« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Astroturf on literal parade: Occupy DC agitator admits to paying protesters.

The Daily Caller has some entertaining video up of a ‘Occupy DC organizer’ admitting that some of the spontaneous voluntary protesters that he has in tow – ones, not even incidentally, that are more, ah, diverse than the baseline of ‘pasty-faced white twenty-something hipster who’s seriously underwater in his/her liberal arts degree student debt’ – are actually being paid to show up and wave signs in a language that is perhaps not the mother tongue of the country of their birth*.

Let’s go over a few of the things suggested by this video. Kudos for the Daily Caller for sending in a reporter who could speak Spanish, by the way: that was just entertainingly nasty, and probably what forced the admission in the first place.

First off, and the most serious point: if you’re wondering why on earth the guy in the video above is even willing to admit that some of his squad of ‘volunteers’ were not actually volunteers, you shouldn’t. From his point of view – which is to say, the point of view of the activist Left – of course you pay people to pad out your numbers, if you have to. Everybody does that. I mean, it’s great if there are enough motivated people out there to swell your crowd, but you still budget to bring in more folks anyway. This is one major reason why the activist Left is so infuriated with the Tea Party movement, by the way: many of them honestly and truly believe that the groups are being subsidized and funded directly from major corporations, and they legitimately don’t understand why this isn’t being exposed in the media**. So… sure, everybody does it, so why not admit to it?

Second… now, I may be jumping to conclusions, here, in assuming that at least one of the individuals in that video may not even have a green card. But I’m going to take that chance and state that, while I am of course a notorious pro-amnesty immigration squish, it’s at times like these that I can understand the attitudes of my more hard-nosed colleagues. I mean, look at that. There are plenty of aforementioned American twentysomething hipsters – at that very rally – who would have been darned glad to get the job of holding up a sign and woodenly repeating random progressive pablum. But they didn’t get those jobs, did they? And if you’re a fellow immigration squish who’s thinking that I’m being too hardline, consider this: by any objective standard an illegal Mexican immigrant willing to work three jobs is of more practical value to the country than a twenty seven year old inconveniently tattooed former barista with a Masters degree in semiotics. Let the latter carry the darn signs, and free up the former for more useful work.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*And more importantly, the country that would issue their passports. If they have passports. Which they may not actually have.

**Sure, you know and I know that the answer to that is that you can’t wave around a Bloody Check that doesn’t actually exist, but this is the Activist Left that we’re talking about, here. They have a narrative that they need to let them sleep at night, and it’s perilous to challenge it. For a given value of ‘perilous.’

COMMENTS

  • sbm1

    but I will give the Occupy DC crowd credit that most of the people I saw seemd to actualyl be real people, with home made type signs, and not the coordinated and fake SEIU paid types. At least form the pics I saw.

    Those like the guy above who pay others to protest don’t actually think that they have real support for their cause, which is as sad as inviting your out of town cousin to the prom, becasue you think every girl in school will turn you down.

    But I think the lefties can manage to get enough ragin grannies and vets for peace out to this woodstock reunion fest, to join the great unwashed unemployable hipsters with their gay concentration camp creating che guevara t-shirts on….

    but if they are against lobbyists, and against bail-outs, I can’t see how they could think that the government is not the enabler of all this…..

  • dajeeps

    I’ve looked at a lot of video from various areas of the protest, and I didn’t see as much of the parasitic sloths that I expected after listening to commentary and new stories about the movement. What I saw was at least 50% more libertarian in nature. There was even one guy holding up a sign telling moveon.org and Soros to F*-off.

    I think it is a mistake to just mock these people off the cuff, without even looking at it. That is what Democrats did to the tea party movement and it did nothing positive for our country. I hope we can learn from that and do as much as we can to understand what this movement is all about. We should not be like Democrats and do as much as we can to foster unity by finding commonality, and working on those things together.

  • edintexas

    The MSM is doing their best to promote this, particularly through using the term “spreading across the country”. A few hundred in this major city or that, isn’t much “spreading”. Heck, even in Moscow on the Guadalupe (Austin, TX), with a college student population at UT of 35,000, only two hundred are reported as showing up for “Occupy Austin”.

