« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

NYT – trusted?/ripped off?/betrayed by? – ThinkProgress over Darrell Issa?

Let me just executive summary this ThinkProgress/New York Times trainwreck, because Powerline has a very good detailed takedown of it already:

  • ThinkProgress wrote some sloppy, badly researched hit pieces on House Oversight Chair Darrell Issa (R);
  • Eric Litchblau of the New York Times apparently turned them – without attribution – into a extremely sloppy, badly researched hit article on House Oversight Chair Darrell Issa (R);
  • and Issa’s office spent a leisurely afternoon blowing large holes in the Times’ story.

Among other things, apparently Litchblau misstated prices of buildings purchased, got business relationships wrong, woefully overestimated profits, and generally demonstrated why math is hard. At least, it’s hard for New York Times reporters – and the left-wing shills that they apparently rip off.

By the way, the ThinkProgress author himself thinks that the NYT article plagiarized him, although I agree with John over at Powerline: this is one time that you don’t want to be associated with a major newspaper.

Anyway, for those who don’t remember: Eric Litchblau is one of the guys who won a Pulitzer for attempting to sabotage ongoing American counter-terrorism efforts via the illegal* publication of details of the NSA’s domestic surveillance program – a program that has since been approved by a Democratic-controlled Congress** – so it’s not entirely surprising that the almost-seditionist in question would find ThinkProgress’s work… compelling. Which is fine, as long as Litchblau saved that sort of thing for a private blog or website. But if Lichblau suddenly feels the need to do real journalism, then he apparently needs to learn what people in New Media already know: do not trust ThinkProgress’s content. They make things up and then hope that somebody with a louder mike, and no judgement, uncritically repeats what they’ve made up.

Just saying, that’s all.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Yes, laws on revealing classified documents effectively cannot be enforced in our current political climate; possibly they even shouldn’t be enforced, in some cases. It’s still illegal.

**I’m mentioning that last bit solely for the sadism.

COMMENTS

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    I?m mentioning that last bit solely for the sadism.

    Some of us have grown rather fond of your “sadism.” Please don’t stop doing it.

    Thanks,
    RickBull

  • toadold

    In the US it is my understanding that if you are a public figure you can be defamed and slandered and your chances of redress through the court system are low and very expensive. However more and more people are getting tired of the loophole given by having to prove malice by the slanderer. The NYT may wake up some day and find that they have generated enough resentment that their political opponents will have enough power and public opinion on their side to change the law to something like what the British have. The court actions under those rules could be really entertaining and painful to the pocket books of the MSM.

  • Darin_H

    I’d like for them to print the page 23 correction, and for Issa to sue them for slander/whatever and not ask for money, but for a front page correction.

  • johnt

    Issa has the cash to take out a full page ad, somewhere if not the Times, which is to scummy even to allow a fully paid response.
    So which weirdo will handle the “we stand by our story” bit?
    The things they will do for Obama and ruin.

  • runner12

    do with his investigations into the Obama administration, namely Operation Fast and Furious or the Gunwalker scandal if you will.

    I watched an hour long piece on this on Hannity the other day. It was eye-opening to see the blatant obstructionism being exercisesd by the DOJ.

    Issa is relentlessly pursuing this, making himself some powerful enemies along the way. The Leftist media will do anything to discredit Issa while the Obama administration continues to stall and obstruct. The last thing they want is this scandal blowing wide open in an election year.

  • gwalt

    That they, the professional left, are coming out this early and lying a la Dan Rather and John McCain lobbyist affairs is telling. They have no arrows left in their quiver. No bullets left in the chamber. The Left is imploding under their own philosophy and bad ideas. As Glenn Reynolds likes to say; Faster please.