« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Washington Post has a macaca on its back.

I swear to God, it’s like the paper remembers that one, perfect high that it got from torpedoing then-Senator George Allen’s re-election run in 2006, and has been chasing the dragon ever since:

  • 2009: You all remember the McDonnell/Deeds gubernatorial contest, yes? You also remember how the WaPo went so all-in on pushing an absurd story that Jim Geraghty started calling it the Washington Bob McDonnell’s Thesis.
  • 2011: The Rick Perry nonsense with regard to the name of a ranch that his family rented hunting rights to. Notice how that didn’t blow up after all?

And now we have this silly little hit piece on Marco Rubio’s story regarding his parents, which is not just so inaccurate that it’s being smacked down by other newspapers; it’s so inaccurate that it’s being smacked down by the newspaper’s own columnists. The problem? The guy who wrote the article – which implied that Rubio habitually lied about when his parents fled Cuba without actually giving proof that Rubio habitually lied about when his parents fled Cuba – is himself an apologist for the Castro regime (h/T: Erick Erickson) who was apparently willing to use Birther agitprop* (I have another word for it, but it’s unprintable). Actually, the real problem for the Washington Post is that Marco Rubio is a young, engaging, excellent rhetorician and politician who has inexplicably picked the wrong party to belong to; couple that with a certain bitter frustration that their side’s young, engaging, etc. etc. who they helped elect President in 2008 has turned out to be neither an excellent rhetorician or politician and you can understand their actions. Well, that and the chimerical nostalgia of how the paper was able to change the news in 2006.

Seriously, guys? The first step to fighting an addiction is to admit that you have one.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Seriously, folks, as I’ve said before:

…if your definition of ‘natural-born citizen’ means that you have to question the eligibility of this guy…

…then let me be the first to inform you: YOU ARE CURRENTLY FROLICKING IN THE ENDLESS, SUN-LIT PLAINS OF STUPIDITY.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Finrod

    The entire MSM still pines for the 1970s, when they brought down a Republican President with the Watergate scandal. To this day scandals are denoted with the -gate suffix.

  • center77

    I posted this video on my old blog (I’m not sure, maybe 6 months) and called him the next Republican icon, very Kennedy like (In look and ability to wow a group of supporters. I was very upset at Rubio for throwing Perry under the bus for the establishment of the party.

    Rubio supported in-state tuition while he was a a state senator, but when confronted with that fact after it became an issue, he turned around and said something a long the line of opposite of what he used to believe. I’m tired of watching these so called conservatives throwing principle out the window just to find favor with the establishment.

    Rubio knew it wou8ld help Perry to come out and admit he supported the law, but he did not do it. He dodged the question, and went on to say that he would not support it for his state.

    On the bright side, Perry is running with a awesome plan that should get conservatives happy about him,

    1. Flat Tax with provisions to protect the poor with children.

    2. NO EAR MARKS, no more stupid spending programs.

    3. Balanced Budget Amendment- now we are talking good ideas.

    4. Energy, Energy, and more energy. The important thing to note is how many parts of our society is affected by high energy prices.

    If Perry could get this agenda through, we would see a Ronald Reagan like recovery, and move towards having a balanced budget again.

    The reason Perry would be able to get this passed is because he is credible on the subject considering his state has been doing so much better than the rest of the nation. Romney, well he cant talk healthcare, at least not credibly. He cannot talk jobs, he fired people, and he was 47th as Governor.

    And how many placed does he bleed support simply because he is who he is. There is only one clear choice in this election, and the sooner conservatives get behind it the better it will be for the country.

  • Flagstaff

    you started slamming Romney. That doesn’t help you, it just hurts everybody else.

  • http://whattoreadtoday.blogspot.com/ Paula

    Even if it were true, it’s not necessarily such a huge deal. I didn’t know until my parents’ 25th anniversary (which occurred strangely close to my 25th birthday) that I was conceived out of wedlock. My parents had a DADT policy on that subject. Lots of families engage in revisionist history with their kids. That said, if my kid were running for the senate, I’d probably set the record straight before it went up on the website.

  • cajungirl2012

    How does that hurt everybody else? Spare me the “for the good of the Party” BS. What the hell has he done? REALLY?

