« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Russ Feingold (D, NOTHING) cuts and runs.

(Via Hot Air) Russ Feingold’s not running for Senate in 2012. He’s not running for Governor in a hypothetical (and futile) 2012 recall election. He’s not running for Governor in the 2014 general election[*]. Russ Feingold’s just running away:

“After twenty-eight continuous years as an elected official … I have found the past eight months to be an opportunity to look at things from a different perspective,” Feingold said in the email, first reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Craig Gilbert. Feingold said he is “thoroughly enjoying the life of a private citizen.”

Funny about that: I’m enjoying Russ Feingold’s life as a private citizen, too.  More than I suspect that he is, brave words to the contrary.

If you’re wondering why this announcement, it’s pretty simple: it’s all the fault of Wisconsin progressives.  You see, the Democratic establishment had a plan with regard to Wisconsin.  The plan was to create a backlash to Republican reform initiatives via a combination of demagoguery, grand-standing, scenery-chewing, and carefully-constructed astroturfing at the state capital by hardcore progressives, union goons, and other shills of the Democratic party; the endgame was to use that backlash to fuel a backhanded takeover of the Wisconsin state senate, then use that as a springboard to recall the Governor next year – and maybe even retake the Wisconsin Assembly in the 2012 elections, too.

It was a dishonorable plan, of course, but it was a plan – and progressive Democrats had one job to do.  It was a simple job: they just had to win three Senate races.  They were given all the money that they needed for it, got the organizational help that they needed, got logistics and national support: all progressives had to do was turn that support into people actually going into voting booths and voting out the Republicans.  And they failed.  They needed three, and they got two.  And this was the progressives’ failure, too.  If they had worked harder, they might have gotten three.  If they had fought longer, they might have gotten three.  If they had been smarter or stronger or more dedicated, they might have gotten three.  But they didn’t do any of those things, because they‘re failures.  And so Russ Feingold will stay hiding in his little corner of academia.

Because Wisconsin Democrats don’t deserve a Russ Feingold, weak as he is.  The man still has standards.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

[*Should have made it clear: this last is personal opinion.]

COMMENTS

  • steve010

    recalls had seats in the Assembly. Does Walker replace them or is there going to be another special election?

  • flannery

    Vacant seats in the Wisconsin legislature are filled by special election. The Governor announces the vacancies and schedules the special elections.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Usually the case for House/Assembly/whatever a particular state calls ‘em.

  • steve010

    would need a candidate to run against Gov. Walker before going out to collect nearly 600K signatures. That’s a load. Who is on the short list, if it’s not Feingold?

  • carolina

    But, they don’t have a candidate. WI is tired of all of these constant elections. The dems will likely wait until the fall 2012 elections. Meanwhile, they have to find a candidate who can beat Walker. Even they know this is not an easy task.
    Time is on Walker’s side, imo. Redistricting kicks in. Voter ID takes effect. The state has stopped deduction of union dues. Union recertification elections are required.
    The WI tax payers may have one this battle.

  • carolina

    But, they don’t have a candidate. WI is tired of all of these constant elections. The dems will likely wait until the fall 2012 elections. Meanwhile, they have to find a candidate who can beat Walker. Even they know this is not an easy task.
    Time is on Walker’s side, imo. Redistricting kicks in. Voter ID takes effect. The state has stopped deduction of union dues. Union recertification elections are required.
    The WI tax payers may have one this battle.

  • carolina

    .

  • CMaree

    As of this month the pundits, like Real Clear Politics and Center for Politics’ Sabato’s Crystal Ball, are saying the 2012 Senate race in Wisconsin is a big toss-up.

    I do hear rumors of a Wisconsinite on vacation mulling a political run. Does anyone like sound of the title “Senator” for Paul Ryan?

  • steve010

    She likes those cold northern climates. Talk about voter turnout.

  • flannery

    If Sarah fled to Wisconsin to run for the Senate (again I say HUH?), would she be accused of being a cheesebagger?

  • victrola

    I don’t like Feingold’s politics, but I do get the sense there’s some decency in the man (for a left-wing Democrat anyway) and I actually think he would be formidable if a GOP candidate slipped up. You almost get the sense that he’s embarrassed of his Party.

    Feingold was the only Democrat I could imagine that might be able to win the upcoming Senate race or likely recall election of Scott Walker. Without Feingold, I don’t think they have any credible statewide Democrats.

    If we nominate the right Presidential candidate in 2012, I can absolutely see Wisconsin going Red, which in of itself means Obama would be shut out of the White House. In 2004, Bush came within one point, and I would argue the state has moved further right after all of this nonsense from the Unions and Obamanomics.

  • Goldwater_Conservative

    that being one with principles, albeit liberal ones. I could at least respect him for that, certainly cant say the same about the rest of the bunch in the senate.

  • gawken

    If he runs, it’d be a tough, hard, campaign:
    1. He’d have to raise a ton of $$$$,which he hates to do
    2. There’s no guarantee he’d even win..Wisconsin is a toss-up state this year
    3. It’ll be harder to win with Obama atop the ticket.

    4. AND EVEN IF HE MANAGES TO WIN THE ELECTION, HE’LL BE SERVING IN THE MINORITY. WHO NEEDS THAT?