« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Democrats facing electoral disasters in NV-02, NY-09?

But before we start talking about implications, let’s review the situations.

  • NY-09.  This D+5 seat was vacated by Anthony Weiner after pictures surfaced… and I don’t need to end that sentence: it’s never good for a politician’s career when the phrase ‘pictures surfaced’ is used to describe his or her situation.  The race thus is between Republican Bob Turner and Democrat David Weprin… and Democrats are even now going frantic.  They’re going frantic because an independent pollster now shows Turner in the lead (which has been consistent with other polling trends); they’re going frantic because Tuner has picked up several key endorsements from prominent New York Democrats (over Weprin’s – really, President Obama’s – Israel policy); and they’re going frantic because the entire Weprin campaign effort seems to be infected with incompetence, starting at the local level* and working all the way up to the DCCC itself.  The Democrats have dumped half a million dollars in this race, and are right now grimly contemplating the possibility that this half a million is buying them bupkis.
  • NV-02.  Meanwhile, this R+5 district is increasingly looking like a retention for the GOP.  Dean Heller vacated the seat after being tapped to become Senator John Ensign’s replacement (Ensign, as you probably remember – and you probably were happy to forget – left office under what we shall charitably call ‘under a cloud’); Republican Mark Amodei will be facing Democrat Kate Marshall.  The DCCC has  essentially written this district off, at this point: their primary strategy, if you’ll pardon the pun, was to get Democratic Secretary of State Ross Miller (elections have consequences, people) to sign off on a winner-take-all election (which would have splintered the Republican vote), only to be told no by the courts.  Since then, Marshall hasn’t been able to make anything stick – including linking Amodei with Paul Ryan‘s Medicare reform plan – and Amodei is favored to win.  Incidentally, the Right has put about 750K into this race, including about $500K from the NRCC.

…and that leads to a couple of points that I’d like to make.  Democratic operatives have been busily trying to argue that the amount of money that the GOP has dumped into the Nevada race – which by all accounts is a healthily-Republican district – shows the weakness of the Republicans (for an example of this argument, see this Washington Post article).  This argument may be less seen over the next three days, seeing as the DCCC is currently trying to put out the fire in NY-09 by throwing money onto it and hoping that it’ll smother, but it’s still there.  Another argument – see FireDogLake** for that example – is that NY-09 is just representative of the ‘anti-incumbent’ sentiment that’s supposedly out there.  No doubt we’ll all hear other excuses for failure in the next two days, not to mention the classic “GOTV will save us!” line that traditionally comes as a harbinger of DOOM.

However.  If both NY-09 and NV-02 go Republican on Tuesday night – and I think that the odds are good that we’re picking up both – then those arguments are going to collapse utterly.  Yup, the GOP spent a lot of money to keep NV-02 away from the Democrats, who wanted that seat badly.  And?  The Democrats did the same thing in NY-09.  Money spent in a successful defense may or may not have been wisely spent; money spent in an unsuccessful defense was rarely wisely spent.  And as for anti-incumbency sentiment… well, there is definitely that mood out there.  But if it’s still only going to end up biting Democrats on the rear (remember, Mark Amodei is just as much, or as little, an ‘incumbent’ as David Weprin is), well…

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: Mark Amodei for NV-02; Bob Turner for NY-09.

*It is cruel of me to link to this video, I know.  But politics ain’t beanbag.

**I suggest that people start taking FDL a bit more seriously, by the way.  While a Hard Left site filled with unpleasant people, it has nonetheless started to realize that merely boot-licking the Democratic party leadership is not a viable long-term survival strategy for the netroots.  Its increasing willingness to criticize its own party openly and with heat may not be making an impact now, but if 2012 turns out to be the Great Shellacking 2 for the Democrats, they’re going to be in a position to eventually do to the Democrats what, say, RedState does to the Republicans now.  Which is to say, growl, and have their growls taken seriously by the party leadership.

What?  I certainly hope that they’ll be offended by the implication that I think that, someday, they might be the RedState of the Left.  But it’s not my fault that they want their own version of what we have.

COMMENTS

  • Wayne

    off point to say that it was and continues to be the influence of the Tea Party that lead to the 2010 “shellacking”? The Republican Party can and should take it’s fair share of responsibility for the economic condition we are in and without the grassroots movement of the silent majority getting off their behinds and becoming engaged in the political process, it would be business as usual in Washington, regardless of which party controlled the house, senate and white house.

    While the focus may be on jobs and the economy for the upcoming elections, the goal of the Tea Party is Constitutional governance. Regardless of party, that message should be clear.

