« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

A Primer for the 3Q Obama for America (OfA) numbers.

Well, the 3rd quarter is over, which means that the set of speculation over various and sundry people’s fundraising totals may now kick into high gear. Probably the most anticipated numbers will be coming from Obama for America (OfA), given their haul last time – and their brags this time. The Politico has started off with an eye-grabbing headline – “Obama 3Q haul: $55M or more?” (H/T: Hot Air)- which is at least something that we can use to start looking at numbers. And write elaborate posts about them, for that matter.

Let’s go with the traditional bullet points on what needs to be taken into account at this stage of fundraising reporting.

  • The Obama campaign likes to low-ball its initial fundraising estimates. I note this with neither approval nor disapproval: it’s a perfectly legitimate tactic, as long as you don’t overdo it. So don’t be surprised if that $55 million ticks upward.
  • That $55 million number is a combined total. We went over why this was an important point to make last quarter: to summarize, OfA generated $773 million specifically for Obama’s campaign in 2008. We weren’t including the DNC totals then, so we should not include the DNC totals in assessing the likelihood of the President raising a billion (or 750 million) dollars now. Unless, of course, the Democrats just want to admit that they’re not going to raise even close to the same amount of money this go-round.
  • So, what are the real target numbers? Well, so far the President has personally raised almost $47 million this year. In the 2008 cycle Obama raised almost $104 million in his first year, or about 13.43% of his total haul. Depending on whether you’re holding the President to that one billion number or not, Obama thus has to either raise $134 or $101 million in 2011 in order to have a year comparable to 2007′s. That makes his target number either $34 or $25 million for 3Q 2011. This is not out of reach for the President; remember, his 1Q 2011 was extremely bad, when compared to 2007′s (not surprising).
  • The real problem for Obama is 2012. The problem for OfA is that if you concede that they should be judged in 2011 by 2007′s numbers then it’s fair to judge them in 2012 by 2008′s. And Obama’s quarterly goal for that, again depending on whether it’s one billion or $750 million, would have to average $216 or $162 million a quarter ($72/54 million a month). Put it another, less math-y way: Barack Obama is going to have to duplicate the mass wave of Messianic euphoria that propelled his fundraising to such heights in the last election. But to do that he needs to get access to donors. Lots and lots of donors.
  • And now you know why the President wants your five dollars. It’s not for bragging rights and it’s not because your five bucks will make a difference; it’s because with your five bucks comes your contact information, and anybody who sends Obama money now may reliably expect in the future to be essentially spammed by the President every day, starting probably in June.

To sum up: President Obama is – through dint of hard effort – so far managing to stay more or less on track with his fundraising brags; but this year is the easy part. Next year Obama’s going to have to more or less triple his game, and there’s not really any indication so far that the President is on track to replicate 2008′s, and I use the term deliberately, magic. Which I suspect that the OfA campaign team kind of knows. All of this should be reflected in the video that OfA puts together in a couple of weeks to spin the 3Q 2011 results: you should expect that Jim Messina will spend most of it again talking about all the people that OfA has signed up and speaking very little about how much money that OfA has raised.

And you should also expect spam next year. Lots and lots and lots of spam. At levels undreamed of by the minds of mortal men.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • wonkish1

    Romney is around $13-14 million which is the worst for Romney this year and in 08

    Paul is tried his darnedest to hit $8 million at the end because he was so close towards the end

    Santorum has less than 1 million(ouch)

    Some vague answers have come out there and it looks like $3-4 million

    Newt’s not going to be pretty likely $2 million to $3 million. Maybe $4 million on the extreme high. But to Newt’s credit most of it has been flowing in lately.

    The big question marks still out there are Perry and Cain. Don’t expect Cain to have anything stellar(his rise was to late in the Q). And Perry very likely has passed up Romney this Q giving him some badly needed good news.

    Oh and apparently some issue with when Huntsman entered the race meant he didn’t have to file last Q so he gets actually has like a whole Q plus a few more weeks of fundraising. I heard the number $4 million batted around by some folks.

