraction could also explain why she’s not up-to-speed on the Dem woman-hater count. Or she’s those other things you and Moe said.

    H/T AOS

  • http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu Rhymes With Right

    Might just apply to Debbie.

  • rcatheart

    But isn’t it the job of the whips to know, um, how many people voted for what? Especially on major, controversial, media-garnering, base-aggravating kinds of votes?

  • GregInFla

    I would think she would be aware of the other DEM votes. Then again, selective amnesia is a leftist strength. It has worked for Obama.

  • Adjoran

    1. They are definitely not considering a remake of the TV series The Nanny

    2. Despite her qualifications, she has no practical chance of being recognized as the Dumbest Person In Congress as long as Patty Murray can hang on, and that’s apparently forever.

    3. They still make mirrors. Do something with the hair, girlfriend, even if it’s wrong!

  • bassboat

    some of the time but not all of the time Debbie. What is sad is that she knows that she is lying as she spews it out. The libs have to try to run down people because if they espouse their policies they will truly look as stupid as Debbie just did.

  • Menlo

    Apparently, “one individual isolated vote here and there” can make all the difference. I would characterize the funding of Planned Parenthood in general as “one individual isolated vote.”

    I guess it’s lucky for her most voters don’t have a clue who she is.

    As an aside, I saw her picture and can’t help but wonder if it is just the lighting or if she is wearing a fall?

  • steve53

    My comments:

    Matthew Brooks wrote Wasserman Schultz: “Not everyone in Congress is like you and that?s why it is important for both of us to continue to speak out freely when individuals in our parties break from a position of support for Israel. I did so just two weeks ago when Congressman Ron Paul announced his candidacy for President.”

    Good but where was Brooks when George W. Bush was president? Only days after the 9/11 Muslim-terror atrocities in NY and Washington, Bush became the first U.S. president to make the establishment of a Muslim-enemy state in Israel a “formal goal of U.S. policy.” What did Brooks say?
    Bush is responsible in large part for the rise of Barack Hussein Obama. Where was Brooks during eight years of Bush’s presidency even as he, Dr. Rice and Colin Powell lied about Israel?

    Brooks “I hope you agree with me that no one ? in either party ? whether it?s the President of the United States, a candidate for President or a rank and file member ? should be shielded from criticism if their positions are harmful to Israel?s well being….”

    Agreed

    “I recognize that now, as the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, you are in a position where you must support candidates whose positions on Israel are different from yours.”

    Where is it written? A Chairman of either the Republican or the Democratic National Committee has to be mute (silent) when one of their candidates adopts a immoral, even wicked positions?

    “To that end, I understand why you would like to shield and provide political amnesty to those Democrats whose positions undermine Israel?s security.”

    Why would Brooks “understand” that the Chairwoman would shield or provide political amnesty to candidates or Congressmen (women) who espouse immoral positions? Is it because that is what Brooks did in the case of Republicans like Mr. Bush?

  • romeg

    Where the hell is the Republican counterpart to DW-S?

    Why isn’t there a high-ranking Republican out there shouting from the rooftops what abominable, freedom hating, anti free-enterprise scum Democrats are?

    IOW why do we always bring pen knives to gun fights?

  • gritsandall

    I think those politicians who voted to defund planned parenthood are not anti-women;but, pro-children. When I was young, before ’73, women protected their babies.

  • politicalqrm

    For some reason Republicans seem to think that if you are soft-spoken and polite that people will appreciate your efforts in trying to be civil.

    What many people in the party don’t realize is that all the lefties from the 60′s are now in charge of the Dem party and their strategy is to hit hard, frequently and LOUDLY.

    You’re right: pen knives to gun fights… And we will continue to struggle and lose until strong people are put at the forefront of the party, but that means getting rid of the country clubbers. They’re the ones putting up a fight against…..the outspoken Tea Partiers., the people who can go up against the likes of DWS.

  • mitchsf

    remember her Obamacare gaffe?

    She may be smart, but she’s not knowledgeable or well prepared.

    Her virtual “one woman” protest in front of Allen West’s campaign office last year was a joke.

  • uselogic

    Or knowledgeable or well prepared. She has some guile…. kinda’ like a stereotypical, lying used car salesman. This twit has made it because she is in a completely safe district of left-tilting, aging condo commandos in South Florida. At her best, she can recite Dem talking points and no better.

    Friends in SFLA have been to her meetings and say that, in person, its like looking into the dead eyes of a zombie. There’s no there there.

  • redpenny

    will cover this deal.First this woman is a moron and secondly she’s as ugly as the rear end of a crap wagon!!!

  • romeg

    With the Mitch Daniels philosophy: “We have to get people to LIKE us in order to get them to listen to us.”

  • Menlo

    If voters actually listened to her, she would cost Democrats more votes than they got. I’d prefer Republicans act and talk like adults and display a bit more intellect than she does. Republicans do lack the same passion and the same will to advance their own party’s principles. Republicans also lack the same party unity.

  • carolina

    I don’t understand why anyone would ever believe a word she says.

    Her lies are clumsy.

  • carolina

    I don’t understand why anyone would ever believe a word she says.

    Her lies are clumsy.

  • lineholder

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asJNCKLoLNA&feature=player_embedded

    This is the one where she talks about how those eeeevviiiiilllll Republicans want illegal immigration to be a crime!!! Heaven forbid, what are they thinking, right?

    And I think I’ll check out “ditzy blonde” in Wikipedia, because they may be putting up a new post in Debbie’s honor