  • jaykali

    Even though they despise the Tea Party..how dare they protest our beloved president’s policies! – they love some spontaneous protests when they are left-inspired.

    So Matt Lauer and Obama and their friends aren’t indignant towards ANY protest, just ones that originate from conservatives.

    I doubt these will get violent but I imagine the MSM and Democratic allies will have some egg on their face if these start getting violent. I don’t count goofy ‘protest’ arrests as violence.

    That’s fine if people want to protest, I don’t mind peaceful protests I suppose. It also puts your ‘message’ under scrutiny so if people can’t come up with a coherent message then they will continue to be laughed at.

    I don’t like how ‘Wall Street’ is lumped in with business in this country. I am not so much a fan of Wall Street and exotic investments that are super-complicated and helped lead us into a financial meltdown. Republicans would most likely resist any sort of meaningful regulation while Democrats severely over-regulate. But most businesses are not publicly traded and the issue with Wall Street isn’t some problem with Apple’s stock being too high – it goes back to Banks and bailouts and exotic risk taking that led to a collapse. That is really irritating, I don’t see how that benefits Americans. I wish we could have some regulation keeping Banks in particular from investing in risky, exotic securities. As for the rest of Wall Street I don’t really care as long as they are following the laws.

  • http://whattoreadtoday.blogspot.com/ Paula

    It was about 60-20-20

    60% unions
    20% anti-establishment/anti-war/lean-anarchist types
    20% unemployed and want to protest something, not sure why they’re there

    They had *maybe* 200 yesterday, but only about a dozen spent the night. It was unbelievably unorganized. They’re just hoping it will all work out somehow.

    The group was only slightly more diverse than what you’d find at a Tea Party rally.

  • http://whattoreadtoday.blogspot.com/ Paula

    Check out my pics and report from #OccupyCleveland and report back.

    Parasitic sloths – unions – parasitic sloths – unions….hmmm…gonna have to ponder that a while…

  • ThePoliticalHat

    …but that doesn’t change the fact that they are mistaken. While both they and us have good reason to be angry, their anger is misplaced by both their own “education” and the support of the professional leftist agitators.

    The sincere ones are just being used by the unions, organized leftist groups, and their fellow-goers (as well as anonymous, who are probably just in it for the “LULZ”).

    It is those hard core leftists that we should be concerned about, not the fools who believe that their “General Assemblies” (AKA soviets) will lead to a paradise of equality and the death of “hierarchy.”

  • runner12

    Read Paula’s diary. They are the unions, fully embracing of the socialist left. There may be a few opportunists out there to promote their cause, but that is it.

    Every one a professional protestor.

  • Ausonius

    My wife received images showing what seem to be several hundred thousand protesters.

    I had an impression that PhotoShop was at work! :)

    Have there been any estimates? I am suspicious because the image was sent by a leftist FaceBook “friend” (i.e. not a friend really) with the comment that “here’s the image that the media won’t show you! Millions (sic) are protesting, but the media won’t tell you that!”

  • williamjameson

    and work till a better offer comes along. Even illegal aliens are tough enough to do that.

    Bunch of freak show extremist lazy bums!

  • carolina

    This allowed banks to get into the risky investment business for the first time.
    Clinton’s buddy was Ken Lewis (founder of Nations Bank that bought BofA)
    One pay-back of favors was Ken Lewis/BofA buying Countrywide.
    That purchase took Lewis down eventually.
    Once again – govt IS the problem.

  • williamjameson

    http://www.redstate.com/williamjameson/2011/10/07/ows-extremist-list-of-demands-posting-for-laughs/

  • weyland

    …led to the mess we are into today. Thanks for the clarification — now back to Soviet Russia for you, you socialist stooge!

  • weyland

    …on what you saw in Cleveland. Isn’t that a little myopic?

  • jaykali

    Are Republicans for bring Glass-Steagall back?