    The Republican Party deserves so much better. He’s a dishonest politician that plays dirty against fellow Repubs. Not voting for Mittens – ever. I’ll stay home if buys the nomination.

    PS. Did you know his wife said you’re stupid if you vote against Mitt? Google it. Birds of a feather. Perfect couple.

  • jen0517

    Who gives a crap if Rubio’s parents didn’t give him State Dept records on the exact dates of their travels! What is his parents were Jews who fled Germany in the early 1930′s to escape the inevitable with Hitler? Was there a cut-off date for that, too? It is ridiculous the lengths WAPO will go to tear someone down.

  • baracksolyndraobama

    this is their caca moment.

    Despite my senator’s denials, I am so jazzed by the idea of him as our veep candidate. Come on 2012, you can’t come soon enough!

  • Duke

    It’s why I can’t STAND to watch the stupid, high school level, ankle-biting beclowning that goes on in the so-called “debates.”

    How in the world can I get behind a person that publicly attacks others on his/her team, and sounds more like a candidate for Captain of the Cheerleading Squad than leader of the free world?!

    Herman Cain is probably doing as well as he is in the straw polls because he’s behaving like a gentleman and an adult.

    Advice to the rest of the political children: Please try to adhere to Pres. Reagan’s “Eleventh Commandment.” No one is interested in being associated with you once you’ve proven you can be the biggest assclown on the stage.

  • Duke

    I really don’t care to support Mr. Mittens either, but I fear we’ll once again be forced to accept the lesser of two evils. I can hold my nose and vote for the likes of McLame or Romney, but there’s no way I can stay home and watch the rabble in Zuccotti Park, and their communist masters, elect the worst example of an American in my lifetime. Can you stand mute and allow someone you don’t especially support politically defeat someone who, at the very least, won’t work at full-throttle to ruin our country? Yeah, I didn’t think so.

    Romney has been focus-grouping, polling, fund raising and practicing for the past 3 years in an all-out attempt to NOT lose again. Having someone come into the game off the bench and defeat him is going to require a serious misstep on his part. Sadly, I think there are better candidates, but the Republican establishment supporters still outnumber us Conservatives. I hope someone more conservative prevails, and if that happens I’ll be proven wrong – and gladly accept that reversal.

  • circlegranch

    This subject surfaced here again today and because its one that I personally have done an extraordinary amount of research and fact finding on, indulge me to share a small portion of the info I took under advisement and how it shaped my opinion.

    Both the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics endorse the use of the vaccination, Gardasil, based on clinical studies that reveal a very low to almost non-existent rate of complications or side effects. The reason that YOUNG girls are recommended to have this 3-stage vaccination is because Gardasil has no effect AFTER exposure to the HPV virus. In other words, Gov. Perry was advised that girls around the age of 11, hopefully of pre-sexual activity age should be the age group receiving it. Advise and counsel was obtained from numerous accredited organizations and medical specialists and research experts. Yes, the words ‘expert’ and ‘official’ and such always throw up red flags to the disbelievers but at some point, whom do we trust in terms of giving us medical advice and guidance especially when they have documented evidence of their findings? Who do we listen to when we hear the word ‘cancer’? I, for one, don’t waste time hearing what those with bias and political agenda’s have to say.

    The human papillomavius is the #1 cause of cervical cancer. If a woman contracts the virus, either by consenusal sexual activity or if she is the victim of rape or incest, there is no vaccine and there is no preventative treatment. Left undetected, cervical cancer in its latter stages can be deadly and it can force sterility by the woman having to undergo hysterectomy. Both these unfortunate possibilities are being seen increasingly in young women that contract HPV and then don’t follow up with routine cervical examinations. Some don’t know they have it. As governor, Rick Perry considered these facts and after hearing multiple examples where insurance companies were not paying for the approx. $400 for the 3 injections, this provided some impetus for his Executive Order.

    Since Perry’s venture into this debate, recent studies show that HPV is now the #1 cause of oropharyngeal cancer in men, outpacing smoking, chewing tobacco and alcohol as causes. There is an alarming increase in tonsillar and throat cancer in non-smoking men in their 30′s-50′s. This is the result of exposure to HPV early in life, quite possibly during their teen years. Once recommended only for girls, the use of HPV vaccinations in boys share equal recommendation in the medical community. HPV vaccination is proven to prevent 90% of genital warts in males.

