« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Liz Warren: pig-ignorant about her own salary?

Liz may end up being a better chew toy for us than even Alan Grayson was.

You know, I’m starting to understand why Liz Warren has all these weird opinions on how value is actually created: she’s just a creature of her environment. This one is a little involved, so bear with me.

  • Thursday, Politico put out a story on the sacrificial lamb candidate for MA-SEN’s upcoming Democratic primary that noted that Warren’s rhetoric about government transparency didn’t extend to her own tenure as chair for the TARP-overseeing (Congressional Oversight Panel). Turns out that “Warren opposed GOP efforts to draft a budget for the bipartisan oversight panel, despite telling The Associated Press in 2008 that she wouldn’t buy a winter coat without a spending plan.”
  • A total of 10.5 million was spent by COP over two years (8.3 million under Warren’s oversight), and we don’t actually have a line-by-line breakdown of what that money was spent on. But we know that 8.7 million went to salaries.
  • Warren’s pay during that time period? According to her campaign staff’s original disclosure? $64,289 for 2009 and 2010. (pause) Why, that’s quite modest, for Washington DC…
  • Oh, wait, never mind: the Warren campaign confessed Friday that she “had been paid $192,722 for serving as chairman of a congressional committee that monitored the 2008 federal bank bailout, three times as much as had originally been acknowledged.” Yeah, that’s more in line with the bloated Dizzy City salary guidelines that we all know and loathe with the collective fury of a billion exploding suns.
  • Are you wondering whether Politico made the goof? Nope! The Warren campaign admitted that they gave out the wrong information. “‘In a rush to meet your deadline, we made an honest mistake,’” [Warren campaign flack Kyle] Sullivan said. “‘And we misread a document and thought $64,289 was for 2009 and 2010. It was only for 2010.’”
  • At this point, you’re probably asking “Couldn’t Politico look all of this up on Warren’s financial disclosure forms? She’s running for Senate.” Yeah… except that Politico claimed that this N-dimensional genius from beyond space and time didn’t actually make the deadline to file one of those things as per federal law.
  • Let me end with the note that this level of pay does not even begin to approach what she was making as a Harvard law professor.

So, let’s recap: Liz Warren is at best exceptionally sloppy about both her personal finances, and the finances of the government agency that she oversaw. Getting information about either was and is as difficult as a broken wisdom tooth extraction – and in the case of Warren’s personal income, the real problem was getting accurate information. Because apparently Liz Warren doesn’t know how much she earns every year. Or she knows, but lies about it. Either way, she is used to making a ridiculous amount of money every year for doing… nothing really productive. Which explains her frankly puerile if somewhat passive-aggressive embracing of class warfare rhetoric: in Liz Warren’s world, the way she became rich* is the way that surely everybody becomes rich. And surely Warren knows, deep down, that she didn’t do anything to actually earn all that sweet, sweet cash.

God save us all from progressive academics: even when they’re racked by shame and guilt over their actions they’ll still try to take it out on the rest of us. Hey, exit question: Liz Warren did pay her taxes, right? I wasn’t going to ask, but since she doesn’t even know how much she earns every year…

(See also Jammie Wearing Fool, Instapundit, Ace of Spades HQ, among others. We are going to have so much fun with this candidate…)

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*As near as I can tell, her annual salary indicates that Warren counts by the administration’s own rule of thumb on who to tax into oblivion / incompetently wage class warfare against.

COMMENTS

  • earlgrey

    by two points.

    Either way I think Republicans everywhere should seize on her as both a symptom and the cause of many of the nations’ troubles..

  • bobojake

    Out here in the West we call them LIARS and Thieves. I thank the Internet Media for exposing Warren for what she is. Brian William won’t.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    You know, all that financial reform stuff?

    Dodd Frank?

    Poor Scott will have a tough sell trying to convince voters he’s opposed to what she’s all about.

  • Adjoran

    Brown wasn’t in the Senate when that passed.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    ” She long advocated for the creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,[3][4] which was established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law by President Barack Obama on July 21, 2010. As the special advisor she worked on implementation of the CFPB.

  • johnt

    to any other human, in any way. I mean the Harvard salary & the rest of it. Based on what this fool has said, if you make money in a social environment said society has seemingly an unlimited claim on it, your rights are tenuous. Presumably only a hermit would escape her claws. Or is she an exception? A little expropriation may be in order, say we leave her with $35k, with an addtional allowance for her psychiatrist.
    The difference about this woman is only that she is nutty and predatory enough to say out loud what the rest of the leftist criminal class believes.