  • daniel22

    the unions like this bunch as does the DNC/MoveOn. I am sorry for the honest union members in this country. I would be embarrassed to think that I was represented there. But if the Progressives want to use this “grassroots” movement to counter the Tea Party all the better. The differences could not be clearer leaving no room for fence sitting.
    What do you call a group who has no leader, no rules(except those adopted by consensus), and no distinct goal?

  • ag8tor

    the Obama Administration! How about you?

  • 2warabnvet

    they are Marxists, union thugs, and parasites, but a significant number are starry- eyed, but disillusioned, young people who spent four years in college on various “studies” (women’s studies, black studies, etc.) and now find they possess no skills of any value to society

  • spolson

    If these people are the pride of the education system. They have not been served. I have read interviews, speeches and blogs and none of these people have a basic understanding of economics, capitalism,Marxism, and what they want. How much embarrassment do they have to endure. Tell them they won and let them go back to class where they can languish in their stupidity.

  • http://www.plumbbobblog.com Plumb_Bob

    The Left doesn’t have to import entire crowds. A handful of organizers can drop suggestions to several different groups and produce a movement of relatively spontaneous protesters. They don’t have to control the crowds, except to keep them protesting. In that manner, a small number of leftist organizers can create a crowd on demand.

    The OWS movement is mostly sincere idiots, but the event itself is planned, timed, orchestrated, approved, financed, protected, and carefully monitored by the Obama White House. I’ll bet my hat on it. This is what community organizers do. OWS is the White House’s planned Anti-Tea-Party.

  • mirac777

    Understand the big picture 100%. Funny how the CPUSA, AFL-CIO- Wall street protesters, and Teachers Unions are all pimping Obama’s jobs bill too.

    http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/10/cpusa-obamas-jobs-bill-occupywallstreet/

    Add a dash of Child Socialist indoctriniation in there to boot. This is the Obama2012 Reelection campaign 100%.

  • mirac777

    and witnessed a max of 150 people at 3pm Sat. Low and behold our local news had it pegged at “thousands.”And of course they exagerated it on their own web page, even though the picture proves just how few sheep attended right above their own statement

    .Boy when the welfare crowd realizes they will be broke for the rest of the month due to spending their whole government “paycheck” to check to go out and make fools of themselves, will they EVER be angry!
    Viva la revolucion!

  • mirac777

    caught paying activists to attend the protests!

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/shocker-obamas-top-political-advisor-directly-linked-to-occupy-wall-street-protests/

  • dajeeps

    To take the oxygen out of the movement. I never said there aren’t leftists out there. The movement is growing because they have a message that is very loosely grounded in reality, an element nearly all demagogs need to get anywhere at all. And there are anarchists piling into the fray as well.

    We need to be concerned about societal cohesion, because this is how the ungluing of society starts. I’m not saying it will come to mean anything at all; but the writing is on the wall, so we need to do something to counteract the message and show some real leadership before it gets too far. Mock all you want, but that doesn’t address the discontent people who think camping out in a public park in squalor until such unspecified date will have an impact on their lives.

    We want them to follow us, not leftist radicals.

  • Doc Holliday

    it is all the rage

    these people are nuts. I have to ask you dajeeps where you get your news from. Where I get my news, I have seen these people defecate on police cars, verbally attack Jews over and over, bum rush the Air and Space Museum, try to sell heroin to a reporter, spray graffiti on police cars, and call for things like the end to racism and the end to poisoning the earth.

    These people are nuts, they are the hard core left, they are union thugs, societal drop outs, America haters, hippie wannabees, and mush brained college kids. These people have existed for a long time, and they planned this action for a long time on their lefty blogs. I would not fear these people, it is good they are out in the open for all to see.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    This is not leading to anything. Quite the opposite, the more people see them and hear them the more they are put off by the hate, the silly rhetoric, and the loony tunes philosophy.

    If this is being orchestrated by the white house, it is sure to backfire.