    All this type of specific medical analogy is too explicit for the do-gooder’s such as Michelle Malkin. Her argument and that of others, is that by very virtue of vaccinating children before they become sexually active is somehow an affront to abstinence and will simply drive young innocents into immediate and reckless activity. As Perry has repeatedly stated more times that we can count, THERE WAS A SPECIFIC AND CLEARLY STATED PARENTAL OPT-OUT CLAUSE in his executive order. Perry had no intention of forcing vaccination on anybody’s child. He did want to protect children from a fast-spreading sexually transmitted disease IF the parent consented. Sexually transmitted diseases are on the rise in younger age groups. He was frustrated to think that insurance companies were in some cases not covering the cost and he believed both children from poor households as well as those with parents that could afford it, should have access to a medical breakthrough that is proven to head off cancer and a lifetime of suffering from an insiduous disease.

    For those parents, such as Ms. Malkin, who have made this a centerpiece of their hatred for Rick Perry, I pose this line of thinking: Surely you must have very little confidence in your parenting thus far in terms of rearing your children in a moral and Christ-like manner. After years of guiding and counseling and steering your child in the ways that you wish them to walk, do you seriously think that by virtue of consenting to a 3-injection anti-cancer vaccination is going to throw away all your effort and heartfelt guidance? This glaring lack of confidence in yourselves as parents should give you pause. You would do well to monitor the lyrics your kids hear from their iPod’s and make sure you are present to overhear locker room talk in middle and high schools because you’ll surely be shocked at what kids in these age groups not just talk about, but what they engage in. Your kids are being bombarded with all sorts of sexually explicit filth and you don’t have an opt-out clause for them when you child wants to belong in their peer group.

    We are in the throes of October–National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Pink is on the march everywhere. It’s the most highly publicized cancer in our society. It really, really matters to us as a society to continue to strive to find a cure. Breast cancer can kill. So does cervical cancer and mouth and throat cancer. Imagine the day if we learned that one of our fine Big Pharma companies made the announcement that they had found a highly effective vaccine to prevent breast cancer!! The breast is often associated in a sexual context, right? What if we were told that in order to be protected later in life from breast cancer we’d have to innoculate our daughters at the tender age of 10 or 11; long before conservative, morally grounded parents want their children to start thinking about breast size or the overall thinking regarding a women’s breasts. What if the chemical structure of the vaccine was such that it had to be used prior to the onset of increased hormonal production? Would we cringe and recoil in horror if a governor from of a sovereign state acted in what he believed was the best interest of citizens of his state?

    I don’t intend to make light of breast cancer here. This devastating and sometimes fatal disease has dramatically impacted my own family in a very personal and unfortunate way. I have seen up close what it does to victims and families. I also don’t know one person that would not shout for joy if told there has been a vaccination found. And I know fewer parents that would deny their child the vaccination and if they did, at least wouldn’t start a blame attack on the person giving them the option of receiving it, plus financial assistance if needed.

    Cervical cancer, the cancers in men now being directly linked to HPV exposure at young ages can create the same havoc and leave an empty place at family tables, too. There are more cases of prostate cancer each year than breast cancer. The point being, cancer can be deadly if left untreated no matter if that particular strain gets national attention or not.

    In my most humble opinion, any person that continues to hold out reservation on Rick Perry because of this executive order, which he withdrew and has admitted numerous times was the wrong move, is a person with a limited view on the health and safety of our children and, a person that cannot move past the admission by another human being of having made a mistake. These are persons driven by agenda and political expediency and they are at the core, the very problem in our society because they use situations like this to promote their own self-interest and they prey on the sympathies of those that aren’t informed.

    For those here that frequently ask for links to verify info, here’s my response. I will not make your journey in choosing a candidate an easy one. I have spent hundreds of hours researching this particular topic and yes, I could list here a quick 20 webpages so you can fact check what I write. I suggest, with all due respect, you start doing your own homework. When you invest your precious time away from your daily activities, you will take ownership in the information you collect and you will become more passionate in your views and decision-making. Just as your teachers didn’t give you the answer key when you took a test, in this case, you’ll have to do your own digging. Otherwise, you’ll never learn it.