    I’m just saying…

  • dajeeps

    Many Republican politicians in NY are not of the tea party inclination. It’s great they’re ahead, it shows how much damage the Obama/Pelosi/Reid trio has done to their party. I just wouldn’t hold high expectations of these guys once they get into office. My congressman, Tom Reed (R-NY29), for example, went to a roofing company out in Brighton to announce his bill that reduces the depreciation of commercial roofing by 19 years, with the roofer’s union bosses gathered around to witness as he discussed how many jobs it would create. And this is after he campaigned on going to DC to keep our kids from being saddled with debt. I am not at all happy with him, and am not really sure what to do about it because this is not near as bad as what came before him; but it is a far cry from what I expected.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    don’t sell short the value of Democrats having to defend seats they did not think they’d have to defend, wherever they are.

    If Lincoln was the “founder” of the GOP, then I guess Obama can run as “anti-incumbent.”

  • Wayne

    as you said, Congressman Reed, is better than what came before him, but, it should not be a given that he will be re-elected when the time comes. And, replaced with someone a little more to your liking until each representative gets the message. It goes along with the idea that we didn’t get here over night, and we aren’t going to turn things around over night. This is a fight that must go on for generations.

    But, if I may I’d like to speak to something you said earlier about NY Republicans not being of the “Tea Party inclination”. The discussion with my life long friend who is a Democrat. He is a walking, talking contradiction and when he began bashing the Tea Party, I asked him if he knew that the Tea Party was comprised of Republicans, Independents, Democrats and people from all political persuasion, race, religious denominations and income brackets. Unfortunately, the media has done a good job of making the Tea Party out to be something other than what it is in reality.

    We are all going to have to find a way to communicate with the other side of the isle, in a way that is effective. I watched Emit Smith on Hannity and was fascinated to find that he was a Democrat. Mr. Smith may have been shocked to find that he was a conservative. At least he will be thinking about that discussion and it may actually cause a paradigm shift.

  • Wayne

    have become transparent and with the advent of the Internet, it will be increasingly difficult for them to propagate the Big Lie.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Frankly, lowering the depreciation schedules for roofs is harmless pandering. It’s a tax break. Govt’s take is less.

    The more harmful pandering is when Obama tries to spend $450 billion in order to buy his re-election. That’s an expensive campaign and I hate to be underwriting it.

    We need to stop Republicans from ‘compromising’ away into more debt. We need to cut the spending.

    There is one core signature issue that is a must have: Repeal Obamacare. If they do that, great. If they cant, they are worse than useless.

    Keep hectoring your Congresscritter – if he is going to pander, make him pander to YOU!

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    If the GOP spends five hundred grand to keep a seat and the Dems spend five hundred grand to lose a different seat, then the GOP wins overall. The ideological struggle – which is to make sure that the Republican seats are held by the best possible candidates – is something better left to general elections, or special elections where there’s time for a true primary.

    Also, in this particular case: winning Tuesday means that the Democrats will be more or less required to carve up NY-09 for the 2012 reapportionment… which they wouldn’t have had to do if Weiner hadn’t gone all power-drunk. They probably would have at least tried to eliminate two GOP-leaning districts, instead. That’s worth something, right there.

  • freemanja1991

    underestimate a republican’s ability to lose a special we have a knack for it.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Don’t want to prematurely count chickens before they hatch, but can’t wait for the next Moe Lane “Doom” special on Weds.

    It’s funny how that anti-incumbency mood is taking out one kind of incumbent more than others…

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot

    maybe that’s because, they are just not that into the leftwing Pelosi who cracks 59% unfavorables, vs 40% unfavs for Boehner …
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_favorability_ratings

    And a -23 for Obama on the Ras strong fav/unfav make Obama looking toasty …
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

    Obama’s losing a head-to-head vs the supposedly unelectable Texas cowboy conservative Perry …

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/perry_44_obama_41_president_leads_other_gop_hopefuls

    An NY-09 loss by the Dems may be the tipping point for the libs to cast about and murmur more about replacing the current incompetent head of state as their 2012 nominee …
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/08/us/politics/08bai.html

    Proggies will be staring at a stark very Texan unproggie future if Perry trumps Obama, so Perry may be the one thing that keeps the far left united (they are such good haters of all things conservative) and on the Obama plantation.

    But they SURE wont be happy campers!

    It’ll be DOOM I tell ya. DOOM!

  • acat

    mean bupkis about the next general election…. when the Dems lose.

    Mew

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …but this one ain’t in the bag quite yet. I mean, I think that Turner is going to win, but we need one more unforced error by Weprin to assure a final Death Spiral… and Weprin didn’t campaign today for religious reasons (he’s an Orthodox Jew) and won’t campaign tomorrow (it’s 9/11). All of which effectively means that Weprin and his staff only have one more day in which to Embrace Teh Fail.

  • carolina

    reelection chances might add to the pile-on.
    Nobody loves a loser (or his minions).

  • gr29az

    are coming for anyone who is deliberatly continuing to destroy
    our nation be it left or right. watch out you sons of bitches nov 2012
    is right around the corner.

  • publious

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro1Yjk1P-RY