« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

AG Eric Holder calls Operation Fast & Furious ‘Reckless…’

...and admits that future deaths will occur.

The Obama administration – in the form of Attorney General Eric Holder – admitted today in Congressional testimony that Operation Fast & Furious program was ‘reckless,’ and will likely end up getting even more people killed.

Rep. Ted Poe, R-TX: Would you agree that this operation was reckless? It was a reckless operation on the part of the United States?

Attorney General Eric Holder: I mean, I think that the way that it was carried out I’d certainly say it was flawed, reckless, yeah I’d probably agree with that. I mean it was done inappropriately, and has had tragic consequences and is going – as I’ve said in my opening statement – it’s going to continue to have tragic consequences…

Rep. Poe: More people are going to die? Probably?

AG Holder: Unfortunately, I think that that’s probably true.

So. Let us recap.

  • The Obama administration created Operation Fast & Furious, which deliberately put large numbers of guns in the hands of people who were considered likely to resell them illegally to Mexican narco-terrorists.
  • The Obama administration did not follow the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives’ own rules for selling guns in sting operations.
  • The Obama administration did not keep track of the guns.
  • The Obama administration did not inform the Mexican government that the USA was arming their country’s drug gangs.
  • The Obama administration did not do anything about the Mexican civilian deaths that resulted from Operation Fast & Furious.
  • The Obama administration did not keep our own country’s law enforcement personnel in the loop, which inevitably resulted in at least one of our own Border Agents getting shot (possibly even by a weapon that the Obama administration facilitated).
  • The Obama administration did not voluntarily tell the truth about any of this.
  • And there is at least some suggestion that the Obama administration had a domestic political agenda in mind. One involving domestic gun control.

Let’s not mince words: Eric Holder – and a bunch of other people mentioned by name in this article – needs to resign in disgrace. I don’t care whether he was complicit in Operation Fast & Furious or not; the actions of the Department of Justice are ultimately his responsibility, which means that so are the deaths that resulted from the DoJ’s incompetence/scheming/incompetent scheming. Let me focus on that last bit: people died because we gave other people guns and didn’t even try to control where those guns went. That makes this entire sorry mess a good deal more significant than the usual Washington scandal.

The Democrats don’t want to hear that, of course. Not that I really care.

Moe Lane (Crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • banzaibob

    They should turn your butt over to the Mexican authorities for prosecution. This isn’t an oops sorry about that, it’s reckless homicide.

  • irishgirl

    fool going to be ousted from his office?

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    You were talking to Holder. Never mind. :)

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Holder:

    Castanza:

    Thank you.

    ColdWarrior

  • banzaibob

    I should have written Holder instead of you. I’m a little ticked off because my wife and I have relatives in Mexico and they now live in fear.

    They would sit on the porch with the entrance gate unlocked and enjoy the evenings. Now at night they lock the gate, lock the door and stay inside because of gunfire they can hear around the neighborhood.

  • spinoneone

    The really big one was orchestrated through the State Department to sell the Mexican military on the order of 20,000 AR-15 semi-automatic weapons, of which, at least one quarter of “missing.” See below for more on the story:

    http://pjmedia.com/blog/gunwalker-goes-legal-obama-massively-increased-gun-sales-to-mexican-military/

  • johnt

    for AG then this stumblebum. Top notch Democrat liars are a dime a dozen in the cesspool called Washington. Obama had the pick of the crop, some few even better than himself, and he goes for this third rate imitation of a slime covered deceiver. Well everybody makes mistakes.

  • kowalski

    If people ever want to know why elections are so important and that in the end we have to settle our differences to build on our momentum in the House, retake the Senate and retake the Presidency, this entire sordid affair starting from 2008 on is just about the best example I can think of.

    Kudos to Redstate for really keeping this on the front page. The more dots that appear and the more dots that get connected on this subject the worse it becomes and the more disgusting it is.

    It should sober everyone up right the hell up. What went on here was some very dirty business. I don’t want to give them four more years to try again.

  • kowalski

    Who had the guts to start blowing the whistle on what they knew was a part of a much bigger problem. Those people are heros in my book. They’re going to go unsung for now, but they’re heros.

    Don’t think elections don’t matter. Your 2nd Amendment rights depend on them. Wherever you live, if you consider the 2nd Amendment an issue (and everyone should) vote for the legislators who give you access, who talk with you reasonably, and who most importantly have a proven track record. (R), (D) or (I) or whatever – don’t sandbag them.

    Here in Massachusetts we work hard to keep score and that puts me in the position as a Republican of supporting a lot of Democrats in State elections. I wish there were more Republicans on the ballot but they’re aren’t. But there’s a universe of difference between the (D)s who “get it” on the 2nd Amendment and those who don’t, and I support the former based on their *voting records* and legislative records and their record of outreach and responsiveness.

    This Fast and Furious business is an octopus and we haven’t seen all the tentacles yet by any stretch of the imagination.

  • Glaucon

    OK Holder, you admit it was a case of incompetence, so are you going to fall on your sward, or are you going fire some people? Which is it? Is there any accountability at all?

  • Glaucon

    Was that a confession of culpability, or is it just the first talking point so that you can further dismantle the Second Amendment? I can hear it now…”we can’t get those guns back, but we have a plan that will prevent gun violence in the future…”