    For the Michelle Malkin’s and others that have been publicly outspoken on this, they don’t need my list of references but here’s a few time-tested take-it-to-the-bank references I will share and ones which we all, myself included, would do well to follow:

    “Judge not, so you will not be judged.”
    “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”
    “Beware of false witnesses.”

  • Flagstaff

    Great presentation. The analogy to breast cancer is very instructive.

    I can add that by making the vaccination “opt-out” rather than “opt-in” and therefore eligible for payment by insurance, it would have been given to many more of the kids who would (perhaps) need it most; at the very least, it would be administered to more kids than if insurance did not pay for it, many of them kids whose parents wanted it for them but couldn’t afford to pay for it.

    Too bad it didn’t happen by legislative act anyway.

    If giving the HPV shot to youngsters will make them more sexually active, does giving tetanus shots to them make them think it’s OK to be careless around rusty nails?

    The only thing wrong with Perry’s action was to do it by exec order, and he admitted that. What the exec order was about is beside the point. The fact that Bachmann (and others) tried to make the treatment itself an issue was the second reason I decided to drop support for her.

  • capitalistpig

    were pushing for mandated HPV vaccines at the time,including then S.C. State Senator Nikki Haley .

  • capitalistpig

    as a MN State Senator VOTED on a bill that wouldve also gave children of illegals instate-tuition.
    http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/polinaut/archive/2011/09/in-state_tuitio.shtml
    Her words:
    It turns out that Bachmann voted for a similar measure in 2005 while serving in the Minnesota Senate. The language, which was included in a larger higher education funding bill, would have allowed students who had attended a Minnesota high school for three years or more, had graduated and had enrolled in public Minnesota college to pay in-state tuition.

    During debate of the bill, Bachmann spoke in support of an amendment that would have required such students to be legal residents as well.

    “Is citizenship a privilege, or is it a right?” she asked on May 5, 2005, the day the chamber debated the bill. “It seems like the understanding we’ve always had in this nation is that citizenship is a privilege for those who are not born in this nation… This [bill] is affirmatively having our state make a new decision about citizenship. And really by doing this, we are answering that citizenship is now a right as opposed to a privilege.”

    She voted for the amendment, which failed.

    But when it came time to vote on final school funding bill, Bachmann was one of 63 senators who voted in favor of the legislation; three lawmakers, including two Republicans, opposed the bill.
    hypocrisy,yet not many know this.If they did,her campaign would surely sink big time and Perry would be vindicated.

  • onemovoter

    where she was in the Minnesota senate and voted for mandatory vaccinations, may have even sponsored some amendments.

    I’m trying to look for the links, it was from local news paper sources if I recall. Can anyone help find that info for me?

  • onemovoter

    Now I remember. She actually voted for it in the Minnesota senate. And here she is condemning Perry for it?

  • circlegranch

    but am not tech savvy enough to know how to do that. So, once you’ve clicked on THIS comment, you’ll find, “GARDASIL, the facts you don’t know” just above. This is a reply to that original post.

  • Scope

    This subject surfaced here again today and because its one that I personally have done an extraordinary amount of research and fact finding on, indulge me to share a small portion of the info I took under advisement and how it shaped my opinion.

    Both the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics endorse the use of the vaccination, Gardasil, based on clinical studies that reveal a very low to almost non-existent rate of complications or side effects. The reason that YOUNG girls are recommended to have this 3-stage vaccination is because Gardasil has no effect AFTER exposure to the HPV virus. In other words, Gov. Perry was advised that girls around the age of 11, hopefully of pre-sexual activity age should be the age group receiving it. Advise and counsel was obtained from numerous accredited organizations and medical specialists and research experts. Yes, the words ?expert? and ?official? and such always throw up red flags to the disbelievers but at some point, whom do we trust in terms of giving us medical advice and guidance especially when they have documented evidence of their findings? Who do we listen to when we hear the word ?cancer?? I, for one, don?t waste time hearing what those with bias and political agenda?s have to say.