  • vandalii

    Though I thought I was back in kindergarten for a moment with this little clip of say & repeat, I do have to say that the folks there seem to all be in “agreeance” with each other. Seems much easier to make sure these sheeple understand the message when stated in 3-5 word bites.

    I’m pretty sure, though, that if either house of congress had to operate in this manner, even less would be done than is already (not) done. Plus they’d lose their ace playing card: the ability to twist each others’ words around willy-nilly, spinning it their own way without being called on the carpet.

    As I said, my first reaction was, “how stupid” but with more thought about it, keeping the message clear trumps foolish-sounding sheep-like bleating, IMHO. I suspect a Tea Party demonstration might be able to at least complete a sentence before repeating so might be a bit more efficient than this way of talking :-) .

  • vandalii

    …that the (alleged) illegals were paid and they were not. Might be an interesting interjection to see what happens if some poor white hippie finds out his illegal alien “brother” gets $20 for doing the same thing he does for free (and he’s not even s’posed to be in this country, let alone protesting Wall Street).

    Anyone want to go get that rumor started in Zuccoti Park so we can witness just how “progressive” these mooches really are when their pocketbook is deflated by their immigration problem? ;-)

  • vandalii

    …they missed the opportunity to have their little rainman dance get (possible) wisdom from someone actually in some level of gov’t power speak to them about how a *real* injustice was handled in the 60′s and gain a full-fledged ally in Congress. Lewis has publically acknowledged their process, but can’t be that happy a bunch of pasty-faced hippie wannabes didn’t care what a signficant African-American leader had to say…let’s ask Maxine Waters what we should do ;-)

    The Dems are currently acting like they are all for this little temper-tantrum since it seems to aim itself (when there is any aim at all) toward their enemies — conservatives (read: those that believe working speaks louder than, well, speaking). Once the public gets their bellyful of the destruction of parks, private property, clogging of roadways, etc. the Dems will immediately let off the gas and find another shiny object to try to turn into a “vote for me” crisis. John Lewis would’ve been a big help to these silly people shouting each other down like little children … Mic Check Mic Check

    Ironic that it still comes down to one person holding the mic when it’s time to decide what the “agenda” is. He deftly manipulated this crowd away from giving Mr. Lewis the floor (“it doesn’t look like we’ll come to consensus any time soon…”). Gotta maintain control when getting consensus…

  • Doc Holliday

    trying to decide on the next action to take. How does one even parody this other than show it to people?

  • Doc Holliday

    Lewis could have added gravitas to their little sit in, they are so convoluted, they don’t even know how to be traditional lefty dirt bags.

  • cwfoster

    They are expendable cannon fodder. their purpose is to swell numbers and be excitable so they can be incited to riot, and then the National Guard, and US troops can be called out to suppress the “Tea Partiers” (think it’s an accident that Obomber and Bidet have been drawing those comparisons?) THEY know the end game Lewis, Pelosi and maybe Reid do not, that’s why Lewis addressed the crowd in Atlanta this weekend and was shocked that he was shouted down. You don’t see the ‘inner circle’ approaching those crowds, because they know it’s a pack of mad dogs being formed up to be whipped into a frenzy when the numbers are sufficient to overcome the police lines. Worried about law enforcement casualties? These are the people responsible for Brian Terry’s and Jamiie Zapata, they don’t CARE about a few cops, nor the citizens or troops killed in the ensuing clashes when martial law is declared. The only thing that matters is that they can seize unprecedented power and suspend civil liberties to prevent losing that power.

  • chico

    …by this exhibit of drone, sheeple stupidity. Orwell was about 27 years off. What scares Hell out of me is…THESE PEOPLE VOTE! God help us.

  • sbm1

    my father is watching too much Glenn Beck in his old age, and actually getting worked up about these loony tunes…..after seeing that Atlanta footage I just started laughing at the whole thing…now Kanye West walking through OWS with gold teeth….the whole thing is laughable, and will not catch any kindling within America. If Soros or anyone is actualyl wasting thier money to instigate this, they might as well be making it rain with nejamins in the champagne room…..because that money is completely wasted.