« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Fast & Furious Update: William Hoover claims ‘exit strategy’ meeting.

Short version of Fast & Furious, for those who came in late: the federal government decided to try to fight the spread of illegal weapons sales among Mexican narco-terrorist gangs by… encouraging and facilitating the sale of illegal weapons to Mexican narco-terrorist gangs.  No, it did not end well: the guns that were illegally resold often got lost track of, right up to the point where they appeared on Mexican murder scenes (at least one of which was a US Border Patrol agent’s).  This scandal has been building for several months, and is now at the point where people are seriously starting to wonder if they’re going to be going to jail for their actions – and how they’re going to avoid that.

In other words, there’s a serious scandal going on.  One that promises to be messy.

Anyway, this report from the LA Times gives some more – both new, and interesting -  details about the operation.  To summarize:

  • Acting Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives (BAFTE) Deputy Director William Hoover* is claiming that he called a meeting (which included members of the Justice Department) in which he demanded an early end to the program.
  • This alleged demand was allegedly marginalized by the Justice Department’s (in the form of the US Attorney General’s office) need for indictments.  Any indictments.
  • No indictments were brought down for almost a year.  In the intervening time, Fast & Furious guns appeared in murder scenes involving both Mexicans and Americans.
  • Numerous BATFE officials insist that the Justice Department was responsible for delays, despite numerous requests for movement on either ending the program, or bringing in indictments.
  • The eventual indictments took place in January 2011.  It is not explained why Hoover, or anyone else at BATFE/DoJ, did not blow the whistle on this beforehand.

…OK, that’s me being disingenuous.  A lot of these people didn’t blow the whistle because the Obama administration hates whistle-blowers, and January 2011 also – coincidentally, no doubt – was when the Republicans took back control of the House, thus offering people some sort of protection against reprisal.  Thus the various mechanisms and policies grouped together as being ‘oversight’ began: so, what’s the next step?

Why, it’s seeing who in the Justice Department doesn’t want to go to jail, of course.  That’s always a fun thing to find out – at least, it’s fun if you’re not the one for whom the question has a personal resonance.

Moe Lane

PS: My usual reminder: these things take time to develop.  The ‘good’ scandals usually do.

*Heritage points out that Hoover is effectively in the Justice Department himself, of course.

COMMENTS

  • Adjoran

    has been quite effective at stonewalling the Congress on any number of things, and ignored FOIA requests which might expose embarrassing information until judges force the release, so I expect that Holder’s DOJ will continue that plan. If nothing can be forced out before the 2012 election, it will have to wait for a Republican Administration.

  • babykaboomer

    And here I thought L’il Fast and Furious was just Michelle’s pet name for her hubby!

    Goes to show: It’s neither the crime nor the cover-up; it’s the stunningly arrogant mindset of academic, elitist progressives that leads them down the winding path to their ineluctable destruction.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    I’m confounded how these investigations seemingly toil in such obscurity.

  • toothpick

    Let me help. Remember the (D) after Obama’s name on the ballot? That one letter explains all by itself the complete absence of stories about this budding scandal on the front pages of the New York Times, Washington Post, etc.

  • paulplantowin

    to bring the kind of pressure the MSM generates. If Nixon were in the WH this would be regular front page stuff. Until conservative news gains much more muscle this kind of scandal will stay way below the average citizen’s radar.

  • paulplantowin

    to bring the kind of pressure the MSM generates. If Nixon were in the WH this would be regular front page stuff. Until conservative news gains much more muscle this kind of scandal will stay way below the average citizen’s radar.

  • Tbone

    to bring more light and heat to bear on this matter.

    Good luck with that.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Not to brag, but I make a pretty good one. I found that the hardest thing about making it for me was to accept that you just can’t rush the part of the recipe where you walk away and let things simmer for a while. :)

    Seriously, the WaPo is defensively claiming right now that they’ve been paying attention to this story, ya, you betcha: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/slow-draw-on-fast-and-furious/2011/08/12/gIQAv0OxBJ_story.html

    …they might like to ignore it, but the can’t, particularly. And it remains true that movement on this scandal is directly related to folks becoming more and more worried about going to jail and/or getting disgraced. That takes time.

  • OldNuc

    to drop, the larger bang it makes when it does. I am waiting patiently for this one to fall as it will be very large. Might even displace Watergate as the largest scandal of record. No one was killed by Watergate.

  • Finrod

    I’m perfectly happy with this story getting legs in 2012 instead of 2011, just so long as it’s before November 2012.