  • spinoneone

    may still be under reported. Note that a Congressperson has a salary of $179750 per annum. A Senior Executive Service level Federal Employee has the same max except that s/he may make up the the salary of the Vice President [$230,000] with locality pay and awards.

  • reaganbuckley

    Her campaign probably took her annual salary from 2009-2011 as the total value instead of adding it up. Probably is in fact an “honest” mistake. Plenty of other reasons to oppose her candidacy, but I don’t think this is going to gain much traction.

  • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

    MA loses a Congressional seat every decade because of the many native born residents who flee the state. They flee because of people like Liz Warren and Deval Patrick.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    Since the junior Senator from MA helped pass Dodd Frank, which created the Marxist Bride of Frankenstein’s new bureacracy.

  • Swamp_Yankee

    You cant beat the enemy if you do not understand the enemy. Tea Partiers often differentiate Republicans and conservatives by degrees but rarely do the same for liberals. They are not all the same and EW is no rank and file Democrat.

    EW is a movement radical. She is not a knee jerk, populist, or an idiot. She is from Oklahoma, educated in Houston, and Cantabridgian by choice. Brilliant, deceptive, and radical with malicious intention. People throw the term marxist around loosely. She is the real deal disciple. Her votes will be the least of her damage.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    I’m speaking of Dodd Frank and the CFPB.

    He’s complicit or culpable, or both.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    is pretty much representative of the problem.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    ?You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be (perfectly) clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn?t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did.

    Warren speaks as if the factory owner paid zero taxes

    OECD Study: US has most progressive tax system

  • publious

    is that more voters in Massachusetts are thinking like this newly minted hobo…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pH9OborFYs

  • samudaef

    Hey, we all want what’s “fair,” right? And, raising taxes on the “rich” is only “fair” in trying to balance the federal budget.

    The problem here is that President Obama and other liberals don’t explicitly describe what they mean by “fairness”. When across-the-board fairness is finally achieved, what will America look like?

    Fairness is a concept that all will support; yet, it has many different meanings to many different people…

    …because of which this word “fairness” becomes a dangerous political Trojan Horse.

    Is the end state of “fairness” Karl Marx’s “classless society” where sameness is mandatory, personal talent, motivation and achievement are irrelevant, and all are assigned an equally dismal standard of living.

    Is it a Soviet-style system where individual freedoms are relinquished for the “collective good”, where an elitist oligarchy exempts itself from the imposed impoverishment of the proletariat, and national productivity is cannibalized on the altar of leftist political correctness.

    Is it a country where people are free to pursue personal development, achieve more, earn more and enjoy the fruits of their self determination?

    We can’t kid ourselves. We must inquire about the political agenda hiding inside of this Trojan Horse.

    This agenda can be minimalist government which recognizes and respects individual choices, life outcomes, and long-cherished Constitutional freedoms.

    This agenda can also be Big Bully government that is expansive and powerful enough to micro-manage everyone’s life choices, arbitrarily confiscate and redistribute personal property, disarm and dispatch all opponents, and capriciously suspend personal liberties at will.

    Given that it is President Obama and others like Warren Buffet, and Liz Warren whom are parking this Trojan Horse before our front gate, I suspect that the latter agenda hides within.

  • swami7774

    A Democrat poll showed a Democrat ahead. Shocking.

  • Wayne

    I recommend that a Department of Neutrino Science be created. It’s sole purpose to send individuals embracing progressive ideology back in time and dropped squarely into the Bolshevik Revolution where they will have the opportunity to comprehend empirically the truth about their utopian belief system. It would appear that Warren and others like her are incapable of making the synapse that enables them to apply logic and reason to their paradigm of the world. Since they believe that government is the answer to all societal ills, I’m sure this department would be funded and put in action believing it to be a good idea for them. I volunteer to head the department and selection committee for individuals suffering from this particular ailment and I believe I could get Warren to recommend funding it. ;-)

  • earlgrey

    They did do a decent job of polling Scott browns first race, as I recall. Media has invested a lot in demonizing Republicans. This race should be interesting. I don ‘t support Romney, but I bet Scott Brown is rooting for him.

  • johnt

    I wonder if Warren includes shoveling $535 million to insider green energy companies in her “all in this together” rubric?