    The human papillomavius is the #1 cause of cervical cancer. If a woman contracts the virus, either by consenusal sexual activity or if she is the victim of rape or incest, there is no vaccine and there is no preventative treatment. Left undetected, cervical cancer in its latter stages can be deadly and it can force sterility by the woman having to undergo hysterectomy. Both these unfortunate possibilities are being seen increasingly in young women that contract HPV and then don?t follow up with routine cervical examinations. Some don?t know they have it. As governor, Rick Perry considered these facts and after hearing multiple examples where insurance companies were not paying for the approx. $400 for the 3 injections, this provided some impetus for his Executive Order.

    Since Perry?s venture into this debate, recent studies show that HPV is now the #1 cause of oropharyngeal cancer in men, outpacing smoking, chewing tobacco and alcohol as causes. There is an alarming increase in tonsillar and throat cancer in non-smoking men in their 30?s-50?s. This is the result of exposure to HPV early in life, quite possibly during their teen years. Once recommended only for girls, the use of HPV vaccinations in boys share equal recommendation in the medical community. HPV vaccination is proven to prevent 90% of genital warts in males.

    All this type of specific medical analogy is too explicit for the do-gooder?s such as Michelle Malkin. Her argument and that of others, is that by very virtue of vaccinating children before they become sexually active is somehow an affront to abstinence and will simply drive young innocents into immediate and reckless activity. As Perry has repeatedly stated more times that we can count, THERE WAS A SPECIFIC AND CLEARLY STATED PARENTAL OPT-OUT CLAUSE in his executive order. Perry had no intention of forcing vaccination on anybody?s child. He did want to protect children from a fast-spreading sexually transmitted disease IF the parent consented. Sexually transmitted diseases are on the rise in younger age groups. He was frustrated to think that insurance companies were in some cases not covering the cost and he believed both children from poor households as well as those with parents that could afford it, should have access to a medical breakthrough that is proven to head off cancer and a lifetime of suffering from an insiduous disease.

    For those parents, such as Ms. Malkin, who have made this a centerpiece of their hatred for Rick Perry, I pose this line of thinking: Surely you must have very little confidence in your parenting thus far in terms of rearing your children in a moral and Christ-like manner. After years of guiding and counseling and steering your child in the ways that you wish them to walk, do you seriously think that by virtue of consenting to a 3-injection anti-cancer vaccination is going to throw away all your effort and heartfelt guidance? This glaring lack of confidence in yourselves as parents should give you pause. You would do well to monitor the lyrics your kids hear from their iPod?s and make sure you are present to overhear locker room talk in middle and high schools because you?ll surely be shocked at what kids in these age groups not just talk about, but what they engage in. Your kids are being bombarded with all sorts of sexually explicit filth and you don?t have an opt-out clause for them when you child wants to belong in their peer group.

    We are in the throes of October?National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Pink is on the march everywhere. It?s the most highly publicized cancer in our society. It really, really matters to us as a society to continue to strive to find a cure. Breast cancer can kill. So does cervical cancer and mouth and throat cancer. Imagine the day if we learned that one of our fine Big Pharma companies made the announcement that they had found a highly effective vaccine to prevent breast cancer!! The breast is often associated in a sexual context, right? What if we were told that in order to be protected later in life from breast cancer we?d have to innoculate our daughters at the tender age of 10 or 11; long before conservative, morally grounded parents want their children to start thinking about breast size or the overall thinking regarding a women?s breasts. What if the chemical structure of the vaccine was such that it had to be used prior to the onset of increased hormonal production? Would we cringe and recoil in horror if a governor from of a sovereign state acted in what he believed was the best interest of citizens of his state?

    I don?t intend to make light of breast cancer here. This devastating and sometimes fatal disease has dramatically impacted my own family in a very personal and unfortunate way. I have seen up close what it does to victims and families. I also don?t know one person that would not shout for joy if told there has been a vaccination found. And I know fewer parents that would deny their child the vaccination and if they did, at least wouldn?t start a blame attack on the person giving them the option of receiving it, plus financial assistance if needed.

    Cervical cancer, the cancers in men now being directly linked to HPV exposure at young ages can create the same havoc and leave an empty place at family tables, too. There are more cases of prostate cancer each year than breast cancer. The point being, cancer can be deadly if left untreated no matter if that particular strain gets national attention or not.

