« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Elizabeth Warren’s inaccurate Karl Rove whining.

So let me set the background, here. Crossroads GPS is a 501(c)(4) associated with American Crossroads (a 527 advocacy group which has Karl Rove advising it; this will be important later), and it put out this ad on Massachusetts Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren (who is running, of course, against Republican Senator Scott Brown). Said ad helpfully points out that Warren was up to her eyeballs assisting the 2008 TARP bailout – yes, the same bailout that she’s now trying to be a class warrior against:

Summation of the video: Elizabeth Warren talks a good game, but she was involved in TARP, in a supervisory role – so if people don’t like the way that TARP unfolded, blame her. The ad alludes to the way that Warren sucked up to the Chamber of Commerce in order to try to get support to be made the formal head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Moving away from the ad: Warren also tried that with the 2010 crop of freshmen House Republicans, with about the same amount of success. On the other hand, Warren did manage to put into place the man who would eventually succeed her as chief CFPB bureaucrat… one Raj Date, former executive at Capital One and Deutsche Bank. All in all, this is all pretty standard, somewhat interchangeable Washington insider (Democratic edition) stuff from Warren. Nothing special, alas.

Now, at this point somebody’s going to complain that Warren was critical of the TARP program when she was (honestly, not very effectively) overseeing it. To which the only necessary response is a shrug and the observation that Lefty radicals typically break down into two types: those who believe that the system is damaged, and needs repair; and those who believe that the system is broken, and needs replacement. Elizabeth Warren was fine when she was timidly taking the first position on TARP; but now that she’s brassily taking the second… well, it’s not Crossroads GPS’s fault that the woman voluntarily became part of the System and now wants to pretend that she wasn’t. Revolution isn’t a part-time business, Elizabeth.

Anyway, all of this apparently upset Ms. Warren in that special way that is reserved for academic lefties who suddenly discover that the real world actually scores your performance, not your intentions – so she lashed back out at Karl Rove. No, not because Karl Rove’s a standard, if somewhat dated, devil figure among the American academic left… well, not just because of that. It’s also because Elizabeth Warren apparently thinks that “Karl Rove was part of the inner circle when President Bush pushed for TARP bailouts.”

” Inner circle.” Oh, my. In point of fact, by the time that the financial crisis/TARP bailouts rolled around – which is to say, the late summer of 2008 – Karl Rove had been out of the Bush administration for over a year and was acting as a political commentator. In fact, I have been looking around for a couple of days, and I am not finding any real indication that Karl Rove was involved in the TARP bailout at all – or, at least, not involved from the inside. Which is of course not something that you can say about Warren.

Now, I get that Elizabeth Warren would very much like people to hear the word ‘TARP’ and not immediately associate it with her drawing a six figure salary off of… well, I’m sure that she did something while she was there, although I couldn’t begin to tell you what it was. And I’m equally sure that Warren would like the radicals sullenly buzzing around her cronies in the Democratic Establishment to become happy little worker bees for her campaign – and never mind that the woman’s annual salary lately easily puts her in 1% territory. So I understand the need to distance Elizabeth Warren v. 2011 from Elizabeth Warren v. 2008.

But… can we have a little basic accuracy, here? Not checking to see when Karl Rove resigned from the White House is not quite at Martha Coakley-levels of basic campaign idiocy, but you can see her house from there.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • mystryda

    What is it about Massachusetts that leads to dual political-personality syndrome?

    Or, what does Mitt Romney have in common with Elizabeth Warren?

    “So I understand the need to distance Elizabeth Warren v. 2011 from Elizabeth Warren v. 2008.”

  • reaganbuckley

    Warren is more of a leftist commie, but she’s had far less power to implement her far left economic policies than Rove/Bush socialist policies.

    1) Remember the “ownership society.” Great campaign by Rove/Bush to help inflate the housing bubble. Thanks to Rove’s touting of this policy whereby the gov’t subsidizes people to buy houses they can’t afford we find ourselves in this economic mess.