  • wonkish1

    “Some vague answers have come out…” was referring to Bachmann

  • freentn

    he has the “Justice” Department to cover up for him.

  • earlgrey

    And analysis. A good read.

  • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

    As team McCain was hoodwinked into the matching funds game by Obama’08, only to see them raise $750 million, I wonder at what point do they cross the matching funds threshold only to wish they had not?

  • wonkish1

    The debatable question though is: Will Obama come up a little short of last years numbers, be about the same, or hit his $1 billion target.

    I would odds on favor of tying his amount from last year and falling way short of his $1 billion dollar goal for this cycle.

  • publious

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1-RchxqTPg

  • SoFiMil

    In the past, they counted campaign paraphernalia.

  • msctex

    It begs the question: is any amount of money sufficient to re-sell an established failure? I’d argue his true capital — the thing which most needs to be measured in order to accurately gauge his chances for not just election but nomination — is the Media’s willingness to continue to overlook glaring issues (Solyndra, Fast and Furious, etc.), and the Democratic Party’s willingness to pretend polls say something other than what they do.

    The day the Party decides Obama is a liability, the Press may suddenly discover the depth of a few stories currently aggressively ignored.

  • SoFiMil

    .

  • wonkish1

    Will allow Obama do buy America in 2012. That is for damn sure.

  • florajo

    We’re held back when we attribute every bad decision made by the federal bureaucratic pyramid to Obama, yet we didn’t hold Bush’s feet to the fire on anything at all — not even Medicare expansion.

    Let’s pick a candidate who will push an honest conservative position.

  • earlgrey

    I have seen people complain about Bush and Medicare and NCLB, but Bush isn’t President and he isn’t running for President. Obama is.

  • Darin_H

    1

  • Xasteius

    Unlike Whitman, Obama has shown that he has no moral scruples in the pursuit of what he wants. I will be surprised (assuming a Republican wins in 2012) if a transition of power occurs smoothly. At a minimum, I expect riots in the cities if he loses.

  • johnt

    just plain folks, probably from some folks overseas, and with the right washing, from a certain old Nazi.

  • msctex

    now taking place — small scale, and of no real consequence.

    The scale of Obama’s failure cannot be overstated. He has accomplished precisely nothing, while doing enormous damage. There will be some willing to stand by him due to the melanin in his skin, but as far as genuine arguable reasons to support the man, there simply are none. I expect him to got with a whimper, not a bang.

  • trickamsterdam

    he’s lent to his own campaign (not from donors). He could probably do better…but everyone knows he can’t win.

    He should have tried to win over conservatives, w/ his economic and alt. foreign policy plans, instead of chasing independents that aren’t there…he might have found an audience.

    I bet Romney’s also done better lately (like Newt & Cain). After the second Perry debate, a lot of people figured out he (Perry) was in trouble. Then Romney probably did even better after the third one.

    @ the author – Interesting and good post, especially since I hate doing my own math.

  • wonkish1

    nt

  • wbb1950

    The media is OBSESSED with whether the Annointed One manages to achieve a billion dollars in fundraising. It matters to them mainly because they assume a good portion whatever he does raise will be coming to them in the form of advertising purchases. I am probably not typical, but my immediate reaction to any commercial pimping for Obama will be to reach for the channel changer. I cannot suspend disbelief in the face of what I know to be bold faced lies. Fortunately, the station I watch will not be carrying his lies. Other than that the media aspect I wonder how much of a difference it really makes. At this point, I wonder how much spamming will do. The problem he cannot shake is he is running against his own record, and it is a track record of failure.

  • trickamsterdam

    (on fox.news.com) but this says less than half, but more than a half million:

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/jon-huntsman-raises-41m-when-you-include-the-donation-he-gave-himself.php

    Doesn’t matter. Still the same basic point. He should have gone right instead of going left…and who knows where he could be? Anyway, it doesn’t matter now. This is a four man race now, and he isn’t one of them.