    In my most humble opinion, any person that continues to hold out reservation on Rick Perry because of this executive order, which he withdrew and has admitted numerous times was the wrong move, is a person with a limited view on the health and safety of our children and, a person that cannot move past the admission by another human being of having made a mistake. These are persons driven by agenda and political expediency and they are at the core, the very problem in our society because they use situations like this to promote their own self-interest and they prey on the sympathies of those that aren?t informed.

    For those here that frequently ask for links to verify info, here?s my response. I will not make your journey in choosing a candidate an easy one. I have spent hundreds of hours researching this particular topic and yes, I could list here a quick 20 webpages so you can fact check what I write. I suggest, with all due respect, you start doing your own homework. When you invest your precious time away from your daily activities, you will take ownership in the information you collect and you will become more passionate in your views and decision-making. Just as your teachers didn?t give you the answer key when you took a test, in this case, you?ll have to do your own digging. Otherwise, you?ll never learn it.

    For the Michelle Malkin?s and others that have been publicly outspoken on this, they don?t need my list of references but here?s a few time-tested take-it-to-the-bank references I will share and ones which we all, myself included, would do well to follow:

    ?Judge not, so you will not be judged.?
    ?Love thy neighbor as thyself.?
    ?Beware of false witnesses.?

  • retire05

    But history proves the hysterics to be wrong, time after time. And that is what Bachmann, and Santorum, engaged in when they attacked Rick Perry over the Gardasil EO. Michelle Malkin had another motive. She was a Palin supporter, who was hoping Palin would throw her hat into the ring. Malkin has also gone after Perry on the Aga Kahn issue, not bothering to do her own research, but taking the word of Pam Geller, who sees jihadists under her own bed. Geller got b!tchslapped by another blogger who bothered to dig into the history of the Texas/Perry/Aga Kahn broo-ha-ha. Geller even went so far as to elimiate some of the actual facts of the issue to prove her claims. When she was taken down by another blogger, she attacked that blogger on her own web site, along with anyone who questioned her about it.

    The Council of State Legislatures has all the information on the Gardasil issue; what states enacted legislation, what states/cities require it. Washington, D.C. city council passed the requirement for Gardasil (no opt-out available) which had to be approved by Congressional resolution. Bachmann was then a Congresswoman, who did not make an issue out of it, when the resolution was passed.

    Bachmann was also a state representative when Minnesota passed the mandate for the vaccine for Hepititus B, also a disease that is generally transmitted via sexual activity. There is NO opt-out in Minnesota for the Hep B vaccine.

    Of all the current vaccines that had adverse side effects, the polio vaccine was one of them. People not only became seriously ill, some died. Yet, it was made mandatory is almost every school district in the nation, and polio has been virtually wiped out in the U.S. If you check the CDC for incidents of adverse affects from vaccinations, you will find that the Hep B vaccine has a much higher rate of adverse effects than does Gardasil. Yet, Bachmann doesn’t seem to be opposed to that vaccine.

    Bachmann’s argument was that HPV is not transmitted via casual contact, only via sexual contact. But Hep B is not transmitted via casual contact, nor does a tetanus shot protect you from a disease contracted casually. My son suffered from allergies and was not able to take the tetanus shots. I filed one form, at the beginning of his school years, stating such, which was placed in his school records, and that was the end of that. Those records followed him through three school districts in two states.

    One other thing; when Perry issued the EO, he felt it was of immediate importance. The Texas Congress had already met, and would not meet again for two years (being a bi-cameral Congress). It also made it a requirement for insurance companies to cover the very expensive cost of the vaccine, which more and more parents were requesting. I found it a bit odd that Sarah Palin would bash Perry over that since as governor, she signed legislation that would give the vaccination to ALL Alaskan girls, for free, paid for by the entire nation via HHS. Unlike Perry’s EO that required insurance companies, and M/M to pick up the tab, Palin’s legislation required the federal Health and Human services to pick up the tab providing the vaccination at no cost to any Alaskan family. The Alaskan program was no different than Romneycare which is being supported by taxpayers in all 50 states.

  • acat

    Munroe on cancer

    Cancer is devastating. Even if treated, there’s a significant chance of it coming back, in a less treatable form.

