« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Wisconsin redistricting maps are out.

Alternate title: Wisconsin Gutter War expands.

There is a gutter war going on right now in Wisconsin, by the way.  It’s not one that the Republicans there started, but darned if they’re not grimly intent on finishing it – and for anybody who might be upset at that notion, let me remind you of something: oddly enough, when you threaten a man or woman’s family, it’s rare that he or she will… just shrug that off later.  The more typical response usually involves the phrase ‘put down like mad dogs.’

Of course that statement, while true, is perhaps a little melodramatic for this situation: Wisconsin state legislators have merely put out the likely new redistricting maps.  Normally, it’s the federal one that would get the most ink or pixels, but the state legislative one will probably get touched upon in the media, too (for reasons that will be made clear)…

Let’s first look at the federal map.  Here’s the old one:

…and here’s the new one:

As was reported last month, this new map will primarily buttress freshman Republican Sean Duffy in WI-07, mostly by sending over Democratic-voting areas over to Democrat Ron Kind in WI-03.  Mind you Kind doesn’t need them, although you’d never know that from his bawling on cue like a stuck calf about this.  Including some shouting about ‘bipartisanship’…

Ahem.  Death.  Threats.

…which would be funny if it wasn’t actually offensive in this context.  This map will probably be adopted: the GOP was careful to preserve that federally-mandated racial gerrymander in WI-04; none of the existing Democrats are actually getting targeted; and the GOP controls the redistricting process.  What’s that I hear?  “For right now?”  Yes, let’s talk about the state legislature redistricting process.  Here’s where the gutter war really heats up.

Link via Ann Althouse: the short version is that the state Republican party is not only gearing up to pass a redistricting map that will have significant impact on the recall elections*; it’s also planning two pieces of legislation that will uncouple the redistricting process from having to wait on local municipalities to redraw their ward lines (read: eliminates a likely Democratic delaying tactic) and reform/fast-track the map appeal process in the state courts (read: eliminates a likely Democratic delaying tactic).  The Democrats are, predictably, starting just now to scream about this – but, if one of the commenters to that particular link is correct, then the state GOP very carefully followed federal racial gerrymandering guidelines on the state legislative level, too, thus neatly eliminating the most likely avenue for a successful court challenge**.  And absent a successful court challenge, the map is inevitable.  More to the point, it’s inevitable in the short term; this may be all resolved before the bulk of the primary phase of the recall election process is quite finished.  Which is almost certainly one reason why the GOP made sure in the first place that almost all of the races involved had primary challengers on one side or the other.

Bottom line: we have an extremely motivated state Republican party out there in Wisconsin; one with a definite sense of determination and an uncritical willingness to get on with business and not particularly care what people say about it.  Then again, if threatening people’s families doesn’t work as an intimidation tactic the first time…

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Republican Alberta Darling gets a more Republican district, in time for her recall election.  Democrat Bob Wirch gets redistricted out of his district, in time for his recall election (the same thing happens to Democratic recall candidates Fred Clark and Nancy Nusbaum).  That’s in the Senate.  The Assembly is a little less dramatic, but still entertaining:

In the Assembly, 11 pairs of sitting lawmakers are drawn into the same districts, and 11 other districts are left without incumbents. In three districts, Republicans would have to run against each other; in two districts, Democrats would have to run against each other; and in six, a Republican would have to run against a Democrat – in districts that Democrats said leaned Republican.

Never do an enemy a small injury. Or threaten his or her family.

**And now you know why the GOP has never seriously challenged the VRA’s racial gerrymandering guidelines.  Which are, by the way, wrong and not really in the best interests of the Republic – including the demographic groups that those guidelines are supposed to be helping.  But I have no ability to change that, more’s the pity.

COMMENTS

  • rbdwiggins

    Elections have consequences, and at this point, there is none more important to Wisconsin’s future than Secretary of State.

  • indccc

    The Secretary of State has nothing to do with elections. We have what is called the Government Accountability Board…a group of retired judges that are appointed by the Governor, in charge of elections. But, yes, the Democrats and Unions are finally learning that elections have conquences. They don’t seem to like it very much.

  • rec0n

    I love seeing the Eagles raise their heads.

  • tea4me

    ..all these on Wisconsin are the most enjoyable and most looked forward to.

    I just love what the patriotic Rebulicans are doing to the Marxist/leftists in their state.

    What a shining example of how to take on the left and to take our country back!

  • carolina

    I find it very interesting how this redistricing plan will take a lot of the steam out of the dems, even if they manage to pick up a couple of seats in the recall elections.
    With recall primaries and elections on July 12 & 19 and Aug 9 & 16 – there will be plenty more WI news to note all summer.

    Good job WI republicans!

  • urherex

    that there are enough people,Dems.,Union and just folks that
    are fed up with all the bullying,rude crude,and socially unacceptable,
    antics, go vote to end all of this once and for all. Of course that is
    after all the recounts, and all the votes that are found in the car trunks.
    There’s an old saying “You can’t cheet an on honest man”, Of course that was before Unions. Everyone in Wi. This Is Our Last
    Best Hope to send a message that it’s time for the Progressive
    Thugs to Move On dot com.

  • eldstenorge

    and, please give us either Scott Walker or Paul Ryan as our Presidential and/or Vice Presidential candidate.

  • victrola

    the true ugly faces of their opponents, and they’re going for the jugular from here on out. These people cannot be reasoned or compromised with, only defeated.

    It’s too bad Republicans from other states have never been up against something like this, maybe they too would stop trying to get pats on the head from the MSM and Democrats that only want one thing: to destroy them.

  • Finrod

    Would that the GOP in the other 49 states get the same courage.

  • gekster

  • freemanja1991

    Is there anyway they could have made CD 2 more liberal, as well as 4?Also Could they have not made Ron Kline’s more favorable to him?

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    And there’s a limit to how much you can fiddle with things before running into geographical and demographic limits. Shoring up Duffy meant that they had to shift in friendly territory, and that means shifting out unfriendly territory. That territory has to go somewhere, and handing it off to Kind at least keeps the status quo. Which is actually GOP+2.

  • freemanja1991

    About D+3?

  • http://jakespeaks.wordpress.com/ Jake W

    If only every other state Republican party and the national GOP had this kind of courage.

  • Finrod

    .

  • jen0517

    n/t

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …is a little deceptive; Kind usually cruises to re-election. 2010 was more or less a perfect storm that wasn’t quite perfect enough. I say that with some disappointment: believe me, I’d love to get rid of somebody who has “Protegee of William [expletive deleted]ing Proxmire” on his resume…