    2) Rove may not have been working for the Bush administration at the time of the bailouts, but he ensured the election of Bush and shepherding in of the appointment of Hank Paulson and Ben Bernacke, the main architects of confiscating taxpayer money and distributing it to their wealthy friends who make lousy investments.

    3) The prescription drug benefit plan – another socialist policy by Bush/Rove to run up the debt to astronomical levels. It’s great how my taxpayer money gets confiscated to supplement prescription drugs for millionaire seniors. Thanks Rove!

    At least we know where Warren stands. Rove hides his commie tendencies, but his socialism came out in spades when he was in power.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Have you considered taking up a hobby? An exercise regime? Perhaps a course or two at your local community college?

  • reaganbuckley

    My point is that Warren has the POTENTIAL to wreak havoc on our economy, but not the POWER (yet.) Rove had the POWER and helped put into place bad, socialist economic policies that have helped to run up our debt to astronomical levels and confiscated my tax dollars to no useful social purpose.

    Rove by his deeds is not a fiscal conservative. He practices Chicago style politics, but for our side. We should hold conservatives to a higher standard. That’s how we win in the long run.

    If you or other Red State Commissars want to ban me for criticizing nominal conservatives for helping to implement hair-brained socialist policies as they criticize other socialists who have yet to cause similar damage that is your prerogative.

    Incidentally, I work two jobs, go to grad school full time at a premier university on a full scholarship, just got done working out, collect antique coins and guns and have a family to take care of. So if you do ban me I do have plenty other things to do with my time.

    Regardless, I do wish you a pleasant Sunday.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    “There’s something pathetic about TRYING to get banned, reaganbuckley” is a fairly straightforward observation, I would think.

    Moe Lane

    PS: Reply To This is your friend, by the way. I mention this because you seem to be having a problem with it.

  • Bill S

    ?Don’t turn around, look, look,
    the Kommissar is out and about!
    He’ll keep his eye on you
    and you know why.

    “Der Kommissar” is gong in my tag line…

  • reaganbuckley

    That is the whole message of the Tea Party. A group Rove whose candidates Rove disparages routinely.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Not only does have have those on the other side of the aisle vilifying him, now we have those who are (allegedly) on our side attempting to make a demon of him.

    While I am fairly certain that Rove wears no halo, the worst that I can say about him is that he uses leftist strategies to promote conservative candidates (and it’s about time somebody on the right learned how to do this). Conservative Spin 101 to be taught by Professor Karl Rove EdD.

  • eaglesteam
    At least we know where Warren stands. Rove hides his commie tendencies, but his socialism came out in a />b>Omega replica/b> spades when he was in power.
  • reaganbuckley

    It will corrupt and lead to our downfall.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Do you consider the campaign ad posted in this diary to be Alinsky in nature? I don’t. There is nothing in the narrative that is untrue, yet it points to the hypocrisy of Elizabeth Warren in profiting from TARP, then speaking out against it. There is nothing corrupting in telling the truth.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Unfortunately, calling site moderators Kommissars rude names is kind of frowned on, here.

    Bye!

  • renl57

    Nice of RS to ding Elizabeth Warren.

    But as I recall, RS refused to support Brown’s Senate campaign last year because of his stance on abortion.

    Now Brown is in a tough fight against Warren.

    Will RS abandon Brown again over his abortion stance?

  • celador2

    The funding group that will come to the aid of Sen Scott Brown and his many, many constituents is the RNC. The RNC is a big tent and if they can help save the R seat they will.

  • romeg

    as this bespectacled, nerdy guy that worked in the basement at the White House using a white board and an erasable marker to count votes and parse election and polling results.

    I was unaware that he made and implemented policy.

    To say that he was able to “…wreak havoc havoc on our economy and the free market system…” sounds like something that someone on MSNBC or Clinton’s Pit Chihuahua, Robert Reich, might say.