    I don’t see the government having a right to tell parents that they must vaccinate to prevent a transmissible cancer, but .. I honestly don’t understand that choice. If there’s a way to prevent it, why would you not do so?

    Mew

  • circlegranch

    I limited what I wrote, thinking I’d hold readers only so long before they clicked on to something else, so your post provides a wealth of add’l info that is necessary to complete the big picture.

    If Fox and our conservative radio talk show hosts were doing their jobs, they’d have called Ms. Bachmann out for her hypocrisy. They love to point fingers at the MSM, or “Lame Stream Media” as Palin calls it (where was HER outrage over Bachmann’s attack?) Bachmann took the bleeding heart role of being the protective mother against the evil governor chasing down young girls and forcibly injecting them with a drug that induces mental retardation. She lost all credibility with her rants and holier than thou attitude. She deliberately left out the facts of her record as MN state legislator so that means she’ll say or do anything for political expediency too. She loves to talk about the need to vet the candidates but of course, she’s immune and her friends in the media that are covering for her, allowing her to get away with stuff like this. I think we should melt the phone lines at Hannity’s radio show and see if he has the guts to take a call about this. Same with Boortz and Levin. If these guys are no longer credible and they’ve been sucked into this, they need to go on record as to why.

    Now that Bachmann’s staff in NH has quit, next thing we’ll hear is that they’ve gone to work for Romney and if Bachmann doesn’t win Iowa, she’s done and she’ll follow her staff into his camp. This whole primary situation is so vividly obvious as to which candidates are being protected and why, and which candidate is being essentially abused by the media. If Rick Perry had put his hand on Mitt Romney’s shoulder, he’d probably be accused of assault and the Fox folks would not shut up about it. If Perry had countered Bachmann’s attack on Gardasil during the first debate and reminded her of her votes in MN on hepatitis vaccinations, he’d been ridiculed by Fox for beating up on the girl. Look what’s happened to him for exposing Romney’s hypocrisy on immigration? Romney stood right there in Vegas and lied by saying he’d like to see Perry’s proof that he ever hired an illegal. He knew the lawn care company had illegals on staff or a year and his son hired them for his home, too. Still, he skates free. It’s Perry that was out of line.

    Surely a couple dozen books will be written when this is over about the back room deals and dirty politicking that went on to get Romney the nomination. Win at any cost. Ignore proven records of accomplishment. Let’s just convince these ignorant tea party folks that hang on our every word that the best choice is to go w/ the funny guy that hasn’t run anything in 15 years. Then, once all our loyal following is convinced, he’ll drop out and get behind Romney taking them with him. This is such a slick plan; nobody will ever figure it out!

  • retire05

    It is my reading that Bachmann is now claiming that only two of her NH staff quit. But I also read that they went over to the Perry camp. That is not a good sign for Bachmann. She took a gun and shot her own campaign to death.

    Yeah, Romney lied. I have read all the Boston Globe reports on his illegal hires. He was fully aware of them for over a year. But it also brings another thing into play; his loyalty to anyone in his church. The guy who owned “Lawn Service With A Heart” (with a heart? As compared to “heartless”? Isn’t that ironic.) is a fellow chuch member to Romney. It’s called “patronage” and is a system that FDR used extensively.

    You see, the new Romney is really the old Romney, but he has Fox in his back pocket because Fox is made up of NYC/DC beltway insiders and they damn sure don’t want some hillbilly from a southern state taking over the Oval Office. Much better to have a nor’eastern metro sexual reside at 1600 Pennsylvannia Avenue. Outside of Huckabee, what other Southerners does Fox employ? None.

    As to Romney putting his hand on Perry’s shoulder: Perry should have told him “Do that again and invade my personal space, and the only luck you will have is getting your hand back.” But Rick IS a gentleman, and anyone who has met him will tell you that. Romney was trying to intimidate Rick with that action, and it makes me sick that Fox did not call Romney down on it. Romney was also telling Rick that if Rick wanted to be POTUS he needed to learn to let others talk. Yet, Romney went on to do the very same thing to Santorum who did not beg for help from Anderson Cooper like Mr. Whiney Massachussets who gives a free ride to illegals from Kenya.